GISTNCT03424876
To Compare the Efficacy of Surgery Followed by Sunitinib With Surgery Followed by Imatinib in GIST Patients With Progression on Imatinib.
An observational study of GIST, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
To compare the efficacy of surgery followed by sunitinib with surgery followed by imatinib in GIST patients with progression on imatinib;To investigate the optimal therapy after surgery in GIST patients with focal or multifocal progression in imatinib Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- GIST
- What is being tested?
- Imatinib 400mg and Sunitinib 37.5Mg Oral Capsule
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 2 Jun 2017to 8 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Test group is imatinib 400 mg/day or higher dose treatment failure and satisfactory reduction of tumor surgery patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor, patients must meet all the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria to enter test.
Who may be able to join
- .Histopathological diagnosis of metastatic GIST.
- . After the treatment of imatinib, imatinib 400mg/day after treatment, the tumor generalized.
- . Patients with generalized progress were satisfied with tumor reduction after imatinib resistance for various reasons.
- at least 1 month after surgery for imatinib treatment or sunitinib treatment.
- at least one imaging assessment was received after surgery.
- . Complete clinical data and follow-up data.
Who cannot join
- . Before operation, he was treated with sunitinib
- . Patients receiving tumor reduction were not satisfied with the standard of the reduction of tumor.
- . The treatment of imatinib or sunitinib after surgery was less than 1 month.
- . Incomplete clinical data or follow-up data.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142
Jian Li, MD
About this study
Official title: A Retrospective Cohort Study
To compare the efficacy of surgery followed by sunitinib with surgery followed by imatinib in GIST patients with progression on imatinib;To investigate the optimal therapy after surgery in GIST patients with focal or multifocal progression in imatinib
Read the detailed description
Primary Endpoint: To evaluate the progression free survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib Secondary Endpoint：To evaluate the overall survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib the relationship of c-kit secondary mutation and progression free survival of surgery followed by TKI therapy the safety and tolerability of the two therapy.
Statistics:All the statistical analysis is performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM corporation, United States). Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables. PFS and OS analyses were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test and multivariable analyses were performed to assess survival difference. A two sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- GIST
- Being tested
- Imatinib 400mg, Sunitinib 37.5Mg Oral Capsule
- Keywords
- Sunitinib Imatinib
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Imatinib 400mgDrug
exposure 400 mg/day or 600mg/day,
Sunitinib 37.5Mg Oral CapsuleDrug
exposure 37.5 mg/day, continuous taking, or 50 mg/day (4/2)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Imatinib 400 mg/day or 600mg/day, and within 6 weeks after surgery, continuous treatment was not tolerated until tumor progression, recurrence or adverse reactions were not tolerated. Receives: Drug: Imatinib 400mg | |
| Arm B | Sunitinib 37.5 mg/day, continuous taking, or 50 mg/day (4/2), began within 6 weeks after surgery, and was continuously administered until tumor progression, recurrence or adverse reactions were not tolerated Receives: Drug: Sunitinib 37.5Mg Oral Capsule |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficiency
The curative effect was evaluated by measuring the unprogression-survival (PFS) each treatment group.
Measured: 12 months
Security
Clinical and laboratory toxicity/symptoms will be graded according to the nci-ctc toxicity criteria.
Measured: 12 months
Molecular marker detection
Gene mutation of c-kit/PDGFRA of imatinib resistance
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Feb 2018
- Study start2 Jun 2017
- Primary completion2 Jun 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion8 Aug 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GISTStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Shen Lin, Peking University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03424876
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- G0602
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 3 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: IPD will be shared later
Publications
Abrams TJ, Lee LB, Murray LJ, Pryer NK, Cherrington JM. SU11248 inhibits KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in preclinical models of human small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003 May;2(5):471-8.
PubMed 12748309Rubin BP, Singer S, Tsao C, Duensing A, Lux ML, Ruiz R, Hibbard MK, Chen CJ, Xiao S, Tuveson DA, Demetri GD, Fletcher CD, Fletcher JA. KIT activation is a ubiquitous feature of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res. 2001 Nov 15;61(22):8118-21.
PubMed 11719439Li J, Gao J, Hong J, Shen L. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in Chinese patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Future Oncol. 2012 May;8(5):617-24. doi: 10.2217/fon.12.29.
PubMed 22646775Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, Miettinen M, O'Leary TJ, Remotti H, Rubin BP, Shmookler B, Sobin LH, Weiss SW. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002 May;33(5):459-65. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2002.123545.
PubMed 12094370Blackstein ME, Blay JY, Corless C, Driman DK, Riddell R, Soulieres D, Swallow CJ, Verma S; Canadian Advisory Committee on GIST. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;20(3):157-63. doi: 10.1155/2006/434761.
PubMed 16550259Goettsch WG, Bos SD, Breekveldt-Postma N, Casparie M, Herings RM, Hogendoorn PC. Incidence of gastrointestinal stromal tumours is underestimated: results of a nation-wide study. Eur J Cancer. 2005 Dec;41(18):2868-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.009. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
PubMed 16293410DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, Mudan SS, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg. 2000 Jan;231(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200001000-00008.
PubMed 10636102Graadt van Roggen JF, van Velthuysen ML, Hogendoorn PC. The histopathological differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. J Clin Pathol. 2001 Feb;54(2):96-102. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.2.96.
PubMed 11215292Mendel DB, Laird AD, Xin X, Louie SG, Christensen JG, Li G, Schreck RE, Abrams TJ, Ngai TJ, Lee LB, Murray LJ, Carver J, Chan E, Moss KG, Haznedar JO, Sukbuntherng J, Blake RA, Sun L, Tang C, Miller T, Shirazian S, McMahon G, Cherrington JM. In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Jan;9(1):327-37.
PubMed 12538485O'Farrell AM, Abrams TJ, Yuen HA, Ngai TJ, Louie SG, Yee KW, Wong LM, Hong W, Lee LB, Town A, Smolich BD, Manning WC, Murray LJ, Heinrich MC, Cherrington JM. SU11248 is a novel FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2003 May 1;101(9):3597-605. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2307. Epub 2003 Jan 16.
PubMed 12531805Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell. 2000 Oct 13;103(2):211-25. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00114-8. No abstract available.
PubMed 11057895Bello C. B. Houk, L. Sherman, et al. Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of SU11248 in healthy volunteers. Proc.ASCO abstr#3078, 2005.
Blanke CD, Rankin C, Demetri GD, Ryan CW, von Mehren M, Benjamin RS, Raymond AK, Bramwell VH, Baker LH, Maki RG, Tanaka M, Hecht JR, Heinrich MC, Fletcher CD, Crowley JJ, Borden EC. Phase III randomized, intergroup trial assessing imatinib mesylate at two dose levels in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing the kit receptor tyrosine kinase: S0033. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 1;26(4):626-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4452.
PubMed 18235122Zalcberg JR, Verweij J, Casali PG, Le Cesne A, Reichardt P, Blay JY, Schlemmer M, Van Glabbeke M, Brown M, Judson IR; EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group, the Italian Sarcoma Group; Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group. Outcome of patients with advanced gastro-intestinal stromal tumours crossing over to a daily imatinib dose of 800 mg after progression on 400 mg. Eur J Cancer. 2005 Aug;41(12):1751-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.034.
PubMed 16098458Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, Blackstein ME, Shah MH, Verweij J, McArthur G, Judson IR, Heinrich MC, Morgan JA, Desai J, Fletcher CD, George S, Bello CL, Huang X, Baum CM, Casali PG. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006 Oct 14;368(9544):1329-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69446-4.
PubMed 17046465
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Retrospective Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03424876
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- G0602
- Conditions
- GIST
- Keywords
- Sunitinib Imatinib
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Jun 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 8 Aug 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the efficacy of surgery followed by sunitinib with surgery followed by imatinib in GIST patients with progression on imatinib;To investigate the optimal therapy after surgery in GIST patients with focal or multifocal progression in imatinib
Detailed description
Primary Endpoint: To evaluate the progression free survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib Secondary Endpoint：To evaluate the overall survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib the relationship of c-kit secondary mutation and progression free survival of surgery followed by TKI therapy the safety and tolerability of the two therapy.
Statistics:All the statistical analysis is performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM corporation, United States). Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables. PFS and OS analyses were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test and multivariable analyses were performed to assess survival difference. A two sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | – | Drug: Imatinib 400mgImatinib 400 mg/day or 600mg/day, and within 6 weeks after surgery, continuous treatment was not tolerated until tumor progression, recurrence or adverse reactions were not tolerated. |
| Arm B | – | Drug: Sunitinib 37.5Mg Oral CapsuleSunitinib 37.5 mg/day, continuous taking, or 50 mg/day (4/2), began within 6 weeks after surgery, and was continuously administered until tumor progression, recurrence or adverse reactions were not tolerated |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Test group is imatinib 400 mg/day or higher dose treatment failure and satisfactory reduction of tumor surgery patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor, patients must meet all the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria to enter test.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- .Histopathological diagnosis of metastatic GIST.
- . After the treatment of imatinib, imatinib 400mg/day after treatment, the tumor generalized.
- . Patients with generalized progress were satisfied with tumor reduction after imatinib resistance for various reasons.
- at least 1 month after surgery for imatinib treatment or sunitinib treatment.
- at least one imaging assessment was received after surgery.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- . Before operation, he was treated with sunitinib
- . Patients receiving tumor reduction were not satisfied with the standard of the reduction of tumor.
- . The treatment of imatinib or sunitinib after surgery was less than 1 month.
- . Incomplete clinical data or follow-up data.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Imatinib 400mgexposure 400 mg/day or 600mg/day, | Drug | Arm A |
| Sunitinib 37.5Mg Oral Capsuleexposure 37.5 mg/day, continuous taking, or 50 mg/day (4/2) | Drug | Arm B |
Primary outcome
Efficiency
Time frame: 12 months
The curative effect was evaluated by measuring the unprogression-survival (PFS) each treatment group.
Security
Time frame: 12 months
Clinical and laboratory toxicity/symptoms will be graded according to the nci-ctc toxicity criteria.
Molecular marker detection
Time frame: 12 months
Gene mutation of c-kit/PDGFRA of imatinib resistance
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2018.
- Background: PubMed 12748309Abrams TJ, Lee LB, Murray LJ, Pryer NK, Cherrington JM. SU11248 inhibits KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in preclinical models of human small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003 May;2(5):471-8.
- Background: PubMed 11719439Rubin BP, Singer S, Tsao C, Duensing A, Lux ML, Ruiz R, Hibbard MK, Chen CJ, Xiao S, Tuveson DA, Demetri GD, Fletcher CD, Fletcher JA. KIT activation is a ubiquitous feature of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res. 2001 Nov 15;61(22):8118-21.
- Background: PubMed 22646775Li J, Gao J, Hong J, Shen L. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in Chinese patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Future Oncol. 2012 May;8(5):617-24. doi: 10.2217/fon.12.29.
- Results publication: PubMed 12094370Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, Miettinen M, O'Leary TJ, Remotti H, Rubin BP, Shmookler B, Sobin LH, Weiss SW. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002 May;33(5):459-65. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2002.123545.
- Results publication: PubMed 16550259Blackstein ME, Blay JY, Corless C, Driman DK, Riddell R, Soulieres D, Swallow CJ, Verma S; Canadian Advisory Committee on GIST. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;20(3):157-63. doi: 10.1155/2006/434761.
- Results publication: PubMed 16293410Goettsch WG, Bos SD, Breekveldt-Postma N, Casparie M, Herings RM, Hogendoorn PC. Incidence of gastrointestinal stromal tumours is underestimated: results of a nation-wide study. Eur J Cancer. 2005 Dec;41(18):2868-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.009. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 10636102DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, Mudan SS, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg. 2000 Jan;231(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200001000-00008.
- Results publication: PubMed 11215292Graadt van Roggen JF, van Velthuysen ML, Hogendoorn PC. The histopathological differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. J Clin Pathol. 2001 Feb;54(2):96-102. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.2.96.
- Results publication: PubMed 12538485Mendel DB, Laird AD, Xin X, Louie SG, Christensen JG, Li G, Schreck RE, Abrams TJ, Ngai TJ, Lee LB, Murray LJ, Carver J, Chan E, Moss KG, Haznedar JO, Sukbuntherng J, Blake RA, Sun L, Tang C, Miller T, Shirazian S, McMahon G, Cherrington JM. In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Jan;9(1):327-37.
- Results publication: PubMed 12531805O'Farrell AM, Abrams TJ, Yuen HA, Ngai TJ, Louie SG, Yee KW, Wong LM, Hong W, Lee LB, Town A, Smolich BD, Manning WC, Murray LJ, Heinrich MC, Cherrington JM. SU11248 is a novel FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2003 May 1;101(9):3597-605. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2307. Epub 2003 Jan 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 11057895Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell. 2000 Oct 13;103(2):211-25. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00114-8. No abstract available.
- Results publicationBello C. B. Houk, L. Sherman, et al. Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of SU11248 in healthy volunteers. Proc.ASCO abstr#3078, 2005.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. IPD will be shared later
Related trials for GIST
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn More About How Well Treatment With Sevabertinib (BAY 2927088) Tablets Works and How Safe it is in Participants Who Have a Solid Tumor With Mutations of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)
Advanced Solid Tumors, HER2 Mutation
RecruitingPhase 2
Belzutifan/MK-6482 for the Treatment of Advanced Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma (PPGL), Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (pNET), Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) Disease-Associated Tumors, Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (wt GIST), or Solid Tumors With HIF-2α Related Genetic Alterations (MK-6482-015)
Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
RecruitingObservational study
Surgery in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) for Treatment, Tumor Modeling, and Genomic Analysis
Gastric Cancer, Gastric Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of Ziftomenib in Combination With Imatinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST)
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST), Gastrointestinal Stromal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase I Trial to Determine the Dose and Evaluate the PK and Safety of Lutetium Lu 177 Edotreotide Therapy in Pediatric Participants With SSTR-positive Tumors
Somatostatin Receptor Positive, NETs
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of GIST, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lin Shen, MD (010-88196088, goodjf@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficiency (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03424876, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2018.