Colorectal CancerPhase 3COLOPEC-IINCT03413254
Second and Third Look Laparoscopy in pT4 Colon Cancer Patients for Early Detection of Peritoneal Metastases
A Phase 3 study testing Routine follow-up, Second look DLS and Third look DLS in people with Colorectal Cancer and Peritoneal Metastases, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 10 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The COLOPEC II multicentre randomized trial will investigate the role of second and third look laparoscopy to detect metachronous peritoneal metastases at a clinically occult stage during the follow-up of pT4 colon cancer patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer, Peritoneal Metastases
- What is being tested?
- Routine follow-up, Second look DLS and Third look DLS
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 389 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2018to 1 Oct 2028
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Curative intent resection of pT4a,bN0-2M0 colon cancer or rectosigmoid cancer above the peritoneal reflection, with or without adjuvant systemic therapy;
- Age between 18 and 80 years;
- Written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Histological subtype other than (mucinous) adenocarcinoma or signet-ring cell carcinoma;
- Clinical condition that does not allow for second look surgery or subsequent treatment of PM if detected;
- Second look surgery thought not to be technically possible (i.e. because of extensive abdominal surgery / re-interventions).
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
Netherlands10 sites
Flevoziekenhuis
Almere Stad
Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Amsterdam
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Amsterdam
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
Amsterdam
OLVG
Amsterdam
Catharina hospital
Eindhoven
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen
St. Antonius hospital
Nieuwegein
Radboudumc
Nijmegen
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht
About this study
Official title: Second and Third Look Laparoscopy in pT4 Colon Cancer Patients for Early Detection of Peritoneal Metastases; the COLOPEC-II Randomized Multicentre Trial
The COLOPEC II multicentre randomized trial will investigate the role of second and third look laparoscopy to detect metachronous peritoneal metastases at a clinically occult stage during the follow-up of pT4 colon cancer patients. It is expected that detection of PM at a clinically occult stage will translate into survival benefit, due to higher percentage of patients eligible for curative intent treatment with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
Read the detailed description
Problem description Approximately 20-30% of patients with pT4 colon cancer develop peritoneal metastases (PM). The only proven curative option for macroscopic PM is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), but the efficacy and morbidity highly depend on the extent of peritoneal involvement. Unfortunately, due to restricted accuracy of imaging modalities and the absence of early symptoms, PM are often detected at a stage in which only about 20-25% of patients are eligible for CRS+HIPEC, and even these patients appear to have a relatively high peritoneal cancer index (PCI). New diagnostic strategies are urgently required to detect PM at an early stage, resulting in a higher percentage of patients eligible for CRS+HIPEC, which will translate into better survival because of the uniformly reported direct association between PCI and survival.
Proposed solution Preliminary findings of the COLOPEC trial (NCT02231086) revealed that PM were already detected at intentionally adjuvant HIPEC within 2 months after resection of the primary tumour in 10% of patients with pT4 colon cancer. Based on these findings and literature, second look diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) to detect PM when the disease is still potentially curable by CRS+HIPEC may be considered as an essential component of early follow-up of pT4 colon cancer. This needs confirmation in a larger patient cohort before implementing this in practice. Furthermore, metachronous PM develop later on (>12 months) in an additional 15-20% of the patients. These patients will be missed by a second look DLS and might therefore benefit from a third look DLS later on, which will be investigated in the COLOPEC II trial.
Objective The primary aim of this study is to determine the added value of third look DLS after a negative second look DLS in pT4 colon cancer patients to detect PM at a clinically occult stage.
Study design This is a randomized multicentre trial in which eligible patients will have routine CT-abdomen at 6 months postoperative (+3 months for those still treated with adjuvant chemotherapy), followed by second look DLS within 1 month after CT if no PM or other metastases not amenable for local treatment are detected. Patients without PM found during second look DLS will subsequently be randomized between routine follow-up including CT-abdomen at 18 months in the control arm, or an experimental arm with a third look DLS provided that PM or incurable metastases are absent at the 18 months CT-abdomen. The primary endpoint of the study is the proportion of PM detected after negative second look DLS. The primary endpoint will be determined at 20 months.
Study population Patients aged 18-80 years who underwent intentionally curative resection of pT4a,bN0-2M0 colon cancer or rectosigmoid cancer above the peritoneal reflection, either with or without adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, who are fit enough and surgically accessible to undergo second look DLS between 6-10 months postoperatively and subsequent treatment of PM if detected.
Intervention DLS will be performed in patients not already diagnosed with PM and without other metastases that impede curative intent treatment. Access to the abdominal cavity is obtained under general anaesthesia by open introduction away from areas of expected adhesions, followed by adhesiolysis if necessary. Complete staging of the intra-abdominal cavity is performed, with biopsy of any lesion suspicious of PM, and determining the PCI for those patients with suspected PM.
Expected outcome It is hypothesized that in patients who had a negative second look DLS, PM become clinically apparent in 5% until 20 months postoperatively with routine follow-up. A third look DLS following a negative CT-abdomen at 18 months postoperative is expected to detect an additional 10% of PM. It is expected that detection of PM at a clinically occult stage will translate into survival benefit, based on the observation that survival rates after CRS+HIPEC are higher if the PCI is lower.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Peritoneal Metastases
- Being tested
- Routine follow-up, Second look DLS, Third look DLS
- Keywords
- pT4 colon cancer, Peritoneal metastases, Early detection, Diagnostic laparoscopy, Second look surgery, Third look surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Routine follow-upOther
Patients visit the outpatient clinic twice a year during the first two to three years and annually thereafter, until five years postoperative. CEA-levels are determined at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months after primary resection. Detection of liver metastases with ultrasound or CT is performed at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months postoperative. At 6 and 18 months postoperative, a CT-scan is part of the study protocol, but ultrasound of the liver is allowed for other time intervals during follow-up. Colonoscopy is performed at 12 and 48 months postoperative.
Second look DLSProcedure or surgery
Second look DLS is performed within one month from negative CT at 6-9 months (depending last date of adjuvant chemotherapy) and normal CEA. Laparoscopic access to the abdominal cavity is obtained under general anaesthesia, followed by adhesiolysis if necessary. Complete staging is performed, with biopsy of any lesion suspicious of PM, and determining the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in case of PM. Conversion to laparotomy not allowed for better exposure, but only for intra-operative complications.
Third look DLSProcedure or surgery
Third look DLS is performed within one month from negative CT at 18 months and normal CEA. Laparoscopic access to the abdominal cavity is obtained under general anaesthesia, followed by adhesiolysis if necessary. Complete staging is performed, with biopsy of any lesion suspicious of PM, and determining the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in case of PM. Conversion to laparotomy not allowed for better exposure, but only for intra-operative complications.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 2nd look DLS + routine FU | Active comparator | Follow-up after curatively resected pT4 colon cancer, consisting of second look DLS after negative CT abdomen at 6-9 months and normal CEA, with subsequent routine follow-up according to the Dutch colorectal cancer guideline until 5 years. Receives: Other: Routine follow-up; Procedure: Second look DLS |
| 2nd and 3rd DLS + routine FU | Experimental | Follow-up after curatively resected pT4 colon cancer, consisting of second look DLS after negative CT abdomen at 6-9 months and normal CEA, with subsequent routine follow-up and third look DLS after negative CT abdomen at 18 months and normal CEA. Third look DLS is not performed in patients with evidence of disease that is not curable, or in those already diagnosed with PM in the preceding period. Receives: Other: Routine follow-up; Procedure: Second look DLS; Procedure: Third look DLS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of peritoneal metastases detected after a negative second look DLS
Peritoneal metastases that are detected using either routine follow-up or third look DLS according to randomization.
Measured: 20 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
Incidence of PM at second look DLS after curative treatment of primary tumour, depending on pathological pT4 stage, pathological nodal stage and histology
Occult peritoneal metastases not detected by routine CT scan 6-9 months after primary resection of pT4 colon cancer, that are detected at second look DLS performed at 6-10 months after the primary resection.
Measured: 6-10 months
Incidence of PM during first 20 months after curative resection of primary tumour, depending on pathological pT4 stage, pathological nodal stage and histology
This outcome measure tries to stratify pT4 colon cancer patients in clinically relevant subgroups based on their risk to develop PM.
Measured: 20 months
Incidence of PM in patients who did or did not undergo adjuvant chemotherapy
This outcome measure analysis a potential impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the development of PM.
Measured: 20 months
Sensitivity, specificy, NPV and PPV of CT imaging to detect PM compared to DLS
Diagnostic accuracy of CT using DLS findings as gold standard.
Measured: 20 months
Proportion of detected PM eligible for curative intent CRS+HIPEC at different follow-up intervals
This outcome measures determines the clinical impact of PM detection, considering potentially curative intent treatment.
Measured: 20 months
30-day morbidity related to second/third look DLS
This outcome measure is important to determine the harm/benefit ratio of DLS.
Measured: From the second or third look DLS till 30 days postoperative
Extent of adhesiolysis required at second/third look DLS assessed with the Zühlke score
The Zühlke score measures the severity of intraabdominal adhesions.
- Filmy adhesions.
- Stronger adhesions requiring some sharp dissection.
- Dense vascularized adhesions requiring sharp dissection.
- Extreme dense vascularized adhesions with high risk for organ damage during dissection.
A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Measured: 20 months
5-year peritoneal recurrence free survival
This outcome measure determines whether third look DLS has any impact on the overall detection of PM.
Measured: 5 years
5-year disease-free survival
Important long-term oncological endpoint to determine the potential oncological benefit of third look DLS.
Measured: 5 years
5-year overall survival
Important long-term oncological endpoint to determine the potential oncological benefit of third look DLS.
Measured: 5 years
Quality of life assessed with the CRC-29 questionnaire
Assessing impact of invasive diagnostic procedures on QOL.
Measured: 2 years
Quality of life assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Assessing impact of invasive diagnostic procedures on QOL.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jan 2018
- Study start1 Mar 2018
- Primary completion1 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 389 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, P.J. Tanis, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03413254
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL61507.018.17
- Acronym
- COLOPEC-II
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Second and Third Look Laparoscopy in pT4 Colon Cancer Patients for Early Detection of Peritoneal Metastases; the COLOPEC-II Randomized Multicentre Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03413254
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COLOPEC-II / NL61507.018.17
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Peritoneal Metastases
- Keywords
- pT4 colon cancer, Peritoneal metastases, Early detection, Diagnostic laparoscopy, Second look surgery, Third look surgery
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 389 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)University, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The COLOPEC II multicentre randomized trial will investigate the role of second and third look laparoscopy to detect metachronous peritoneal metastases at a clinically occult stage during the follow-up of pT4 colon cancer patients. It is expected that detection of PM at a clinically occult stage will translate into survival benefit, due to higher percentage of patients eligible for curative intent treatment with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
Detailed description
Problem description Approximately 20-30% of patients with pT4 colon cancer develop peritoneal metastases (PM). The only proven curative option for macroscopic PM is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), but the efficacy and morbidity highly depend on the extent of peritoneal involvement. Unfortunately, due to restricted accuracy of imaging modalities and the absence of early symptoms, PM are often detected at a stage in which only about 20-25% of patients are eligible for CRS+HIPEC, and even these patients appear to have a relatively high peritoneal cancer index (PCI). New diagnostic strategies are urgently required to detect PM at an early stage, resulting in a higher percentage of patients eligible for CRS+HIPEC, which will translate into better survival because of the uniformly reported direct association between PCI and survival.
Proposed solution Preliminary findings of the COLOPEC trial (NCT02231086) revealed that PM were already detected at intentionally adjuvant HIPEC within 2 months after resection of the primary tumour in 10% of patients with pT4 colon cancer. Based on these findings and literature, second look diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) to detect PM when the disease is still potentially curable by CRS+HIPEC may be considered as an essential component of early follow-up of pT4 colon cancer. This needs confirmation in a larger patient cohort before implementing this in practice. Furthermore, metachronous PM develop later on (>12 months) in an additional 15-20% of the patients. These patients will be missed by a second look DLS and might therefore benefit from a third look DLS later on, which will be investigated in the COLOPEC II trial.
Objective The primary aim of this study is to determine the added value of third look DLS after a negative second look DLS in pT4 colon cancer patients to detect PM at a clinically occult stage.
Study design This is a randomized multicentre trial in which eligible patients will have routine CT-abdomen at 6 months postoperative (+3 months for those still treated with adjuvant chemotherapy), followed by second look DLS within 1 month after CT if no PM or other metastases not amenable for local treatment are detected. Patients without PM found during second look DLS will subsequently be randomized between routine follow-up including CT-abdomen at 18 months in the control arm, or an experimental arm with a third look DLS provided that PM or incurable metastases are absent at the 18 months CT-abdomen. The primary endpoint of the study is the proportion of PM detected after negative second look DLS. The primary endpoint will be determined at 20 months.
Study population Patients aged 18-80 years who underwent intentionally curative resection of pT4a,bN0-2M0 colon cancer or rectosigmoid cancer above the peritoneal reflection, either with or without adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, who are fit enough and surgically accessible to undergo second look DLS between 6-10 months postoperatively and subsequent treatment of PM if detected.
Intervention DLS will be performed in patients not already diagnosed with PM and without other metastases that impede curative intent treatment. Access to the abdominal cavity is obtained under general anaesthesia by open introduction away from areas of expected adhesions, followed by adhesiolysis if necessary. Complete staging of the intra-abdominal cavity is performed, with biopsy of any lesion suspicious of PM, and determining the PCI for those patients with suspected PM.
Expected outcome It is hypothesized that in patients who had a negative second look DLS, PM become clinically apparent in 5% until 20 months postoperatively with routine follow-up. A third look DLS following a negative CT-abdomen at 18 months postoperative is expected to detect an additional 10% of PM. It is expected that detection of PM at a clinically occult stage will translate into survival benefit, based on the observation that survival rates after CRS+HIPEC are higher if the PCI is lower.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 2nd look DLS + routine FU | Active comparator | Other: Routine follow-up, Procedure: Second look DLSFollow-up after curatively resected pT4 colon cancer, consisting of second look DLS after negative CT abdomen at 6-9 months and normal CEA, with subsequent routine follow-up according to the Dutch colorectal cancer guideline until 5 years. |
| 2nd and 3rd DLS + routine FU | Experimental | Other: Routine follow-up, Procedure: Second look DLS, Procedure: Third look DLSFollow-up after curatively resected pT4 colon cancer, consisting of second look DLS after negative CT abdomen at 6-9 months and normal CEA, with subsequent routine follow-up and third look DLS after negative CT abdomen at 18 months and normal CEA. Third look DLS is not performed in patients with evidence of disease that is not curable, or in those already diagnosed with PM in the preceding period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Curative intent resection of pT4a,bN0-2M0 colon cancer or rectosigmoid cancer above the peritoneal reflection, with or without adjuvant systemic therapy;
- Age between 18 and 80 years;
- Written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Histological subtype other than (mucinous) adenocarcinoma or signet-ring cell carcinoma;
- Clinical condition that does not allow for second look surgery or subsequent treatment of PM if detected;
- Second look surgery thought not to be technically possible (i.e. because of extensive abdominal surgery / re-interventions).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Routine follow-upPatients visit the outpatient clinic twice a year during the first two to three years and annually thereafter, until five years postoperative. CEA-levels are determined at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months after primary resection. Detection of liver metastases with ultrasound or CT is performed at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months postoperative. At 6 and 18 months postoperative, a CT-scan is part of the study protocol, but ultrasound of the liver is allowed for other time intervals during follow-up. Colonoscopy is performed at 12 and 48 months postoperative. | Other | 2nd and 3rd DLS + routine FU, 2nd look DLS + routine FU |
| Second look DLSSecond look DLS is performed within one month from negative CT at 6-9 months (depending last date of adjuvant chemotherapy) and normal CEA. Laparoscopic access to the abdominal cavity is obtained under general anaesthesia, followed by adhesiolysis if necessary. Complete staging is performed, with biopsy of any lesion suspicious of PM, and determining the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in case of PM. Conversion to laparotomy not allowed for better exposure, but only for intra-operative complications. | Procedure or surgery | 2nd and 3rd DLS + routine FU, 2nd look DLS + routine FU |
| Third look DLSThird look DLS is performed within one month from negative CT at 18 months and normal CEA. Laparoscopic access to the abdominal cavity is obtained under general anaesthesia, followed by adhesiolysis if necessary. Complete staging is performed, with biopsy of any lesion suspicious of PM, and determining the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in case of PM. Conversion to laparotomy not allowed for better exposure, but only for intra-operative complications. | Procedure or surgery | 2nd and 3rd DLS + routine FU |
Primary outcome
Proportion of peritoneal metastases detected after a negative second look DLS
Time frame: 20 months
Peritoneal metastases that are detected using either routine follow-up or third look DLS according to randomization.
12 secondary outcomes
Incidence of PM at second look DLS after curative treatment of primary tumour, depending on pathological pT4 stage, pathological nodal stage and histology
Time frame: 6-10 months
Incidence of PM during first 20 months after curative resection of primary tumour, depending on pathological pT4 stage, pathological nodal stage and histology
Time frame: 20 months
Incidence of PM in patients who did or did not undergo adjuvant chemotherapy
Time frame: 20 months
Sensitivity, specificy, NPV and PPV of CT imaging to detect PM compared to DLS
Time frame: 20 months
Proportion of detected PM eligible for curative intent CRS+HIPEC at different follow-up intervals
Time frame: 20 months
30-day morbidity related to second/third look DLS
Time frame: From the second or third look DLS till 30 days postoperative
Extent of adhesiolysis required at second/third look DLS assessed with the Zühlke score
Time frame: 20 months
5-year peritoneal recurrence free survival
Time frame: 5 years
5-year disease-free survival
Time frame: 5 years
5-year overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
Quality of life assessed with the CRC-29 questionnaire
Time frame: 2 years
Quality of life assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08032562 in People With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Advanced Breast Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer (HR+/ HER2-)
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation for NCI Surgery Branch Clinical Research Protocols
Synovial Cell Cancer, Melanoma
RecruitingObservational study
Myopenia and Mechanisms of Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer, Sarcopenia
Not yet recruiting
Mind-Body Interventions for the Improvement of Quality of Life, Stress, and Sleep Quality Among Survivors of Breast, Prostate, Endometrial, or Colorectal Cancer
Breast Cancer Stage I, Colorectal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab With or Without Pelareorep for Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic RAS-Mutated, Microsatellite-Stable Colorectal Cancer
Ras-mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, mCRC
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Routine follow-up, Second look DLS and Third look DLS in people with Colorectal Cancer and Peritoneal Metastases, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 10 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of peritoneal metastases detected after a negative second look DLS (time frame: 20 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2024.