AzTrials
AzTrials

Neonatal EncephalopathyCOMETNCT03409770

Optimising the Duration of Cooling in Mild Encephalopathy

A study testing Therapeutic hypothermia in people with Neonatal Encephalopathy and Hypothermia Neonatal, run by Thayyil, Sudhin at 8 sites in 3 countries.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Phase II randomised control trial of whole body cooling in mild neonatal encephalopathy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 6 hours
What is being tested?
Therapeutic hypothermia
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
140 participants
Where
8 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
10 Oct 2019to 30 Aug 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 6 hours
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • All of the following three criteria should be met:
  • Age less than six hours. AND
  • Evidence of acute perinatal asphyxia
  • Metabolic acidosis (pH <7.0 and/or BE >-16) in cord gas or a blood gas within one of birth.
  • OR
  • If the pH or BE is borderline (pH<7.15 to 7.0) and/or BE >-10 to -16) in cord and/or blood gas within 1h of birth additional evidence of perinatal asphyxia is required, which includes either an acute obstetric event (e.g. cord prolapse, abruption, shoulder dystocia) OR Need for continued resuscitation or ventilation at 10 minutes and/or a 10 min Apgar score <6
  • Evidence of mild NE (at-least two abnormalities) on an NICHD neurological examination performed between 1 and 6h of birth.

Who cannot join

  • The following group of babies will be excluded prior to randomisation
  • Babies without encephalopathy
  • Babies with moderate or severe encephalopathy who meet the current NICE/AAP guidelines for cooling therapy.
  • Babies with seizures (clinical and/or aEEG/EEG)
  • Babies with moderate or severe abnormalities on aEEG voltage criteria.
  • Babies with life threatening congenital malformations

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 3 countries.

8 sites in 3 countries

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Birmingham Womens Hospital

    Birmingham

  • Medway NHS Foundation Trust

    Gillingham

  • Liverpool Womens Hospital

    Liverpool

  • Homerton University Hospital

    London

  • Imperial College London

    London

  • The Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust

    Newcastle

Other trials in United Kingdom

United States1 site
  • Wayne State University

    Michigan Center, Michigan, 48202

Other trials in United States

Italy1 site
  • Luigi Vanvitelli Hospital

    Naples

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Optimising the Duration of Cooling Therapy in Mild Neonatal Encephalopathy

Phase II randomised control trial of whole body cooling in mild neonatal encephalopathy.

Read the detailed description

Although therapeutic hypothermia for 72 hours reduces brain injury and improves long term neurodevelopmental outcomes after moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy, the benefits and optimal duration of cooling therapy in mild encephalopathy is not known. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years occur in 16% of babies with un-treated mild neonatal encephalopathy. In the phase I of the COMET trial, we have shown that it is feasible to identify and randomise babies with mild encephalopathy, and to obtain the primary outcome (proton MR spectroscopy levels of Thalamic N-acetyl Aspartate) accurately. The phase II of the COMET trial will examine the benefits and optimal duration of cooling therapy in babies with mild encephalopathy.

Research questions

  1. Does whole body cooling initiated within 6 hours of birth and continued for 72 hours increase thalamic MR spectroscopy N-acetyl aspartate levels in babies with mild encephalopathy, when compared with those who are not cooled? (Cohort 1)
  2. In babies with mild encephalopathy undergoing cooling therapy as clinical care, does rewarming at 48 hours as opposed to 72 hours result in similar thalamic N-acetyl aspartate levels? (Cohort 2)

Study Population Cohort 1: A total of 60 babies with mild encephalopathy (>36 weeks; >2Kg) aged less than 6 hours will be recruited from several tertiary neonatal units in the UK, Europe, USA and Canada, over a 2 year period. The babies will be randomised to usual care (no cooling) or cooling therapy (core temperature 33 to 34 C) for 72 hours within six hours of birth. MR imaging and spectroscopy will be performed between 4 to 14 days after birth.

Cohort 2: A total of 80 babies will mild encephalopathy (>36 weeks; >2Kg) aged 24 to 48 hours and undergoing cooling therapy as a part of standard clinical care will be recruited from several UK cooling centres, over a 2 year period. The babies will be randomised to rewarming after 48 hours or 72 hours of cooling therapy. MR imaging and spectroscopy will be performed between 4 to 14 days after birth. The babies recruited to cohort 1 will not be eligible for recruitment to cohort 2.

Primary outcome (both cohorts)

  • Proton MR spectroscopy Thalamic N-acetyl aspartate levels between 4 to 14 days of age.

Benefits of the trial These data will inform the national and international guidelines on management of babies with mild neonatal encephalopathy. If a shorter duration of cooling is as good or better than 3 days of cooling, this will reduce the intensive care stays, opioid use and separation from parents.

Being tested
Therapeutic hypothermia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Therapeutic hypothermiaOther

    Whole body cooling using a servo controlled device

Study groups in NCT03409770
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Usual careNo interventionUsual care (normothermia) arm
Therapeutic hypothermia - 48 hExperimentalWhole body cooling (33 to 34 C) for 48 hours
Receives: Other: Therapeutic hypothermia
Therapeutic hypothermia - 72 hExperimentalWhole body cooling (33 to 34 C) for 72 hours
Receives: Other: Therapeutic hypothermia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Thalamic N-acetyl aspartate level

    Feasibility of obtaining Proton MR spectroscopy thalamic N-acetyl aspartate level

    Measured: 4 to 14 days after birth

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Brain injury on conventional MR imaging

    Cortical, white matter or deep nuclei injury

    Measured: 4 to 14 days after birth

  2. Hospital stay

    Duration of hospital stay

    Measured: Upto 30 days after birth

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jan 2018
  2. Study start10 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Therapeutic hypothermia (33 to 34 C) for 2 different durations (48, or 72 h) and usual care (normothermia)
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
140 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03409770
Sponsor's protocol ID
241031
Other IDs
37318
Acronym
COMET
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
10 Jan 2018
Last updated
4 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data can be shared unconditionally will be made available when scientific manuscripts are published. Data that cannot be shared publicly (e.g. to protect patient confidentiality) will be by request only. The PI will review each request on case-by-case basis. Upon approval the data requester will be asked to sign a data sharing agreement.

Publications

  • Prempunpong C, Chalak LF, Garfinkle J, Shah B, Kalra V, Rollins N, Boyle R, Nguyen KA, Mir I, Pappas A, Montaldo P, Thayyil S, Sanchez PJ, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Sant'Anna G. Prospective research on infants with mild encephalopathy: the PRIME study. J Perinatol. 2018 Jan;38(1):80-85. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.164. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

    PubMed 29095433
  • Oliveira V, Singhvi DP, Montaldo P, Lally PJ, Mendoza J, Manerkar S, Shankaran S, Thayyil S. Therapeutic hypothermia in mild neonatal encephalopathy: a national survey of practice in the UK. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Jul;103(4):F388-F390. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313320. Epub 2017 Sep 23.

    PubMed 28942433
  • Lally PJ, Montaldo P, Oliveira V, Swamy RS, Soe A, Shankaran S, Thayyil S. Residual brain injury after early discontinuation of cooling therapy in mild neonatal encephalopathy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Jul;103(4):F383-F387. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313321. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

    PubMed 28935718
  • Lally PJ, Pauliah S, Montaldo P, Chaban B, Oliveira V, Bainbridge A, Soe A, Pattnayak S, Clarke P, Satodia P, Harigopal S, Abernethy LJ, Turner MA, Huertas-Ceballos A, Shankaran S, Thayyil S. Magnetic Resonance Biomarkers in Neonatal Encephalopathy (MARBLE): a prospective multicountry study. BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 30;5(9):e008912. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008912.

    PubMed 26423856
  • Robertson NJ, Thayyil S, Cady EB, Raivich G. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy biomarkers in term perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy: from neuropathological correlates to future clinical applications. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2014;10(1):37-47. doi: 10.2174/157339631001140408120613.

    PubMed 25055862
  • Lally PJ, Price DL, Pauliah SS, Bainbridge A, Kurien J, Sivasamy N, Cowan FM, Balraj G, Ayer M, Satheesan K, Ceebi S, Wade A, Swamy R, Padinjattel S, Hutchon B, Vijayakumar M, Nair M, Padinharath K, Zhang H, Cady EB, Shankaran S, Thayyil S. Neonatal encephalopathic cerebral injury in South India assessed by perinatal magnetic resonance biomarkers and early childhood neurodevelopmental outcome. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e87874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087874. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 24505327
  • Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Taylor A, Bainbridge A, Cady EB, Chong WK, Murad S, Omar RZ, Robertson NJ. Cerebral magnetic resonance biomarkers in neonatal encephalopathy: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2010 Feb;125(2):e382-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1046. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

    PubMed 20083516
  • Montaldo P, Cirillo M, Burgod C, Caredda E, Ascione S, Carpentieri M, Puzone S, D'Amico A, Garegrat R, Lanza M, Moreno Morales M, Atreja G, Shivamurthappa V, Kariholu U, Aladangady N, Fleming P, Mathews A, Palanisami B, Windrow J, Harvey K, Soe A, Pattnayak S, Sashikumar P, Harigopal S, Pressler R, Wilson M, De Vita E, Shankaran S, Thayyil S; COMET Trial Group. Whole-Body Hypothermia vs Targeted Normothermia for Neonates With Mild Encephalopathy: A Multicenter Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e249119. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9119.

    PubMed 38709535

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Therapeutic hypothermia in people with Neonatal Encephalopathy and Hypothermia Neonatal, run by Thayyil, Sudhin at 8 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United Kingdom, United States, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Thalamic N-acetyl aspartate level (time frame: 4 to 14 days after birth). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03409770, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in