System; Lupus ErythematosusFLARENCT03426384
FLARE Lupus Research Study Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
A study testing Mymee Program in people with System; Lupus Erythematosus, run by Mymee Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The first phase of this pilot study will assess changes in quality of life at the end of a 16-week Mymee program in patients with moderate to severe SLE. The second phase will assess changes in healthcare utilization and cost over a one year period after program end. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- System; Lupus Erythematosus
- What is being tested?
- Mymee Program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Feb 2018to 5 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥ 18 years of age who can consent for themselves
- Location - U.S.
- Proficient in English (speaking, reading, and writing)
- Own or have reliable access to a smartphone (iPhone or Android)
- Provision of medical record
- Diagnosis of Lupus SLE as indicated in medical record
Show all 10Show fewer
- Symptomatic lupus as indicated by a score of at least 6 on one or more of BPI-SF questions 3, 5, or 6 and/or a score of at least 3 on one or more of the first four questions on the FACIT
- Current prescription for one or more of the following medications: 20mg/day of oral prednisone (or other oral corticosteroid equivalent dose); methotrexate and/or other immunosuppressive therapy of any dosage such as cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan®), methotrexate (Rheumatrex™), or azathioprine (muran®), adalimumab (Humira Pen, Humira Pen Crohn's-UC-HS Start, Humira Pediatric Crohn's Start, Humira, and Humira Pen Psoriasis-Uveitis), Plaquenil, Cellcept; monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) such as Benlysta® (belimuab, formerly called LymphoStat-B™); rituximab (Rituxan, MabThera and others);
- Able and willing to consent to study protocol
- Medications which have been stable for 3 months
Who cannot join
- Pregnant and/or planning to get pregnant before end of 16-week intervention
- In prison during any part of the 16-month study period
- Resident of a nursing home, wards of the state, or Institutionalized during any part of the 16-month study period
- Persons with decisional incapacity/cognitive impairment
- Participating in another clinical trial, interventional or observational research during the study period
- Plan or intention to receive/start during the 16-week (112 day) intervention period either:
Show all 11Show fewer
- a standing dose of oral steroid agents at a 20mg dose of prednisone (or other oral corticosteroid equivalent dose);
- pulses or tapers of steroids for flares for more than a total of 30 days within the observation period
- any pulse/taper dose of steroids during the last 4 weeks of the intervention period;
- immunosuppressive agents, or biologic response modifiers.
- Diagnosed with cancer
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Can Individualized Diet and Lifestyle Modifications Derived From Digital Therapeutics and Health Coaching Improve Symptoms of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
The first phase of this pilot study will assess changes in quality of life at the end of a 16-week Mymee program in patients with moderate to severe SLE. The second phase will assess changes in healthcare utilization and cost over a one year period after program end.
Read the detailed description
Intervention Group The Intervention Group will enter daily tasks into the Mymee app. After the first intake session, the subject will participate in weekly 20-30-minute coaching sessions with the Health Coach. At the second session, the Health Coach will review the symptoms and the free text entered by the subject to determine which dietary and environmental factors will be monitored in the Mymee app.
Each subsequent week, the Health Coach will review and discuss with the subject the food diary and the data entered into the Mymee app during the previous week. Based on this discussion and the subject's medical records, the Health Coach will determine or revise which symptoms will continue to be monitored using the Mymee App.
Control Group The Control Group subjects will receive no training, coaching, or other intervention services from Mymee. The Control Group subjects will complete the same battery of assessments at the same intervals as the Intervention Group subjects.
- Conditions
- System; Lupus Erythematosus
- Being tested
- Mymee Program
- Keywords
- SLE, FLARE, Lupus, Digital Therapeutics, Health Coaching, Smartphone App
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mymee ProgramBehavioural
A combination of digital therapeutics and telephonic health coaching is used to identify and test dietary, lifestyle, and environmental triggers in order to reduce symptoms of auto-immune disease.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Active comparator | The Intervention Group will enter daily tasks into the Mymee app. After the first intake session, the subject will participate in weekly 20-30-minute coaching sessions with the Health Coach. At the second session, the Health Coach will review the symptoms and the free text entered by the subject to determine which dietary and environmental factors will be monitored in the Mymee app.
Each subsequent week, the Health Coach will review and discuss with the subject the food diary and the data entered into the Mymee app during the previous week. Based on this discussion and the subject's medical records, the Health Coach will determine or revise which symptoms will continue to be monitored using the Mymee App. Receives: Behavioral: Mymee Program |
| Control Group | No intervention | The Control Group subjects will receive no training, coaching, or other intervention services from Mymee. The Control Group subjects will complete the same battery of assessments at the same intervals as the Intervention Group subjects. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF)
BPI-SF is a 9-item questionnaire with two domains: pain severity and pain interference. The pain severity items have values which range from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("pain as bad as you can imagine"), and the pain interference items have values which range from 0 ("does not interfere") to 10 ("completely interferes"). The pain severity and pain interference domain scores can be calculated as the mean of the scores of their component items.
Measured: Change from baseline, measured at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 of the intervention and then every 3 months for the 1 year following the intervention
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue)
The FACIT-Fatigue Sale is a 13-item questionnaire assessing fatigue, where the items use a Likert-type scale (with values ranging from 0 to 4). The responses for each item are added to obtain a total score which ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue.
Measured: Change from baseline, measured at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 of the intervention and then every 3 months for the 1 year following the intervention]
LupusQOL
LupusQoL is a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) specific health-related quality of life measure. It is a 34-item questionnaire where each item uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (with values ranging from 0 to 4). Each item pertains to one of eight domains: physical health, pain, planning, intimate relationships, burden to others, emotional health, body image, and fatigue. Each domain of the LupusQoL is scored separately. The score for each domain is equal to the average of the domain's items scaled such that the range of possible scores is 0 (worst health-related quality of life) to 100 (best health-related quality of life).
Measured: Change from baseline, measured at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 of the intervention and then every 3 months for the 1 year following the intervention
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in healthcare cost
Comparison of healthcare costs over a one year period, pre- and post- intervention
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2018
- Study start12 Feb 2018
- Primary completion5 Sep 2018
- Study completion5 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for System; Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mymee Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03426384
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20172250
- Acronym
- FLARE
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 18 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 10 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Kaul A, Gordon C, Crow MK, Touma Z, Urowitz MB, van Vollenhoven R, Ruiz-Irastorza G, Hughes G. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Jun 16;2:16039. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.39.
PubMed 27306639Lim SS, Bayakly AR, Helmick CG, Gordon C, Easley KA, Drenkard C. The incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus, 2002-2004: The Georgia Lupus Registry. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;66(2):357-68. doi: 10.1002/art.38239.
PubMed 24504808Lisnevskaia L, Murphy G, Isenberg D. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. 2014 Nov 22;384(9957):1878-1888. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60128-8. Epub 2014 May 31.
PubMed 24881804Somers EC, Marder W, Cagnoli P, Lewis EE, DeGuire P, Gordon C, Helmick CG, Wang L, Wing JJ, Dhar JP, Leisen J, Shaltis D, McCune WJ. Population-based incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus: the Michigan Lupus Epidemiology and Surveillance program. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;66(2):369-78. doi: 10.1002/art.38238.
PubMed 24504809Davis LS, Reimold AM. Research and therapeutics-traditional and emerging therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Apr 1;56(suppl_1):i100-i113. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew417.
PubMed 28375452Pons-Estel GJ, Alarcon GS, Scofield L, Reinlib L, Cooper GS. Understanding the epidemiology and progression of systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Feb;39(4):257-68. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.10.007. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
PubMed 19136143Bernatsky S, Boivin JF, Joseph L, Manzi S, Ginzler E, Gladman DD, Urowitz M, Fortin PR, Petri M, Barr S, Gordon C, Bae SC, Isenberg D, Zoma A, Aranow C, Dooley MA, Nived O, Sturfelt G, Steinsson K, Alarcon G, Senecal JL, Zummer M, Hanly J, Ensworth S, Pope J, Edworthy S, Rahman A, Sibley J, El-Gabalawy H, McCarthy T, St Pierre Y, Clarke A, Ramsey-Goldman R. Mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2550-7. doi: 10.1002/art.21955.
PubMed 16868977Lightstone L, Doria A, Wilson H, Ward FL, Larosa M, Bargman JM. Can we manage lupus nephritis without chronic corticosteroids administration? Autoimmun Rev. 2018 Jan;17(1):4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
PubMed 29108828Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Aug;14(8):1847-50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0456. No abstract available.
PubMed 16103423Squance ML, Reeves GE, Bridgman H. The Lived Experience of Lupus Flares: Features, Triggers, and Management in an Australian Female Cohort. Int J Chronic Dis. 2014;2014:816729. doi: 10.1155/2014/816729. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
PubMed 26464865Kamen DL. Environmental influences on systemic lupus erythematosus expression. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2014 Aug;40(3):401-12, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2014.05.003.
PubMed 25034153Gulati G, Brunner HI. Environmental triggers in systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Apr;47(5):710-717. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
PubMed 29169635Mu Q, Zhang H, Luo XM. SLE: Another Autoimmune Disorder Influenced by Microbes and Diet? Front Immunol. 2015 Nov 30;6:608. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00608. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26648937Bates MA, Brandenberger C, Langohr II, Kumagai K, Lock AL, Harkema JR, Holian A, Pestka JJ. Silica-Triggered Autoimmunity in Lupus-Prone Mice Blocked by Docosahexaenoic Acid Consumption. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 11;11(8):e0160622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160622. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27513935He B, Hoang TK, Wang T, Ferris M, Taylor CM, Tian X, Luo M, Tran DQ, Zhou J, Tatevian N, Luo F, Molina JG, Blackburn MR, Gomez TH, Roos S, Rhoads JM, Liu Y. Resetting microbiota by Lactobacillus reuteri inhibits T reg deficiency-induced autoimmunity via adenosine A2A receptors. J Exp Med. 2017 Jan;214(1):107-123. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160961. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
PubMed 27994068
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Can Individualized Diet and Lifestyle Modifications Derived From Digital Therapeutics and Health Coaching Improve Symptoms of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03426384
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FLARE / 20172250
- Conditions
- System; Lupus Erythematosus
- Keywords
- SLE, FLARE, Lupus, Digital Therapeutics, Health Coaching, Smartphone App
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mymee Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 12 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The first phase of this pilot study will assess changes in quality of life at the end of a 16-week Mymee program in patients with moderate to severe SLE. The second phase will assess changes in healthcare utilization and cost over a one year period after program end.
Detailed description
Intervention Group The Intervention Group will enter daily tasks into the Mymee app. After the first intake session, the subject will participate in weekly 20-30-minute coaching sessions with the Health Coach. At the second session, the Health Coach will review the symptoms and the free text entered by the subject to determine which dietary and environmental factors will be monitored in the Mymee app.
Each subsequent week, the Health Coach will review and discuss with the subject the food diary and the data entered into the Mymee app during the previous week. Based on this discussion and the subject's medical records, the Health Coach will determine or revise which symptoms will continue to be monitored using the Mymee App.
Control Group The Control Group subjects will receive no training, coaching, or other intervention services from Mymee. The Control Group subjects will complete the same battery of assessments at the same intervals as the Intervention Group subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Mymee ProgramThe Intervention Group will enter daily tasks into the Mymee app. After the first intake session, the subject will participate in weekly 20-30-minute coaching sessions with the Health Coach. At the second session, the Health Coach will review the symptoms and the free text entered by the subject to determine which dietary and environmental factors will be monitored in the Mymee app. Each subsequent week, the Health Coach will review and discuss with the subject the food diary and the data entered into the Mymee app during the previous week. Based on this discussion and the subject's medical records, the Health Coach will determine or revise which symptoms will continue to be monitored using the Mymee App. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –The Control Group subjects will receive no training, coaching, or other intervention services from Mymee. The Control Group subjects will complete the same battery of assessments at the same intervals as the Intervention Group subjects. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- ≥ 18 years of age who can consent for themselves
- Location - U.S.
- Proficient in English (speaking, reading, and writing)
- Own or have reliable access to a smartphone (iPhone or Android)
- Provision of medical record
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Pregnant and/or planning to get pregnant before end of 16-week intervention
- In prison during any part of the 16-month study period
- Resident of a nursing home, wards of the state, or Institutionalized during any part of the 16-month study period
- Persons with decisional incapacity/cognitive impairment
- Participating in another clinical trial, interventional or observational research during the study period
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mymee ProgramA combination of digital therapeutics and telephonic health coaching is used to identify and test dietary, lifestyle, and environmental triggers in order to reduce symptoms of auto-immune disease. | Behavioural | Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF)
Time frame: Change from baseline, measured at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 of the intervention and then every 3 months for the 1 year following the intervention
BPI-SF is a 9-item questionnaire with two domains: pain severity and pain interference. The pain severity items have values which range from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("pain as bad as you can imagine"), and the pain interference items have values which range from 0 ("does not interfere") to 10 ("completely interferes"). The pain severity and pain interference domain scores can be calculated as the mean of the scores of their component items.
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue)
Time frame: Change from baseline, measured at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 of the intervention and then every 3 months for the 1 year following the intervention]
The FACIT-Fatigue Sale is a 13-item questionnaire assessing fatigue, where the items use a Likert-type scale (with values ranging from 0 to 4). The responses for each item are added to obtain a total score which ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue.
LupusQOL
Time frame: Change from baseline, measured at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 of the intervention and then every 3 months for the 1 year following the intervention
LupusQoL is a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) specific health-related quality of life measure. It is a 34-item questionnaire where each item uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (with values ranging from 0 to 4). Each item pertains to one of eight domains: physical health, pain, planning, intimate relationships, burden to others, emotional health, body image, and fatigue. Each domain of the LupusQoL is scored separately. The score for each domain is equal to the average of the domain's items scaled such that the range of possible scores is 0 (worst health-related quality of life) to 100 (best health-related quality of life).
1 secondary outcome
Change in healthcare cost
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Dec 2019.
- Background: PubMed 27306639Kaul A, Gordon C, Crow MK, Touma Z, Urowitz MB, van Vollenhoven R, Ruiz-Irastorza G, Hughes G. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Jun 16;2:16039. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.39.
- Background: PubMed 24504808Lim SS, Bayakly AR, Helmick CG, Gordon C, Easley KA, Drenkard C. The incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus, 2002-2004: The Georgia Lupus Registry. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;66(2):357-68. doi: 10.1002/art.38239.
- Background: PubMed 24881804Lisnevskaia L, Murphy G, Isenberg D. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. 2014 Nov 22;384(9957):1878-1888. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60128-8. Epub 2014 May 31.
- Background: PubMed 24504809Somers EC, Marder W, Cagnoli P, Lewis EE, DeGuire P, Gordon C, Helmick CG, Wang L, Wing JJ, Dhar JP, Leisen J, Shaltis D, McCune WJ. Population-based incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus: the Michigan Lupus Epidemiology and Surveillance program. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;66(2):369-78. doi: 10.1002/art.38238.
- Background: PubMed 28375452Davis LS, Reimold AM. Research and therapeutics-traditional and emerging therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Apr 1;56(suppl_1):i100-i113. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew417.
- Background: PubMed 19136143Pons-Estel GJ, Alarcon GS, Scofield L, Reinlib L, Cooper GS. Understanding the epidemiology and progression of systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Feb;39(4):257-68. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.10.007. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
- Background: PubMed 16868977Bernatsky S, Boivin JF, Joseph L, Manzi S, Ginzler E, Gladman DD, Urowitz M, Fortin PR, Petri M, Barr S, Gordon C, Bae SC, Isenberg D, Zoma A, Aranow C, Dooley MA, Nived O, Sturfelt G, Steinsson K, Alarcon G, Senecal JL, Zummer M, Hanly J, Ensworth S, Pope J, Edworthy S, Rahman A, Sibley J, El-Gabalawy H, McCarthy T, St Pierre Y, Clarke A, Ramsey-Goldman R. Mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2550-7. doi: 10.1002/art.21955.
- Background: PubMed 29108828Lightstone L, Doria A, Wilson H, Ward FL, Larosa M, Bargman JM. Can we manage lupus nephritis without chronic corticosteroids administration? Autoimmun Rev. 2018 Jan;17(1):4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
- Background: PubMed 16103423Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Aug;14(8):1847-50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0456. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26464865Squance ML, Reeves GE, Bridgman H. The Lived Experience of Lupus Flares: Features, Triggers, and Management in an Australian Female Cohort. Int J Chronic Dis. 2014;2014:816729. doi: 10.1155/2014/816729. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
- Background: PubMed 25034153Kamen DL. Environmental influences on systemic lupus erythematosus expression. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2014 Aug;40(3):401-12, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2014.05.003.
- Background: PubMed 29169635Gulati G, Brunner HI. Environmental triggers in systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Apr;47(5):710-717. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for System; Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingObservational study
Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa) in Ovarian Preservation in SLE Subjects Receiving Cyclophosphamide as Determined by Questionnaires
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Sle), Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (Poi)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Active, not recruiting
Fatigue in Lupus Intervention Programmes (FLIP)
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CLN-978, a Subcutaneously Administered CD19-directed T Cell Engager, in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
SLE, SLE (Systemic Lupus)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mymee Program in people with System; Lupus Erythematosus, run by Mymee Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) (time frame: Change from baseline, measured at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 of the intervention and then every 3 months for the 1 year following the intervention). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03426384, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2019.