AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerPhase 2NCT03407430

Trial of Pregabalin for Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (GCSF)-Induced Bone Pain

A Phase 2 study testing Pregabalin in people with Breast Cancer and Lymphoma, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Purpose: To evaluate the preventative effects of pregabalin on pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain in cycle 1. Because granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptors are found at nerve endings which modulate the pain signal, blocking this with pregabalin is theorized to prevent the occurrence of this adverse… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer, Lymphoma, Pain
What is being tested?
Pregabalin
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
11 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
27 Jan 2016to 20 Jul 2017
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of a non-myeloid hematologic malignancy scheduled to initiate a cycle of chemotherapy that requires prophylactic use of a granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor (based on the provider's discretion), provided the schedule of chemotherapy cycles allows the use of pegfilgrastim at a dose of 6 mg SC once per cycle OR Diagnosis of breast cancer scheduled to initiate dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy or docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) chemotherapy that requires prophylactic use of a granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor, provided the schedule of chemotherapy cycles allows the use of pegfilgrastim, at a dose of 6 mg SC once per cycle; pegfilgrastim scheduled for 24 hours post chemotherapy.
  • Schedule of chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim initiation can accommodate initiation of pregabalin 4 days prior to pegfilgrastim dose.
  • Baseline pain scores <7 as measured via 10-point numerical scale for pain (see section 11.1); pain score and use of any non-opioid pain medication must be self-reported as stable (same dose and frequency) over the 7 days prior to screening; for opioids, patient must self-report the same dose and frequency over the 28 days prior to screening. Patients who are receiving peri-procedural short-acting analgesics will still be included as long as they are no longer receiving analgesics by D1 of chemotherapy.

Who cannot join

  • A history of (within one month) or current pregabalin use.
  • Baseline pain scores ≥7 as measured via 10-point numerical scale for pain (see section 11.1).
  • Unwilling to discontinue use of antihistamines from 7 days prior to D1 of study medication.
  • Creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≤60 ml/min (as measured via Cockcroft-Gault) based on serum creatinine measured as part of standard of care prior to administration of chemotherapy
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test prior to initiating therapy (note, this test should be standard of care prior to administration of chemotherapy).
  • Patient is unable or unwilling to abide by the study protocol or cooperate fully with the investigator.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Eligible and agrees to enroll into therapeutic trial ongoing at the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (LCCC) (i.e., the treatment trial will take precedence over LCCC1314).
  • Currently receiving therapeutic doses of anticoagulants (ie, prophylactic use of anticoagulants is allowed) due to possibility of dizziness and falls while on pregabalin.
  • Currently receiving aromatase inhibitors or agents targeted against Ph+ leukemias (i.e., imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib) or scheduled to start these drugs during cycle 1 of scheduled chemotherapy.
  • Presence of bone metastases.
  • History of angioedema.
  • History of a seizure disorder.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • North Carolina Cancer Hospital

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase II, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomized Crossover Trial of Pregabalin for the Prophylaxis of Pegfilgrastim-induced Bone Pain

Purpose:

To evaluate the preventative effects of pregabalin on pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain in cycle 1. Because granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptors are found at nerve endings which modulate the pain signal, blocking this with pregabalin is theorized to prevent the occurrence of this adverse effect.

Read more

Participants:

Patients will be at least 18 years of age with either a diagnosis of a non-myeloid hematologic malignancy scheduled to initiate a cycle of chemotherapy that requires prophylactic use of a G-CSF, or with a diagnosis of breast cancer scheduled to initiate dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy or docetaxel/cyclophosphamide that requires prophylactic use of a G-CSF.

Procedures (methods):

This is a randomized (1:1), single center, placebo-controlled, double blind, crossover phase II study. The primary objective is to compare the proportion of patients who have an increase in pain score of ≥3 from baseline in cycle 1 between Arm A (pregabalin) and Arm B (placebo). In consultation with the treating physician, the PI will determine what day pegfilgrastim will be initiated in each eligible, consented patient. Pregabalin or placebo will begin 4 days prior to pegfilgrastim administration, and continue for 7 additional days starting the day of pegfilgrastim administration.

Read the detailed description

Study Synopsis

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single center, crossover phase II clinical trial investigating the prophylactic analgesic effects of pregabalin (Lyrica®) during the first two cycles of chemotherapy in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®). The investigators have restricted enrollment in this trial to breast cancer patients and those with hematological malignancies, who require pegfilgrastim prophylactically. Pegfilgrastim is associated with bone pain (which can be severe) when used in these populations.

In this study 60 patients are randomized to Arm A (pregabalin in cycle 1; placebo in cycle 2) or Arm B (placebo in cycle 1; pregabalin in cycle 2). The primary objective is to compare the proportion of patients who have an increase in pain score of ≥3 from baseline through the end of study medication in cycle 1 between Arm A (pregabalin) and Arm B (placebo).

A secondary objective is to compare of the proportion of patients with an increase in pain score of ≥3 from baseline between pregabalin and placebo across the 2 cycles. Other outcomes evaluated are the safety of this combination, the proportion of patients with an increase in bone/joint pain score of ≥3 from baseline, the proportion of patients with severe pain, the maximum change in pain score, and time to and number of days of rescue (breakthrough) analgesics.

For measuring pain, the investigators will rely on a validated 10-point numerical pain scale that patients will complete prior to initiation of pregabalin in each cycle, and for 7 days starting the day of pegfilgrastim administration in each cycle.

Pegfilgrastim is a pegylated form of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) which is FDA approved to decrease the duration of neutropenia, thus the incidence of infection, by stimulating granulocyte production in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy associated with a significant risk of febrile neutropenia. As a long-acting product, this pegylated version is administered once per chemotherapy cycle, 24-72 hours after chemotherapy is complete.

Bone and skeletal pain due to pegfilgrastim have been reported in early clinical trials at rates of 22-33%, with sites of pain commonly noted in the lower back, posterior iliac crest and sternum. However more recent studies have found incidences as high as 59-71% with 27% experiencing severe pain (pain greater than 5 on a 10-point scale). Notably, Kirshner and colleagues conducted a phase III randomized trial evaluating the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) naproxen for the prevention of pegfilgrastim-related bone pain in patients with nonmyeloid cancer. Patients completed questionnaires at home documenting any new bone or joint pain post pegfilgrastim. The majority enrolled (68%) had breast cancer, and 7% had hematological malignancies. In this study of 510 patients, (257 on naproxen and 253 on placebo), the overall pain incidence was 71.3% (27% severe) in the placebo group and 61.1 % (19.2% severe) in the naproxen group. While naproxen significantly reduced the incidence of all and severe bone pain, and reduced the duration of bone pain (from 2.4 to 1.9 days), the authors concluded that novel preventive strategies are needed given the high incidence of bone pain even when naproxen is used for treatment.

The average onset of bone pain is 4 days after initiation of pegfilgrastim and with a duration of between 2-3 consecutive days. Because patients get multiple cycles of chemotherapy every 14-28 days, these repeated episodes of bone pain can significantly hinder quality of life. In the case where pegfilgrastim is withheld because of severe bone pain, chemotherapy dose-intensity and schedule often cannot be maintained threatening efficacy in addition to an increased potential for infectious complications.

Bone pain secondary to pegfilgrastim is usually treated with NSAIDs such as ibuprofen or naproxen, or opioids. Opioids are often preferred over NSAIDs because patients may be thrombocytopenic and at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding, and NSAIDs increase the risk of both of these adverse events. In addition, NSAIDs have an antipyretic property which is problematic in neutropenic patients. Their use can mask febrile neutropenia, which could mean an important sign of infection is missed in immunocompromised hosts. Because there are no established predictive factors for development of bone pain, nearly all patients who get pegfilgrastim receive a prescription for opioids in case they experience pain. Patients do not take pain medications to prevent the pain, but instead generally wait until they experience pain before starting these analgesics. In general, pain is more difficult to control once it has started, thus a prophylactic strategy may be more advantageous. To avoid any impact on the dose and/or schedule of chemotherapy, it would be optimal to prevent bone pain occurring after administration of pegfilgrastim, rather than advising the patient to treat this pain if/when it happens.

Primary Objective

Compare the proportion of patients who have an increase in pain score of ≥ 3 from baseline through the end of study medication in cycle 1 between Arm A and Arm B

Secondary Objectives

  • Compare the proportion of patients who have an increase in pain score of ≥ 3 from baseline between pregabalin and placebo across the 2 cycles
  • Compare the proportion of patients who have an increase in bone/joint pain score of ≥ 3 from baseline through the end of study medication in cycle 1 between Arm A and Arm B
  • Compare the number of days of breakthrough analgesic use between pregabalin and placebo within cycle 1 and across the 2 cycles
  • Compare the proportion of patients with severe pain between pregabalin and placebo within cycle 1 and across the 2 cycles
  • Compare the maximum change in pain score from baseline between pregabalin and placebo within cycle 1 and across the 2 cycles
  • Compare the maximum neuropathic pain score between pregabalin and placebo within cycle 1 and across the 2 cycles
  • Describe the safety (assessed via NCI CTCAE v4) of pregabalin when used in the prevention of bone pain secondary to pegfilgrastim

Exploratory Objective

  • Compare pain measures between pregabalin and placebo in the breast cancer and hematological malignancy subgroups separately within cycle 1 and across the 2 cycles
  • Compare the time to first breakthrough analgesic use between pregabalin and placebo during cycle 1

Primary Endpoint

Pain score is based on a 10-point numerical scale (see section 11.1) for pain as documented at baseline (at screening for cycle 1 and day 1 of study medication prior to cycle 2) and on patient log (see section 11.3) for 7 days starting the day of pegfilgrastim administration

Secondary/Exploratory Endpoints

  • Bone/joint pain score is based on a 10-point numerical scale (see section 11.1) for pain as documented at baseline (at screening for cycle 1 and day 1 of study medication prior to cycle 2) and on patient log (see section 11.3) for 7 days starting the day of pegfilgrastim administration
  • Severe pain will be measured using the 10-point numerical scale for pain (see section 11.1) as documented on the patient log (section 11.3; severe pain is defined as a score >5 on this scale, similar to Kirshner and colleagues3)
  • A day of breakthrough analgesic use is defined as any day in which patient increases the dose of any pain medication compared to baseline, or the addition of a new pain medication as documented on patient log (see section 11.3); time to first breakthrough analgesic use is defined as the time in days from pegfilgrastim administration to the first day patient uses breakthrough analgesic
  • Neuropathic pain is assessed via the Neuropathic Pain Scale (see section 11.2) as documented from phone calls twice during study medication administration post pegfilgrastim administration.
Being tested
Pregabalin, Placebo
Keywords
Pregabalin, Bone pain, Pegfilgrastim, Supportive care, prevention
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms, Lymphoma, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PregabalinDrug

    Also called Pregabalin/Placebo

    During the first chemotherapy cycle, the patient will receive pregabalin 75mg (1 capsule) BID x 4 days before pegfilgrastim 6mg subcutaneous (SC) x1; then pregabalin 150mg (2 capsules) BID x 7 days. During the second chemotherapy cycle, the patient will receive placebo in the same dosing scheme.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called Placebo/Pregabalin

    During the first chemotherapy cycle, the patient will receive placebo (1 capsule) BID x 4 days before pegfilgrastim 6mg SC x1; then placebo (2 capsules) BID x 7 days. During the second chemotherapy cycle, the patient will receive pregabalin in the same dosing scheme.

Study groups in NCT03407430
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pregabalin, then PlaceboExperimentalPregabalin in cycle 1; placebo in cycle 2. Pregabalin or matching placebo will be administered at 75 mg twice a day (BID) for 4 days, to patients receiving pegfilgrastim for hematologic malignancies or breast cancer patients on myelosuppressive chemotherapy . Starting the day of pegfilgrastim, the dose of study medication will be increased to 150 mg PO BID provided the patient is tolerating the lower dose (ie, they are not experiencing any pregabalin associated toxicities >Grade 1). This will be determined by the research team on the day of pegfilgrastim administration.
Receives: Drug: Pregabalin
Placebo, then PregabalinExperimentalPlacebo in cycle 1; pregabalin in cycle 2. Pregabalin or matching placebo will be administered at 75 mg BID for 4 days, to patients receiving pegfilgrastim for hematologic malignancies or breast cancer patients on myelosuppressive chemotherapy . Starting the day of pegfilgrastim, the dose of study medication will be increased to 150 mg PO BID provided the patient is tolerating the lower dose (ie, they are not experiencing any pregabalin associated toxicities >Grade 1). This will be determined by the research team on the day of pegfilgrastim administration.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Patients Who Have an Increase in Pain Score of ≥ 3 From Baseline Through the End of Study Medication in Cycle 1

    Compare the proportion of patients who have an increase in pain score of ≥ 3 from baseline through the end of study medication in cycle 1 between Arm A and Arm B.

    The ten-point numerical scale is scored from 0 to 10. They will use this scale to rate their pain (and separately bone/joint pain) with 0 signifying "no pain" and 10 signifying "the worst pain you can imagine."

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Proportion of Patients Who Have an Increase in Pain Score of ≥ 3 From Baseline Between Pregabalin and Placebo Across the 2 Cycles

    Compare the proportion of patients who have an increase in pain score of ≥ 3 from baseline between pregabalin and placebo across the 2 cycles.

    The ten-point numerical scale is scored from 0 to 10. They will use this scale to rate their pain (and separately bone/joint pain) with 0 signifying "no pain" and 10 signifying "the worst pain you can imagine."

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  2. Proportion of Patients Who Have an Increase in Bone/Joint Pain Score of ≥ 3 From Baseline Through the End of Study Medication in Cycle 1

    Compare the proportion of patients who have an increase in bone/joint pain score of ≥ 3 from baseline through the end of study medication in cycle 1 between Arm A and Arm B.

    The ten-point numerical scale is scored from 0 to 10. They will use this scale to rate their pain (and separately bone/joint pain) with 0 signifying "no pain" and 10 signifying "the worst pain you can imagine."

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  3. Number of Days of Breakthrough Analgesic Use Between Pregabalin and Placebo Across the 2 Cycles

    Compare the number of days of breakthrough analgesic use between pregabalin and placebo within cycle 1 and across the 2 cycles.

    The number of days of breakthrough analgesic use (i.e additional pain medication being required) is evaluated based on participant-provided medication logs kept during study treatment. If additional pain medication outside of their normal pain control regimen was reported, this day counts as 1. The total days for each patient are then reported, with a total range from zero to 14 (for patients with breast cancer) or zero to 21 (for patients with a lymphoma).

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  4. Proportion of Patients With Severe Pain Between Pregabalin and Placebo Across the 2 Cycles

    Compare the proportion of patients with severe pain between pregabalin and placebo within cycle 1 and across the 2 cycles.

    The ten-point numerical scale is scored from 0 to 10. They will use this scale to rate their pain (and separately bone/joint pain) with 0 signifying "no pain" and 10 signifying "the worst pain you can imagine."

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  5. Maximum Change in Pain Score From Baseline Between Pregabalin and Placebo Across the 2 Cycles

    Compare the maximum change in pain score from baseline between pregabalin and placebo within cycle 1 and across the 2 cycles.

    The ten-point numerical scale is scored from 0 to 10. They will use this scale to rate their pain (and separately bone/joint pain) with 0 signifying "no pain" and 10 signifying "the worst pain you can imagine." Each patient will be assessed regularly, including: before therapeutic intervention (i.e. at consent/screening), first day of chemotherapy administration (during cycles 1 \& 2), 4 days after pegfilgrastim administration (during cycles 1 \& 2), and 8 days after pegfilgrastim administration (during cycles 1 \& 2).

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  6. Maximum Neuropathic Pain Score Between Pregabalin and Placebo Across the 2 Cycles

    Compare the maximum neuropathic pain score between pregabalin and placebo within cycle 1 and across the 2 cycles.

    The "ID Pain" scale (also know as the "Identify Pain" scale) is a 6-item, participant-completed screening tool designed to help differentiate nociceptive and neuropathic pain. This pain score also helps to evaluate the presence/absence of neuropathic pain at a given point of time.

    1. Did the pain feel like pins and needles?
    2. Did the pain feel hot/burning?
    3. Did the pain feel numb?
    4. Did the pain feel like electrical shocks?
    5. Is the pain made worse with the touch of clothing or bed sheets?
    6. Is the pain limited to your joints?

    A "yes" response to questions 1-5 are scored as 1; for question 6, a "yes" is scored as -1. As such, higher scores (approaching 5) signify worse outcomes. The scale's total range for a patient is -1 to 5.

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  7. Number of Subjects That Experienced a Grade 2 or Higher Adverse Events When Taking Pregabalin

    CTCAE The NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events is a descriptive terminology utilized for Adverse Event (AE) reporting. A grading (severity) scale is provided for each AE term. Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE.

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2018
  2. Study start27 Jan 2016
  3. Primary completion3 Jun 2017
  4. Study completion20 Jul 2017

Why it stopped: Low patient accrual

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
placebo-controlled, double blind, randomized crossover trial
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
11 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03407430
Sponsor's protocol ID
LCCC 1314
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
2 Jan 2018
Last updated
26 Jun 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared and kept confidential.

Publications

  • Amgen. Pegfilgrastim. Package Insert. Accessed June 9, 2013

  • Kirshner J, Hickock J, Hofman M. Pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain: Incidence, risk factors, and management in a community practice. Comm Onc 4:455-459, 2007.

  • Kirshner JJ, Heckler CE, Janelsins MC, Dakhil SR, Hopkins JO, Coles C, Morrow GR. Prevention of pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain: a phase III double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the university of rochester cancer center clinical community oncology program research base. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1974-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.8364. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

    PubMed 22508813
  • Kubista E, Glaspy J, Holmes FA, Green MD, Hackett J, Neumann T; Pegfilgrastim Study Group. Bone pain associated with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim is similar to daily filgrastim in patients with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2003 Feb;3(6):391-8. doi: 10.3816/cbc.2003.n.003.

    PubMed 12636878
  • Tassone DM, Boyce E, Guyer J, Nuzum D. Pregabalin: a novel gamma-aminobutyric acid analogue in the treatment of neuropathic pain, partial-onset seizures, and anxiety disorders. Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):26-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.013.

    PubMed 17379045

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Pregabalin in people with Breast Cancer and Lymphoma, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jun 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Patients Who Have an Increase in Pain Score of ≥ 3 From Baseline Through the End of Study Medication in Cycle 1 (time frame: Up to 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03407430, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in