AzTrials
AzTrials

Rate of Complete Resection in a Unique Surgical TimeDIAPERNCT03402516

Comparison of Two Bipolar Resector in Less Than 3cm Myoma Resection

A study testing 18.5 resector and 26Fr resector in people with Rate of Complete Resection in a Unique Surgical Time, run by Bicetre Hospital at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hysteroscopic resection of type 0, 1 or 2 myoma is frequent. The more frequent resector used for myoma resection is 26Fr hysteroscope. Actual miniaturization of resector led to 18.5Fr resector with a potential benefit because of less dilatation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
18.5 resector and 26Fr resector
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
308 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Nov 2017to 31 Mar 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Older than 18 years old
  • With a type 0,1 or 2 unique myoma requiring surgery

Who cannot join

  • No medical care

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hopital Bicetre

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275

    Perrine Capmas, MD-PhD, +33145217714, perrine.capmas@aphp.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Impact of the Diameter on the Performance of Two Bipolar Resectors 18.5Fr and 26Fr

Hysteroscopic resection of type 0, 1 or 2 myoma is frequent. The more frequent resector used for myoma resection is 26Fr hysteroscope. Actual miniaturization of resector led to 18.5Fr resector with a potential benefit because of less dilatation. These resectors are often used but no scientific evaluation has been performed.

Hypothesis of this non inferiority trial is that complete resection in a unique surgical time will be comparable with both resectors.

Read the detailed description

Myoma type 0, 1 or 2 are often symptomatic (abnormal uterine bleeding or infertility) and hysteroscopic resections are thus frequent. This management is a minimally invasive surgery.

Usually, a 26Fr resectoscope is used and the main articles on this topic report hysteroscopie resections with a 26Fr resectoscope. Miniaturization of resector led to decrease in the size of resectors with a potential benefit because of a less important cervical dilatation and then a smaller risk of adverse events and an increase in the number of surgery under local anaesthesia.

Use of 18.5Fr resectors is more and more frequent but, to our knowledge, it has never been evaluated for benefit on cervical dilatation but also for rate of complete resection in one time, surgical length and rate of unbalanced input/output.

Intuitively, a smaller diameter could led to a less traumatic cervical dilatation but it could also led to an higher risk of incomplete treatment in one time and a longer surgical duration and a more frequent unbalanced input/output.

No study compare use of these two resectors (18.5 and 26Fr) all the more randomized. With 26Fr resector, the rate of complete resection in one time for less than 3cm myoma is around 90%. If this rate is higher with the 18.5Fr resector, the risk/benefit balance (including economic evaluation) won't be favorable to this use.

Being tested
18.5 resector, 26Fr resector
Keywords
hysteroscopic myomectomy, 26Fr resector, 18.5Fr resector

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 18.5 resectorDevice

    hysteroscopic myomectomy with a 18.5 Fr resector after cervical dilatation until Hegar bougie number 7

  • 26Fr resectorDevice

    hysteroscopic myomectomy with a 26Fr resector after cervical dilatation until Hegar bougie number 10

Study groups in NCT03402516
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
18.5Fr resectorExperimentalUsed of a 18.5Fr bipolar resector for hysteroscopic myomectomy. Cervical dilatation would be performed until Hegar bougie number 7 and then a classic hysteroscopic resection will be performed with a 18.5Fr bipolar resector.
Receives: Device: 18.5 resector
26Fr resectorActive comparatorUsed of a 26Fr bipolar resector for hysteroscopic myomectomy. Cervical dilatation would be performed until Hegar bougie number 10 and then a classic hysteroscopic resection will be performed with a 24Fr bipolar resector.
Receives: Device: 26Fr resector

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison with chi square test of rate of complete surgery in one time

    Complete resection of myoma in one time

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Duration of surgery

    Comparison of duration of surgery between 2 arms

    Measured: 3 years

  2. Rate of unbalanced in and out balance

    Comparison of rate of unbalanced in and out balance between the 2 groups. A in/out balance higher than 500cc will be consider has unbalanced).

    Measured: 3 years

  3. Cost effectiveness analyses

    Comparison of cost for complete resection of myoma between groups

    Measured: 3 years

  4. Complications rate

    Comparison of complications rate (including cervical complications)

    Measured: 3 years

  5. Use of a 26Fr resector

    Report of the rate of use of a 26Fr resector in the 18.5Fr group

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2018
  2. Study start1 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
308 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03402516
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016-A01740-51
Acronym
DIAPER
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
26 Dec 2017
Last updated
27 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 18.5 resector and 26Fr resector in people with Rate of Complete Resection in a Unique Surgical Time, run by Bicetre Hospital at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison with chi square test of rate of complete surgery in one time (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in