Acute Mountain SicknessPhase 1SEAWARDNCT03424226
Sickness Evaluation at Altitude With Acetazolamide at Relative Dosages
A Phase 1 study testing Acetazolamide in people with Acute Mountain Sickness, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This double blind randomized trial will compare acetazolamide taken the morning of ascent to acetazolamide taken the evening prior to ascent for the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS). The day of ascent dosing has not been studied as a powered primary outcome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Mountain Sickness
- What is being tested?
- Acetazolamide
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 105 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 Aug 2018to 30 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-75 healthy non-pregnant volunteer
- live at low elevation < 4000 ft
- Arrange your own transportation to WMRS (Bishop) by Friday evening of study weekend
- Available for full study duration (Friday PM-Sunday AM)
Who cannot join
- Age <18 or >75, Pregnant, Live at altitude >4000 ft Slept at altitude > 4000ft within 1 week of study Allergic to acetazolamide, sulfa drugs, Taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Acetazolamide, or Corticosteroids 1 week prior to study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This double blind randomized trial will compare acetazolamide taken the morning of ascent to acetazolamide taken the evening prior to ascent for the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS). The day of ascent dosing has not been studied as a powered primary outcome. The study population is hikers who are ascending at their own rate under their own power in a true hiking environment at the White Mountain Research Station, Owen Valley Lab (OVL) and Bancroft Station (BAR), Bancroft Peak, White Mountain, California
Read the detailed description
The specific aim of this study is to determine whether acetazolamide started the day-of ascent is inferior to the standard night before ascent dose of acetazolamide for the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS) in travelers in travelers to high altitude. Acetazolamide has been examined in over 200 high altitude studies over the past 50 years, and is the most commonly used drug for AMS prevention in the high mountains of Nepal, Western Europe, and Africa. Current Wilderness Medical Society Practice Guidelines recommend a 125mg dose of acetazolamide daily started the day or evening prior to ascent. However, day of ascent dosage has recently been found to be effective prophylaxis for severe AMS compared to placebo, but efficacy of day-of ascent dosage has not be confirmed versus standard acetazolamide dosage.
While acetazolamide is commonly used as an acclimatization aid, it is traditionally started the day or evening prior to ascent to theoretically optimize diuretic effect and compensatory respiratory changes. This timing may be impractical when rapid ascent is necessary, such as in search and rescue and military operations, or for the general recreationalists, trekkers, or climbers who do not have time to start prophylaxis prior to heading into the mountains. As there are an estimated 100 million recreationalists annually who ascend to high altitude around the world, innovation on optimal timing has a potentially large impact on traveler safety.
Acetazolamide has a time of onset between 60 - 90 minutes when taken as an immediate release tablet, with peak effect between 2 - 4 hours. With these pharmacokinetics in mind, we recently found that there was an observed robust protective effect of acetazolamide on severe AMS when taken the morning of ascent, and this was the first study to examine day-of dosing. This novel finding has not been otherwise investigated, and confirmation of this unique observation has the potential to increase acetazolamide'sits usage in "high risk" populations maximizing safety, while minimizing discomfort and poor sleep from pre-ascent nocturia., such as trekkers, skiers, climbers, and tactical missions requiring rapid ascents in the mountains of North America and Europe.
- Conditions
- Acute Mountain Sickness
- Being tested
- Acetazolamide
- Medical subject headings
- Altitude Sickness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AcetazolamideDrug
Also called diamox
a diuretic and commonly used medication for prevention and treatment of acute mountain sickness
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| day of acetazolamide | Experimental | acetazolamide 125mg twice a day, started morning of ascent Receives: Drug: Acetazolamide |
| night before acetazolamide | Active comparator | acetazolamide 125mg twice a day, started evening before ascent Receives: Drug: Acetazolamide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
incidence of acute mountain sickness
incidence of acute mountain sickness by Lake Louise Questionnaire
Measured: 2 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2018
- Study start4 Aug 2018
- Primary completion30 Sep 2018
- Study completion30 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Mountain SicknessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Double blind randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Grant S Lipman, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03424226
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 44765
- Acronym
- SEAWARD
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sickness Evaluation at Altitude With Acetazolamide at Relative Dosages
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03424226
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SEAWARD / 44765
- Conditions
- Acute Mountain Sickness
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This double blind randomized trial will compare acetazolamide taken the morning of ascent to acetazolamide taken the evening prior to ascent for the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS). The day of ascent dosing has not been studied as a powered primary outcome. The study population is hikers who are ascending at their own rate under their own power in a true hiking environment at the White Mountain Research Station, Owen Valley Lab (OVL) and Bancroft Station (BAR), Bancroft Peak, White Mountain, California
Detailed description
The specific aim of this study is to determine whether acetazolamide started the day-of ascent is inferior to the standard night before ascent dose of acetazolamide for the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS) in travelers in travelers to high altitude. Acetazolamide has been examined in over 200 high altitude studies over the past 50 years, and is the most commonly used drug for AMS prevention in the high mountains of Nepal, Western Europe, and Africa. Current Wilderness Medical Society Practice Guidelines recommend a 125mg dose of acetazolamide daily started the day or evening prior to ascent. However, day of ascent dosage has recently been found to be effective prophylaxis for severe AMS compared to placebo, but efficacy of day-of ascent dosage has not be confirmed versus standard acetazolamide dosage.
While acetazolamide is commonly used as an acclimatization aid, it is traditionally started the day or evening prior to ascent to theoretically optimize diuretic effect and compensatory respiratory changes. This timing may be impractical when rapid ascent is necessary, such as in search and rescue and military operations, or for the general recreationalists, trekkers, or climbers who do not have time to start prophylaxis prior to heading into the mountains. As there are an estimated 100 million recreationalists annually who ascend to high altitude around the world, innovation on optimal timing has a potentially large impact on traveler safety.
Acetazolamide has a time of onset between 60 - 90 minutes when taken as an immediate release tablet, with peak effect between 2 - 4 hours. With these pharmacokinetics in mind, we recently found that there was an observed robust protective effect of acetazolamide on severe AMS when taken the morning of ascent, and this was the first study to examine day-of dosing. This novel finding has not been otherwise investigated, and confirmation of this unique observation has the potential to increase acetazolamide'sits usage in "high risk" populations maximizing safety, while minimizing discomfort and poor sleep from pre-ascent nocturia., such as trekkers, skiers, climbers, and tactical missions requiring rapid ascents in the mountains of North America and Europe.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Double blind randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| day of acetazolamide | Experimental | Drug: Acetazolamideacetazolamide 125mg twice a day, started morning of ascent |
| night before acetazolamide | Active comparator | Drug: Acetazolamideacetazolamide 125mg twice a day, started evening before ascent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 18-75 healthy non-pregnant volunteer
- live at low elevation < 4000 ft
- Arrange your own transportation to WMRS (Bishop) by Friday evening of study weekend
- Available for full study duration (Friday PM-Sunday AM)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Age <18 or >75, Pregnant, Live at altitude >4000 ft Slept at altitude > 4000ft within 1 week of study Allergic to acetazolamide, sulfa drugs, Taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Acetazolamide, or Corticosteroids 1 week prior to study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AcetazolamideAlso: diamoxa diuretic and commonly used medication for prevention and treatment of acute mountain sickness | Drug | day of acetazolamide, night before acetazolamide |
Primary outcome
incidence of acute mountain sickness
Time frame: 2 days
incidence of acute mountain sickness by Lake Louise Questionnaire
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Mountain Sickness
Recruiting
Erythrocytapheresis for Chronic Mountain Sickness
Chronic Mountain Sickness
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Antibody in Acute Mountain Sickness
Acute Mountain Sickness
Not yet recruiting
Key Diagnostic & Therapeutic Technologies for Severe Acute High Altitude Disease (SAHAD): Integration and Application
Severe High Altitude Pulmonary Edema, Severe High Altitude Cerebral Edema
RecruitingObservational study
Altitude and Outcomes in Pediatric ARDS: A Multicenter Study
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Pediatric, Altitude Hypoxia
Recruiting
Effect of Acute Hypoxia on RIght VEntRicular Function in Asthma.
Hypoxia, Altitude, Hypoxia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Acetazolamide in people with Acute Mountain Sickness, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
incidence of acute mountain sickness (time frame: 2 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2018.