AzTrials
AzTrials

Contraceptive UsageNCT03402217

Patient Centered Postpartum Contraception App

An observational study of Contraceptive Usage, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate a smart phone-based application ("app") designed to inform pregnant women ages 15-25 about their contraception options. The goal of this research will be to evaluate the usability, feasibility and acceptability of this app. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 25 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Contraceptive Usage
What is being tested?
Patient Centered Postpartum Contraception App
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 May 2018to 7 Jan 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 25 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Study population: -Recruitment will occur at local primary care clinics.

Who may be able to join

  • Pregnant
  • Identify as African American or Black
  • English as primary language

Who cannot join

  • Not pregnant
  • Not identifying as African American or Black
  • Language other than English as primary language

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Chicago Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60605

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study will evaluate a smart phone-based application ("app") designed to inform pregnant women ages 15-25 about their contraception options. The goal of this research will be to evaluate the usability, feasibility and acceptability of this app.

Read the detailed description

This study will evaluate a smart phone-based application ("app") designed to inform pregnant women ages 15-25 about their contraception options. The goal of this research will be to evaluate the usability, feasibility and acceptability of this app. Participants will be asked to complete a survey after informed consent and before using the app. After using the app, participants will complete a second survey. This second survey will ask questions about the app including the following topics: Usability, user-friendliness, navigation, user interface, time spent, organization readability; Feasibility, informative, helpful, comprehensible, quality of art, interface, sound; and Acceptability breadth of content, depth of content, engaging and motivating, Innovative utility and value. Women will also rate the degree to which they promote use of the product: would use the app if available, believe the app will support contraceptive use and would recommend the app to peers. Study participation will end once participants are done with the second survey.

Being tested
Patient Centered Postpartum Contraception App
Keywords
Contraception, Post Partum Contraception
Medical subject headings
Contraception Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Patient Centered Postpartum Contraception AppBehavioural

    This is a theory-based smart phone-based application designed to provide immediate postpartum contraception information to young women aged 15-25.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of Application

    Feasibility, acceptability and usability of application. Mean of each item is reported. Each item has a possible score of 1-5, 1 = strongly disagree; 5= strongly agree. Higher scores indicate a better results for all items except "I found the app too complex to understand," "I think I would need tech support to use this app," "I thought there was too much inconsistency in app," "I found the app cumbersome to use," and "I needed to learn a lot before I could get going," where a lower score is a better result.

    Measured: Immediately post intervention

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Prior Method Use

    Methods of birth control participants have ever used

    Measured: Pre-Survey

  2. Number of Pregnancies (Including Current)

    Measured: Pre-Survey

  3. Contraception Knowledge

    7 questions assessing participant knowledge of different contraception methods

    Measured: Pre-Survey

  4. Patient Activation

    Participant total of 13 Likert-style questions asking about how active a role they have taken in determining their health care. Measurement presented is the sum of 13 Likert items 1-5 to create a scale score. Possible score range from 13-65, with higher scores indicating more activation.

    Measured: Pre-Survey, immediately post intervention

  5. Information, Motivation and Behavioral Skills

    15 questions asking participants about the information, motivation, and behavioral skills they possess relating to spacing pregnancies by 18 months or longer, split into information, motivation, and behavioral self-efficacy variables. Three subscales are presented: information subscale, motivation subscale, and behavioral skills subscale. The information scale is the summed correct answers to 7 questions, possible score 0-7. Motivation subscale is the sum of 6 Likert-type items with values from 1-4, for possible scores of 6-24; higher score is better. Behavioral skills subscale is the sum of 5 Likert-type items with values from 1-5, for possible subscales scores of 5-25; higher score is better.

    Measured: immediately post intervention

  6. Number of Children

    Measured: Pre-Survey

  7. Number of Induced Abortions

    Previous miscarriages, abortions, times pregnant and children participants have

    Measured: Pre-Survey

  8. Number of Miscarriages

    Previous miscarriages, abortions, times pregnant and children participants have

    Measured: Pre-Survey

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2018
  2. Study start18 May 2018
  3. Primary completion7 Jan 2019
  4. Study completion7 Jan 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03402217
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB17-12541
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
5 Jan 2018
Last updated
3 May 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Contraceptive Usage, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 May 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of Application (time frame: Immediately post intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in