AzTrials
AzTrials

Patient SatisfactionNCT03403660

Physician Attire and Appreciation of Physician Communication in Postpartum Women

A study testing non White coat in people with Patient Satisfaction, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Wearing white coat during hospital rounds has been associated with increased risk of colonization and transmission of resistant pathogens. On the other hand, studies have shown that physicians' attire affects patients' confidence in their physician and the patient-physician relationship. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Patient Satisfaction
What is being tested?
non White coat
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
178 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 May 2017to 16 Jun 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Maternal age ≥ 18 years and <50 years
  • Patient admitted to postpartum floor at University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB)
  • Patient care managed by obstetric physicians during the postpartum period.

Who cannot join

  • Patient admitted to ICU
  • Delivery resulting in stillbirth Patient not fluent in Spanish and/or English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Universty of Texas Medical Branch

    Galveston, Texas, 77550

Other trials in United States

About this study

Wearing white coat during hospital rounds has been associated with increased risk of colonization and transmission of resistant pathogens. On the other hand, studies have shown that physicians' attire affects patients' confidence in their physician and the patient-physician relationship. The results of these studies were highly dependent on the practice setting, with no data in postpartum patients.

The objective is to test the hypothesis that not wearing a white coat during physician postpartum rounds impact patient-physician communication scores.

Read the detailed description

Patient satisfaction is an important measure of quality of care. One of the most important variables in patients satisfaction scores is the physician communication skills. There have been several studies evaluating different strategies to improve the patient perceptions of patient - physician communication including delayed physician rounds, improvement of handoff strategies, and family centered rounds. Additionally, research has shown that patients develop a first impression of their physician based on the physician's verbal and nonverbal communication, including the clothing and cleanliness. Patient - physician communication scores not only have an impact on patient care, but are also now linked to Medicare reimbursements.

White coats have been widely used in the medical profession, however some physicians believe that this can be a nonverbal barrier to patient's interaction. Prior studies on the impact of physician attire have reported conflicting results. In a survey published by Cha et al, obstetric and gynecologic patients seen in the outpatient clinic preferred that the resident use white coats. Another study showed that patients favor the use of white coat in the Internal Medicine outpatient clinic which may favorably influence trust and confidence in the medical encounter.

No randomized controlled trial has been published on the impact of the use of white coat on patient - physician communication scores in the postpartum patients. This trial's primary outcome is to evaluate the impact of physician attire (specifically wearing white coat) during postpartum rounds on "patient - physician communication" scores.

This study is a randomized controlled trial performed in postpartum patients to evaluate the impact of not wearing white coat during rounds on "patient - physician communication" scores.

Being tested
non White coat
Keywords
Attire, White coat, Patient physician communication
Medical subject headings
Patient Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • non White coatOther

    Postpartum patients are randomized to either arm of the study (white coat or standard scrub suit only) by location. All the obstetric physicians associated with patient's postpartum care should use or not use white coat in every single encounter with patient.

Study groups in NCT03403660
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
non white coat roundingExperimentalThe postpartum physician rounding in this group will be performed wearing white coat.
Receives: Other: non White coat
White coat roundingPlacebo comparatorThe postpartum physician rounding in this group will be performed not wearing white coat.
Receives: Other: non White coat

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient - physician communication score

    Obtained from the three Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) questions.

    Measured: 24 to 120 hours

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Hospital rating scores

    Obtained from one question of the HCAHPS survey

    Measured: 24 to 120 hours

  2. Recommending the hospital to friends and family

    Obtained from one question of the HCAHPS survey

    Measured: 24 to 120 hours

  3. Physician attire rating score

    Rated from 1 to 4

    Measured: 24 to 120 hours

  4. White coat use

    Patient answer if she remember or not if their physician were using white coat.

    Measured: 24 to 120 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2018
  2. Study start1 May 2017
  3. Primary completion16 Jun 2017
  4. Study completion16 Jun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Women are randomly assigned to having their postpartum physician team wear a white coat (WC) or not (no-WC) during rounds.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
178 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03403660
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB 17-0096
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
20 Dec 2017
Last updated
5 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing non White coat in people with Patient Satisfaction, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient - physician communication score (time frame: 24 to 120 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in