AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3BE READYNCT03410992

A Study With a Initial Treatment Period Followed by a Randomized-withdrawal Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab in people with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis and Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 77 sites in 9 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Phase 3 study to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab versus placebo in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Bimekizumab
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
435 participants
Where
77 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
5 Feb 2018to 7 Jan 2020
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Must be at least 18 years of age
  • Chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO) for at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit
  • Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) >=12 and body surface area (BSA) affected by PSO >=10% and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score >=3 on a 5-point scale
  • Subject is a candidate for systemic PSO therapy and/or phototherapy
  • Female subject of child bearing potential must be willing to use highly effective method of contraception

Who cannot join

  • Subject has an active infection (except common cold), a recent serious infection, or a history of opportunistic, recurrent, or chronic infections
  • Subject has concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
  • Subject has any other condition, including medical or psychiatric, which, in the Investigator's judgment, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
  • Presence of active suicidal ideation or positive suicide behavior
  • Presence of moderately severe major depression or severe major depression
  • Subject has any active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, or in situ cervical cancer

Trial locations and contacts

77 sites in 9 countries.

77 sites in 9 countries

United States20 sites
  • Ps0013 940

    Beverly, Massachusetts, 01915

  • Ps0013 947

    Buffalo, New York, 14221

  • Ps0013 949

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-1716

  • Ps0013 928

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33912

  • Ps0013 937

    Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919

  • Ps0013 933

    Murray, Utah, 84107

  • Ps0013 944

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115

  • Ps0013 968

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Ps0013 965

    New York, New York, 10025

  • Ps0013 962

    Owensboro, Kentucky, 42303

  • Ps0013 929

    Portland, Oregon, 97223

  • Ps0013 901

    Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801

  • Ps0013 963

    Rochester, New York, 14623

  • Ps0013 914

    San Antonio, Texas, 78213

  • Ps0013 919

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • Ps0013 955

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Ps0013 966

    Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30329

  • Ps0013 967

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Ps0013 954

    Skokie, Illinois, 60077

  • Ps0013 956

    Verona, New Jersey, 07044-2946

Other trials in United States

Poland19 sites
  • Ps0013 355

    Bialystok

  • Ps0013 361

    Bialystok

  • Ps0013 369

    Bialystok

  • Ps0013 352

    Gdansk

  • Ps0013 358

    Katowice

  • Ps0013 359

    Katowice

  • Ps0013 366

    Katowice

  • Ps0013 357

    Kielce

  • Ps0013 363

    Krakow

  • Ps0013 360

    Lodz

  • Ps0013 356

    Lublin

  • Ps0013 374

    Poznan

  • Ps0013 353

    Szczecin

  • Ps0013 350

    Warsaw

  • Ps0013 351

    Warsaw

  • Ps0013 354

    Warsaw

  • Ps0013 365

    Wroclaw

  • Ps0013 368

    Wroclaw

  • Ps0013 370

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Canada11 sites
  • Ps0013 658

    Ajax

  • Ps0013 672

    Edmonton

  • Ps0013 671

    Hamilton

  • Ps0013 675

    Markham

  • Ps0013 663

    Mississauga

  • Ps0013 660

    Montreal

  • Ps0013 668

    North Bay

  • Ps0013 667

    Ottawa

  • Ps0013 665

    Québec

  • Ps0013 676

    Surrey

  • Ps0013 657

    Waterloo

Other trials in Canada

Russia7 sites
  • Ps0013 400

    Moscow

  • Ps0013 402

    Moscow

  • Ps0013 403

    Moscow

  • Ps0013 404

    Saint Petersburg

  • Ps0013 405

    Saint Petersburg

  • Ps0013 401

    Saratov

  • Ps0013 406

    Yaroslavl

Other trials in Russia

Hungary6 sites
  • Ps0013 261

    Budapest

  • Ps0013 262

    Miskolc

  • Ps0013 253

    Orosháza

  • Ps0013 260

    Szeged

  • Ps0013 250

    Szolnok

  • Ps0013 258

    Veszprém

Other trials in Hungary

Germany5 sites
  • Ps0013 202

    Hamburg

  • Ps0013 220

    Hamburg

  • Ps0013 219

    Münster

  • Ps0013 200

    Schwerin

  • Ps0013 204

    Witten

Other trials in Germany

Australia3 sites
  • Ps0013 003

    Carlton

  • Ps0013 008

    East Melbourne

  • Ps0013 006

    Kogarah

Other trials in Australia

South Korea3 sites
  • Ps0013 701

    Busan

  • Ps0013 705

    Seongnam-si

  • Ps0013 703

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Ps0013 550

    Manchester

  • Ps0013 554

    Reading

  • Ps0013 555

    Salford

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study With an Initial Treatment Period Followed by a Randomized-Withdrawal Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

Phase 3 study to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab versus placebo in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

Being tested
Bimekizumab, Placebo
Keywords
Bimekizumab, PSO, Psoriasis
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic, Psoriasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BimekizumabDrug

    Also called UCB4940

    Bimekizumab will be provided at pre-specified time intervals.

  • PlaceboOther

    Also called PBO

    Subjects will receive Placebo at pre-specified time points to maintain the blinding of the Investigational Medicinal Products.

Study groups in NCT03410992
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bimekizumab cohortExperimentalSubjects will receive bimekizumab for 16 Weeks. Subjects who achieve certain predefined response criteria will be re-randomized to either receive bimekizumab or placebo until Week 56. Subjects who do not achieve predefined response criteria will enter the bimekizumab escape arm.
Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab; Other: Placebo
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorSubjects will receive placebo for 16 Weeks. Subjects who achieve certain predefined response criteria will proceed with placebo until Week 56. Subjects who do not achieve certain predefined response criteria will enter the bimekizumab escape arm.
Receives: Other: Placebo
Bimekizumab Escape armExperimentalSubjects who do not achieve certain predefined response criteria at Week 16 or later will enter the bimekizumab escape arm and will receive open-label bimekizumab for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16

    A PASI90 responder was defined as a participant that achieved 90% reduction from Baseline in the PASI score. Body divided into 4 areas: head/arms/trunk to groin/legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear)-4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0-6 scale. Final PASI=average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The min possible PASI score is 0=no disease, the max score is 72=maximal disease. Study participants with missing score at Week 16 were counted as nonresponders (NRI).

    Measured: At Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response at Week 16

    The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-Inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as Clear or Almost Clear with at least a 2-category improvement relative to Baseline. Study participants with missing score at Week 16 were counted as nonresponders (NRI).

    Measured: At Week 16

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 16

    A PASI100 responder was defined as a participant that achieved 100% reduction from Baseline in the PASI score. Body divided into 4 areas: head/arms/trunk to groin/legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear)-4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0-6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The min possible PASI score is 0=no disease, the max score is 72=maximal disease. Study participants with missing score at Week 16 were counted as nonresponders (NRI).

    Measured: At Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants With a IGA Clear Response at Week 16

    The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as Clear with at least >= 2 category improvement relative to Baseline. Study participants with missing score at Week 16 were counted as nonresponders (NRI).

    Measured: At Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 4

    A PASI75 responder was defined as a participant that achieved 75% reduction from Baseline in the PASI score. Body divided into 4 areas: head/arms/trunk to groin/legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear)-4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0-6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The min possible PASI score is 0=no disease, the max score is 72=maximal disease. Study participants with missing score at a given week were counted as nonresponders.

    Measured: At Week 4

  4. Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Pain at Week 16

    As PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit.

    PSD pain item was assessed daily on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain). PSD score for pain at a given visit was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in pain score higher than the prespecified 1.98 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with PSD pain response.

    Measured: At Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Itch at Week 16

    A PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit.

    PSD itch item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no itch) to 10 (very severe itch). PSD score for itch was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in itch score higher than the prespecified 2.39 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD itch response.

    Measured: At Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Scaling at Week 16

    As PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit. PSD scaling item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no scaling) to 10 (very severe scaling). PSD score for scaling was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in scaling score higher than the prespecified 2.86 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD scaling response.

    Measured: At Week 16

  7. Percentage of Participants With Scalp IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at Week 16 for Participants With Scalp Psoriasis (PSO) at Baseline

    Only participants with scalp involvement at Baseline completed the scalp IGA. Participants with scalp involvement at Baseline were defined as those with a scalp IGA score >0 at Baseline. Scalp lesions were assessed in terms of clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness using a 5-point scale (0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4= Severe). Scalp IGA 0/1 response at Week 16 was defined as clear (0) or almost clear (1) with at least a 2-category improvement from Baseline to Week 16.

    Measured: At Week 16

  8. Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 56 Among Week 16 PASI90 Responders

    A PASI90 responder was defined as a participant that achieved 90% reduction from Baseline in the PASI score. Study participants with missing score at Week 56 or who met the criterion for relapse were counted as nonresponders (NRI).

    Measured: At Week 56

  9. Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period

    The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the adverse event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period (up to Week 16)

  10. Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period

    The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period (up to Week 16)

  11. Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period

    The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period (up to Week 16)

  12. Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Randomized-Withdrawal Period

    The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the adverse event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From end of Initial Treatment Period (Week 16) until the Safety Follow-Up (up to 56 weeks duration)

  13. Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Randomized-Withdrawal Period

    The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From end of Initial Treatment Period (Week 16) until the Safety Follow-Up (up to 56 weeks duration)

  14. Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Randomized-Withdrawal Period

    The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From end of Initial Treatment Period (Week 16) until the Safety Follow-Up (up to 56 weeks duration)

  15. Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Escape Treatment

    The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the adverse event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Escape Baseline (Week 0) until Safety Follow-Up (up to 28 weeks duration)

  16. Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Escape Treatment

    The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Escape Baseline (Week 0) until Safety Follow-Up (up to 28 weeks duration)

  17. Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Escape Treatment

    The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Escape Baseline (Week 0) until Safety Follow-Up (up to 28 weeks duration)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jan 2018
  2. Study start5 Feb 2018
  3. Primary completion28 Dec 2018
  4. Study completion7 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
435 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03410992
Sponsor's protocol ID
PS0013
Other IDs
2016-003426-16, 2016
Acronym
BE READY
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
19 Jan 2018
Last updated
15 Apr 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Stein Gold L, Merola JF, Peterson L, Wixted K, Cross N, Deherder D, Thaci D. Bimekizumab Safety in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Pooled Results From Phase 2 and Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Jul 1;158(7):735-744. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.1185.

    PubMed 35544084
  • Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Rosmarin D, Lebwohl M, Peterson L, Madden C, de Cuyper D, Davies O, Thaci D. Bimekizumab safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled data from up to 3 years of treatment in randomized phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2024 Mar 15;190(4):477-485. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad429.

    PubMed 37950894
  • Strober B, Boehncke WH, Krueger JG, Magnolo N, Vender R, Warren RB, Lopez Pinto JM, Kavanagh S, Hoepken B, Gisondi P. Bimekizumab Efficacy in Psoriasis by Subgroups: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3/3b Clinical Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Dec;15(12):3633-3650. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01557-1. Epub 2025 Oct 8.

    PubMed 41060492
  • Armstrong A, Papp KA, Lebwohl M, Savage LJ, Yamanaka K, Vlase DE, Warham R, Lambert J, Lopez Pinto JM, Wixted K, Thaci D. Bimekizumab Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Plaque Psoriasis: 4-Year Results from BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY, and BE BRIGHT. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jan;16(1):585-603. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01595-9. Epub 2025 Dec 8.

    PubMed 41359217
  • Krueger JG, Cutcutache I, Lebwohl M, Gudjonsson JE, Pinter A, Langley RG, Merola J, Tada Y, Skelton A, Rastrick J, Ferecsko AS, Page M, Davies O, Lopez Pinto JM, Warham R, Shaw S, Warren RB. Bimekizumab long-term response in psoriasis: Mechanistic insights into efficacy level and durability. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026 Apr;157(4):905-916. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2025.12.1013. Epub 2026 Jan 22.

    PubMed 41580158
  • Gisondi P, Elewski B, Pinter A, Yamaguchi Y, Gooderham M, Kavanagh S, Wixted K, Cross N, Szilagyi B, Merola JF. Bimekizumab efficacy in scalp, nail and palmoplantar psoriasis versus comparators and over 4 years. J Dermatolog Treat. 2026 Dec;37(1):2637344. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2026.2637344. Epub 2026 Mar 9.

    PubMed 41800601
  • Blauvelt A, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, Strober B, Warren RB, Puig L, Morita A, Gordon KB, Fernandez-Penas P, Kavanagh S, Lopez Pinto JM, Lambert J, Hoepken B, Deherder D, Cross N, Thaci D. Bimekizumab durability of efficacy through 196 weeks and safety through 4 years in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from the BE BRIGHT open-label extension trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Sep;93(3):644-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.04.038. Epub 2025 Apr 24.

    PubMed 40286813
  • Merola JF, Gottlieb AB, Pinter A, Elewski B, Gooderham M, Warren RB, Piaserico S, Wixted K, Cross N, Tilt N, Wiegratz S, Mrowietz U. Bimekizumab Efficacy in High-Impact Areas: Pooled 2-Year Analysis in Scalp, Nail, and Palmoplantar Psoriasis from Phase 3/3b Randomized Controlled Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;14(12):3291-3306. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01295-w. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

    PubMed 39578348
  • Warren RB, Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Garcia L, Cioffi C, Peterson L, Pelligra C, Ciaravino V. Psychometric Validation of the Psoriasis Symptoms and Impacts Measure (P-SIM), a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Patients with Plaque Psoriasis, Using Data from the BE VIVID and BE READY Phase 3 Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Oct;11(5):1551-1569. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00570-4. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

    PubMed 34260044
  • Gordon KB, Foley P, Krueger JG, Pinter A, Reich K, Vender R, Vanvoorden V, Madden C, White K, Cioffi C, Blauvelt A. Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE READY): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021 Feb 6;397(10273):475-486. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00126-4.

    PubMed 33549192

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab in people with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis and Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 77 sites in 9 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 77 sites in United States, Poland, Canada, Russia, Hungary and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Mar 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16 (time frame: At Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03410992, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in