AzTrials
AzTrials

Borderline Personality DisorderPhase 2NCT03418675

Brexpiprazole in Borderline Personality Disorder

A Phase 2 study testing Rexulti in people with Borderline Personality Disorder, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of the proposed study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Brexpiprazole in adults with borderline personality disorder (BPD). The hypothesis to be tested is that brexpiprazole will be more effective and well tolerated in adults with BPD compared to placebo. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Borderline Personality Disorder
What is being tested?
Rexulti
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
26 Nov 2018to 14 Apr 2021
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men and women age 18-65;
  • Primary diagnosis of BPD
  • Zanarini scale score of at least 9 at baseline
  • Ability to understand and sign the consent form.

Who cannot join

  • Unstable medical illness based on history or clinically significant abnormalities on baseline physical examination
  • Subjects with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder
  • Subjects with an active substance use disorder
  • Current pregnancy or lactation, or inadequate contraception in women of childbearing potential
  • Subjects considered an immediate suicide risk based on the Columbia Suicide Severity rating Scale (C-SSRS) (www.cssrs.columbia.edu/docs)
  • Illegal substance use based on urine toxicology screening
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Initiation of psychological interventions within 3 months of screening
  • Use of any other psychotropic medication
  • Previous treatment with Brexpiprazole
  • Cognitive impairment that interferes with the capacity to understand and self-administer medication or provide written informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Brexpiprazole in the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder.

The primary objective of the proposed study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Brexpiprazole in adults with borderline personality disorder (BPD). The hypothesis to be tested is that brexpiprazole will be more effective and well tolerated in adults with BPD compared to placebo. The proposed study will provide needed data on the treatment of a disabling disorder.

Read the detailed description

Borderline personality disorder is characterized by mood instability, cognitive symptoms, impulsive behavior, and disturbed relationships (1-3). A variety of psychotherapies have been developed (4-6) and, while research on the use of medication is ongoing, no drug has been approved in the United States or elsewhere for its treatment (7). Second generation antipsychotics have been the most intensively studied (8-11). Current treatments for BPD are often inadequate. Dialectical behavioral therapy has been shown to reduce BPD but finding trained psychologists is difficult.

Dysfunctions in the serotoninergic and dopaminergic systems have been demonstrated in-and considered as possible causes for-symptoms associated with the disorder (25-28). Several studies on the use of traditional (29) and atypical antipsychotic agents in patients with borderline personality disorder (30-31) have shown a positive effect on individual symptoms (29, 32-36). However, we are not aware of any study evaluating Brexpiprazole in the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder. In the proposed double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the influence of Brexpiprazole on the multifaceted psychopathological symptoms and aggression of patients with borderline personality disorder will be investigated.

Brexpiprazole therefore has distinctive properties that make it a promising option for patients with BPD. Brexpiprazole is a novel D2 partial agonist, has affinity for 5-HT1A, acts as an antagonist of the noradrenergic α1/2 receptor, partial agonist for D3, and antagonist for 5-HT2A (37-39). In addition, because of low rates of side effects, Brexpiprazole should be a well-tolerated and in fact desired medication approach to BPD.

Being tested
Rexulti, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Borderline Personality Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RexultiDrug

    Also called Brexpiprazole

    Atypical antipsychotic

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called no other names

    Pill that contains no medicine

Study groups in NCT03418675
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparator1 milligram per day for the first week and 1 milligram per day for the final taper week 2 milligrams per day for 10 weeks between taper periods.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
RexultiExperimental1 milligram per day day for the first week and 1 milligram per day for the final taper week 2 milligrams per day for 10 weeks between taper periods.
Receives: Drug: Rexulti

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder

    A clinician-administered scale assessing Borderline Personality Scale severity at all study visits. Scores range from 0-36. Higher scores represent worse Borderline Personality Disorder severity, and lower scores represent milder Borderline Personality Disorder severity.

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 1 (Visit 2), Week 2 (Visit 3), Week 4 (Visit 4), Week 6 (Visit 5), Week 8 (Visit 6), Week 10 (Visit 7), Week 12 (Visit 8)

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)

    A clinician-administered behavior rating scale measuring four types of aggressive behavior that will be assessed at all 9 visits. The subsets range on a scale from 0-4 with 0 indicating no aggression present. This scale tracks changes in level of aggression over time. The total weighted sum of the sections of the scale is recorded. Higher total scores indicate higher aggression levels.

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 1 (Visit 2), Week 2 (Visit 3), Week 4 (Visit 4), Week 6 (Visit 5), Week 8 (Visit 6), Week 10 (Visit 7), Week 12 (Visit 8)

  2. Young Mania Rating Scale

    A clinician-administered, 11 item scale that assesses manic symptoms at baseline and over time. Higher total scores indicate higher severity of manic symptoms. This scale is used to rate the severity of manic abnormality in the patient. Subsets of the scale range from 0-4 with 0 indicating no severity. This scale will be assessed at all visits.

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 1 (Visit 2), Week 2 (Visit 3), Week 4 (Visit 4), Week 6 (Visit 5), Week 8 (Visit 6), Week 10 (Visit 7), Week 12 (Visit 8)

  3. Self Report Version of Zanarini Scale

    A self-report scale assessing Borderline Personality severity that will be assessed at all visits.This scale is assessing severity and change in BPD symptoms. This is a 9-item scale measuring severity of different aspects of Borderline Personality Disorder, with each item rated on a 0-4 scale, 0=no symptoms, 4=severe symptoms. Total scores range from 0-36.

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 1 (Visit 2), Week 2 (Visit 3), Week 4 (Visit 4), Week 6 (Visit 5), Week 8 (Visit 6), Week 10 (Visit 7), Week 12 (Visit 8)

  4. Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST)

    A self rated scale used to measure severity and change. The first 12 items of the scale are on a scale from 1-5, with 5 meaning that the item caused extreme distress, severe difficulties in relationships, and/or kept them from getting things done. The lowest rating (1) means it caused little or no problems. Items 13-15 (positive behaviors) are rated according to frequency. Completed at every visit.

    Measured: Assessed at Visits 1 to 8, change in scores from Visit 1 to Visit 8 (baseline to week 12) is reported

  5. Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS)

    A self-report assessment of impulsivity that will be assessed at baseline and visit 8. The BIS is composed of 30 items describing common impulsive or non-impulsive (for reverse scored items) behaviors and preferences. Items are scored on a 4-point scale: (Rarely/Never = 1, Occasionally = 2, Often = 3, Almost Always/Always = 4). These scores are summed to produce an overall impulsivity score ranging from 30 (not impulsive) to 120 (extremely impulsive).

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 12 (Visit 8)

  6. Symptom Checklist-90 Revised

    An instrument that helps evaluate a broad range of psychological problems and symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder psychopathology. This will be assessed at baseline and visit 8.The 115 items are rated by using a 5-step Likert scale (0=not at all, 4=very strong) and provide a global picture of borderline psychopathology. Global scores of borderline psychopathology are calculated by summing 12 items and range from 0-48. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder.

    Measured: Baseline, Visit 8 (Week 12)

  7. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)

    A clinician-administered assessment of anxiety that will be assessed at all study visits (Visit 1-Visit 8). Changes in scores from baseline to final visit will be assessed. Higher scores (up to 56) indicate higher levels of anxiety, with 0 being no symptoms of anxiety.

    Measured: assessed at Visits 1 to 8, change in scores from Visit 1 to Visit 8 (baseline to Week 12) is reported

  8. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)

    A clinician-administered assessment of depression that will be assessed at all study visits (Visits 1-8). Higher total scores indicate higher levels of depression (up to 52), while a score of 0 would indicate no depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Assessed at Visits 1 to 8, change in scores from Visit 1 to Visit 8 (baseline to week 12) is reported

  9. MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview

    A short-structured interview that assesses comorbid psychiatric disorders according to the DSM 5 criteria. This assessment will be done during the baseline visit.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 1)

  10. Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)

    Subjects will complete the SDS at all visits. The change in scores from baseline to study completion will be assessed. The scale itself assesses the level of disability from borderline personality disorder (or target disorder) with higher scores indicating a more debilitating disorder. Scores range from 0-30.

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 1 (Visit 2), Week 2 (Visit 3), Week 4 (Visit 4), Week 6 (Visit 5), Week 8 (Visit 6), Week 10 (Visit 7), Week 12 (Visit 8)

  11. Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)

    A self-report assessment of patient perceived quality of life that will be assessed at baseline and visit 8. Higher scores indicate a higher quality of life, whereas lower scores indicate a lower quality of life. Participants are asked to rate the importance of each domain on a 3-point scale ranging from 1=not important to 3=very important, and to rate how satisfied they are with that domain on a 6-point scale, ranging from -3=very dissatisfied to +3=very satisfied. In scoring, importance ratings are multiplied by satisfaction ratings to produce weighted satisfaction scores for each of the 16 domains. Weighted satisfaction scores are summed and divided by the number of domains that were rated as important or very important to produce a raw score, which is then converted to a t-score, which provides a proxy measurement for perceived quality of life. T-scores range from very low perceived quality of life (0-36) to high perceived quality of life (58-77).

    Measured: Baseline (Week 1), Week 12 (Visit 8)

  12. Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS)

    A self-report scale measuring suicidality. Subjects will complete the scale at all visits. Subjects are asked about suicidal thoughts. If answers are no, rater can proceed to "suicidal behavior" section where subject is asked about any non-suicidal self injurious behavior. If yes, subject is asked about intensity of ideations. In the event of serious threat to themselves, the subject will be escorted to the emergency room. Total score indicates severity of suicidal ideation and behavior, with lower scores representing lower levels of suicidality and higher scores representing higher levels of suicidality. A score of 0 would reflect no suicidality present, whereas a maximum score of 5 would reflect active suicidal ideation with intent to act.

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 12 (Visit 8)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Feb 2018
  2. Study start26 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion14 Apr 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03418675
Sponsor's protocol ID
17-1729
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
25 Jan 2018
Last updated
18 Mar 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gunderson J: Borderline Personality Disorder, 2nd ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 2000

  • Nakao K, Gunderson JG, Phillips KA, Tanaka N: Functional impairment in personality disorders. J Pers Disord 1992; 6:24-31

  • Black DW, Blum N, Pfohl B, Hale N. Suicidal behavior in borderline personality disorder: prevalence, risk factors, prediction, and prevention. J Pers Disord. 2004 Jun;18(3):226-39. doi: 10.1521/pedi.18.3.226.35445.

    PubMed 15237043
  • Linehan MM, Comtois KA, Murray AM, Brown MZ, Gallop RJ, Heard HL, Korslund KE, Tutek DA, Reynolds SK, Lindenboim N. Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy vs therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;63(7):757-66. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.757.

    PubMed 16818865
  • Blum N, St John D, Pfohl B, Stuart S, McCormick B, Allen J, Arndt S, Black DW. Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for outpatients with borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial and 1-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;165(4):468-78. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07071079. Epub 2008 Feb 15.

    PubMed 18281407
  • McMain SF, Guimond T, Streiner DL, Cardish RJ, Links PS. Dialectical behavior therapy compared with general psychiatric management for borderline personality disorder: clinical outcomes and functioning over a 2-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;169(6):650-61. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11091416.

    PubMed 22581157
  • Lieb K, Vollm B, Rucker G, Timmer A, Stoffers JM. Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Cochrane systematic review of randomised trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;196(1):4-12. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062984.

    PubMed 20044651
  • Nickel MK, Muehlbacher M, Nickel C, Kettler C, Pedrosa Gil F, Bachler E, Buschmann W, Rother N, Fartacek R, Egger C, Anvar J, Rother WK, Loew TH, Kaplan P. Aripiprazole in the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 May;163(5):833-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.833.

    PubMed 16648324
  • Schulz SC, Zanarini MC, Bateman A, Bohus M, Detke HC, Trzaskoma Q, Tanaka Y, Lin D, Deberdt W, Corya S. Olanzapine for the treatment of borderline personality disorder: variable dose 12-week randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;193(6):485-92. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.037903.

    PubMed 19043153
  • Zanarini MC, Schulz SC, Detke HC, Tanaka Y, Zhao F, Lin D, Deberdt W, Kryzhanovskaya L, Corya S. A dose comparison of olanzapine for the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;72(10):1353-62. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04138yel.

    PubMed 21535995
  • Pascual JC, Soler J, Puigdemont D, Perez-Egea R, Tiana T, Alvarez E, Perez V. Ziprasidone in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;69(4):603-8. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0412.

    PubMed 18251623
  • Rinne T, de Kloet ER, Wouters L, Goekoop JG, de Rijk RH, van den Brink W. Fluvoxamine reduces responsiveness of HPA axis in adult female BPD patients with a history of sustained childhood abuse. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 Jan;28(1):126-32. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300003.

    PubMed 12496948
  • Flewett T, Bradley P, Redvers A. Management of borderline personality disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Jul;183:78-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.1.78-a. No abstract available.

    PubMed 12835254
  • Verheul R, Van Den Bosch LM, Koeter MW, De Ridder MA, Stijnen T, Van Den Brink W. Dialectical behaviour therapy for women with borderline personality disorder: 12-month, randomised clinical trial in The Netherlands. Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;182:135-40. doi: 10.1192/bjp.182.2.135.

    PubMed 12562741
  • Nickel M, Nickel C, Leiberich P, Mitterlehner F, Forthuber P, Tritt K, Rother W, Loew T. [Psychosocial characteristics in persons who often change their psychotherapists]. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2004 Apr;154(7-8):163-9. doi: 10.1007/s10354-004-0058-z. German.

    PubMed 15182043

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Rexulti in people with Borderline Personality Disorder, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Mar 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (time frame: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 1 (Visit 2), Week 2 (Visit 3), Week 4 (Visit 4), Week 6 (Visit 5), Week 8 (Visit 6), Week 10 (Visit 7), Week 12 (Visit 8)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03418675, which also lists 51 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in