AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT03419793

Effect of Segmental Muscle Vibration on Upper Extremity Functional Ability Post Stroke

A study testing segmental vibration device and physical therapy exercises in people with Stroke, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background and objective: Upper extremity functional impairments are common consequences post stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of Segmental muscle vibration (SMV) application along with supervised physical therapy (SPT) on improving activities of daily living (ADL) and motor recovery on… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
segmental vibration device and physical therapy exercises
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
37 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2016to Jan 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • confirmed diagnosis of stroke

Who cannot join

  • if they had any serious orthopedic injury/disease, cardiopulmonary problems or suffered from a neurological disease (other than stroke).

About this study

Background and objective: Upper extremity functional impairments are common consequences post stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of Segmental muscle vibration (SMV) application along with supervised physical therapy (SPT) on improving activities of daily living (ADL) and motor recovery on the hemiparetic upper extremity in patients with stroke.

Methods: A sample of 37 patients post stroke (29 males) was randomly assigned to either supervised physical therapy (SPT) control group (n=18) or supervised physical therapy and segmental muscle vibration (SPT-SMV) experimental group (n=19). All patients received 3 sessions per week of SPT for 8 weeks. The SPT-SMV experimental group received SMV at the end of each SPT session. Outcome measures used were Barthel Index (BI), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), and goniometry for Range of Motion (ROM) assessment.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
segmental vibration device, physical therapy exercises
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • segmental vibration deviceDevice

    Also called physical therapy intervention

    segmental vibration device

  • physical therapy exercisesOther

    Also called manual resistance exercise

Study groups in NCT03419793
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
physical therapy intervention and segmental muscle vibrationExperimentalphysiotherapy intervention and segmental muscle vibration device
Receives: Device: segmental vibration device; Other: physical therapy exercises
physical therapy interventionSham comparatorphysical therapy intervention alone
Receives: Other: physical therapy exercises

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. goniometry

    Range of motion assessed by goniometry; is the measurement of angles, particularly those formed by joints. These angles may be measured in a standing position or in flexion or extension.

    Measured: Change from Baseline Range of Motion at 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Barthel Index (BI)

    The Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (BI). Measure of functional disability. The BI consisting of 10 common activities of daily living (ADL) activities, administered through direct observation. These are assessed for independence/ dependence and scored via an arbitrary weighting system (originally applied to reflect nursing care and social acceptability). Eight of the ten items represent activities related to personal care; the remaining 2 are related to mobility. The index yields a total score out of 100 - the higher the score, the greater the degree of functional independence

    Measured: Change from Baseline Functional level at 8 weeks

  2. Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)

    Muscle strength assessed by using manual muscle testing (MMT) . The six- point Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale is the most often used system, with the procedures detecting the magnitude of strength by grading muscle strength from 0 to 5. In which a score of 0 was no contraction, 1 was a flicker of contraction, 2 was active movement with gravity eliminated, 3 was active movement against gravity, 4 was active movement against gravity and resistance and 5 was normal power

    Measured: Change from Baseline Muscle power at 8 weeks

  3. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    The scale is used to assign a subjective rating of the amount of resistance or tone perceived by the examiner as a limb is moved through its full range of motion. The original Ashworth scale consisted of 5 grades from 0 - 4. in which score of 0 was no increase in muscle tone, 1 was Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension, 1+ was slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM, 2 was more marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved, 3 was considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult and 4 was affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension

    Measured: Change from Baseline muscle tone at 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Feb 2018
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2016
  4. Study completionJan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
37 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03419793
Sponsor's protocol ID
212/17
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
18 Jan 2018
Last updated
5 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing segmental vibration device and physical therapy exercises in people with Stroke, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

goniometry (time frame: Change from Baseline Range of Motion at 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT03419793 | AzTrials