AzTrials
AzTrials

LMA Versus Mgso4 in Attenuating Stress Response During Emergence of Supratentorial Tumours PatientsNCT03406403

A Comparative Study Between Laryngeal Mask Airway and Magensium Sulphate in Attenuating Systemic Stress Response During Emergence of Patients Undergoing Supratentorial Tumours.

A study testing Laryngeal mask airway and Magensium sulphate in people with LMA Versus Mgso4 in Attenuating Stress Response During Emergence of Supratentorial Tumours Patients, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the efficacy of replacement of ETT with LMA and administration of Magnesium sulphate at the end of the surgery in attenuating systemic stress response during emergence of patients undergoing supratentorial tumours Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Laryngeal mask airway and Magensium sulphate
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
19 Jan 2018to 1 Jun 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • ASA physical status I, II.
  • Ages between 18 and 60 years.
  • Body mass index (BMI) < 30.
  • Elective surgery

Who cannot join

  • Patients have cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic and endocrine diseases.
  • Patients have any degree of disturbed conscious level.
  • Ages <18 or >60 years.
  • BMI >30.
  • Patients have history of allergy to Magnesium sulphate.
  • Patients have uncontrolled hypertension during preoperative assessment.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients have risk of aspiration (eg. hiatus hernia)
  • Patients have difficult airway management during intubation with direct laryngoscope or time of intubation >30 seconds.
  • Failed ventilation with LMA.
  • Emergency surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Ahmed Abdalla Mohamed

    Cairo, 11451

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

To evaluate the efficacy of replacement of ETT with LMA and administration of Magnesium sulphate at the end of the surgery in attenuating systemic stress response during emergence of patients undergoing supratentorial tumours

Read the detailed description

Rapid recovery from neuroanesthesia and early neurological examination are desirable in most cases.(1)Although, Systemic and cerebral hemodynamic changes caused by extubation and emergence from anesthesia may endanger neurosurgical patients and increase the risk of postoperative intracranial hemorrhage and cerebral edema and may even result in the requirement of reoperation.(2) During this phase, heart rate and arterial blood pressure increase leading to increases in cerebral blood flow and intracranial pressure.(3) Some studies have reported such hemodynamic effects in up to 50% of patients after supratentorial craniotomy.(4,5) Replacing the endotracheal tube (ETT) with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) prior to emergence from anesthesia is safe and effectively reduces the cardiovascular response.(6) The potential protective benefit of this approach has not yet been demonstrated for awakening neurosurgery patients, however.

Magnesium is the forth most abundant cation in the body and the second most abundant intracellular cation. It activates many of the enzyme systems.(7) Magnesium sulphate inhibits catecholamines release from adrenergic nerve terminals and from adrenal medulla, through blocking N-type of Ca-channel at peripheral sympathetic nerve ending so it is used to decrease the adverse cardiovascular effects during larygeoscopy and endotracheal intubation.(8) But its role in attenuating stress response during extubation is not well studied and need more research.

Being tested
Laryngeal mask airway, Magensium sulphate, Control group (closure of anesthetics)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laryngeal mask airwayDevice

    After obtaining approval of the ethics committee of Kasr Al Ainy Hospitals and informed written consents from the patients, this study will be performed on 20 patients in Kasr Al Ainy Hospitals with ASA physical status I, II and ages between 18 and 60 years undergoing undergoing supratentorial tumours excision under general anesthesia

  • Magensium sulphateDrug

    After obtaining approval of the ethics committee of Kasr Al Ainy Hospitals and informed written consents from the patients, this study will be performed on 20 patients in Kasr Al Ainy Hospitals with ASA physical status I, II and ages between 18 and 60 years undergoing undergoing supratentorial tumours excision under general anesthesia

  • Control group (closure of anesthetics)Other

    After obtaining approval of the ethics committee of Kasr Al Ainy Hospitals and informed written consents from the patients, this study will be performed on 20 patients in Kasr Al Ainy Hospitals with ASA physical status I, II and ages between 18 and 60 years undergoing undergoing supratentorial tumours excision under general anesthesia

Study groups in NCT03406403
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Laryngeal mask airway groupActive comparator20 slips of papers will be taken and labeled as group L (LMA) These slips will be placed in an envelope and one slip will be raised for each patient.
Receives: Device: Laryngeal mask airway; Drug: Magensium sulphate; Other: Control group (closure of anesthetics)
Magensium sulphate groupActive comparator20 slips of papers will be taken and labeled as group M (Mgso4) These slips will be placed in an envelope and one slip will be raised for each patient
Receives: Device: Laryngeal mask airway; Drug: Magensium sulphate; Other: Control group (closure of anesthetics)
Control group (closure of anesthetics)Active comparator20 slips of papers will be taken and labeled as group C (Control) These slips will be placed in an envelope and one slip will be raised for each patient.
Receives: Device: Laryngeal mask airway; Drug: Magensium sulphate; Other: Control group (closure of anesthetics)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean arterial blood presure

    Total dose of nitroglycerin needed in each group to maintain mean blood pressure within 20 % of basal line.

    Measured: 5 minutes from closure of anesthetics until 15 minutes after extubation

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Intracranial pressure Measurement

    Intracranial pressure will be measured at these moments: basal line preinduction, end of surgery, before extubation and 1, 10 minutes after extubation.

    Measured: 1 and 10 minutes after extubation.

  2. Quality of extubation

    Qualityof extubation will be evaluated based on cough immediately after extubation, using a five point rating scale

    Measured: Time Onset of cough immediately after extubation

  3. Level of consciousness

    consciousness level will be recorded based on Ramasy score scale at 5 and 15 minutes after extubation, using the following indices

    Measured: 5 and 15 minutes after extubation

  4. End of surgery and extubation

    Time interval between end of surgery and extubation in each group

    Measured: intraoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2018
  2. Study start19 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion31 May 2018
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
We hypothesize that the LMA is more effective than Magnesium sulphate in attenuating systemic stress response during emergence of patients undergoing supratentorial tumours
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03406403
Sponsor's protocol ID
N-102-2017
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
26 Dec 2017
Last updated
6 Jun 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Via scholar Gate

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laryngeal mask airway and Magensium sulphate in people with LMA Versus Mgso4 in Attenuating Stress Response During Emergence of Supratentorial Tumours Patients, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean arterial blood presure (time frame: 5 minutes from closure of anesthetics until 15 minutes after extubation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in