Study to Evaluate Switching From an E/C/F/TAF Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) Regimen or a TDF Containing Regimen to B/F/TAF FDC in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Infected Participants Aged ≥ 65 Years

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure. Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure. Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure. Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure. Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined timepoint within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 72 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined timepoint within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined timepoint within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using missing = failure approach. In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using missing = failure approach. In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 72 was analyzed using missing = failure approach. In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using missing = failure approach. In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach. In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach. In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 72 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach. In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach. In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).