Arthritis, RheumatoidESCALATE-RANCT03387423
Observational Study to Determine How Physicians Make Treatment Decisions in Patients Treated With Tofacitinib for Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
An observational study of Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 91 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
This non-interventional study aims to identify key factors that are driving treatment decisions by rheumatologists in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients starting treatment with Tofacitinib in a real world setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- What is being tested?
- Tofacitinib
- How many people
- 1,459 participants
- Where
- 91 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 2 Nov 2017to 17 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis who are eligible for treatment with Tofacitinb according to Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years
- Confirmed Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis by rheumatologist
- Patient is eligible for Tofacitinib treatment according to Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)
- Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
Who cannot join
- Contraindications according to Xeljanz® SmPC
- Receipt of any investigational drug within 3 months before study inclusion
- Patients who have received any previous treatment with Tofacitinib or other JAK inhibitors
- Patients who are investigational site staff members or patients who are Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
91 sites in 1 country.
91 sites in 1 country
Germany91 sites
Private Practice Kupka
Altenburg, 04600
Private Practise Boehm
Altenholz, 24161
Private Practice Marycz
Amberg, 92224
Private Practice Fuchs
Augsburg, 86157
private practise Gause
Bad Bramstedt, 24576
ACURA Kliniken Rheinland-Pfalz AG
Bad Kreuznach, 55543
MFZ Medizinisches Forschungszentrum Weserbergland
Bad Pyrmont, 31812
Private Practice Manger
Bamberg, 96047
Private Practice Ochs
Bayreuth, 95444
Private Practice Schmitt-Haendle
Bayreuth, 95444
Private Practice
Bayreuth, 95444
Ambulantes Gesundheitszentrum der Charité
Berlin, 10117
Private Practice Bozorg
Berlin, 10713
Private Practice Brandt-Juergens
Berlin, 12161
Privat Practice Remstedt
Berlin, 12435
private practise Herzberg
Berlin, 12435
Private Practice Seifert
Berlin, 12555
Private Practice Zinke
Berlin, 13055
Private Practice Thiele
Berlin, 14129
Immanuel Klinikum Bernau
Bernau, 16321
Private Practise
Braunschweig, 38100
MED Bayern OST GmbH
Burghausen, 84489
Private Practice Lorenz
Chemnitz, 09139
Private Practice Baerlecken
Cologne, 50996
Private Practice Kirrstetter
Deggendorf, 94469
Kreiskranenhaus Demmin GmbH
Demmin, 17109
Private Practice Menne
Dortmund, 44263
Private Practice Luethke
Dresden, 01097
Private Practice Fischer
Dresden, 01277
Private Praxis
Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40237
private practise Pech
Eberswalde, 16225
Private Practice Steinmueller
Ehringshausen, 35630
Asklepios MVZ Nord SH GmbH, c/o AK St. Georg
Elmshorn, 25335
Private Practice Kaestner
Erfurt, 99096
Private Practice Koch
Erfurt, 99096
Private Practice Haeckel
Frankenberg, 09669
Private Practice Mueller
Freiberg, 09599
SRH Krankenhaus Waltershausen-Friedrichroda GmbH
Friedrichroda, 99894
Private Practice Abahji
Germering, 82110
Private Practice Sensse
Gifhorn, 38518
Private Practice Holst
Glaisin, 19288
Private Practice Zeh
Göppingen, 73033
Private Practice Semmler
Güstrow, 18273
private practise Kühne
Haldensleben I, 39340
Private Practice Liebhaber
Halle, 06128
Private Practice Dahmen
Hamburg, 22415
private practise Aries
Hamburg, 22767
Private Practice Stille
Hanover, 30161
private practise Heilig
Heidelberg, 69120
private practise Wernicke
Hohen Neuendorf, 16540
Private Practice Kremers
Jülich, 52428
Medius Kliniken gGmbH
Kirchheim unter Teck, 73230
Kreiskrankenhaus Langenau
Langenau, 89129
Private Practice Hamann
Leipzig, 04109
Private Practice Schwarze
Leipzig, 04129
Private Practice Kudela
Magdeburg, 39104
private practise Sieburg
Magdeburg, 39104
Private Practice Rossbach
Mansfeld, 06343
Private Practice Harmuth
Marktredwitz, 95615
Private Practice Worsch
Mühlhausen, 99974
Private Practice Krueger
München, 81541
Private Practice Raub
Münster, 48143
Praxis Dr.med. Holger Krauel Facharzt für Innere Medizin und Rheumatologie
Naumburg, 06618
Private Practice Berger
Naunhof, 04683
Private Practise
Neubrandenburg, 17033
Private Practice Volberg
Neuss, 41462
MCN Medic Center Nuernberg GmbH
Nuremberg, 90443
Private Practice Goettl
Passau, 94032
Private Practice Graessler
Pirna, 01796
Private Practice Baumann
Plauen, 08523
Knappschaftsklinikum Soor, Klinik fuer Rheumatologie und Klinische Immunologie
Püttlingen, 66346
Private Practice Wassenberg, Koehler, Weier
Ratingen, 40878
Private Practice Richter
Rostock, 18059
private practise Biewer
Saarbrücken, 66111
MVZ Dialysezentrum Schweinfurt
Schweinfurt, 97421
Private Practice Moebius
Schwerin, 19053
Private Practice
Schwerin, 19053
private practise Ständer
Schwerin, 19053
Private Practice Melzer
Seesen, 38723
MVZ Klinikum Straubing
Straubing, 94315
Private Practice
Templin, 17268
Private Practice Pyra
Torgelow, 17358
Private Practice Haas
Tübingen, 72072
Klinik an der Weissenburg GmbH
Uhlstaedt-Kirchhasel, 07407
Private Practice Rinaldi
Ulm, 89073
Private Practice Woerth
Wiesbaden, 65189
Klinikverbund St. Antonius und St. Josef GmbH
Wuppertal, 42105
Rheuma Praxis Barmen Dres. med. Demirel / Hruschka
Wuppertal, 42285
Private Practice
Zschopau, Saxony, 09405
Private Practice Fricke-Wagner
Zwickau, 08056
Private Practice Alliger
Zwiesel, 94227
About this study
Official title: ESCALATE-RA A NON-INTERVENTIONAL STUDY OF CRITICAL FACTORS FOR ESCALATING DRUG TREATMENT IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH TOFACITINIB FOR MODERATE TO SEVERE ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
This non-interventional study aims to identify key factors that are driving treatment decisions by rheumatologists in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients starting treatment with Tofacitinib in a real world setting.
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Being tested
- Tofacitinib
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TofacitinibDrug
Patients who are started on Tofacitinib treatment according to the drug label
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Treatment Escalations
Treatment escalations was defined as participants who switched to another disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) or combination of DMARDs when compared to the last visit. The following three types of escalations were reported: treatment termination, treatment step-up/switch and treatment step-down. Treatment termination was defined as the termination of a DMARD (or multiple when on combination therapy) without starting a new DMARD therapy. Treatment step-up/switch was defined as an increase from the current treatment regime towards e.g.a combination of DMARDs and treatment step-down, was defined as de-escalation from the current treatment regime, example (e.g.) from combination therapy to monotherapy. One participant can fall into more than 1 type of escalation.
Measured: From date of first prescription of tofacitinib up to 24 Months
Time to Treatment Escalation
Time to treatment escalation was defined as time in days from escalation visit date to next escalation visit date. The following three types of escalations were reported: treatment termination, treatment step-up/switch and treatment step-down. Treatment termination was defined as the termination of a DMARD (or multiple when on combination therapy) without starting a new DMARD therapy. Treatment step-up/switch was defined as an increase from the current treatment regime (monotherapy) towards a combination of DMARDs and treatment step-down, was defined as de-escalation from the current treatment regime, e.g. from combination therapy to monotherapy. Number of participants with total number of each type of treatment escalations during the study (step-up/switch, step-down, treatment termination along with all escalations) are reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: From date of first prescription of tofacitinib up to 24 Months
Secondary outcomes (19)
Time to First Step Up Treatment Escalation
Time to first step-up treatment escalation was defined for participants who experienced a treatment step-up and was measured as date of first treatment step up escalation minus (-) date of first prescription of tofacitinib. Treatment step-up was defined as an increase from the current treatment regime (monotherapy) towards a combination of DMARDs.
Measured: From date of first tofacitinib prescription up to date of first step-up treatment escalation (maximum up to 24 months)
Number of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) as Assessed by Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
SDAI was calculated using the following formula: SDAI = Tender Joint Count (TJC) (using 28 joints) + Swollen Joint Count (SJC) (using 28 joints) + Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis (PtGA) (0-10 centimetre [cm] scale) + Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PhGA) (0-10 cm scale) + C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligram per decilitre [mg/dL]). TJC28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, and knees whereas SJC28 included shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP, PIP and knees (excluding artificial joints). PtGA and PhGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) scale (0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst], where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. SDAI score of less than or equal to (<=11) indicates LDA.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving LDA as Assessed by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
CDAI was calculated using the following formula: CDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm). TJC28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP and proximal PIP joints, and knees whereas SJC28 included shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP, PIP and knees (excluding artificial joints). PtGA and PhGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst], where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. CDAI score of <= 10 indicates LDA.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving LDA Based on Disease Activity Score (DAS28-4) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated using the following formula: 0.56* square root of (TJC28) + 0.28* square root of (SJC28) + 0.70* natural log (ln) (ESR in [millimeter per hour [mm/ hour]) + 0.014*(PtGA in cm). PtGA was assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 ESR <= 3.2 indicates LDA.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving LDA as Based on DAS28-4 C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: 0.56* square root of (TJC28) + 0.28* square root of (SJC28) + 0.36*ln (CRP in mg/l +1) + 0.014*(PtGA in mm)+ 0.96. PtGA was assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 CRP <= 3.2 indicates LDA.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Remission as Assessed by American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-EULAR Boolean Remission Criteria at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
ACR-EULAR Boolean remission criteria was defined as when participant had ACR remission =1 if; TJC28 <=1, SJC28 <=1, CRP <=1mg/dL and PtGA <= 2 cm on a 0 to 10 cm scale, where higher values indicate greater affection due to disease activity.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Remission as Assessed by SDAI at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
SDAI was calculated using the following formula: SDAI = (TJC28) + (SJC28) + (PtGA in cm) + (PhGA in cm) + (CRP in mg/dL). TJC28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP and PIP joints, and knees whereas SJC28 included shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP, PIP and knees (excluding artificial joints). PtGA and PhGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst], where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. SDAI score of <=3.3 indicates remission.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Remission as Assessed by CDAI at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
CDAI was calculated using the following formula: CDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm). TJC28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP and proximal PIP joints, and knees whereas SJC28 included shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP, PIP and knees (excluding artificial joints). PtGA and PhGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst], where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. CDAI score of <=2.8 indicates remission.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Remission as Assessed by DAS-28 ESR at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated using the following formula: 0.56*square root of (TJC28) + 0.28*square root of (SJC28) + 0.70*In (ESR in mm/ hour) + 0.014*PtGA in cm. PtGA was assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 ESR score of <2.6 indicates remission.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Remission as Assessed by DAS28-4 CRP at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: 0.56*square root of (TJC28) + 0.28*square root of (SJC28) + 0.36*ln (CRP in mg/l +1) + 0.014*(PtGA in cm)+ 0.96. PtGA was assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 CRP score of <2.6 indicates remission.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 ESR at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated using the following formula: 0.56*square root of (TJC28) + 0.28*square root of (SJC28) + 0.70*In (ESR in mm/ hour) + 0.014*PtGA in cm. PtGA was assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 CRP at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: 0.56*square root of(TJC28) + 0.28*square root of(SJC28) + 0.36*ln (CRP in mg/l +1) + 0.014*(PtGA in cm)+ 0.96. PtGA was assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
The duration of morning stiffness was determined by asking the following questions: "When you wake up in the morning, do you currently suffer from morning stiffness?" "How long does the morning stiffness last from the time you wake up?". The change from baseline in duration of morning stiffness was calculated as: morning stiffness at time point -morning stiffness at baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in the Functional Ability Questionnaire Hannover (FFbH) at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
The FFbH for RA is a German short questionnaire for the assessment of patientive functional capacity in the context of basic everyday activities (range: 0-100% functional capacity, where higher percentage indicates more capacity for everyday activities). The FFbH questionnaire consisted of 18 questions with 3 possible responses (Yes; Yes, but with effort; No or only with outside help). The total score was the sum of the scores of all 18 questions, where for each question (Yes = 2 points; Yes, but with effort = 1 point; No or only with outside help = 0 points).The functional capacity (%) is calculated by (total score*100) divided by (2*number of valid responses). The change from baseline was calculated at each time point as functional capacity at timepoint - functional capacity at baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Functional Remission in FFbH at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
The FFbH for RA is a German short questionnaire for the assessment of patientive functional capacity in the context of basic everyday activities (range: 0-100% functional capacity, where higher percentage indicates more capacity for everyday activities). The FFbH questionnaire consisted of 18 questions with 3 possible responses (Yes; Yes, but with effort; No or only with outside help). The total score was the sum of the scores of all 18 questions, where for each question (Yes = 2 points; Yes, but with effort = 1 point; No or only with outside help = 0 points). The functional capacity [%] is calculated by (total score*100)/ (2*number of valid responses). Functional remission in FFbH was defined as functional capacity > 83 %.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) Group EuroQoL- 5 Dimensions- 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Total Scores at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
The EQ-5D-3L is a standardised instrument used to measure quality of life. It is based on five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression with each dimension having three levels of function: 1 indicates no problem; 2 indicates some problem; 3 indicates extreme problem. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group (German weights) assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score was transformed and results in a total score range of 0.05 to 1.00; higher scores indicating a better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)- Fatigue Scale at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
The FACIT-F Scale is a participant completed questionnaire consisting of 13 items that assess fatigue. Participants responded to each item on a 5-point scale based on their experience of fatigue during the past 7 days (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 =somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). Instrument scoring yielded a range from 0 to 52 (negatively worded items were reversed during analysis), with higher scores representing better participant status (less fatigue).
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Mean Number of Days of Drug Survival at Months 12 and 24
Drug survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. For participants who terminated tofacitinib, the drug survival status was recorded as (status = 1 and time = termination date tofacitinib - date of initiation on tofacitinib) and for participants who do not terminate tofacitinib (status = 0 and time = date of final visit - date of initiation on tofacitinib.
Measured: At 12 and 24 months
Number of Participants Per Categories of Satisfaction With Tofacitinib Treatment at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Satisfaction with treatment was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (where 0 = extremely dissatisfied, 1= dissatisfied, 2 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 3 = satisfied and 4 = extremely satisfied) in response to the question "How satisfied are you with the drugs that you have received for your arthritis since your last visit?".
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jan 2018
- Study start2 Nov 2017
- Primary completion17 Jul 2023
- Study completion17 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,459 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03387423
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A3921302
- Other IDs
- ESCALATE-RA
- Acronym
- ESCALATE-RA
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Individual data sharing
- No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Krueger K, Behrens F, Brandt-Juergens J, Detert J, Feuchtenberger M, Prothmann U, Behmer O, Hsieh MM, Jobst J, Klaus P, Meng T. Tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: a German real-world study with focus on treatment changes, effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes (ESCALATE-RA). BMJ Open. 2026 Feb 12;16(2):e096952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096952.
PubMed 41689213
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ESCALATE-RA A NON-INTERVENTIONAL STUDY OF CRITICAL FACTORS FOR ESCALATING DRUG TREATMENT IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH TOFACITINIB FOR MODERATE TO SEVERE ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03387423
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ESCALATE-RA / A3921302
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,459 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 2 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This non-interventional study aims to identify key factors that are driving treatment decisions by rheumatologists in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients starting treatment with Tofacitinib in a real world setting.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis who are eligible for treatment with Tofacitinb according to Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years
- Confirmed Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis by rheumatologist
- Patient is eligible for Tofacitinib treatment according to Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)
- Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Contraindications according to Xeljanz® SmPC
- Receipt of any investigational drug within 3 months before study inclusion
- Patients who have received any previous treatment with Tofacitinib or other JAK inhibitors
- Patients who are investigational site staff members or patients who are Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TofacitinibPatients who are started on Tofacitinib treatment according to the drug label | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Treatment Escalations
Time frame: From date of first prescription of tofacitinib up to 24 Months
Treatment escalations was defined as participants who switched to another disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) or combination of DMARDs when compared to the last visit. The following three types of escalations were reported: treatment termination, treatment step-up/switch and treatment step-down. Treatment termination was defined as the termination of a DMARD (or multiple when on combination therapy) without starting a new DMARD therapy. Treatment step-up/switch was defined as an increase from the current treatment regime towards e.g.a combination of DMARDs and treatment step-down, was defined as de-escalation from the current treatment regime, example (e.g.) from combination therapy to monotherapy. One participant can fall into more than 1 type of escalation.
Time to Treatment Escalation
Time frame: From date of first prescription of tofacitinib up to 24 Months
Time to treatment escalation was defined as time in days from escalation visit date to next escalation visit date. The following three types of escalations were reported: treatment termination, treatment step-up/switch and treatment step-down. Treatment termination was defined as the termination of a DMARD (or multiple when on combination therapy) without starting a new DMARD therapy. Treatment step-up/switch was defined as an increase from the current treatment regime (monotherapy) towards a combination of DMARDs and treatment step-down, was defined as de-escalation from the current treatment regime, e.g. from combination therapy to monotherapy. Number of participants with total number of each type of treatment escalations during the study (step-up/switch, step-down, treatment termination along with all escalations) are reported in this outcome measure.
19 secondary outcomes
Time to First Step Up Treatment Escalation
Time frame: From date of first tofacitinib prescription up to date of first step-up treatment escalation (maximum up to 24 months)
Number of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) as Assessed by Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving LDA as Assessed by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving LDA Based on Disease Activity Score (DAS28-4) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving LDA as Based on DAS28-4 C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Remission as Assessed by American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-EULAR Boolean Remission Criteria at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Remission as Assessed by SDAI at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Remission as Assessed by CDAI at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Remission as Assessed by DAS-28 ESR at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Remission as Assessed by DAS28-4 CRP at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 ESR at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 CRP at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in the Functional Ability Questionnaire Hannover (FFbH) at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving Functional Remission in FFbH at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) Group EuroQoL- 5 Dimensions- 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Total Scores at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)- Fatigue Scale at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Mean Number of Days of Drug Survival at Months 12 and 24
Time frame: At 12 and 24 months
Number of Participants Per Categories of Satisfaction With Tofacitinib Treatment at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41689213Krueger K, Behrens F, Brandt-Juergens J, Detert J, Feuchtenberger M, Prothmann U, Behmer O, Hsieh MM, Jobst J, Klaus P, Meng T. Tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: a German real-world study with focus on treatment changes, effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes (ESCALATE-RA). BMJ Open. 2026 Feb 12;16(2):e096952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096952.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments on the Modulation of Extracellular Vesicles and Other Biomarkers Involved in the Development of Lung Cancer
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Lung Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Nipocalimab in Moderate to Severe Sjogren's Disease
Sjogrens Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Not yet recruiting
MYTP01 for Immune-Mediated Diseases
IgA Nephropathy, Kidney Transplant Recipients
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Paraffin Wax Therapy and Dry Cupping on Pain and Wrist Function in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
91 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 91 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 91 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Treatment Escalations (time frame: From date of first prescription of tofacitinib up to 24 Months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03387423, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2024.