AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic PainNCT03398408

Cognitive Flexibility Training in Persistent Pain

A study testing Training in people with Chronic Pain, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine whether participation in a cognitive training program over a training period of five weeks improves cognitive flexibility in patients with chronic hip, knee, and back pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Pain
What is being tested?
Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
29 Dec 2017to 7 Aug 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults age 18 to 70 with chronic hip, knee, or low back pain for >3 months
  • Documented moderate to severe chronic pain
  • English as a primary language
  • Access to a computer at home and an email account

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosed Alzheimer's or documented severe cognitive impairment
  • Lack of email/lack of basic computer skills
  • Has undergone an interventional pain procedure within one week prior to enrollment
  • Are scheduled to undergo a pain procedure during the five weeks of complete cognitive training

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Washington University in St. Louis

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

About this study

To determine whether participation in a cognitive training program over a training period of five weeks improves cognitive flexibility in patients with chronic hip, knee, and back pain.

Read the detailed description

This project is a single-center prospective, randomized study to assess whether cognitive flexibility can be improved through training on a Lumosity®-based training module over the course a five week timeframe in patients with chronic hip, knee, and back pain; and whether changes in cognitive flexibility will correlate with perceived pain scores.

Conditions
Chronic Pain
Being tested
Training
Medical subject headings
Chronic Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TrainingBehavioural

    The intervention group will be provided with the cognitive training module and participants will be required to complete a targeted 36-minute daily training for 35 days.

Study groups in NCT03398408
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalPatients in both groups will complete paper-pencil TMT A and B and the CWMST, the computer-based TMT A and B and Color Match, and NCPT tests upon enrollment into the study. Participants in the intervention group will then be provided with the Lumosity cognitive flexibility training module and complete daily training for a total of five weeks. 1-3 days after completion of their training, all patients will be invited to complete the computerized versions of the TMT A and B, Color Match, and NCPT tests again on their personal computers.
Receives: Behavioral: Training
ControlNo interventionPatients in both groups will complete paper-pencil TMT A and B and the CWMST, the computer-based TMT A and B and Color Match, and NCPT tests upon enrollment into the study. Patients in the control group will complete all tests upon enrollment and approximately five weeks after their initial testing, but will not participate in training.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Does cognitive training over five weeks improve cognitive flexibility performance scores in chronic hip, knee, and back pain patients?

    The primary outcome, i.e. NCPT score, will be assessed before and after five weeks of cognitive training. T-test will be used to compare the change in NCPT score between the training and the control group.

    Measured: Up to 5 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jan 2018
  2. Study start29 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion7 Aug 2019
  4. Study completion7 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03398408
Sponsor's protocol ID
201706064
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
28 Dec 2017
Last updated
6 May 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: ADD

Publications

  • Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.

    PubMed 16698416
  • Haroutiunian S, Nikolajsen L, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. The neuropathic component in persistent postsurgical pain: a systematic literature review. Pain. 2013 Jan;154(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.09.010.

    PubMed 23273105
  • Smith BH, Torrance N. Epidemiology of neuropathic pain and its impact on quality of life. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Jun;16(3):191-8. doi: 10.1007/s11916-012-0256-0.

    PubMed 22395856
  • Dworkin RH, Panarites CJ, Armstrong EP, Malone DC, Pham SV. Healthcare utilization in people with postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 May;59(5):827-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03403.x.

    PubMed 21568954
  • Clarke H, Soneji N, Ko DT, Yun L, Wijeysundera DN. Rates and risk factors for prolonged opioid use after major surgery: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2014 Feb 11;348:g1251. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1251.

    PubMed 24519537
  • Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.

    PubMed 12873949
  • Oosterman JM, Dijkerman HC, Kessels RP, Scherder EJ. A unique association between cognitive inhibition and pain sensitivity in healthy participants. Eur J Pain. 2010 Nov;14(10):1046-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 20.

    PubMed 20493746
  • Baliki MN, Mansour AR, Baria AT, Apkarian AV. Functional reorganization of the default mode network across chronic pain conditions. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 2;9(9):e106133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106133. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 25180885
  • Kucyi A, Salomons TV, Davis KD. Cognitive behavioral training reverses the effect of pain exposure on brain network activity. Pain. 2016 Sep;157(9):1895-1904. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000592.

    PubMed 27101426
  • Vachon-Presseau E, Tetreault P, Petre B, Huang L, Berger SE, Torbey S, Baria AT, Mansour AR, Hashmi JA, Griffith JW, Comasco E, Schnitzer TJ, Baliki MN, Apkarian AV. Corticolimbic anatomical characteristics predetermine risk for chronic pain. Brain. 2016 Jul;139(Pt 7):1958-70. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww100. Epub 2016 May 5.

    PubMed 27190016
  • Lamm C, Decety J, Singer T. Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2492-502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

    PubMed 20946964
  • Bernardy K, Klose P, Busch AJ, Choy EH, Hauser W. Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 10;2013(9):CD009796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009796.pub2.

    PubMed 24018611
  • Attal N, Masselin-Dubois A, Martinez V, Jayr C, Albi A, Fermanian J, Bouhassira D, Baudic S. Does cognitive functioning predict chronic pain? Results from a prospective surgical cohort. Brain. 2014 Mar;137(Pt 3):904-17. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt354. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

    PubMed 24441173
  • Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2277-81. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.390.

    PubMed 17406468
  • Kortte KB, Horner MD, Windham WK. The trail making test, part B: cognitive flexibility or ability to maintain set? Appl Neuropsychol. 2002;9(2):106-9. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0902_5.

    PubMed 12214820

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Training in people with Chronic Pain, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Does cognitive training over five weeks improve cognitive flexibility performance scores in chronic hip, knee, and back pain patients? (time frame: Up to 5 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03398408, which also lists 18 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in