HypertensionReachOut EDNCT03422718
Reach Out: Emergency Department-Initiated Hypertension Behavioral Intervention Connecting Multiple Health Systems
A study testing Healthy Behavior Texts, No healthy behavior texts and BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging in people with Hypertension, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study evaluates a health theory based mobile health behavioral intervention to reduce blood pressure (BP) among hypertensive patients evaluated in a community Emergency Department (ED) setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- Healthy Behavior Texts, No healthy behavior texts and BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 488 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 25 Mar 2019to 8 Apr 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age of 18 or greater
- At least one BP with Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) ≥ 160 or a Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 (criteria 1)
- If the patient has repeated measurements after achieving Criteria 1, at least one of the repeat BP remains SBP ≥ 140 or a DBP ≥ 90
- Must have cell phones with text-messaging capability and willingness to receive texts
- Likely to be discharged from the ED
Who cannot join
- Unable to read English (<1% at study site)
- Prisoners
- Pregnant
- Pre-existing condition making one year follow-up unlikely
- Terminal illness with death expected within 90 days
- Current use of 3 or more antihypertensive agents
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients with other serious medical conditions that prevent self-monitoring of BP
- Critical illness with placement in resuscitation bay
- Dementia/cognitive impairment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Reach Out: Randomized Clinical Trial of Emergency Department-Initiated Hypertension Behavioral Intervention Connecting Multiple Health Systems
This study evaluates a health theory based mobile health behavioral intervention to reduce blood pressure (BP) among hypertensive patients evaluated in a community Emergency Department (ED) setting.
Read the detailed description
Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of mortality in the United States. African Americans have the highest prevalence of hypertension of any race/ethnic group in the United States which largely contributes to their increased burden of stroke compared to non-Hispanic whites. In addition, uncontrolled hypertension is more common among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations than their counterparts. To improve health equity, new approaches to hypertension treatment focusing on health care systems and difficult-to-reach populations are needed.
The Emergency Department (ED) represents a missed opportunity to identify and treat hypertension in difficult-to-reach populations. Currently, there are 136 million ED visits per year and nearly all have at least one blood pressure measured and recorded. African Americans and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients are disproportionally represented in the ED patient population and both are increasing. In the age of electronic health records and mobile health, the ED can feasibly become an integral partner in chronic disease management by programming the electronic health record to identify hypertensive patients and dispense a mobile health behavioral intervention. Facilitating ED follow up at primary care clinics is a key feature of the proposed intervention. Thereby leveraging the strengths of the ED and its large patient volume of uncontrolled, difficult-to-reach, hypertensive patients, with the strengths of the primary care clinics, continuity of care is the key to improving community wide utilization of health services and receipt of guideline concordant medical care.
This study looks to determine which behavioral intervention components best contribute to a reduction in systolic blood pressure at one year through a multi-component theory based mobile health behavioral intervention.
Sample Size and Population
We originally planned to enroll approximately 960 patients into the eligibility phase. From this group, we estimate that 480 participants will report qualifying BPs and will be randomized to one of the eight intervention arms. We anticipate 240 participants will fully complete the 12 month, in person follow up visits. However, after accruing approximately 400 randomized participants, we noted lower than expected retention at 6 month visits. Therefore, we adjusted the maximum total number of enrollments and randomizations upwards by 50% each. The overall intention is to achieve approximately 240 protocol completers (attendees at 12-month visit). We will continue to monitor accrual and retention in order to achieve this target.
Data Analysis
The primary analysis will fit a linear regression model with the outcome of SBP change (baseline minus 12 months) and main effect-coded binary predictors of healthy behavior texts (yes vs. no), prompted BP self-monitoring frequency (high vs. low), and primary care provider visit scheduling and transportation (active vs. passive). Initial analyses will focus on the main effects. Additional analyses will include all the two-way interactions of the three intervention components (only considering interactions where at least one of the factors in the interaction demonstrates a sufficiently large main effect).
The main secondary analyses will use time-to event (Cox Proportional Hazards) and logistic regression. For the endpoint of interest, (either time to first primary care visit, or the binary variable indicating attendance at two or more primary care visits within 1 year of randomization), the investigators will fit an adjusted regression model.
Extension Study:
Reach Out Cognition which will extend Reach Out data collection past the current 12 months to 15 and 18 months. During Reach Out Cognition, we aim to assess novel approaches to mobile health (mHealth) self-administered cognition and blood pressure (BP) measurements. These approaches may include cognitive assessments via mobile applications (apps) and Web-based surveys, and wireless BP measurements via Bluetooth-enabled blood pressure cuffs and apps.
The study population for Reach Out Cognition will be drawn from Reach Out participants who complete the Reach Out intervention and are defined as: participants who complete the 12-month outcome assessment. We anticipate about 240 participants will have completed Reach Out's 12-month outcome assessment and will be eligible for Reach Out Cognition.
Descriptive statistics will be used to evaluate acceptability, feasibility and satisfaction. The de-nominator is the number of Reach Out participants who complete the 12 month assessments. Regarding feasibility, we will separately determine the feasibility by mHealth measure (i.e. cognition vs. BP), phone type (i.e. smartphone vs. feature phone) and operating system type (iOS vs. Android vs. Windows) as a continuous and dichotomous (>50% completion of each assessment type) measure. The satisfaction scale will be assessed for all participants. Given the difference in procedures by phone type, we will compare satisfaction between the smartphone and feature phone users using a Kruskal-Wallis test.
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Being tested
- Healthy Behavior Texts, No healthy behavior texts, BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging, BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging, Physician appointment and transportation scheduling
- Keywords
- stroke, hypertension
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Healthy Behavior TextsBehavioural
Participants receive motivational health behavior texts
No healthy behavior textsBehavioural
Participants do not receive healthy behavior texts
BP Monitoring Daily Via Text MessagingBehavioural
Daily text messages will prompt participants for BP by home cuff
BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text MessagingBehavioural
Weekly text messages will prompt participants for BP by home cuff
Physician appointment and transportation schedulingBehavioural
Participants receive assistance scheduling physician appointment and transportation to those appointments
No physician appointment and transportation schedulingBehavioural
Participants do not receive assistance scheduling physician appointment or transportation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | No healthy behavior texts BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging No physician appointment and transportation scheduling Receives: Behavioral: No healthy behavior texts; Behavioral: BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging; Behavioral: No physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Healthy Behavior Texts BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging No physician appointment and transportation scheduling Receives: Behavioral: Healthy Behavior Texts; Behavioral: BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging; Behavioral: No physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | No healthy behavior texts BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging No physician appointment and transportation scheduling Receives: Behavioral: No healthy behavior texts; Behavioral: BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging; Behavioral: No physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 4 | Experimental | Healthy Behavior Texts BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging No physician appointment and transportation scheduling Receives: Behavioral: Healthy Behavior Texts; Behavioral: BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging; Behavioral: No physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 5 | Experimental | No healthy behavior texts BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging Physician appointment and transportation scheduling Receives: Behavioral: No healthy behavior texts; Behavioral: BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging; Behavioral: Physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 6 | Experimental | Healthy Behavior Texts BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging Physician appointment and transportation scheduling Receives: Behavioral: Healthy Behavior Texts; Behavioral: BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging; Behavioral: Physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 7 | Experimental | No healthy behavior texts BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging Physician appointment and transportation scheduling Receives: Behavioral: No healthy behavior texts; Behavioral: BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging; Behavioral: Physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 8 | Experimental | Healthy Behavior Texts BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging Physician appointment and transportation scheduling Receives: Behavioral: Healthy Behavior Texts; Behavioral: BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging; Behavioral: Physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure
Change in 12-month Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Hazard Ratio Analysis of Participant Time From Enrollment Emergency Department Visit to the First PCP Visit
Utilizing multivariable Cox regression analysis, the relationship between mHealth components and attendance at initial Primary Care Physician (PCP) appointment after Emergency Department visit is explored. The analysis adjusts for age, sex, race, presence of a primary care provider, and usage of blood pressure medications. The Hazard Ratio in this context is a measure indicating the relative risk of experiencing the event of interest (time to first PCP visit). A Hazard Ratio greater than 1 implies a greater risk of receipt of a first PCP appointment, and a Hazard Ratio less than 1 implies a lower risk of receipt of a first PCP appointment within 12-month follow-up. The use of Hazard Ratio in this context allows for the assessment of the impact of mHealth components on the timing of primary care engagement while accounting for potential confounding variables. This allows more valuable insights into the effectiveness of these components in facilitating access to primary care visits.
Measured: Baseline ED visit (in days)
Odds Ratio Analysis of Participants Completing 2 or More Primary Care Visits
Utilizing logistic regression analysis, the probability of participants attending 2 or more primary care visits within a 12-month period is explored. The analysis adjusts for age, sex, race, presence of a primary care provider, and usage of blood pressure medications. The Odds Ratio in this context indicates the likelihood of an event occurring. A higher Odds Ratio suggests an increased likelihood of attending multiple primary care visits, while a lower Odds Ratio indicates a decreased likelihood. The use of Odds Ratio in this context is justified as it allows for the comparison of the likelihood of attending two or more primary care while accounting for covariates. This is useful in logistic regression analysis, where the outcome variable is binary (i.e., attending two or more primary care visits or not) and the focus is on understanding the association between predictor variables and the probability of the outcome.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2018
- Study start25 Mar 2019
- Primary completion8 Apr 2021
- Study completion8 Apr 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 488 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, William J Meurer, University of Michigan
- Investigators
- William Meurer, MD, Principal investigator, University of MichiganLesli Skolarus, MD, Principal investigator, University of MichiganMackenzie Dinh, MS, Study director, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03422718
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HUM00138470
- Other IDs
- R01MD011516
- Acronym
- ReachOut ED
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 20 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: In accordance with NIH policy, a public use dataset will be prepared by the investigators. The archiving and posting procedures are to be determined at this point.
Publications
Skolarus LE, Lin CC, Mishra S, Meurer W, Dinh M, Whitfield C, Bi R, Brown D, Oteng R, Buis LR, Kidwell K. Engagement in mHealth-Prompted Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Participants Recruited From a Safety-Net Emergency Department: Secondary Analysis of the Reach Out Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jun 12;12:e54946. doi: 10.2196/54946.
PubMed 38889070Dinh M, Lin CC, Whitfield C, Farhan Z, Meurer WJ, Bailey S, Skolarus LE. Exploring the Acceptability and Feasibility of Remote Blood Pressure Measurements and Cognition Assessments Among Participants Recruited From a Safety-Net Emergency Department (Reach Out Cognition): Nonrandomized Mobile Health Trial. JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 28;8:e54010. doi: 10.2196/54010.
PubMed 38805251Skolarus LE, Dinh M, Kidwell KM, Lin CC, Buis LR, Brown DL, Oteng R, Giacalone M, Warden K, Trimble DE, Whitfield C, Farhan Z, Flood A, Borgialli D, Montas S, Jaggi M, Meurer WJ. Reach Out Emergency Department: A Randomized Factorial Trial to Determine the Optimal Mobile Health Components to Reduce Blood Pressure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 May;16(5):e009606. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009606. Epub 2023 May 16.
PubMed 37192282Skolarus LE, Dinh M, Kidwell KM, Farhan Z, Whitfield C, Levine DA, Meurer WJ. Supplement study update for Reach Out: a multi-arm randomized trial of behavioral interventions for hypertension initiated in the emergency department: Reach Out Cognition. Trials. 2021 Nov 24;22(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05806-4.
PubMed 34819115Meurer WJ, Dinh M, Kidwell KM, Flood A, Champoux E, Whitfield C, Trimble D, Cowdery J, Borgialli D, Montas S, Cunningham R, Buis LR, Brown D, Skolarus L. Reach out behavioral intervention for hypertension initiated in the emergency department connecting multiple health systems: study protocol for a randomized control trial. Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04340-z.
PubMed 32493502
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reach Out: Randomized Clinical Trial of Emergency Department-Initiated Hypertension Behavioral Intervention Connecting Multiple Health Systems
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03422718
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ReachOut ED / HUM00138470
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Keywords
- stroke, hypertension
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 488 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
- Study start
- 25 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Apr 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Jun 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates a health theory based mobile health behavioral intervention to reduce blood pressure (BP) among hypertensive patients evaluated in a community Emergency Department (ED) setting.
Detailed description
Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of mortality in the United States. African Americans have the highest prevalence of hypertension of any race/ethnic group in the United States which largely contributes to their increased burden of stroke compared to non-Hispanic whites. In addition, uncontrolled hypertension is more common among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations than their counterparts. To improve health equity, new approaches to hypertension treatment focusing on health care systems and difficult-to-reach populations are needed.
The Emergency Department (ED) represents a missed opportunity to identify and treat hypertension in difficult-to-reach populations. Currently, there are 136 million ED visits per year and nearly all have at least one blood pressure measured and recorded. African Americans and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients are disproportionally represented in the ED patient population and both are increasing. In the age of electronic health records and mobile health, the ED can feasibly become an integral partner in chronic disease management by programming the electronic health record to identify hypertensive patients and dispense a mobile health behavioral intervention. Facilitating ED follow up at primary care clinics is a key feature of the proposed intervention. Thereby leveraging the strengths of the ED and its large patient volume of uncontrolled, difficult-to-reach, hypertensive patients, with the strengths of the primary care clinics, continuity of care is the key to improving community wide utilization of health services and receipt of guideline concordant medical care.
This study looks to determine which behavioral intervention components best contribute to a reduction in systolic blood pressure at one year through a multi-component theory based mobile health behavioral intervention.
Sample Size and Population
We originally planned to enroll approximately 960 patients into the eligibility phase. From this group, we estimate that 480 participants will report qualifying BPs and will be randomized to one of the eight intervention arms. We anticipate 240 participants will fully complete the 12 month, in person follow up visits. However, after accruing approximately 400 randomized participants, we noted lower than expected retention at 6 month visits. Therefore, we adjusted the maximum total number of enrollments and randomizations upwards by 50% each. The overall intention is to achieve approximately 240 protocol completers (attendees at 12-month visit). We will continue to monitor accrual and retention in order to achieve this target.
Data Analysis
The primary analysis will fit a linear regression model with the outcome of SBP change (baseline minus 12 months) and main effect-coded binary predictors of healthy behavior texts (yes vs. no), prompted BP self-monitoring frequency (high vs. low), and primary care provider visit scheduling and transportation (active vs. passive). Initial analyses will focus on the main effects. Additional analyses will include all the two-way interactions of the three intervention components (only considering interactions where at least one of the factors in the interaction demonstrates a sufficiently large main effect).
The main secondary analyses will use time-to event (Cox Proportional Hazards) and logistic regression. For the endpoint of interest, (either time to first primary care visit, or the binary variable indicating attendance at two or more primary care visits within 1 year of randomization), the investigators will fit an adjusted regression model.
Extension Study:
Reach Out Cognition which will extend Reach Out data collection past the current 12 months to 15 and 18 months. During Reach Out Cognition, we aim to assess novel approaches to mobile health (mHealth) self-administered cognition and blood pressure (BP) measurements. These approaches may include cognitive assessments via mobile applications (apps) and Web-based surveys, and wireless BP measurements via Bluetooth-enabled blood pressure cuffs and apps.
The study population for Reach Out Cognition will be drawn from Reach Out participants who complete the Reach Out intervention and are defined as: participants who complete the 12-month outcome assessment. We anticipate about 240 participants will have completed Reach Out's 12-month outcome assessment and will be eligible for Reach Out Cognition.
Descriptive statistics will be used to evaluate acceptability, feasibility and satisfaction. The de-nominator is the number of Reach Out participants who complete the 12 month assessments. Regarding feasibility, we will separately determine the feasibility by mHealth measure (i.e. cognition vs. BP), phone type (i.e. smartphone vs. feature phone) and operating system type (iOS vs. Android vs. Windows) as a continuous and dichotomous (>50% completion of each assessment type) measure. The satisfaction scale will be assessed for all participants. Given the difference in procedures by phone type, we will compare satisfaction between the smartphone and feature phone users using a Kruskal-Wallis test.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: No healthy behavior texts, Behavioral: BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging, Behavioral: No physician appointment and transportation schedulingNo healthy behavior texts BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging No physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Behavioral: Healthy Behavior Texts, Behavioral: BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging, Behavioral: No physician appointment and transportation schedulingHealthy Behavior Texts BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging No physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | Behavioral: No healthy behavior texts, Behavioral: BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging, Behavioral: No physician appointment and transportation schedulingNo healthy behavior texts BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging No physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 4 | Experimental | Behavioral: Healthy Behavior Texts, Behavioral: BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging, Behavioral: No physician appointment and transportation schedulingHealthy Behavior Texts BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging No physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 5 | Experimental | Behavioral: No healthy behavior texts, Behavioral: BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging, Behavioral: Physician appointment and transportation schedulingNo healthy behavior texts BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging Physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 6 | Experimental | Behavioral: Healthy Behavior Texts, Behavioral: BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging, Behavioral: Physician appointment and transportation schedulingHealthy Behavior Texts BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text Messaging Physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 7 | Experimental | Behavioral: No healthy behavior texts, Behavioral: BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging, Behavioral: Physician appointment and transportation schedulingNo healthy behavior texts BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging Physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
| Arm 8 | Experimental | Behavioral: Healthy Behavior Texts, Behavioral: BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging, Behavioral: Physician appointment and transportation schedulingHealthy Behavior Texts BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging Physician appointment and transportation scheduling |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age of 18 or greater
- At least one BP with Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) ≥ 160 or a Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 (criteria 1)
- If the patient has repeated measurements after achieving Criteria 1, at least one of the repeat BP remains SBP ≥ 140 or a DBP ≥ 90
- Must have cell phones with text-messaging capability and willingness to receive texts
- Likely to be discharged from the ED
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Unable to read English (<1% at study site)
- Prisoners
- Pregnant
- Pre-existing condition making one year follow-up unlikely
- Current use of 3 or more antihypertensive agents
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy Behavior TextsParticipants receive motivational health behavior texts | Behavioural | Arm 2, Arm 4, Arm 6, Arm 8 |
| No healthy behavior textsParticipants do not receive healthy behavior texts | Behavioural | Arm 1, Arm 3, Arm 5, Arm 7 |
| BP Monitoring Daily Via Text MessagingDaily text messages will prompt participants for BP by home cuff | Behavioural | Arm 3, Arm 4, Arm 7, Arm 8 |
| BP Monitoring Weekly Via Text MessagingWeekly text messages will prompt participants for BP by home cuff | Behavioural | Arm 1, Arm 2, Arm 5, Arm 6 |
| Physician appointment and transportation schedulingParticipants receive assistance scheduling physician appointment and transportation to those appointments | Behavioural | Arm 5, Arm 6, Arm 7, Arm 8 |
| No physician appointment and transportation schedulingParticipants do not receive assistance scheduling physician appointment or transportation | Behavioural | Arm 1, Arm 2, Arm 3, Arm 4 |
Primary outcome
Change in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: 12 months
Change in 12-month Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
2 secondary outcomes
Hazard Ratio Analysis of Participant Time From Enrollment Emergency Department Visit to the First PCP Visit
Time frame: Baseline ED visit (in days)
Odds Ratio Analysis of Participants Completing 2 or More Primary Care Visits
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jun 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38889070Skolarus LE, Lin CC, Mishra S, Meurer W, Dinh M, Whitfield C, Bi R, Brown D, Oteng R, Buis LR, Kidwell K. Engagement in mHealth-Prompted Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Participants Recruited From a Safety-Net Emergency Department: Secondary Analysis of the Reach Out Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jun 12;12:e54946. doi: 10.2196/54946.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38805251Dinh M, Lin CC, Whitfield C, Farhan Z, Meurer WJ, Bailey S, Skolarus LE. Exploring the Acceptability and Feasibility of Remote Blood Pressure Measurements and Cognition Assessments Among Participants Recruited From a Safety-Net Emergency Department (Reach Out Cognition): Nonrandomized Mobile Health Trial. JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 28;8:e54010. doi: 10.2196/54010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37192282Skolarus LE, Dinh M, Kidwell KM, Lin CC, Buis LR, Brown DL, Oteng R, Giacalone M, Warden K, Trimble DE, Whitfield C, Farhan Z, Flood A, Borgialli D, Montas S, Jaggi M, Meurer WJ. Reach Out Emergency Department: A Randomized Factorial Trial to Determine the Optimal Mobile Health Components to Reduce Blood Pressure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 May;16(5):e009606. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009606. Epub 2023 May 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34819115Skolarus LE, Dinh M, Kidwell KM, Farhan Z, Whitfield C, Levine DA, Meurer WJ. Supplement study update for Reach Out: a multi-arm randomized trial of behavioral interventions for hypertension initiated in the emergency department: Reach Out Cognition. Trials. 2021 Nov 24;22(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05806-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32493502Meurer WJ, Dinh M, Kidwell KM, Flood A, Champoux E, Whitfield C, Trimble D, Cowdery J, Borgialli D, Montas S, Cunningham R, Buis LR, Brown D, Skolarus L. Reach out behavioral intervention for hypertension initiated in the emergency department connecting multiple health systems: study protocol for a randomized control trial. Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04340-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. In accordance with NIH policy, a public use dataset will be prepared by the investigators. The archiving and posting procedures are to be determined at this point.
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
William Meurer, MD principal investigator
University of Michigan
Lesli Skolarus, MD principal investigator
University of Michigan
Mackenzie Dinh, MS study director
University of Michigan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Healthy Behavior Texts, No healthy behavior texts and BP Monitoring Daily Via Text Messaging in people with Hypertension, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03422718, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2024.