PrematurityNCT03388437
Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation for Preterm Infants After Extubation
A study testing NI-NAVA and NIPPV in people with Prematurity and Respiratory Failure, run by King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
Non-invasive respiratory support has been emerging in the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants to minimise the risk of lung injury. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) provides a method of augmenting continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) by delivering ventilator… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 2 weeks
- Conditions the study is for
- Prematurity, Respiratory Failure, Ventilator Lung; Newborn
- What is being tested?
- NI-NAVA and NIPPV
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- 1 May 2017to 30 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 2 weeks
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Born less than 32 weeks gestation with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and requiring endotracheal tube and mechanical ventilation.
- Less than two weeks old
- First extubation attempt
- CRIB score 0-5
- Written-informed parental consent for the study
Who cannot join
- Major congenital malformations or respiratory abnormalities
- Neuromuscular disease
- phrenic nerve palsy
- Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade III or IV
- Absence of informed consent
- Out born infants
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation for Preterm Infants After Extubation: A Randomised Control Trial
Non-invasive respiratory support has been emerging in the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants to minimise the risk of lung injury. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) provides a method of augmenting continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) by delivering ventilator breaths via nasal prongs.It may increase tidal volume, improve gas exchange and reduce work of breathing. However, NIPPV may associate with patient-ventilator asynchrony that can cause poor tolerance and risk of intubation. It may also in increased risk of pneumothorax and bowel perforation because of increase in intrathoracic pressure.
On the other hand, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a newer mode of ventilation, which has the potential to overcome these challenges. It uses the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) as a signal to synchronise the mechanical ventilatory breaths and deliver an inspiratory pressure based on this electrical activity. Comparing NI-NAVA and NIPPV in preterm infants, has shown that NI-NAVA improved the synchronization between patient and ventilator and decreased diaphragm work of breathing .
Read more
There is lack of data on the use of NI-NAVA in neonates post extubation in the literature. To date, no study has focused on short-term impacts. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the need of additional ventilatory support post extubation of NI-NAVA and NIPPV and also the risk of developing adverse outcomes.
Aim:
The aim is to compare NI-NAVA \& NIPPV in terms of extubation failure in infants< 32 weeks gestation.
Hypothesis:
Investigators hypothesized that infants born prematurely < 32 weeks gestation who extubated to NI-NAVA have a lower risk of extubation failure and need of additional ventilatory support.
Read the detailed description
Study Design: Randomised controlled trial
Study Setting: single center NICU level III, KFAFH tertiary care center , Jeddah Saudi Arabia
- Conditions
- Prematurity, Respiratory Failure, Ventilator Lung; Newborn
- Being tested
- NI-NAVA, NIPPV
- Keywords
- Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist NI-NAVA, Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation NIPPV, post extubation
- Medical subject headings
- Premature Birth, Respiratory Insufficiency, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NI-NAVADevice
Enrolled infants will receive Surfactant and loading dose of Caffeine citrate prior to extubation. The criteria for extubation will be as per attending decision.
The device is used Servo-I ventilator (MAQUET). FiO 2 % is adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90-94% on pulse oximetry. The flow rate is 8-10 L/min. NAVA electrodes will be inserted within nasogastric catheter \& positioned at the level of diaphragm.Vital signs and ventilatory parameters are monitored hourly. Blood gases will be measured before and one hour after extubation
NIPPVDevice
Enrolled infants will receive Surfactant and loading dose of Caffeine citrate prior to extubation. The criteria for extubation will be as per attending decision.
The device is used Servo-I ventilator (MAQUET). FiO 2 % is adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90-94% on pulse oximetry. The flow rate is 8-10 L/min. NAVA electrodes will be inserted within nasogastric catheter \& positioned at the level of diaphragm.Vital signs and ventilatory parameters are monitored hourly. Blood gases will be measured before and one hour after extubation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NI-NAVA | Experimental | Initial setting; NAVA level of 2; PEEP of 5-6 cm H 2 O, apnea time 5-10 seconds, target Edi maximum between 10-15 and minimum < 5 for 72 hours post extubation Receives: Device: NI-NAVA |
| NIPPV | Active comparator | Initial setting; PIP can be increased by 2 cm H 2 O from the pre-extubation PEEP of 5-6 cm for 72 hours post extubation Receives: Device: NIPPV |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment failure
- Treatment failure during the first 72 hours post-extubation.
- Reintubation (failure of extubation) within 72 hours' post extubation.
Treatment failure is defined as:
- Hypoxia (FiO 2 requirement > 0.35)
- Respiratory acidosis defined as pH < 7.2 \& PCo2> 60 mmHg
- Major apnea requiring mask ventilation or > 4 episodes/ hour.
The protocol will discontinue according to treatment failure criteria as mentioned above.
Rescue treatment with NIPPV will be allowed and will be considered as treatment failure
Measured: 72 hours
Secondary outcomes (9)
Death prior to discharge
Death
Measured: 90 days from birth
Intraventricular haemorrhage IVH (grades III & IV)
defined as haemorrhage causing ventricular dilatation with or without brain parenchymal involvement
Measured: 7 days after extubation
Pneumothorax
diagnosed radiologically
Measured: 7 days after extubation
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
defined as requirement for supplemental oxygen at 28 days of life or requirement for supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age
Measured: 36 weeks' postmenstrual age
Necrotizing enterocolitis
defined according to modified Bell's criteria (stage 2 to 3)
Measured: 7 days after extubation
Gastrointestinal perforation
diagnosed radiologically or at operation
Measured: 7 days after extubation
Nosocomial sepsis
defined as positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures taken after five days of age
Measured: 7 days after extubation
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)
stage 3 or greater (International classification)
Measured: 40 weeks corrected postnatal age
Duration of hospitalisation or Length of stay (in days)
Number of days in hospital until first discharge
Measured: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jan 2018
- Study start1 May 2017
- Primary completion30 Apr 2019
- Study completion30 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PrematurityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial * A web generated a block randomisation list. * A block of 4, stratification based on GA, gender \& antenatal steriods * Sequentially numbered, opaque and sealed envelopes * Restricted access to envelopes
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Raniah Aljeaid, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital
- Investigators
- Raniah Aljeaid, Principal investigator, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital JeddahNisreen Kafi, Study director, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital JeddahFawzia Sabbagh, Study director, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital JeddahMai Abu Seoud, Study chair, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital Jeddah
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03388437
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC 202
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 27 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Lee J, Kim HS, Jung YH, Shin SH, Choi CW, Kim EK, Kim BI, Choi JH. Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants: a randomised phase II crossover trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Nov;100(6):F507-13. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308057. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
PubMed 26178463Stein H, Howard D. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in neonates weighing <1500 grams: a retrospective analysis. J Pediatr. 2012 May;160(5):786-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.10.014. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
PubMed 22137670
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation for Preterm Infants After Extubation: A Randomised Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03388437
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC 202
- Conditions
- Prematurity, Respiratory Failure, Ventilator Lung; Newborn
- Keywords
- Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist NI-NAVA, Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation NIPPV, post extubation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- King Fahad Armed Forces HospitalOther government
- Study start
- 1 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Non-invasive respiratory support has been emerging in the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants to minimise the risk of lung injury. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) provides a method of augmenting continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) by delivering ventilator breaths via nasal prongs.It may increase tidal volume, improve gas exchange and reduce work of breathing. However, NIPPV may associate with patient-ventilator asynchrony that can cause poor tolerance and risk of intubation. It may also in increased risk of pneumothorax and bowel perforation because of increase in intrathoracic pressure.
On the other hand, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a newer mode of ventilation, which has the potential to overcome these challenges. It uses the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) as a signal to synchronise the mechanical ventilatory breaths and deliver an inspiratory pressure based on this electrical activity. Comparing NI-NAVA and NIPPV in preterm infants, has shown that NI-NAVA improved the synchronization between patient and ventilator and decreased diaphragm work of breathing .
There is lack of data on the use of NI-NAVA in neonates post extubation in the literature. To date, no study has focused on short-term impacts. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the need of additional ventilatory support post extubation of NI-NAVA and NIPPV and also the risk of developing adverse outcomes.
Aim:
The aim is to compare NI-NAVA \& NIPPV in terms of extubation failure in infants< 32 weeks gestation.
Hypothesis:
Investigators hypothesized that infants born prematurely < 32 weeks gestation who extubated to NI-NAVA have a lower risk of extubation failure and need of additional ventilatory support.
Detailed description
Study Design: Randomised controlled trial
Study Setting: single center NICU level III, KFAFH tertiary care center , Jeddah Saudi Arabia
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial * A web generated a block randomisation list. * A block of 4, stratification based on GA, gender \& antenatal steriods * Sequentially numbered, opaque and sealed envelopes * Restricted access to envelopes
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NI-NAVA | Experimental | Device: NI-NAVAInitial setting; NAVA level of 2; PEEP of 5-6 cm H 2 O, apnea time 5-10 seconds, target Edi maximum between 10-15 and minimum < 5 for 72 hours post extubation |
| NIPPV | Active comparator | Device: NIPPVInitial setting; PIP can be increased by 2 cm H 2 O from the pre-extubation PEEP of 5-6 cm for 72 hours post extubation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 2 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Born less than 32 weeks gestation with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and requiring endotracheal tube and mechanical ventilation.
- Less than two weeks old
- First extubation attempt
- CRIB score 0-5
- Written-informed parental consent for the study
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Major congenital malformations or respiratory abnormalities
- Neuromuscular disease
- phrenic nerve palsy
- Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade III or IV
- Absence of informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NI-NAVAEnrolled infants will receive Surfactant and loading dose of Caffeine citrate prior to extubation. The criteria for extubation will be as per attending decision. The device is used Servo-I ventilator (MAQUET). FiO 2 % is adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90-94% on pulse oximetry. The flow rate is 8-10 L/min. NAVA electrodes will be inserted within nasogastric catheter \& positioned at the level of diaphragm.Vital signs and ventilatory parameters are monitored hourly. Blood gases will be measured before and one hour after extubation | Device | NI-NAVA |
| NIPPVEnrolled infants will receive Surfactant and loading dose of Caffeine citrate prior to extubation. The criteria for extubation will be as per attending decision. The device is used Servo-I ventilator (MAQUET). FiO 2 % is adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90-94% on pulse oximetry. The flow rate is 8-10 L/min. NAVA electrodes will be inserted within nasogastric catheter \& positioned at the level of diaphragm.Vital signs and ventilatory parameters are monitored hourly. Blood gases will be measured before and one hour after extubation | Device | NIPPV |
Primary outcome
Treatment failure
Time frame: 72 hours
1. Treatment failure during the first 72 hours post-extubation. 2. Reintubation (failure of extubation) within 72 hours' post extubation. Treatment failure is defined as: * Hypoxia (FiO 2 requirement > 0.35) * Respiratory acidosis defined as pH < 7.2 \& PCo2> 60 mmHg * Major apnea requiring mask ventilation or > 4 episodes/ hour. The protocol will discontinue according to treatment failure criteria as mentioned above. Rescue treatment with NIPPV will be allowed and will be considered as treatment failure
9 secondary outcomes
Death prior to discharge
Time frame: 90 days from birth
Intraventricular haemorrhage IVH (grades III & IV)
Time frame: 7 days after extubation
Pneumothorax
Time frame: 7 days after extubation
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
Time frame: 36 weeks' postmenstrual age
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Time frame: 7 days after extubation
Gastrointestinal perforation
Time frame: 7 days after extubation
Nosocomial sepsis
Time frame: 7 days after extubation
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)
Time frame: 40 weeks corrected postnatal age
Duration of hospitalisation or Length of stay (in days)
Time frame: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jul 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 26178463Lee J, Kim HS, Jung YH, Shin SH, Choi CW, Kim EK, Kim BI, Choi JH. Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants: a randomised phase II crossover trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Nov;100(6):F507-13. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308057. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 22137670Stein H, Howard D. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in neonates weighing <1500 grams: a retrospective analysis. J Pediatr. 2012 May;160(5):786-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.10.014. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Prematurity
RecruitingObservational study
An Observational Study to Collect Data on How Aflibercept (Eylea) Given Using a Paediatric Dosing Device is Used in Preterm Babies With Retinopathy of Prematurity in the United Kingdom (UK)
Retinopathy of Prematurity, Preterm Infants
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Environmental Comfort and Oral Motor Stimulation on Comfort and Oral Feeding Readiness in Preterm Infants
Prematurity, Feeding Behaviors
Recruiting
Maximising Maternal Milk for Preterm Infant
Breastfeeding, Prematurity
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Assessment of Worldwide Acute Kidney Injury Epidemiology in Neonates 2.0
Acute Kidney Injury, Fluid Overload
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Diseases With Salivary Gland Involvement
Healthy Volunteer, Sjogren's Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Raniah Aljeaid principal investigator
King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital Jeddah
Nisreen Kafi study director
King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital Jeddah
Fawzia Sabbagh study director
King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital Jeddah
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing NI-NAVA and NIPPV in people with Prematurity and Respiratory Failure, run by King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment failure (time frame: 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03388437, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.