Helicobacter Pylori InfectionNCT03404440
Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori With a Lactobacillus Reuteri Strain Plus Proton Pump Inhibitor
A study testing L.Reuteri in people with Helicobacter Pylori Infection, run by University of Bari at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Meta-analyses involving >4000 subjects with probiotics added to antimicrobial Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in populations with antibiotic resistance have reported a mean increase in eradication rate of 12.2%. It is unclear how to translate that result into clinical practice. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Helicobacter Pylori Infection
- What is being tested?
- L.Reuteri
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2016to 1 Nov 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Scheduled for upper endoscopy for any reason
- Biopsy specimens indicative of Hp infection
- 13C-UBT indicative of Hp infection
- > 18 years of age
- Informed consent obtained
Who cannot join
- Severe gastritis
- Peptic ulcer
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Malignancy
- Other clinically significant condition
- Alcohol abuse
- Drug abuse
- Patients taking bismuth compounds, anti-secretory drugs, antibiotics or probiotics during 4 weeks preceding endoscopy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori With a Lactobacillus Reuteri Strain Combination (Strains DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 6475) and a Proton Pump Inhibitor
Meta-analyses involving >4000 subjects with probiotics added to antimicrobial Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in populations with antibiotic resistance have reported a mean increase in eradication rate of 12.2%. It is unclear how to translate that result into clinical practice.
To evaluate whether administration of Lactobacillus reuteri plus a PPI without antibiotics would eradicate H. pylori infections.
This was a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized 2 site study of L. reuteri (2 x 108 CFU L. reuteri DSM 17938 plus 2 x 108 CFU L. reuteri ATCC PTA 6475) 7 times per day or matching placebo plus 20 mg pantoprazole b.i.d. for 4 weeks. Cure was defined by negative 13C-UBT, 4 weeks after therapy. Sample size was based on obtaining >50% cures to be clinically useful as monotherapy.
Read the detailed description
Aim of study This double-blind study will assess if the combination of PPI and a strain combination (Gastrus) of L.reuteri can yield higher eradication rates if doses are increased and dose interval shortened. The aim is to achieve at least 50% eradication as assessed by UBT.
Study Product
Gastrus capsules:
2x108 CFU Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 + 2x108 CFU Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 6475.
Placebo capsules:
Identical in shape, colour and taste to Gastrus capsules but without the Lactobacillus reuteri components.
Both study products are delivered in identical containers containing 30 capsules.
Dosing Group 1: 1 Gastrus capsule 7 times per day + Pantoprazole 20 mg b.i.d. Group 2: 1 placebo capsule 7 times per day + Pantoprazole 20 mg b.i.d. One capsule of the Study Product are to be taken every 2-3 hours 7 times per day.
The Study Product containers will be collected at the day 28 visit and remaining tablets are counted and compliance checked.
40 mg Pantoprazole is to be taken just before breakfast and dinner (i.e. daily dose 80 mg).
Length of treatment The optimal length of dosing needed is unknown. Saggioro and Francavilla used 30 and 28 days respectively and Dore et al had a 60-day regimen. From a practical/economical/tolerability point of view, a 28-day regimen is suggested in order to shorten the time to triple-therapy for those non-eradicated. Those patients with H. pylori at the second UBT/Endoscopy (i.e. treatment failures) will be offered standard eradication therapy.
Compliance, PP and ITT In order to be assessed as "compliant" the participant should have consumed at least 75% (or other?) of the allotted doses. In order to improve compliance, the participants will be equipped with alarm-devices. Compliant patients will be assessed as Per-Protocol (PP). Patients that are non-compliant but have consumed at least one full day of doses (i.e. 14 tablets) will be included in the Intention-To-Treat analysis.
Outcomes Primary efficacy parameter Number of H. pylori-eradicated at 9 weeks as evidenced by Δ-13C-UBT < 5 ppm. The difference between active and placebo treatment will be compared.
Exploratory parameters Changes in GSRS at 4 and 9 weeks as compared to baseline and between groups. Changes of the gastric microbiota in the presence of PPI with or without Gastrus.
Sample size calculation Assuming that the spontaneous eradication is 5% or less, and that the desired eradication rate on active treatment is >50%, 23 subjects are needed in each group with a power of 90% and a confidence level of 95%. To correct for potential drop-outs, 25 subjects will be recruited to each group.
Ethical committee The study protocol will have to be approved by the local ethical committee before study start. Once approved, a protocol summary will be posted on clinicaltrials.gov.
Study flow and procedures Randomisation \& labelling Randomisation will be computerised using the tool provided by randomizer.org. A third party not otherwise involved in the study will label active and placebo Study Product. Randomisation lists will be kept in sealed envelopes at the study sites and a sealed copy will also be kept at BioGaia. The envelopes may not be open until all study data have been entered into the database and until the database has been locked. However, see "Serious Adverse Event" below.
Patients will be entered into the study sequentially by allocating the lowest available remaining randomisation number to the patient.
Procedures Histology During endoscopy two biopsy specimens are taken from the antrum, one from the angulus and two from the corpus. Hp-infection is defined as the presence of typical histology and bacteria on histological examination of biopsies stained by H\&E and GIEMSA. One additional biopsy from the corpus area is placed in PBS with 5% glycerol and stored at - 70 oC until further processing for microbiota analyses (see below.
Gastric microbiota analysis Bacterial DNA extraction and sequencing for microbiota analyses is performed according to a standardised protocol (Willing BP et. al 2010). Analysis of community structure focuses on sequencing of targeted regions e.g. the 16S rRNA gene using the Illumina Miseq high-throughput sequencing platform. Sequences are finally processed with the QIIME 1.8.0 pipeline (Caporaso JG et. al 2010).
13C-UBT According to standard protocol (Gatta L., et al. 2006). After the first UBT needed for inclusion, a second UBT will be performed at 8-9 weeks (4-5 weeks after end of study treatment) to assess Hp status.
Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). Participants will be asked to fill out the GSRS questionnaire after inclusion but before taking the first dose of study product, at 4 weeks (end of treatment) and at 8-9 weeks (at follow-up UBT) (Svedlund J. et al. 1988) Data collection The Principal Investigator will prepare one set of Case Record Forms (CRF) for each patient in which all data pertinent to the study will be entered.
Statistical methods All efficacy parameters will be analysed according to both ITT and PP. Safety considerations The investigator is responsible for monitoring the safety of subjects who have entered the study. All adverse events (AE) occurring after any administration of the study product will be followed to the end of the study or until resolution. AE will be evaluated by the Investigator and reported in the CRF.
Serious adverse events, as defined below, must be reported to the sponsor within 24 hours of when the investigator became aware of the SAE. It is also important to report all adverse events that result in permanent discontinuation of the study product, whether serious or non-serious.
Adverse Events An adverse event (AE) is any undesirable medical occurrence in a subject administered a study product, regardless of causality assessment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study product, whether or not considered related to the study product. All adverse events, including observed or volunteered problems, complaints, or symptoms are to be recorded on the case report form (CRF). Each adverse event is to be evaluated for duration, intensity, and causal relationship with the study product or other factors.
Subjects should be instructed to report any AE that they experience to the Investigator. Investigators should assess for AE at each visit. AE occurring during the clinical trial, including the follow-up period should be recorded on the appropriate AE CRF. To capture the most potentially relevant safety information during a clinical trial, it is important that investigators record accurate AE terms on CRF.
If discernible at the time of completing an AE in CRF, a specific disease or syndrome rather than individual associated signs and symptoms should be identified by the investigator and recorded on the CRF. However, if an observed or reported sign or symptom is not considered a component of a specific disease or syndrome by the investigator, it should be recorded as a separate AE on the CRF. Laboratory values will be collected on the laboratory CRF. Do not enter changes from baseline in laboratory values on the AE CRF.
Serious Adverse Events A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE that results in death is immediately life threatening requires or prolongs hospitalisation results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity is a medically significant event for any reason. Breaking the randomisation code In case that the responsible investigator decides that the randomisation code has to be revealed because that the AE may have been caused by the Study Product and that un-blinding is of essence for the further treatment of the patient, the following procedure will be followed: The responsible investigator will assign a professional otherwise not involved in the study to un-blind the Study Product for the specific patient. He/she will open the sealed envelope, find the relevant randomisation number and inform the responsible investigator without revealing any other randomisation numbers. He/she will then re-seal the envelope with transparent tape, date and sign on the tape.
- Conditions
- Helicobacter Pylori Infection
- Being tested
- L.Reuteri
- Keywords
- helicobacter pylori, L. Reuteri, Proton Pump Inhibitor
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
L.ReuteriOther
Also called Gastrus
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| L.Reuteri | Active comparator | Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 + Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 one tablet by mouth 7 times per day + Pantoprazole 20 mg twice a day for 28 days Receives: Other: L.Reuteri |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo one tablet by mouth 7 times per day + Pantoprazole 20 mg twice a day for 28 days Receives: Other: L.Reuteri |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Eradication
number of patients with H. pylori infection eradicated at 9 weeks assessed by Δ-13C-UBT <5‰
Measured: Four weeks after post treatmetn assessed by Δ-13C-UBT
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2018
- Study start15 Jan 2016
- Primary completion30 Jun 2017
- Study completion1 Nov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Helicobacter Pylori InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- double-blind randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bari
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ruggiero Francavilla, University of Bari
- Investigators
- ruggiero francavilla, Md PhD, Principal investigator, University of Bari
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03404440
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LRHPPPI
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 30 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 19 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bibbo S, Ahlstrom G, Pes GM, Graham DY, Engstrand L, Merola E, Dore MP. Resilience of the Gut Microbiome to Short Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy With or Without High-Dosage L. reuteri in H. pylori-Infected Adults. Helicobacter. 2025 Sep-Oct;30(5):e70064. doi: 10.1111/hel.70064.
PubMed 40993967Dore MP, Bibbo S, Pes GM, Francavilla R, Graham DY. Role of Probiotics in Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Lessons from a Study of Lactobacillus reuteri Strains DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 6475 (Gastrus(R)) and a Proton-Pump Inhibitor. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2019 Apr 1;2019:3409820. doi: 10.1155/2019/3409820. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31065301
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori With a Lactobacillus Reuteri Strain Combination (Strains DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 6475) and a Proton Pump Inhibitor
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03404440
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LRHPPPI
- Conditions
- Helicobacter Pylori Infection
- Keywords
- helicobacter pylori, L. Reuteri, Proton Pump Inhibitor
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BariUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Meta-analyses involving >4000 subjects with probiotics added to antimicrobial Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in populations with antibiotic resistance have reported a mean increase in eradication rate of 12.2%. It is unclear how to translate that result into clinical practice.
To evaluate whether administration of Lactobacillus reuteri plus a PPI without antibiotics would eradicate H. pylori infections.
This was a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized 2 site study of L. reuteri (2 x 108 CFU L. reuteri DSM 17938 plus 2 x 108 CFU L. reuteri ATCC PTA 6475) 7 times per day or matching placebo plus 20 mg pantoprazole b.i.d. for 4 weeks. Cure was defined by negative 13C-UBT, 4 weeks after therapy. Sample size was based on obtaining >50% cures to be clinically useful as monotherapy.
Detailed description
Aim of study This double-blind study will assess if the combination of PPI and a strain combination (Gastrus) of L.reuteri can yield higher eradication rates if doses are increased and dose interval shortened. The aim is to achieve at least 50% eradication as assessed by UBT.
Study Product
Gastrus capsules:
2x108 CFU Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 + 2x108 CFU Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 6475.
Placebo capsules:
Identical in shape, colour and taste to Gastrus capsules but without the Lactobacillus reuteri components.
Both study products are delivered in identical containers containing 30 capsules.
Dosing Group 1: 1 Gastrus capsule 7 times per day + Pantoprazole 20 mg b.i.d. Group 2: 1 placebo capsule 7 times per day + Pantoprazole 20 mg b.i.d. One capsule of the Study Product are to be taken every 2-3 hours 7 times per day.
The Study Product containers will be collected at the day 28 visit and remaining tablets are counted and compliance checked.
40 mg Pantoprazole is to be taken just before breakfast and dinner (i.e. daily dose 80 mg).
Length of treatment The optimal length of dosing needed is unknown. Saggioro and Francavilla used 30 and 28 days respectively and Dore et al had a 60-day regimen. From a practical/economical/tolerability point of view, a 28-day regimen is suggested in order to shorten the time to triple-therapy for those non-eradicated. Those patients with H. pylori at the second UBT/Endoscopy (i.e. treatment failures) will be offered standard eradication therapy.
Compliance, PP and ITT In order to be assessed as "compliant" the participant should have consumed at least 75% (or other?) of the allotted doses. In order to improve compliance, the participants will be equipped with alarm-devices. Compliant patients will be assessed as Per-Protocol (PP). Patients that are non-compliant but have consumed at least one full day of doses (i.e. 14 tablets) will be included in the Intention-To-Treat analysis.
Outcomes Primary efficacy parameter Number of H. pylori-eradicated at 9 weeks as evidenced by Δ-13C-UBT < 5 ppm. The difference between active and placebo treatment will be compared.
Exploratory parameters Changes in GSRS at 4 and 9 weeks as compared to baseline and between groups. Changes of the gastric microbiota in the presence of PPI with or without Gastrus.
Sample size calculation Assuming that the spontaneous eradication is 5% or less, and that the desired eradication rate on active treatment is >50%, 23 subjects are needed in each group with a power of 90% and a confidence level of 95%. To correct for potential drop-outs, 25 subjects will be recruited to each group.
Ethical committee The study protocol will have to be approved by the local ethical committee before study start. Once approved, a protocol summary will be posted on clinicaltrials.gov.
Study flow and procedures Randomisation \& labelling Randomisation will be computerised using the tool provided by randomizer.org. A third party not otherwise involved in the study will label active and placebo Study Product. Randomisation lists will be kept in sealed envelopes at the study sites and a sealed copy will also be kept at BioGaia. The envelopes may not be open until all study data have been entered into the database and until the database has been locked. However, see "Serious Adverse Event" below.
Patients will be entered into the study sequentially by allocating the lowest available remaining randomisation number to the patient.
Procedures Histology During endoscopy two biopsy specimens are taken from the antrum, one from the angulus and two from the corpus. Hp-infection is defined as the presence of typical histology and bacteria on histological examination of biopsies stained by H\&E and GIEMSA. One additional biopsy from the corpus area is placed in PBS with 5% glycerol and stored at - 70 oC until further processing for microbiota analyses (see below.
Gastric microbiota analysis Bacterial DNA extraction and sequencing for microbiota analyses is performed according to a standardised protocol (Willing BP et. al 2010). Analysis of community structure focuses on sequencing of targeted regions e.g. the 16S rRNA gene using the Illumina Miseq high-throughput sequencing platform. Sequences are finally processed with the QIIME 1.8.0 pipeline (Caporaso JG et. al 2010).
13C-UBT According to standard protocol (Gatta L., et al. 2006). After the first UBT needed for inclusion, a second UBT will be performed at 8-9 weeks (4-5 weeks after end of study treatment) to assess Hp status.
Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). Participants will be asked to fill out the GSRS questionnaire after inclusion but before taking the first dose of study product, at 4 weeks (end of treatment) and at 8-9 weeks (at follow-up UBT) (Svedlund J. et al. 1988) Data collection The Principal Investigator will prepare one set of Case Record Forms (CRF) for each patient in which all data pertinent to the study will be entered.
Statistical methods All efficacy parameters will be analysed according to both ITT and PP. Safety considerations The investigator is responsible for monitoring the safety of subjects who have entered the study. All adverse events (AE) occurring after any administration of the study product will be followed to the end of the study or until resolution. AE will be evaluated by the Investigator and reported in the CRF.
Serious adverse events, as defined below, must be reported to the sponsor within 24 hours of when the investigator became aware of the SAE. It is also important to report all adverse events that result in permanent discontinuation of the study product, whether serious or non-serious.
Adverse Events An adverse event (AE) is any undesirable medical occurrence in a subject administered a study product, regardless of causality assessment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study product, whether or not considered related to the study product. All adverse events, including observed or volunteered problems, complaints, or symptoms are to be recorded on the case report form (CRF). Each adverse event is to be evaluated for duration, intensity, and causal relationship with the study product or other factors.
Subjects should be instructed to report any AE that they experience to the Investigator. Investigators should assess for AE at each visit. AE occurring during the clinical trial, including the follow-up period should be recorded on the appropriate AE CRF. To capture the most potentially relevant safety information during a clinical trial, it is important that investigators record accurate AE terms on CRF.
If discernible at the time of completing an AE in CRF, a specific disease or syndrome rather than individual associated signs and symptoms should be identified by the investigator and recorded on the CRF. However, if an observed or reported sign or symptom is not considered a component of a specific disease or syndrome by the investigator, it should be recorded as a separate AE on the CRF. Laboratory values will be collected on the laboratory CRF. Do not enter changes from baseline in laboratory values on the AE CRF.
Serious Adverse Events A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE that results in death is immediately life threatening requires or prolongs hospitalisation results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity is a medically significant event for any reason. Breaking the randomisation code In case that the responsible investigator decides that the randomisation code has to be revealed because that the AE may have been caused by the Study Product and that un-blinding is of essence for the further treatment of the patient, the following procedure will be followed: The responsible investigator will assign a professional otherwise not involved in the study to un-blind the Study Product for the specific patient. He/she will open the sealed envelope, find the relevant randomisation number and inform the responsible investigator without revealing any other randomisation numbers. He/she will then re-seal the envelope with transparent tape, date and sign on the tape.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- double-blind randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| L.Reuteri | Active comparator | Other: L.ReuteriLactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 + Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 one tablet by mouth 7 times per day + Pantoprazole 20 mg twice a day for 28 days |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: L.ReuteriPlacebo one tablet by mouth 7 times per day + Pantoprazole 20 mg twice a day for 28 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Scheduled for upper endoscopy for any reason
- Biopsy specimens indicative of Hp infection
- 13C-UBT indicative of Hp infection
- > 18 years of age
- Informed consent obtained
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Severe gastritis
- Peptic ulcer
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Malignancy
- Other clinically significant condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| L.ReuteriAlso: Gastrus | Other | L.Reuteri, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Eradication
Time frame: Four weeks after post treatmetn assessed by Δ-13C-UBT
number of patients with H. pylori infection eradicated at 9 weeks assessed by Δ-13C-UBT <5‰
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jan 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40993967Bibbo S, Ahlstrom G, Pes GM, Graham DY, Engstrand L, Merola E, Dore MP. Resilience of the Gut Microbiome to Short Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy With or Without High-Dosage L. reuteri in H. pylori-Infected Adults. Helicobacter. 2025 Sep-Oct;30(5):e70064. doi: 10.1111/hel.70064.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31065301Dore MP, Bibbo S, Pes GM, Francavilla R, Graham DY. Role of Probiotics in Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Lessons from a Study of Lactobacillus reuteri Strains DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 6475 (Gastrus(R)) and a Proton-Pump Inhibitor. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2019 Apr 1;2019:3409820. doi: 10.1155/2019/3409820. eCollection 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Helicobacter Pylori Infection
RecruitingPhase 3
Keverprazan-Minocycline Dual Therapy of Different Durations Versus Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication.
Helicobacter Infection
RecruitingPhase 1
Impact of Eradication Therapy on Helicobacter Pylori Infection With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease:
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), With Poitive H Pylori
RecruitingObservational study
Feasibility and Performance of FFPE qPCR for Detection of Clarithromycin Resistance in Helicobacter Pylori
HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTIONS
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of Linarazen Gluconate Capsules Combined With Amoxicillin (Dual-Drug Therapy) Versus Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy for First-Line Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori Infection
HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTIONS
Not yet recruitingObservational study
European Implementation Study on Simultaneous Screening for Gastric and Colorectal Cancers
Helicobacter Pylori Infection, Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
ruggiero francavilla, Md PhD principal investigator
University of Bari
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing L.Reuteri in people with Helicobacter Pylori Infection, run by University of Bari at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Eradication (time frame: Four weeks after post treatmetn assessed by Δ-13C-UBT). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03404440, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jan 2018.