Chronic PainNCT03398408
Cognitive Flexibility Training in Persistent Pain
A study testing Training in people with Chronic Pain, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To determine whether participation in a cognitive training program over a training period of five weeks improves cognitive flexibility in patients with chronic hip, knee, and back pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 29 Dec 2017to 7 Aug 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults age 18 to 70 with chronic hip, knee, or low back pain for >3 months
- Documented moderate to severe chronic pain
- English as a primary language
- Access to a computer at home and an email account
Who cannot join
- Diagnosed Alzheimer's or documented severe cognitive impairment
- Lack of email/lack of basic computer skills
- Has undergone an interventional pain procedure within one week prior to enrollment
- Are scheduled to undergo a pain procedure during the five weeks of complete cognitive training
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
To determine whether participation in a cognitive training program over a training period of five weeks improves cognitive flexibility in patients with chronic hip, knee, and back pain.
Read the detailed description
This project is a single-center prospective, randomized study to assess whether cognitive flexibility can be improved through training on a Lumosity®-based training module over the course a five week timeframe in patients with chronic hip, knee, and back pain; and whether changes in cognitive flexibility will correlate with perceived pain scores.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- Training
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TrainingBehavioural
The intervention group will be provided with the cognitive training module and participants will be required to complete a targeted 36-minute daily training for 35 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Patients in both groups will complete paper-pencil TMT A and B and the CWMST, the computer-based TMT A and B and Color Match, and NCPT tests upon enrollment into the study.
Participants in the intervention group will then be provided with the Lumosity cognitive flexibility training module and complete daily training for a total of five weeks. 1-3 days after completion of their training, all patients will be invited to complete the computerized versions of the TMT A and B, Color Match, and NCPT tests again on their personal computers. Receives: Behavioral: Training |
| Control | No intervention | Patients in both groups will complete paper-pencil TMT A and B and the CWMST, the computer-based TMT A and B and Color Match, and NCPT tests upon enrollment into the study. Patients in the control group will complete all tests upon enrollment and approximately five weeks after their initial testing, but will not participate in training. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Does cognitive training over five weeks improve cognitive flexibility performance scores in chronic hip, knee, and back pain patients?
The primary outcome, i.e. NCPT score, will be assessed before and after five weeks of cognitive training. T-test will be used to compare the change in NCPT score between the training and the control group.
Measured: Up to 5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jan 2018
- Study start29 Dec 2017
- Primary completion7 Aug 2019
- Study completion7 Aug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Washington University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lumos Labs, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, simon.haroutounian, Washington University School of Medicine
- Investigators
- Simon Haroutounian, PhD, Principal investigator, Washington University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03398408
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201706064
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 6 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: ADD
Publications
Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.
PubMed 16698416Haroutiunian S, Nikolajsen L, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. The neuropathic component in persistent postsurgical pain: a systematic literature review. Pain. 2013 Jan;154(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.09.010.
PubMed 23273105Smith BH, Torrance N. Epidemiology of neuropathic pain and its impact on quality of life. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Jun;16(3):191-8. doi: 10.1007/s11916-012-0256-0.
PubMed 22395856Dworkin RH, Panarites CJ, Armstrong EP, Malone DC, Pham SV. Healthcare utilization in people with postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 May;59(5):827-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03403.x.
PubMed 21568954Clarke H, Soneji N, Ko DT, Yun L, Wijeysundera DN. Rates and risk factors for prolonged opioid use after major surgery: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2014 Feb 11;348:g1251. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1251.
PubMed 24519537Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.
PubMed 12873949Oosterman JM, Dijkerman HC, Kessels RP, Scherder EJ. A unique association between cognitive inhibition and pain sensitivity in healthy participants. Eur J Pain. 2010 Nov;14(10):1046-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 20.
PubMed 20493746Baliki MN, Mansour AR, Baria AT, Apkarian AV. Functional reorganization of the default mode network across chronic pain conditions. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 2;9(9):e106133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106133. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25180885Kucyi A, Salomons TV, Davis KD. Cognitive behavioral training reverses the effect of pain exposure on brain network activity. Pain. 2016 Sep;157(9):1895-1904. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000592.
PubMed 27101426Vachon-Presseau E, Tetreault P, Petre B, Huang L, Berger SE, Torbey S, Baria AT, Mansour AR, Hashmi JA, Griffith JW, Comasco E, Schnitzer TJ, Baliki MN, Apkarian AV. Corticolimbic anatomical characteristics predetermine risk for chronic pain. Brain. 2016 Jul;139(Pt 7):1958-70. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww100. Epub 2016 May 5.
PubMed 27190016Lamm C, Decety J, Singer T. Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2492-502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
PubMed 20946964Bernardy K, Klose P, Busch AJ, Choy EH, Hauser W. Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 10;2013(9):CD009796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009796.pub2.
PubMed 24018611Attal N, Masselin-Dubois A, Martinez V, Jayr C, Albi A, Fermanian J, Bouhassira D, Baudic S. Does cognitive functioning predict chronic pain? Results from a prospective surgical cohort. Brain. 2014 Mar;137(Pt 3):904-17. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt354. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
PubMed 24441173Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2277-81. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.390.
PubMed 17406468Kortte KB, Horner MD, Windham WK. The trail making test, part B: cognitive flexibility or ability to maintain set? Appl Neuropsychol. 2002;9(2):106-9. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0902_5.
PubMed 12214820
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cognitive Flexibility Training in Persistent Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03398408
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201706064
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lumos Labs, Inc.
- Study start
- 29 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine whether participation in a cognitive training program over a training period of five weeks improves cognitive flexibility in patients with chronic hip, knee, and back pain.
Detailed description
This project is a single-center prospective, randomized study to assess whether cognitive flexibility can be improved through training on a Lumosity®-based training module over the course a five week timeframe in patients with chronic hip, knee, and back pain; and whether changes in cognitive flexibility will correlate with perceived pain scores.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: TrainingPatients in both groups will complete paper-pencil TMT A and B and the CWMST, the computer-based TMT A and B and Color Match, and NCPT tests upon enrollment into the study. Participants in the intervention group will then be provided with the Lumosity cognitive flexibility training module and complete daily training for a total of five weeks. 1-3 days after completion of their training, all patients will be invited to complete the computerized versions of the TMT A and B, Color Match, and NCPT tests again on their personal computers. |
| Control | No intervention | –Patients in both groups will complete paper-pencil TMT A and B and the CWMST, the computer-based TMT A and B and Color Match, and NCPT tests upon enrollment into the study. Patients in the control group will complete all tests upon enrollment and approximately five weeks after their initial testing, but will not participate in training. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults age 18 to 70 with chronic hip, knee, or low back pain for >3 months
- Documented moderate to severe chronic pain
- English as a primary language
- Access to a computer at home and an email account
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosed Alzheimer's or documented severe cognitive impairment
- Lack of email/lack of basic computer skills
- Has undergone an interventional pain procedure within one week prior to enrollment
- Are scheduled to undergo a pain procedure during the five weeks of complete cognitive training
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TrainingThe intervention group will be provided with the cognitive training module and participants will be required to complete a targeted 36-minute daily training for 35 days. | Behavioural | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Does cognitive training over five weeks improve cognitive flexibility performance scores in chronic hip, knee, and back pain patients?
Time frame: Up to 5 months
The primary outcome, i.e. NCPT score, will be assessed before and after five weeks of cognitive training. T-test will be used to compare the change in NCPT score between the training and the control group.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2020.
- Background: PubMed 16698416Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.
- Background: PubMed 23273105Haroutiunian S, Nikolajsen L, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. The neuropathic component in persistent postsurgical pain: a systematic literature review. Pain. 2013 Jan;154(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.09.010.
- Background: PubMed 22395856Smith BH, Torrance N. Epidemiology of neuropathic pain and its impact on quality of life. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Jun;16(3):191-8. doi: 10.1007/s11916-012-0256-0.
- Background: PubMed 21568954Dworkin RH, Panarites CJ, Armstrong EP, Malone DC, Pham SV. Healthcare utilization in people with postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 May;59(5):827-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03403.x.
- Background: PubMed 24519537Clarke H, Soneji N, Ko DT, Yun L, Wijeysundera DN. Rates and risk factors for prolonged opioid use after major surgery: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2014 Feb 11;348:g1251. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1251.
- Background: PubMed 12873949Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.
- Background: PubMed 20493746Oosterman JM, Dijkerman HC, Kessels RP, Scherder EJ. A unique association between cognitive inhibition and pain sensitivity in healthy participants. Eur J Pain. 2010 Nov;14(10):1046-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 25180885Baliki MN, Mansour AR, Baria AT, Apkarian AV. Functional reorganization of the default mode network across chronic pain conditions. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 2;9(9):e106133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106133. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 27101426Kucyi A, Salomons TV, Davis KD. Cognitive behavioral training reverses the effect of pain exposure on brain network activity. Pain. 2016 Sep;157(9):1895-1904. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000592.
- Background: PubMed 27190016Vachon-Presseau E, Tetreault P, Petre B, Huang L, Berger SE, Torbey S, Baria AT, Mansour AR, Hashmi JA, Griffith JW, Comasco E, Schnitzer TJ, Baliki MN, Apkarian AV. Corticolimbic anatomical characteristics predetermine risk for chronic pain. Brain. 2016 Jul;139(Pt 7):1958-70. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww100. Epub 2016 May 5.
- Background: PubMed 20946964Lamm C, Decety J, Singer T. Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2492-502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
- Background: PubMed 24018611Bernardy K, Klose P, Busch AJ, Choy EH, Hauser W. Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 10;2013(9):CD009796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009796.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. ADD
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Active, not recruiting
Integrated Feldenkrais Method With and Without DNS for Chronic Low Back Pain in Females
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
SERENITY Study of Chronic Pain Interference in Adults
Chronic Low Back Pain, Spinal Cord Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Different Treatments in Chronic Pain Patients.
Chronic Pain, Nociplastic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Dual-Task Core Stabilization Training in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Active, not recruiting
Multimodal Manual Therapy vs. Maitland Mobilization for Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
Chronic Neck Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Simon Haroutounian, PhD principal investigator
Washington University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Training in people with Chronic Pain, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Does cognitive training over five weeks improve cognitive flexibility performance scores in chronic hip, knee, and back pain patients? (time frame: Up to 5 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03398408, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2020.