Coronary VesselsOCTIVUSNCT03394079
Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
A study testing PCI in people with Coronary Vessels, run by Seung-Jung Park at 9 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
The primary aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of OCT-guided(optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided) and IVUS-guided(Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided) strategies in patients undergoing Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Vessels
- What is being tested?
- PCI
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,008 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 12 Apr 2018to 31 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men or women at least 19 years of age
- Subjects with obstructive CAD undergoing PCI with contemporary DES or drug-coated balloons (only for in-stent restenosis) under intracoronary imaging guidance.
- The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.
Who cannot join
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or serum creatinine level >1.5 mg/dl), unless patient is on renal replacement therapy.
- Cardiogenic shock or decompensated heart failure with severe LV dysfunction (LVEF) < 30%
- Life expectancy < 1 year for any non-cardiac or cardiac causes
- Any lesion characteristics resulting in the expected inability to deliver the IVUS or OCT catheter to the lesion pre- and post-PCI (eg, moderate or severe vessel calcification or tortuosity)
- Any clinically significant abnormality identified at the screening visit, physical examination, laboratory tests, or electrocardiogram which, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude safe completion of the study
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
South Korea9 sites
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu
Konyang University Hospital
Daejeon
Chonnam National University Hospital
Gwangju
Pusan National University Hospital
Pusan
Asan Medical Hospital
Seoul
Chung-Ang university hospital
Seoul
Gangnam Severance Hospital
Seoul
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul
Kyung hee university hospital
Seoul
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Open Label, Multi-center, Dual Arm, Randomized, Pragmatic Trial : Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
The primary aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of OCT-guided(optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided) and IVUS-guided(Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided) strategies in patients undergoing Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-coated balloons (only for in-stent restenosis) for significant obstructive Coronary artery disease (CAD).
The investigators hypothesize that OCT-guided PCI is non-inferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to primary end point of target-vessel failure (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction [MI], or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization [TVR]) at 1 year after randomization.
- Conditions
- Coronary Vessels
- Being tested
- PCI
- Keywords
- OCT, IVUS, PCI
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PCIProcedure or surgery
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OCT-guided | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: PCI |
| IVUS-guided | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: PCI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of target vessel failure
A composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI or ischemia-driven TVR) at 1 year after randomization.
A composite endpoint is an endpoint that is a combination of multiple clinical endpoints. An event is considered to have occurred if any one of several different events is observed.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (15)
Rate of cardiac Death
Measured: 1, and 5 years
Rate of target vessel myocardial infarction
Measured: 1, and 5 years
Rate of ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization
Measured: 1, and 5 years
Rate of death
cardiac, vascular, non-cardiovascular death
Measured: 1, and 5 years
Rate of myocardial infarction
periprocedural or spontaneous, Q-wave or non-Q-wave.
Measured: 1, and 5 years
Rate of stent thrombosis
Stent thrombosis is defined according to according to the definite or probable criteria of the Academic Research Consortium.
Measured: 1, and 5 years
Rate of stroke
Stroke is defined as focal loss of neurologic function caused by an ischemic or hemorrhagic event, with residual symptoms lasting at least 24 hours or leading to death.
Measured: 1, and 5 years
Rate of repeat revascularization
Any, target-lesion or non-target-lesion, target-vessel or non-target-vessel, ischemia-driven or non-ischemia-driven.
Measured: 1, and 5 years
Rate of any hospitalization
Cardiac or non-cardiac causes.
Measured: 1, and 5 years
Rate of bleeding events
Life-threatening or disabling, major bleeding, or minor.
Bleeding events are assessed according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria.
Measured: 1, and 5 years
Rate of target-lesion failure
Cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization
Measured: 1, and 5 years
Rate of contrast-induced acute kidney injury
Contrast-induced nephropathy is defined as either a greater than 25% increase of serum creatinine or an absolute increase in serum creatinine of 0.5 mg/dl within 72 hours after PCI.
Measured: 3 days
Rate of procedural complications requiring active intervention that were related to PCI or intracoronary imaging devices
Procedural complications (e.g., angiographic dissection of at least type B, coronary perforation, vasospasm, thrombus formation, air embolization, slow flow or no reflow, distal embolization, acute closure, ventricular arrhythmia, cardiac tamponade, or cardiogenic shock) requiring active interventions (prolonged balloon inflations, additional stenting required, thrombus aspiration, pericardiocentesis, cardioversion, or use of mechanical circulatory support devices), which are related to PCI procedures or intravascular imaging evaluation.
Measured: 1 day
Rate of angiographic or imaging-based device success
Patient- or lesion-level analysis.
Angiographic device success is defined as successful PCI at the intended target-lesion with final in-stent residual stenosis of less than 30% by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Imaging-based device success is defined as successful PCI at the intended target-lesion, which fulfills the optimal criterial for stent implantation by IVUS or OCT.
Measured: 1 day
Rate of target vessel failure
A composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI or ischemia-driven TVR)
A composite endpoint is an endpoint that is a combination of multiple clinical endpoints. An event is considered to have occurred if any one of several different events is observed.
Measured: 5 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2018
- Study start12 Apr 2018
- Primary completion17 Feb 2023
- Study completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary VesselsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,008 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seung-Jung Park
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Seung-Jung Park, Asan Medical Center
- Investigators
- Duk-woo Park, MD, Principal investigator, Professor, Division of Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03394079
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AMCCV2017-10
- Acronym
- OCTIVUS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Wee SB, Kang DY, Ahn JM, Park HS, An SY, Seo KW, Lee SH, Yun SC, Baek S, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Lim S, Kim SW, Won H, Hong YJ, Yoon YH, Yoon YW, Bae JH, Park SJ, Park DW; OCTIVUS Investigators. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound for True Bifurcation Lesions. JACC Asia. 2026 Mar 31:S2772-3747(26)00118-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2026.02.019. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 41999374Kim H, Kang DY, Ahn JM, Kim HJ, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Kim SW, Won H, Oh JH, Hong YJ, Yoon YH, Park SJ, Park DW; OCTIVUS Investigators. Proportion and Clinical Impact of Stent Optimization During Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 May 12;18(9):1089-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.01.436. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
PubMed 40272346Kang DY, Ahn JM, Yun SC, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Lim S, Kim SW, Won H, Oh JH, Choe JC, Hong YJ, Yoon YH, Kim H, Choi Y, Lee J, Yoon YW, Kim SJ, Bae JH, Park SJ, Park DW; OCTIVUS Investigators. Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jan 23;83(3):401-413. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.017. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
PubMed 37879490Kang DY, Ahn JM, Yun SC, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Lim S, Kim SW, Won H, Oh JH, Choe JC, Hong YJ, Yoon YH, Kim H, Choi Y, Lee J, Yoon YW, Kim SJ, Bae JH, Park DW, Park SJ; OCTIVUS Investigators. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2023 Oct 17;148(16):1195-1206. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066429. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
PubMed 37634092Kang DY, Ahn JM, Park H, Lee PH, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Park SW, Kim SW, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Hong YJ, Yoon YW, Kim SJ, Bae JH, Oh JH, Park DW, Park SJ. Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled OCTIVUS trial. Am Heart J. 2020 Oct;228:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
PubMed 32871327
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Open Label, Multi-center, Dual Arm, Randomized, Pragmatic Trial : Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03394079
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OCTIVUS / AMCCV2017-10
- Conditions
- Coronary Vessels
- Keywords
- OCT, IVUS, PCI
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,008 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seung-Jung ParkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea
- Study start
- 12 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of OCT-guided(optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided) and IVUS-guided(Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided) strategies in patients undergoing Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-coated balloons (only for in-stent restenosis) for significant obstructive Coronary artery disease (CAD).
The investigators hypothesize that OCT-guided PCI is non-inferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to primary end point of target-vessel failure (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction [MI], or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization [TVR]) at 1 year after randomization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OCT-guided | Experimental | Procedure: PCI |
| IVUS-guided | Active comparator | Procedure: PCI |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Men or women at least 19 years of age
- Subjects with obstructive CAD undergoing PCI with contemporary DES or drug-coated balloons (only for in-stent restenosis) under intracoronary imaging guidance.
- The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or serum creatinine level >1.5 mg/dl), unless patient is on renal replacement therapy.
- Cardiogenic shock or decompensated heart failure with severe LV dysfunction (LVEF) < 30%
- Life expectancy < 1 year for any non-cardiac or cardiac causes
- Any lesion characteristics resulting in the expected inability to deliver the IVUS or OCT catheter to the lesion pre- and post-PCI (eg, moderate or severe vessel calcification or tortuosity)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PCIPercutaneous Coronary Intervention | Procedure or surgery | IVUS-guided, OCT-guided |
Primary outcome
Rate of target vessel failure
Time frame: 1 year
A composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI or ischemia-driven TVR) at 1 year after randomization. A composite endpoint is an endpoint that is a combination of multiple clinical endpoints. An event is considered to have occurred if any one of several different events is observed.
15 secondary outcomes
Rate of cardiac Death
Time frame: 1, and 5 years
Rate of target vessel myocardial infarction
Time frame: 1, and 5 years
Rate of ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 1, and 5 years
Rate of death
Time frame: 1, and 5 years
Rate of myocardial infarction
Time frame: 1, and 5 years
Rate of stent thrombosis
Time frame: 1, and 5 years
Rate of stroke
Time frame: 1, and 5 years
Rate of repeat revascularization
Time frame: 1, and 5 years
Rate of any hospitalization
Time frame: 1, and 5 years
Rate of bleeding events
Time frame: 1, and 5 years
Rate of target-lesion failure
Time frame: 1, and 5 years
Rate of contrast-induced acute kidney injury
Time frame: 3 days
Rate of procedural complications requiring active intervention that were related to PCI or intracoronary imaging devices
Time frame: 1 day
Rate of angiographic or imaging-based device success
Time frame: 1 day
Rate of target vessel failure
Time frame: 5 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41999374Wee SB, Kang DY, Ahn JM, Park HS, An SY, Seo KW, Lee SH, Yun SC, Baek S, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Lim S, Kim SW, Won H, Hong YJ, Yoon YH, Yoon YW, Bae JH, Park SJ, Park DW; OCTIVUS Investigators. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound for True Bifurcation Lesions. JACC Asia. 2026 Mar 31:S2772-3747(26)00118-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2026.02.019. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40272346Kim H, Kang DY, Ahn JM, Kim HJ, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Kim SW, Won H, Oh JH, Hong YJ, Yoon YH, Park SJ, Park DW; OCTIVUS Investigators. Proportion and Clinical Impact of Stent Optimization During Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 May 12;18(9):1089-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.01.436. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37879490Kang DY, Ahn JM, Yun SC, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Lim S, Kim SW, Won H, Oh JH, Choe JC, Hong YJ, Yoon YH, Kim H, Choi Y, Lee J, Yoon YW, Kim SJ, Bae JH, Park SJ, Park DW; OCTIVUS Investigators. Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jan 23;83(3):401-413. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.017. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37634092Kang DY, Ahn JM, Yun SC, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Lim S, Kim SW, Won H, Oh JH, Choe JC, Hong YJ, Yoon YH, Kim H, Choi Y, Lee J, Yoon YW, Kim SJ, Bae JH, Park DW, Park SJ; OCTIVUS Investigators. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2023 Oct 17;148(16):1195-1206. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066429. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32871327Kang DY, Ahn JM, Park H, Lee PH, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Park SW, Kim SW, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Hong YJ, Yoon YW, Kim SJ, Bae JH, Oh JH, Park DW, Park SJ. Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled OCTIVUS trial. Am Heart J. 2020 Oct;228:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Coronary Vessels
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Thiamine Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Coronary Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Duk-woo Park, MD principal investigator
Professor, Division of Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PCI in people with Coronary Vessels, run by Seung-Jung Park at 9 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of target vessel failure (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03394079, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2026.