ObesityNCT03389269
Investigation of Acute Physiological Effects of Aspiration Therapy
An observational study of Obesity and Weight Loss, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
In the present study, the investigators aim to investigate postprandial physiology in patients who have had the Aspire Assist® inserted. This will involve a standardised mixed meal test (MMT) with subsequent aspiration of gastric content compared to MMT without aspiration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity, Weight Loss
- What is being tested?
- Meal test
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2017to 1 Aug 2018
- How long will I take part?
- 14 Days
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: It is planned to recruit up to 25 patients who have had the Aspire Assist inserted. Furthermore, 10 healthy control participants matched for age, weight, height, BMI and sex will be recruited
Who may be able to join
- Patient who have had the Aspire Assist inserted (the aspiration therapy group)
- Age between 18-75 years
- Able to understand written patient information and sign informed consent
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes
- Severe comorbidities that, at the discretion of the investigators, exclude study participation (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) stage III, significant cardiac arrhythmias etc.)
- Previous gastrointestinal surgery (excluding cholecystectomy and appendectomy)
- Gastrointestinal conditions making the participant unsuitable for participation (e.g. ulcerative colitis, Crohn´s disease, clinically significant food allergies, candidiasis etc.)
- Anaemia with a haemoglobin value <6.2 mmol/l (<10 g/dl) for women and <7.4 mmol/l (< 12 g/dl) for men at time of screening
- Abuse of alcohol and/or drugs, or any other co-existing conditions that will make the participant unsuitable to attend to the study schedule, as deemed by the investigators
- Pregnancy or desire to become pregnant during the study period
- Exceptional conditions which, at the discretion of the investigators, preclude the participation in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
In the present study, the investigators aim to investigate postprandial physiology in patients who have had the Aspire Assist® inserted. This will involve a standardised mixed meal test (MMT) with subsequent aspiration of gastric content compared to MMT without aspiration. Furthermore, a comparison will be made between the aspiration group and a control group in order to evaluate whether continuous treatment with aspiration therapy affect the postprandial physiology. The primary outcomes of the trial are differences in postprandial plasma/serum glucose, insulin and gut hormone excursions during MMT with and without aspiration. Secondary outcomes encompass evaluation of satiety, gastric emptying and gallbladder motility following MMT with and without aspiration. Also, food intake during a subsequent ad libitum meal will be evaluated.
Read the detailed description
It is generally agreed that the increasing incidence of obesity mainly is caused by the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle combined with excessive caloric intake. So far, preventive measures and interventions based on lifestyle modifications have not been able to affect the western lifestyle to a degree that remedies the increasing prevalence of obesity. Likewise, no medical interventions have yet been able to induce and maintain significant major weight loss in obese populations. In contrast, bariatric surgery prompts a significant and often sustained weight loss, which frequently triggers remission of obesity-related comorbidities. However, bariatric surgery is invasive, irreversible and costly. Aspiration therapy was introduced as a less invasive and cheaper treatment for obesity. According to some studies, aspiration therapy is nearly as effective as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in terms of excess weight loss after one year. Thus, aspiration therapy may aspire as an alternative treatment option for obesity with lower risk of complications than bariatric surgery.
The risk of developing impaired glucose tolerance and overt type 2 diabetes rises along with increasing obesity. The estimated risk of developing type 2 diabetes increases 3-fold with a body mass index (BMI) of 25-29.9 kg/m2 (overweight) and ~20-fold with a BMI >35 kg/m2 (severely obese) compared to a normal BMI (<25 kg/m2) (6). Type 2 diabetes is a complex, multi-organ metabolic disorder and is associated with serious complications, reduced quality of life and early death. The disease is characterized by hyperglycaemia and, thus, elevated haemoglobinA1c (HbA1c) (>6.5% or >48mmol/mol), which is a blood parameter used clinically as a measure of mean blood glucose over time (~3 months). Studies have shown that up to 70% of the mean plasma glucose levels is caused by postprandial plasma glucose excursions. Moreover, postprandial hyperglycaemia in itself seems to be associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease due to unfavourable effect on both small and large blood vessels. Accordingly, postprandial hyperglycaemia has been suggested to constitute a better predictor of mortality risk than fasting plasma glucose concentrations in both patients with type 2 diabetes and individuals with normal glucose tolerance. Since the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance is ~2-fold higher in obese compared to lean individuals, postprandial hyperglycaemia poses a great risk of developing severe comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes for obese individuals and may increase mortality in this group. It is yet unknown whether aspiration therapy can attenuate the plasma glucose response to a meal. Due to the reduced amount of food reaching the intestine after aspiration, it seems likely that aspiration therapy reduces postprandial plasma glucose excursions and thereby prevents potential postprandial hyperglycaemia.
It is well known that an orally administered glucose load elicits a greater insulin secretion response compared to an intravenous infusion of glucose resulting in identical plasma glucose elevations. This phenomenon is called the incretin effect. The incretin effect is primarily driven by the insulinotropic gut hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). These so-called incretin hormones play crucial roles in regulation of glucose homeostasis and appetite. GLP-1 is produced in the intestinal mucosa by the so-called enteroendocrine L cells, which are predominantly localised in the distal part of the small intestine and the colon. GIP originates from enteroendocrine K 5 cells in the gut mucosa. K cells are assumed to be predominant in the proximal part of the small intestine. Both GLP-1 and GIP are secreted in response to ingestion of nutrients and have strong glucose-dependent insulinotropic effects on pancreatic beta cells. The incretin hormones are of interest in the present study, because impaired incretin effect is an early sign of dysmetabolism in obese individuals and a distinctive feature of type 2 diabetes, suggesting that the impaired glucose tolerance of these patients is, at least in part, due to a defective incretin system. Whether aspiration of gastric content after a meal affects postprandial incretin hormone response has not been elucidated. The investigators plan to investigate meal-induced incretin hormone excursions in plasma with and without aspiration therapy and compare the results to a matched control group.
In addition to GLP-1 and GIP, several other gut-related hormones are known to regulate glucose homeostasis and appetite. Glucagon is a peptide hormone secreted from the pancreatic alpha cells. Glucagon acts opposite to insulin by promoting hepatic gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis causing increased plasma glucose concentrations. Oxyntomodulin and pancreatic peptide YY3-36 (PYY) are peptide hormones secreted by the enteroendocrine L cells in response to feeding and both suppress appetite. Gastrin is a hormone secreted by G cells localised in the pyloric antrum, duodenum and pancreas. Gastrin stimulates acid (HCl) secretion and gastric emptying by increasing gastric motility. Cholecystokinin (CCK) is a peptide hormone secreted by the enteroendocrine I cells in the duodenum. CCK promotes bile release from the gallbladder and also acts as an appetite suppressant. To this point, it is unknown how aspiration therapy affects these appetite- and glucose-regulating hormones during a meal. The investigators aim to investigate this during standardised mixed meal tests with and without aspiration.
Furthermore, it is relevant to examine the effect of aspiration therapy on satiety. Thus, the investigators aim to evaluate the effect of aspiration therapy on satiety before, during and after a mixed meal as well as food intake after the MMT with and without aspiration evaluated through an ad libitum meal provided at the end of the experimental days.
- Conditions
- Obesity, Weight Loss
- Being tested
- Meal test
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Weight Loss
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Meal testOther
240 min mixed meal test with aspiration using AspireAssist.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Obese patients treated with AspireAssist | Healthy, obese with BMI > 27, treated with AspireAssist for weight management, the postprandial glucose metabolism will be tested with a meal test Receives: Other: Meal test | |
| Matched controls | Healthy, obese with BMI > 27, the postprandial glucose metabolism will be tested with a meal test Receives: Other: Meal test |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Plasma glucose concentration
mmol/l, collected during mixed meal test and analysed by YSI STAT 2300
Measured: 0-240 min
Secondary outcomes (16)
Serum Insulin
pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
plasma GLP-1
pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
Indirect Calorimetry
Resting metabolic rate measured by O2 consumption during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
Gallbladder volume
Measured during mixed meal test by UL and calculated by this equation: π/6*D1*D2*D3/1000, D1 = longitudinal diameter, D2 = cross section width, D3 = cross sectional width
Measured: 0-240 min
Ad libitum meal intake
post meal test
Measured: 30 min
Appetite
Evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10, where 0 is no appetite and 10 is very hungry) during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
Plasma GLP-2
pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
Plasma GIP
pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
Plasma Glucagon
pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
Plasma PYY
pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
Plasma Oxyntomodulin
pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
plasma ghrelin
pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
Plasma acetaminophen
mmol/L, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
plasma c-peptide
pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
Plasma CCK
pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
plasma gastrin
pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test
Measured: 0-240 min
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jan 2018
- Study start1 Mar 2017
- Primary completion1 Aug 2018
- Study completion1 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 14 Days
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Christina Charlotte Nexoe-Larsen, University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Investigators
- Filip K Knop, MD, Proff, Principal investigator, Center for diabetes research, gentofte hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03389269
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-16038453
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 12 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of Acute Physiological Effects of Aspiration Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03389269
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-16038453
- Conditions
- Obesity, Weight Loss
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the present study, the investigators aim to investigate postprandial physiology in patients who have had the Aspire Assist® inserted. This will involve a standardised mixed meal test (MMT) with subsequent aspiration of gastric content compared to MMT without aspiration. Furthermore, a comparison will be made between the aspiration group and a control group in order to evaluate whether continuous treatment with aspiration therapy affect the postprandial physiology. The primary outcomes of the trial are differences in postprandial plasma/serum glucose, insulin and gut hormone excursions during MMT with and without aspiration. Secondary outcomes encompass evaluation of satiety, gastric emptying and gallbladder motility following MMT with and without aspiration. Also, food intake during a subsequent ad libitum meal will be evaluated.
Detailed description
It is generally agreed that the increasing incidence of obesity mainly is caused by the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle combined with excessive caloric intake. So far, preventive measures and interventions based on lifestyle modifications have not been able to affect the western lifestyle to a degree that remedies the increasing prevalence of obesity. Likewise, no medical interventions have yet been able to induce and maintain significant major weight loss in obese populations. In contrast, bariatric surgery prompts a significant and often sustained weight loss, which frequently triggers remission of obesity-related comorbidities. However, bariatric surgery is invasive, irreversible and costly. Aspiration therapy was introduced as a less invasive and cheaper treatment for obesity. According to some studies, aspiration therapy is nearly as effective as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in terms of excess weight loss after one year. Thus, aspiration therapy may aspire as an alternative treatment option for obesity with lower risk of complications than bariatric surgery.
The risk of developing impaired glucose tolerance and overt type 2 diabetes rises along with increasing obesity. The estimated risk of developing type 2 diabetes increases 3-fold with a body mass index (BMI) of 25-29.9 kg/m2 (overweight) and ~20-fold with a BMI >35 kg/m2 (severely obese) compared to a normal BMI (<25 kg/m2) (6). Type 2 diabetes is a complex, multi-organ metabolic disorder and is associated with serious complications, reduced quality of life and early death. The disease is characterized by hyperglycaemia and, thus, elevated haemoglobinA1c (HbA1c) (>6.5% or >48mmol/mol), which is a blood parameter used clinically as a measure of mean blood glucose over time (~3 months). Studies have shown that up to 70% of the mean plasma glucose levels is caused by postprandial plasma glucose excursions. Moreover, postprandial hyperglycaemia in itself seems to be associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease due to unfavourable effect on both small and large blood vessels. Accordingly, postprandial hyperglycaemia has been suggested to constitute a better predictor of mortality risk than fasting plasma glucose concentrations in both patients with type 2 diabetes and individuals with normal glucose tolerance. Since the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance is ~2-fold higher in obese compared to lean individuals, postprandial hyperglycaemia poses a great risk of developing severe comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes for obese individuals and may increase mortality in this group. It is yet unknown whether aspiration therapy can attenuate the plasma glucose response to a meal. Due to the reduced amount of food reaching the intestine after aspiration, it seems likely that aspiration therapy reduces postprandial plasma glucose excursions and thereby prevents potential postprandial hyperglycaemia.
It is well known that an orally administered glucose load elicits a greater insulin secretion response compared to an intravenous infusion of glucose resulting in identical plasma glucose elevations. This phenomenon is called the incretin effect. The incretin effect is primarily driven by the insulinotropic gut hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). These so-called incretin hormones play crucial roles in regulation of glucose homeostasis and appetite. GLP-1 is produced in the intestinal mucosa by the so-called enteroendocrine L cells, which are predominantly localised in the distal part of the small intestine and the colon. GIP originates from enteroendocrine K 5 cells in the gut mucosa. K cells are assumed to be predominant in the proximal part of the small intestine. Both GLP-1 and GIP are secreted in response to ingestion of nutrients and have strong glucose-dependent insulinotropic effects on pancreatic beta cells. The incretin hormones are of interest in the present study, because impaired incretin effect is an early sign of dysmetabolism in obese individuals and a distinctive feature of type 2 diabetes, suggesting that the impaired glucose tolerance of these patients is, at least in part, due to a defective incretin system. Whether aspiration of gastric content after a meal affects postprandial incretin hormone response has not been elucidated. The investigators plan to investigate meal-induced incretin hormone excursions in plasma with and without aspiration therapy and compare the results to a matched control group.
In addition to GLP-1 and GIP, several other gut-related hormones are known to regulate glucose homeostasis and appetite. Glucagon is a peptide hormone secreted from the pancreatic alpha cells. Glucagon acts opposite to insulin by promoting hepatic gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis causing increased plasma glucose concentrations. Oxyntomodulin and pancreatic peptide YY3-36 (PYY) are peptide hormones secreted by the enteroendocrine L cells in response to feeding and both suppress appetite. Gastrin is a hormone secreted by G cells localised in the pyloric antrum, duodenum and pancreas. Gastrin stimulates acid (HCl) secretion and gastric emptying by increasing gastric motility. Cholecystokinin (CCK) is a peptide hormone secreted by the enteroendocrine I cells in the duodenum. CCK promotes bile release from the gallbladder and also acts as an appetite suppressant. To this point, it is unknown how aspiration therapy affects these appetite- and glucose-regulating hormones during a meal. The investigators aim to investigate this during standardised mixed meal tests with and without aspiration.
Furthermore, it is relevant to examine the effect of aspiration therapy on satiety. Thus, the investigators aim to evaluate the effect of aspiration therapy on satiety before, during and after a mixed meal as well as food intake after the MMT with and without aspiration evaluated through an ad libitum meal provided at the end of the experimental days.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 14 Days
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Obese patients treated with AspireAssist | – | Other: Meal testHealthy, obese with BMI > 27, treated with AspireAssist for weight management, the postprandial glucose metabolism will be tested with a meal test |
| Matched controls | – | Other: Meal testHealthy, obese with BMI > 27, the postprandial glucose metabolism will be tested with a meal test |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- It is planned to recruit up to 25 patients who have had the Aspire Assist inserted. Furthermore, 10 healthy control participants matched for age, weight, height, BMI and sex will be recruited
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient who have had the Aspire Assist inserted (the aspiration therapy group)
- Age between 18-75 years
- Able to understand written patient information and sign informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes
- Severe comorbidities that, at the discretion of the investigators, exclude study participation (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) stage III, significant cardiac arrhythmias etc.)
- Previous gastrointestinal surgery (excluding cholecystectomy and appendectomy)
- Gastrointestinal conditions making the participant unsuitable for participation (e.g. ulcerative colitis, Crohn´s disease, clinically significant food allergies, candidiasis etc.)
- Anaemia with a haemoglobin value <6.2 mmol/l (<10 g/dl) for women and <7.4 mmol/l (< 12 g/dl) for men at time of screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Meal test240 min mixed meal test with aspiration using AspireAssist. | Other | Matched controls, Obese patients treated with AspireAssist |
Primary outcome
Plasma glucose concentration
Time frame: 0-240 min
mmol/l, collected during mixed meal test and analysed by YSI STAT 2300
16 secondary outcomes
Serum Insulin
Time frame: 0-240 min
plasma GLP-1
Time frame: 0-240 min
Indirect Calorimetry
Time frame: 0-240 min
Gallbladder volume
Time frame: 0-240 min
Ad libitum meal intake
Time frame: 30 min
Appetite
Time frame: 0-240 min
Plasma GLP-2
Time frame: 0-240 min
Plasma GIP
Time frame: 0-240 min
Plasma Glucagon
Time frame: 0-240 min
Plasma PYY
Time frame: 0-240 min
Plasma Oxyntomodulin
Time frame: 0-240 min
plasma ghrelin
Time frame: 0-240 min
Plasma acetaminophen
Time frame: 0-240 min
plasma c-peptide
Time frame: 0-240 min
Plasma CCK
Time frame: 0-240 min
plasma gastrin
Time frame: 0-240 min
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Oct 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Recruiting
Exercise Training and Vitamin D Metabolism
Obesity & Overweight, Vitamin D
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Filip K Knop, MD, Proff principal investigator
Center for diabetes research, gentofte hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Obesity and Weight Loss, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Plasma glucose concentration (time frame: 0-240 min). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2018.