Thoracic TumorCROSS SECTNCT03396614
Detection of (Sub)Clinical Toxicity in Irradiated vs. Non-irradiated Surgically Treated Esophageal Cancer Patients: a Pilot Study (CROSS SECT)
An observational study of Thoracic Tumor, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Rationale: Radiation-induced cardiac and pulmonary toxicity after treatment for intra-thoracic tumors is a clinically relevant problem, which may jeopardize the benefit of (neo-adjuvant) (chemo) radiotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Thoracic Tumor
- What is being tested?
- CTTC scan, cardiac MRI, ECG, 6 minute walking test, echocardiogram
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 21 Oct 2017to 1 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with EC treated with or without neo-CRT, alive without evidence of disease, treated between 2000 and 2012 at the University Medical Centre Groningen will be eligible. Twenty patients will be included in both treatment groups. Length of follow up after treatment does not seem to be an important confounding factor as surgery is not considered to be an important risk factor for late toxicity.
Who may be able to join
- Treated for EC with a curative resection between 2000 and 2012
- Age >= 18 years
- Written informed consent
- No signs of tumor recurrence or new other malignancies.
Who cannot join
- Thoracic radiotherapy for indications other than EC.
- Contra indication for cardiac MRI, pacemaker, cochlear implants, metal not compliable with MRI.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Rationale: Radiation-induced cardiac and pulmonary toxicity after treatment for intra-thoracic tumors is a clinically relevant problem, which may jeopardize the benefit of (neo-adjuvant) (chemo) radiotherapy. Although cure rates are rising since the introduction of neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (neo-CRT) as current standard treatment for esophageal cancer (EC), recent studies showed that there is a substantial risk of non-cancer treatment-related death in these patients. Furthermore, this risk is underestimated as the cause of death of many patients remains unknown, since the distinction between tumor related and non-cancer related death can be difficult.
Cardiac and pulmonary toxicity and its interaction as seen in pre-clinical studies might explain for these unknown deaths as suggested in several clinical studies. Clinical imaging studies performed shortly after treatment showed changes in different cardiac function parameters, all related to radiation dose parameters. Systematic imaging studies analysing subclinical toxicities at longer follow up have never been performed, most probably because of poor survival rates. However, identification of the magnitude of (subclinical) cardiopulmonary toxicity, by performing several cardiopulmonary function tests, is essential in this patient group as this toxicity is most likely the cause of the increased mortality after thoracic radiotherapy. For future perspectives, these results can be used to select the best diagnostic methods for a prospective cohort study to develop prediction tools for cardiopulmonary toxicity..
Read more
Objective: The main objective of this study is to determine the most suitable diagnostic test to identify cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection. Furthermore, we want to estimate the difference in cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection compared to EC survivors who were treated with surgical resection alone.
Study design: Cross-sectional pilot study
Study population: 40 EC patients who were treated with curative intent by esophageal resection with or without neo-CRT
Intervention (if applicable): Not applicable.
Main study parameters/endpoints: As this is an exploratory pilot study to determine the most suitable diagnostic tests for future studies, there will be several endpoints related to (sub)clinical cardiopulmonary dysfunction.
Signs of myocardial ischemia, systolic or diastolic dysfunction, rhythm and valve disorders, pericardial effusion and fibrosis, myocardial fibrosis, focal wall motion disorders and coronary calcifications will be analyzed. The cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection will be compared to cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with surgical resection alone.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Several tests will be performed at one time point, 5-10 years after given treatment. If the findings of the test indicate cardiovascular complications, the patient will be referred to the cardiologist for further analysis and/or preventive measures. As one of the tests, cardiac MRI, including gadolinium (Dotarem 0.2 mmol/kg) enhancement will be performed. Potential side effects of gadolinium include brief headache, nausea (feeling sick) and dizziness for a brief time following the injection. Allergic reactions are rare. Furthermore, a cardiac CT scan will be performed with a total radiation exposure of 0.6 mSv (less than a third of the annual background radiation dose), the risks will be minimal.
- Conditions
- Thoracic Tumor
- Being tested
- CTTC scan, cardiac MRI, ECG, 6 minute walking test, echocardiogram
- Medical subject headings
- Thoracic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CTTC scan, cardiac MRI, ECG, 6 minute walking test, echocardiogramDiagnostic test
CTTC scan, cardiac MRI, ECG, 6 minute walking test, echocardiogram
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EEG, ECG, CT, MRI | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: CTTC scan, cardiac MRI, ECG, 6 minute walking test, echocardiogram |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection will be compared to cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with surgical resection alone.
Measured: cross sectional 5-10 years after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jan 2018
- Study start21 Oct 2017
- Primary completion1 Oct 2020
- Study completion1 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Thoracic TumorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Medical Center GroningenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jannet Beukema, Dr., Principal investigator, Radiation oncologist
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03396614
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RT2017-06/ METc 2017/335
- Acronym
- CROSS SECT
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 28 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Detection of (Sub)Clinical Toxicity in Irradiated vs. Non-irradiated Surgically Treated Esophageal Cancer Patients: a Pilot Study (CROSS SECT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03396614
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CROSS SECT / RT2017-06/ METc 2017/335
- Conditions
- Thoracic Tumor
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center GroningenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: Radiation-induced cardiac and pulmonary toxicity after treatment for intra-thoracic tumors is a clinically relevant problem, which may jeopardize the benefit of (neo-adjuvant) (chemo) radiotherapy. Although cure rates are rising since the introduction of neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (neo-CRT) as current standard treatment for esophageal cancer (EC), recent studies showed that there is a substantial risk of non-cancer treatment-related death in these patients. Furthermore, this risk is underestimated as the cause of death of many patients remains unknown, since the distinction between tumor related and non-cancer related death can be difficult.
Cardiac and pulmonary toxicity and its interaction as seen in pre-clinical studies might explain for these unknown deaths as suggested in several clinical studies. Clinical imaging studies performed shortly after treatment showed changes in different cardiac function parameters, all related to radiation dose parameters. Systematic imaging studies analysing subclinical toxicities at longer follow up have never been performed, most probably because of poor survival rates. However, identification of the magnitude of (subclinical) cardiopulmonary toxicity, by performing several cardiopulmonary function tests, is essential in this patient group as this toxicity is most likely the cause of the increased mortality after thoracic radiotherapy. For future perspectives, these results can be used to select the best diagnostic methods for a prospective cohort study to develop prediction tools for cardiopulmonary toxicity..
Objective: The main objective of this study is to determine the most suitable diagnostic test to identify cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection. Furthermore, we want to estimate the difference in cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection compared to EC survivors who were treated with surgical resection alone.
Study design: Cross-sectional pilot study
Study population: 40 EC patients who were treated with curative intent by esophageal resection with or without neo-CRT
Intervention (if applicable): Not applicable.
Main study parameters/endpoints: As this is an exploratory pilot study to determine the most suitable diagnostic tests for future studies, there will be several endpoints related to (sub)clinical cardiopulmonary dysfunction.
Signs of myocardial ischemia, systolic or diastolic dysfunction, rhythm and valve disorders, pericardial effusion and fibrosis, myocardial fibrosis, focal wall motion disorders and coronary calcifications will be analyzed. The cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection will be compared to cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with surgical resection alone.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Several tests will be performed at one time point, 5-10 years after given treatment. If the findings of the test indicate cardiovascular complications, the patient will be referred to the cardiologist for further analysis and/or preventive measures. As one of the tests, cardiac MRI, including gadolinium (Dotarem 0.2 mmol/kg) enhancement will be performed. Potential side effects of gadolinium include brief headache, nausea (feeling sick) and dizziness for a brief time following the injection. Allergic reactions are rare. Furthermore, a cardiac CT scan will be performed with a total radiation exposure of 0.6 mSv (less than a third of the annual background radiation dose), the risks will be minimal.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EEG, ECG, CT, MRI | – | Diagnostic Test: CTTC scan, cardiac MRI, ECG, 6 minute walking test, echocardiogram |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with EC treated with or without neo-CRT, alive without evidence of disease, treated between 2000 and 2012 at the University Medical Centre Groningen will be eligible. Twenty patients will be included in both treatment groups. Length of follow up after treatment does not seem to be an important confounding factor as surgery is not considered to be an important risk factor for late toxicity.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Treated for EC with a curative resection between 2000 and 2012
- Age >= 18 years
- Written informed consent
- No signs of tumor recurrence or new other malignancies.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Thoracic radiotherapy for indications other than EC.
- Contra indication for cardiac MRI, pacemaker, cochlear implants, metal not compliable with MRI.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CTTC scan, cardiac MRI, ECG, 6 minute walking test, echocardiogramCTTC scan, cardiac MRI, ECG, 6 minute walking test, echocardiogram | Diagnostic test | EEG, ECG, CT, MRI |
Primary outcome
The cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection will be compared to cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with surgical resection alone.
Time frame: cross sectional 5-10 years after treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Thoracic Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jannet Beukema, Dr. principal investigator
Radiation oncologist
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Thoracic Tumor, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection will be compared to cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with surgical resection alone. (time frame: cross sectional 5-10 years after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2024.