AzTrials
AzTrials

Pelvic Organ ProlapseNCT03427606

Continuous Locked Non-barbed Suture for Mesh Fixation During Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse

A study testing Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional single 5-points suture for anterior mesh fixation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 80 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
What is being tested?
Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2016to Apr 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 80 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • For patients
  • Age ≤ 80 years
  • Patient's informed consent
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists: < class III or IV
  • Physiologic, surgical or iatrogenic menopause.
  • No previous major abdominal surgical procedures
Show all 10Show fewer
  • For diseases
  • POP-Q stage III/IV for anterior and/or apical compartment; stage <III for posterior compartment.
  • No uterine cervix dysplasia or endometrial disorders.
  • No uterine size larger than conform 10 weeks gestation

Who cannot join

None listed.

About this study

Official title: Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Continuous Suture for Mesh Fixation

This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional single 5-points suture for anterior mesh fixation.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Pelvic-organ prolapse, in which the pelvic organs (uterus, bladder, and bowel) protrude into or past the vaginal introitus, is a condition often treated with surgery. Women have an 11 percent risk of surgery for prolapse or urinary incontinence by 80 years of age, and of this 11 percent, almost one third of the women have a second surgery. This fact points to the need for improved treatment of pelvic-floor disorders. Numerous surgical procedures have been described for the management of POP. Vaginal surgery may be associated with less postoperative pain and a more rapid return to daily living than abdominal repair. However, in a randomised study, sacrocolpopexy was twice as likely to result in optimal anatomical outcome as vaginal surgery. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy provides the potential to combine the success rates of an abdominal approach with the faster recovery associated with a minimally invasive technique. Tissue dissection and mesh placement may also be facilitated by the magnification and field of view permitted by the laparoscopic approach. These benefits must be balanced against a longer operating time from 150 to 250 minutes according to surgeons' experience. In addition, this procedure is often associated to subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) for the reasons of prevention (post-menopause age) or uterine diseases, which improve still more the operating time.

This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional 5-points single suture for anterior mesh fixation.

Secondary endopoints of this comparison are incidence of intra- or postoperative complications estimated blood loss, postoperative pain (evaluated by VAS), days of hospitalization and costs for the health care system.

Statistical Analysis and Study Design This is a single Institution prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at the Pia Fondazione Panico of Tricase, Italy.

To have an imbalanced results and to reduce any bias, a randomization list has been checked.

Probability (p) values will be considered to be statistically significant at the <0.05 level.

There will be recruited 20 patients to treat using continuous locked suture and 20 patients to treat with standard 5-points single suture for mesh fixation comparing these two techniques in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss and other intra- or post operative complications, postoperative pain, days of hospitalization, costs. All patients will be adequately informed and inserted in the study only after having read and signed an informed consent. Diagnostic, clinical and surgical data of each patient will be prospectively recorded. At the end of the procedure, a schedule will be compiled with intraoperative data. All clinical and histologic data will be recorded prospectively using a database. Pain associated with the procedure will be evaluated by a subjective assessment (analysis of VAS scale values reported by patients at 8 and 24 hours after surgery). Post-operative complications will be evaluated during the first 30 days after surgery according to Dindo's classification.

Being tested
Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
Keywords
sacral colpopexy, laparoscopy, mesh fixation
Medical subject headings
Pelvic Organ Prolapse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral ColpopexyProcedure or surgery

    To verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using continuous locked suture vs traditional 5-points suture for mesh fixation

Study groups in NCT03427606
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Continuous SutureExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
Single 5-points SutureActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Operative Time

    Operative time for LPS subtotal hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy operative time will be calculated from the entrance in the abdominal cavity.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Recurrent Prolapse

    Appearance of recurrent prolapse after one year from surgery

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Feb 2018
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionApr 2017
  4. Study completionApr 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03427606
Sponsor's protocol ID
LSCContinua
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
30 Jan 2018
Last updated
26 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Operative Time (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in