PregnancyNCT03407625
Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor
A study testing Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol and Oral Misoprostol in people with Pregnancy and Labor, Induced, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Induction of labor is associated with increased cesarean delivery rates, particularly in women with an unfavorable cervix. Both pharmacologic and mechanical methods are utilized for cervical ripening and labor induction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy, Labor, Induced
- What is being tested?
- Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol and Oral Misoprostol
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,227 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2018to 13 May 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 37 weeks gestation or greater
- Living, singleton fetus
- No major fetal malformations
- Cephalic presentation
- No prior uterine scar
- Intact fetal membranes
Show all 9Show fewer
- Qualifies for prostaglandin administration according to current Parkland protocol
- Have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os
- Have an indication for induction or attempted induction of labor according to Parkland protocol
Who cannot join
- latex allergy
- non-reassuring fetal status
- HIV
- active herpes outbreak
- Prior uterine scar
- Contraindication to prostaglandins according to current Parkland protocol
- Contraindication to vaginal delivery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Parkland Health and Hospital Systems
Dallas, Texas, 75235
About this study
Official title: Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Cluster Randomized Trial
Induction of labor is associated with increased cesarean delivery rates, particularly in women with an unfavorable cervix. Both pharmacologic and mechanical methods are utilized for cervical ripening and labor induction. Evidence on the safety and effectiveness of various mechanical and pharmacologic methods of cervical ripening and labor induction is abundant, and yet the majority of clinical trials evaluate time to delivery, rather than mode of delivery. This is a prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial to compare a standard method of induction at our institution (oral misoprostol) with an alternative, commonly used combination method of oral misoprostol and transcervical foley bulb in women with term pregnancies requiring induction of labor.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a transcervical foley catheter, in combination with the standard oral misoprostol regimen will result in a decreased primary cesarean delivery rate among women with a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters of less who require induction of labor at term. This study is not an FDA-regulated study: there is no intent to test the foley bulb under an FDA-regulated protocol. Likewise, there is no intent to submit the results of this study for a change in the labeling of the foley used for this study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and by the Office of Research Administration at Parkland Health and Hospital System.
This will be a prospective, cluster-randomized trial comparing two accepted methods of induction of labor at term among women who present for delivery at Parkland Hospital. Eligible participants will include nulliparous and multiparous women at 37 weeks gestation or greater, with a living, singleton fetus and no major fetal malformations, in cephalic presentation, with intact membranes, no prior uterine scar, who qualify for prostaglandin administration and who have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os. Patients with latex allergy, non-reassuring fetal status, HIV, active herpes outbreak, a prior uterine scar, or any contraindication to prostaglandins (including 4 or more painful contractions per 10 minutes prior to prostaglandin administration) will be excluded from participation in the study.
Computer-generated cluster randomization will occur on a weekly basis for all study participants, to either the combination method of foley bulb plus oral misoprostol regimen (study group) or to oral misoprostol alone regimen (control).
According to the randomization protocol each week, participants will be randomized to either the standard of care (oral misoprostol/control group) or standard of care plus foley bulb (study group). The study group will undergo placement of a 30 French foley catheter filled with 30-35cc sterile saline into the cervix in addition to the standard regimen of oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses, for patients who meet criteria for fetal well-being, and do not had more than 4 painful contractions in 10 minutes. Misoprostol will not be administered to patients who have progressed to active labor, defined as 4 centimeters cervical dilation. The control group will undergo induction with our current standard oral misoprostol protocol alone, administered as 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses. Both groups will receive oxytocin as indicated by current labor protocols at our institution.
The primary outcome will be the rate of vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes will include obstetric outcomes, maternal outcomes, and neonatal outcomes. Obstetric outcomes will include indication for induction, need for oxytocin, indication for cesarean delivery, time to active labor, time to delivery, labor analgesia, presence of chorioamnionitis, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, terbutaline use, tachysystole (defined as 6 or more contractions in 10 minutes or tetanic contraction of 120 seconds or longer) or hyperstimulation syndrome (defined as tachysystole accompanied by fetal heart rate decelerations). Maternal outcomes will include estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement, postpartum fever, uterine rupture, and unplanned hysterectomy. Neonatal outcomes will include umbilical cord blood pH, 5-minute APGAR score, intubation or ventilation in the delivery room, neonatal sepsis, and admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission.
- Conditions
- Pregnancy, Labor, Induced
- Being tested
- Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol, Oral Misoprostol
- Keywords
- Pregnancy, Labor Induction, Cervical Ripening
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Foley bulb plus Oral MisoprostolOther
Although labeled "experimental" for comparison purposes, this is not an experimental intervention, as the method is a currently accepted standard of care for cervical ripening and labor induction in the United States.
Oral MisoprostolOther
Patients will receive standard oral misoprostol 100mcg according to current Labor Induction Protocol.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol | Experimental | Patients will received initial transcervical foley bulb, followed by oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses. Receives: Other: Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol |
| Oral Misoprostol | Active comparator | Patients will receive oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses. Receives: Other: Oral Misoprostol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Vaginal Delivery
vaginal delivery at first induction
Measured: at delivery
Secondary outcomes (23)
Time to Delivery
Time (in hours) from start of induction agent to delivery at first induction
Measured: from start of induction agent to time of delivery
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Among women delivered by cesarean, the indication for cesarean
Measured: at delivery
Dose of Oxytocin Given (mcg or mg)
Total dose of oxytocin given for induction as calculated by volume infused, concentration of solution and rate of infusion
Measured: at delivery
Time With Foley Bulb in Place
time (in hours) from insertion to removal or expulsion of foley bulb
Measured: From time of documented insertion until the time of documented expulsion or removal, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 hours.
Presence of Chorioamnionitis
Intrapartum fever (temp equal or greater than 38C) with no other identified cause
Measured: at delivery
Use of Intravenous Analgesia During Labor
Intravenous analgesia used between the start of induction and delivery
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants Used Neuraxial Analgesia During Labor
Regional or neuraxial analgesia (labor epidural or spinal) used between the start of induction and delivery
Measured: from start of induction to delivery
Number of Participants Used General Anesthesia for Delivery
General anesthesia administered for delivery
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants With Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid
Identification of any meconium (green tinge) in the amniotic fluid before or during delivery by a healthcare provider's assessment of gross fluid color.
Measured: At the time of rupture of membranes and at delivery
Terbutaline Use
Administration of terbutaline, a tocolytic agent, for tetanic contractions with or without fetal heart rate decelerations
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants With Tachysystole
6 or more contractions in 10 minutes or tetanic contraction of 120 seconds or longer
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants With Uterine Hyperstimulation Syndrome
Tachysystole accompanied by fetal heart rate decelerations
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants With Excess Blood Loss
Maternal excess blood loss is defined as >500ml for vaginal and >1000ml for cesarean delivery
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants With Blood Transfusion
administration of blood products related to delivery blood loss
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants With Uterine Rupture
spontaneous separation of myometrium in a previously intact, unscarred uterus
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants With Unplanned Hysterectomy
unplanned removal of the uterus following delivery of the fetus
Measured: at discharge from the hospital following delivery
Number of Participants With Postpartum Fever
Fever recorded in the time after delivery but prior to discharge from the hospital, with clinical assessment of endometritis
Measured: Following delivery and prior to discharge
Number of Participants With Umbilical Cord Blood pH <7.0
Arterial or venous cord blood pH defined as <7.0
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants With an 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 4
Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respirations - scored from 0 to 2 for each component, added to make a total score and used as an assessment of initial response to newborn resuscitation, lower scores associated with poor outcomes. Here defined as Apgar less than 4 at 5 minutes.
Measured: 5 minutes after time of birth
Number of Participants That Needed Mechanical Ventilation in Delivery Room (Yes/No)
Intubation with mechanical support or control of neonatal breathing in delivery room
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants Administered Neonatal Antibiotics and/or Neonatal Blood Cultures
Administration of neonatal antibiotics and/or neonatal blood cultures
Measured: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Participants With Neonatal Sepsis
Neonatal bacteremia as defined by bacterial growth in blood cultures
Measured: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Participants With NICU Admission Order
Admission order to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) placed between the time of delivery and infant discharge
Measured: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2018
- Primary completion13 May 2019
- Study completion13 May 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PregnancyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Cluster randomized trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,227 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Emily Adhikari, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Investigators
- Emily H Adhikari, MD, Principal investigator, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03407625
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STU 092016-026
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Adhikari EH, Nelson DB, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Foley Bulb Added to an Oral Misoprostol Induction Protocol: A Cluster Randomized Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;136(5):953-961. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004123.
PubMed 33030881
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Cluster Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03407625
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STU 092016-026
- Conditions
- Pregnancy, Labor, Induced
- Keywords
- Pregnancy, Labor Induction, Cervical Ripening
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,227 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 4 Nov 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Induction of labor is associated with increased cesarean delivery rates, particularly in women with an unfavorable cervix. Both pharmacologic and mechanical methods are utilized for cervical ripening and labor induction. Evidence on the safety and effectiveness of various mechanical and pharmacologic methods of cervical ripening and labor induction is abundant, and yet the majority of clinical trials evaluate time to delivery, rather than mode of delivery. This is a prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial to compare a standard method of induction at our institution (oral misoprostol) with an alternative, commonly used combination method of oral misoprostol and transcervical foley bulb in women with term pregnancies requiring induction of labor.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a transcervical foley catheter, in combination with the standard oral misoprostol regimen will result in a decreased primary cesarean delivery rate among women with a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters of less who require induction of labor at term. This study is not an FDA-regulated study: there is no intent to test the foley bulb under an FDA-regulated protocol. Likewise, there is no intent to submit the results of this study for a change in the labeling of the foley used for this study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and by the Office of Research Administration at Parkland Health and Hospital System.
This will be a prospective, cluster-randomized trial comparing two accepted methods of induction of labor at term among women who present for delivery at Parkland Hospital. Eligible participants will include nulliparous and multiparous women at 37 weeks gestation or greater, with a living, singleton fetus and no major fetal malformations, in cephalic presentation, with intact membranes, no prior uterine scar, who qualify for prostaglandin administration and who have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os. Patients with latex allergy, non-reassuring fetal status, HIV, active herpes outbreak, a prior uterine scar, or any contraindication to prostaglandins (including 4 or more painful contractions per 10 minutes prior to prostaglandin administration) will be excluded from participation in the study.
Computer-generated cluster randomization will occur on a weekly basis for all study participants, to either the combination method of foley bulb plus oral misoprostol regimen (study group) or to oral misoprostol alone regimen (control).
According to the randomization protocol each week, participants will be randomized to either the standard of care (oral misoprostol/control group) or standard of care plus foley bulb (study group). The study group will undergo placement of a 30 French foley catheter filled with 30-35cc sterile saline into the cervix in addition to the standard regimen of oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses, for patients who meet criteria for fetal well-being, and do not had more than 4 painful contractions in 10 minutes. Misoprostol will not be administered to patients who have progressed to active labor, defined as 4 centimeters cervical dilation. The control group will undergo induction with our current standard oral misoprostol protocol alone, administered as 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses. Both groups will receive oxytocin as indicated by current labor protocols at our institution.
The primary outcome will be the rate of vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes will include obstetric outcomes, maternal outcomes, and neonatal outcomes. Obstetric outcomes will include indication for induction, need for oxytocin, indication for cesarean delivery, time to active labor, time to delivery, labor analgesia, presence of chorioamnionitis, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, terbutaline use, tachysystole (defined as 6 or more contractions in 10 minutes or tetanic contraction of 120 seconds or longer) or hyperstimulation syndrome (defined as tachysystole accompanied by fetal heart rate decelerations). Maternal outcomes will include estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement, postpartum fever, uterine rupture, and unplanned hysterectomy. Neonatal outcomes will include umbilical cord blood pH, 5-minute APGAR score, intubation or ventilation in the delivery room, neonatal sepsis, and admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Cluster randomized trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol | Experimental | Other: Foley bulb plus Oral MisoprostolPatients will received initial transcervical foley bulb, followed by oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses. |
| Oral Misoprostol | Active comparator | Other: Oral MisoprostolPatients will receive oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- 37 weeks gestation or greater
- Living, singleton fetus
- No major fetal malformations
- Cephalic presentation
- No prior uterine scar
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- latex allergy
- non-reassuring fetal status
- HIV
- active herpes outbreak
- Prior uterine scar
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Foley bulb plus Oral MisoprostolAlthough labeled "experimental" for comparison purposes, this is not an experimental intervention, as the method is a currently accepted standard of care for cervical ripening and labor induction in the United States. | Other | Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol |
| Oral MisoprostolPatients will receive standard oral misoprostol 100mcg according to current Labor Induction Protocol. | Other | Oral Misoprostol |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Vaginal Delivery
Time frame: at delivery
vaginal delivery at first induction
23 secondary outcomes
Time to Delivery
Time frame: from start of induction agent to time of delivery
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Time frame: at delivery
Dose of Oxytocin Given (mcg or mg)
Time frame: at delivery
Time With Foley Bulb in Place
Time frame: From time of documented insertion until the time of documented expulsion or removal, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 hours.
Presence of Chorioamnionitis
Time frame: at delivery
Use of Intravenous Analgesia During Labor
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants Used Neuraxial Analgesia During Labor
Time frame: from start of induction to delivery
Number of Participants Used General Anesthesia for Delivery
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants With Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid
Time frame: At the time of rupture of membranes and at delivery
Terbutaline Use
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants With Tachysystole
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants With Uterine Hyperstimulation Syndrome
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants With Excess Blood Loss
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants With Blood Transfusion
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants With Uterine Rupture
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants With Unplanned Hysterectomy
Time frame: at discharge from the hospital following delivery
Number of Participants With Postpartum Fever
Time frame: Following delivery and prior to discharge
Number of Participants With Umbilical Cord Blood pH <7.0
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants With an 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 4
Time frame: 5 minutes after time of birth
Number of Participants That Needed Mechanical Ventilation in Delivery Room (Yes/No)
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants Administered Neonatal Antibiotics and/or Neonatal Blood Cultures
Time frame: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Participants With Neonatal Sepsis
Time frame: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Participants With NICU Admission Order
Time frame: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33030881Adhikari EH, Nelson DB, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Foley Bulb Added to an Oral Misoprostol Induction Protocol: A Cluster Randomized Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;136(5):953-961. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004123.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pregnancy
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Population Pharmacokinetics of Temocillin in Acute Enterobacterial Pyelonephritis in Children
Pyelonephritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emily H Adhikari, MD principal investigator
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol and Oral Misoprostol in people with Pregnancy and Labor, Induced, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Nov 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Vaginal Delivery (time frame: at delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03407625, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2020.