Rectal NeoplasmsNCT03426397
"Wait-and-see" Policy for Complete Responders After Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
An observational study of Rectal Neoplasms, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute at 14 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of this prospective observational cohort study is to provide short and long term oncological and functional outcome data on organ preserving treatment in good responders after a standard indication for neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation for rectal cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Neoplasms
- How many people
- 220 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 10 May 2017to 1 Jun 2026
- How long will I take part?
- 5 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The population will consist of patients, aged 18 years or older, with rectal cancer who after a long course of CRT or a short course of radiation with a long waiting interval have a clinical complete response (ycT0N0), as determined by MRI (including DWI) and digital rectal examination + endoscopy. Only patients who fulfill the predefined list of criteria for a clinical complete response will be considered eligible for inclusion in the study.
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 years or older
- Primary rectal cancer (pathologically confirmed)
- Treated with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy
- Clinical complete response (ycT0N0) to neoadjuvant treatment, as determined clinically (digital rectal examination, endoscopy) and radiologically (diffusion weighted imaging-MRI).
- Informed consent and capability of giving informed consent; before informed consent is obtained the patient will be extensively informed about the fact that 'wait-and-see' instead of conventional surgery is not accepted yet by most physicians and that the risks and benefits from these strategies have not been fully determined yet. These issues will be discussed in the patient information form as well.
- Comprehension of the alternative strategies and risks are clear to the patient (in other words that the patient understands the experimental base of the study).
Who cannot join
- Recurrent rectal cancer
- Contra-indications for MRI. If MRI is not possible because of contra-indications (e.g. pacemaker) patients will be excluded. MRI is crucial for response evaluation and follow-up and cannot be omitted in patients that follow the 'wait-and-see policy'.
- Unable to understand or read Dutch
- Unable or unwilling to comply to the intensive follow-up schedule
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 2 countries.
14 sites in 2 countries
Netherlands13 sites, 13 recruiting
- Recruiting
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
Amsterdam, 1066CX
Marit van der Sande, MD, m.vd.sande@nki.nl
Geerard Beets, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
VU Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam
Jurriaan Tuynman, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda
Rogier Crolla, MD, PhD
- Recruiting
Deventer Ziekenhuis
Deventer
Koen Talsma, MD, PhD
- Recruiting
Westfriesgasthuis
Hoorn
Erik Sonneveld, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Leeuwarden Medisch Centrum
Leeuwarden
Christiaan Hoff, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden
Koen Peeters, MD, PhD
- Recruiting
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht
Stephanie Breukink, MD, PhD
- Recruiting
Radboud UMC
Nijmegen
Hans de Wilt, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis
Tilburg
David Zimmerman, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Diakonessenhuis
Utrecht
Apollo Pronk, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Utrecht
Martijn Intven, MD, PhD
- Recruiting
Isala Klinieken
Zwolle
Erik van Westreenen, MD, PhD
Belgium1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Antwerp
Niels Koomen, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: Multicentre Evaluation of the "Wait-and-see" Policy for Complete Responders After Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
The aim of this prospective observational cohort study is to provide short and long term oncological and functional outcome data on organ preserving treatment in good responders after a standard indication for neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation for rectal cancer.
Read the detailed description
Standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer consists of a long course of (CRT) followed by surgical resection. Although the aim of neoadjuvant treatment in these patients is not organ preservation, but rather to provide improved local control, in the tumour disappears completely. Studies from Maastricht, the UK and Brazil have shown that in selected patients with a clinical complete response after CRT, a "wait-and-see" policy without any surgery could be a safe alternative with comparable long-term outcome and better functional outcome compared to patients who had surgery.
The main objective of the study is to provide short and long term oncological and functional outcome data on organ preserving treatment in good responders after a standard indication for neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation. Additional aims are: to set up a national network with expertise centres in the 'wait-and-see' treatment of rectal cancer; to set up a national registry for organ preservation treatment that will generate more evidence on the management and oncological outcome of patients evaluated and treated with organ preservation and [3] to offer through this network to all patients who are considered good candidates this 'wait-and-see' approach using the most up to date tools for selection and follow-up.
Study design: multicenter prospective observational cohort study and implementation study. Study population: The population will consist of patients, aged 18 years or older, with rectal cancer who after a long course of CRT or a short course of radiation with a long waiting interval have a clinical complete response (ycT0N0).
The main study endpoint is 2-year non-regrowth disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints are [1] the number of fully operational centres who can deliver high quality organ preserving care in rectal cancer in the Netherlands, [2] 2-year regrowth rate, [3] 2-year local control, [4] 2-year overall survival, [5] determination of the optimal follow-up schedule and [6] quality of life.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: In the majority of patients who participate in the study, major surgery and the associated morbidity can be avoided. Although scientific proof shows "wait-and-see" only comes with a small risk with adequate selection and follow up, the exact risk is not yet well established and needs to be confirmed by this study. The benefit-risk ratio for this study is regarded as favourable.
- Conditions
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Complete response, Organ preservation, Wait-and-See, Watch-and-Wait, Watchful Waiting
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms, Pathologic Complete Response
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study population | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
2-year non-regrowth disease-free survival
Absence of non-regrowth local or distant recurrence or death within 2 years of follow-up
Measured: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
Secondary outcomes (6)
Number of fully operational centres
Number of operational centres who can deliver high quality organ preserving care in rectal cancer in the Netherlands
Measured: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
2-year local regrowth rate
The proportion of local regrowth
Measured: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
2-year local control
Absence of local recurrence(unresectable regrowth, resected with R1, or requiring more extensive than TME surgery) or death
Measured: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
2-year overall survival
Absence of death
Measured: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
Determination of the optimal follow-up schedule
A balance between early detection of recurrence and compliance to follow-up
Measured: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
Quality of life
Quality of life (general health, disease specific and functional outcomes)
Measured: At 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after the start of wait-and-see protocol
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2018
- Study start10 May 2017
- Primary completion1 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Netherlands Cancer InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 5 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dutch Cancer Society
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Geerard Beets, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer InstituteRegina Beets -Tan, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03426397
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M16WAS
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 21 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Meyer VM, Meuzelaar RR, Schoenaker IJH, de Groot JB, Reerink O, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Beets GL, van Westreenen HL. Delayed TME Surgery in a Watch-and-Wait Strategy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of Hospital Costs and Surgical and Oncological Outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 May 1;66(5):671-680. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002259. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
PubMed 34856587
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicentre Evaluation of the "Wait-and-see" Policy for Complete Responders After Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03426397
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M16WAS
- Conditions
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Complete response, Organ preservation, Wait-and-See, Watch-and-Wait, Watchful Waiting
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dutch Cancer Society
- Study start
- 10 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this prospective observational cohort study is to provide short and long term oncological and functional outcome data on organ preserving treatment in good responders after a standard indication for neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation for rectal cancer.
Detailed description
Standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer consists of a long course of (CRT) followed by surgical resection. Although the aim of neoadjuvant treatment in these patients is not organ preservation, but rather to provide improved local control, in the tumour disappears completely. Studies from Maastricht, the UK and Brazil have shown that in selected patients with a clinical complete response after CRT, a "wait-and-see" policy without any surgery could be a safe alternative with comparable long-term outcome and better functional outcome compared to patients who had surgery.
The main objective of the study is to provide short and long term oncological and functional outcome data on organ preserving treatment in good responders after a standard indication for neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation. Additional aims are: to set up a national network with expertise centres in the 'wait-and-see' treatment of rectal cancer; to set up a national registry for organ preservation treatment that will generate more evidence on the management and oncological outcome of patients evaluated and treated with organ preservation and [3] to offer through this network to all patients who are considered good candidates this 'wait-and-see' approach using the most up to date tools for selection and follow-up.
Study design: multicenter prospective observational cohort study and implementation study. Study population: The population will consist of patients, aged 18 years or older, with rectal cancer who after a long course of CRT or a short course of radiation with a long waiting interval have a clinical complete response (ycT0N0).
The main study endpoint is 2-year non-regrowth disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints are [1] the number of fully operational centres who can deliver high quality organ preserving care in rectal cancer in the Netherlands, [2] 2-year regrowth rate, [3] 2-year local control, [4] 2-year overall survival, [5] determination of the optimal follow-up schedule and [6] quality of life.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: In the majority of patients who participate in the study, major surgery and the associated morbidity can be avoided. Although scientific proof shows "wait-and-see" only comes with a small risk with adequate selection and follow up, the exact risk is not yet well established and needs to be confirmed by this study. The benefit-risk ratio for this study is regarded as favourable.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 5 Years
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study population | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The population will consist of patients, aged 18 years or older, with rectal cancer who after a long course of CRT or a short course of radiation with a long waiting interval have a clinical complete response (ycT0N0), as determined by MRI (including DWI) and digital rectal examination + endoscopy. Only patients who fulfill the predefined list of criteria for a clinical complete response will be considered eligible for inclusion in the study.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Aged 18 years or older
- Primary rectal cancer (pathologically confirmed)
- Treated with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy
- Clinical complete response (ycT0N0) to neoadjuvant treatment, as determined clinically (digital rectal examination, endoscopy) and radiologically (diffusion weighted imaging-MRI).
- Informed consent and capability of giving informed consent; before informed consent is obtained the patient will be extensively informed about the fact that 'wait-and-see' instead of conventional surgery is not accepted yet by most physicians and that the risks and benefits from these strategies have not been fully determined yet. These issues will be discussed in the patient information form as well.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Recurrent rectal cancer
- Contra-indications for MRI. If MRI is not possible because of contra-indications (e.g. pacemaker) patients will be excluded. MRI is crucial for response evaluation and follow-up and cannot be omitted in patients that follow the 'wait-and-see policy'.
- Unable to understand or read Dutch
- Unable or unwilling to comply to the intensive follow-up schedule
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
2-year non-regrowth disease-free survival
Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
Absence of non-regrowth local or distant recurrence or death within 2 years of follow-up
6 secondary outcomes
Number of fully operational centres
Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
2-year local regrowth rate
Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
2-year local control
Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
2-year overall survival
Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
Determination of the optimal follow-up schedule
Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol
Quality of life
Time frame: At 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after the start of wait-and-see protocol
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34856587Meyer VM, Meuzelaar RR, Schoenaker IJH, de Groot JB, Reerink O, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Beets GL, van Westreenen HL. Delayed TME Surgery in a Watch-and-Wait Strategy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of Hospital Costs and Surgical and Oncological Outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 May 1;66(5):671-680. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002259. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Rectal Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Geerard Beets, MD, PhD principal investigator
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute
Regina Beets -Tan, MD, PhD principal investigator
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute
14 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rectal Neoplasms, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute at 14 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Netherlands, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marit van der Sande, MD (0031205129111, m.vd.sande@nki.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
2-year non-regrowth disease-free survival (time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03426397, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2020.