Pelvic Organ ProlapseNCT03427606
Continuous Locked Non-barbed Suture for Mesh Fixation During Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse
A study testing Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico.
Trial summary
This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional single 5-points suture for anterior mesh fixation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 80 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- What is being tested?
- Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Apr 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 80 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- For patients
- Age ≤ 80 years
- Patient's informed consent
- American Society of Anesthesiologists: < class III or IV
- Physiologic, surgical or iatrogenic menopause.
- No previous major abdominal surgical procedures
Show all 10Show fewer
- For diseases
- POP-Q stage III/IV for anterior and/or apical compartment; stage <III for posterior compartment.
- No uterine cervix dysplasia or endometrial disorders.
- No uterine size larger than conform 10 weeks gestation
Who cannot join
None listed.
About this study
Official title: Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Continuous Suture for Mesh Fixation
This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional single 5-points suture for anterior mesh fixation.
Read the detailed description
Introduction Pelvic-organ prolapse, in which the pelvic organs (uterus, bladder, and bowel) protrude into or past the vaginal introitus, is a condition often treated with surgery. Women have an 11 percent risk of surgery for prolapse or urinary incontinence by 80 years of age, and of this 11 percent, almost one third of the women have a second surgery. This fact points to the need for improved treatment of pelvic-floor disorders. Numerous surgical procedures have been described for the management of POP. Vaginal surgery may be associated with less postoperative pain and a more rapid return to daily living than abdominal repair. However, in a randomised study, sacrocolpopexy was twice as likely to result in optimal anatomical outcome as vaginal surgery. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy provides the potential to combine the success rates of an abdominal approach with the faster recovery associated with a minimally invasive technique. Tissue dissection and mesh placement may also be facilitated by the magnification and field of view permitted by the laparoscopic approach. These benefits must be balanced against a longer operating time from 150 to 250 minutes according to surgeons' experience. In addition, this procedure is often associated to subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) for the reasons of prevention (post-menopause age) or uterine diseases, which improve still more the operating time.
This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional 5-points single suture for anterior mesh fixation.
Secondary endopoints of this comparison are incidence of intra- or postoperative complications estimated blood loss, postoperative pain (evaluated by VAS), days of hospitalization and costs for the health care system.
Statistical Analysis and Study Design This is a single Institution prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at the Pia Fondazione Panico of Tricase, Italy.
To have an imbalanced results and to reduce any bias, a randomization list has been checked.
Probability (p) values will be considered to be statistically significant at the <0.05 level.
There will be recruited 20 patients to treat using continuous locked suture and 20 patients to treat with standard 5-points single suture for mesh fixation comparing these two techniques in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss and other intra- or post operative complications, postoperative pain, days of hospitalization, costs. All patients will be adequately informed and inserted in the study only after having read and signed an informed consent. Diagnostic, clinical and surgical data of each patient will be prospectively recorded. At the end of the procedure, a schedule will be compiled with intraoperative data. All clinical and histologic data will be recorded prospectively using a database. Pain associated with the procedure will be evaluated by a subjective assessment (analysis of VAS scale values reported by patients at 8 and 24 hours after surgery). Post-operative complications will be evaluated during the first 30 days after surgery according to Dindo's classification.
- Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Being tested
- Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
- Keywords
- sacral colpopexy, laparoscopy, mesh fixation
- Medical subject headings
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral ColpopexyProcedure or surgery
To verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using continuous locked suture vs traditional 5-points suture for mesh fixation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Suture | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy |
| Single 5-points Suture | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Operative Time
Operative time for LPS subtotal hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy operative time will be calculated from the entrance in the abdominal cavity.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Recurrent Prolapse
Appearance of recurrent prolapse after one year from surgery
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2018
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionApr 2017
- Study completionApr 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pelvic Organ ProlapseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrea Morciano, Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico
- Investigators
- Andrea Morciano, M.D., Principal investigator, Pia Fondazione Giovanni Panico
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03427606
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LSCContinua
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 30 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Continuous Suture for Mesh Fixation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03427606
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LSCContinua
- Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Keywords
- sacral colpopexy, laparoscopy, mesh fixation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. PanicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional single 5-points suture for anterior mesh fixation.
Detailed description
Introduction Pelvic-organ prolapse, in which the pelvic organs (uterus, bladder, and bowel) protrude into or past the vaginal introitus, is a condition often treated with surgery. Women have an 11 percent risk of surgery for prolapse or urinary incontinence by 80 years of age, and of this 11 percent, almost one third of the women have a second surgery. This fact points to the need for improved treatment of pelvic-floor disorders. Numerous surgical procedures have been described for the management of POP. Vaginal surgery may be associated with less postoperative pain and a more rapid return to daily living than abdominal repair. However, in a randomised study, sacrocolpopexy was twice as likely to result in optimal anatomical outcome as vaginal surgery. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy provides the potential to combine the success rates of an abdominal approach with the faster recovery associated with a minimally invasive technique. Tissue dissection and mesh placement may also be facilitated by the magnification and field of view permitted by the laparoscopic approach. These benefits must be balanced against a longer operating time from 150 to 250 minutes according to surgeons' experience. In addition, this procedure is often associated to subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) for the reasons of prevention (post-menopause age) or uterine diseases, which improve still more the operating time.
This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional 5-points single suture for anterior mesh fixation.
Secondary endopoints of this comparison are incidence of intra- or postoperative complications estimated blood loss, postoperative pain (evaluated by VAS), days of hospitalization and costs for the health care system.
Statistical Analysis and Study Design This is a single Institution prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at the Pia Fondazione Panico of Tricase, Italy.
To have an imbalanced results and to reduce any bias, a randomization list has been checked.
Probability (p) values will be considered to be statistically significant at the <0.05 level.
There will be recruited 20 patients to treat using continuous locked suture and 20 patients to treat with standard 5-points single suture for mesh fixation comparing these two techniques in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss and other intra- or post operative complications, postoperative pain, days of hospitalization, costs. All patients will be adequately informed and inserted in the study only after having read and signed an informed consent. Diagnostic, clinical and surgical data of each patient will be prospectively recorded. At the end of the procedure, a schedule will be compiled with intraoperative data. All clinical and histologic data will be recorded prospectively using a database. Pain associated with the procedure will be evaluated by a subjective assessment (analysis of VAS scale values reported by patients at 8 and 24 hours after surgery). Post-operative complications will be evaluated during the first 30 days after surgery according to Dindo's classification.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Suture | Experimental | Procedure: Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy |
| Single 5-points Suture | Active comparator | Procedure: Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- For patients
- Age ≤ 80 years
- Patient's informed consent
- American Society of Anesthesiologists: < class III or IV
- Physiologic, surgical or iatrogenic menopause.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral ColpopexyTo verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using continuous locked suture vs traditional 5-points suture for mesh fixation | Procedure or surgery | Continuous Suture, Single 5-points Suture |
Primary outcome
Operative Time
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Operative time for LPS subtotal hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy operative time will be calculated from the entrance in the abdominal cavity.
1 secondary outcome
Recurrent Prolapse
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2018.
Related trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Recruiting
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training During Pregnancy
Urinary Incontinence, Anal Incontinence
Not yet recruiting
Perineal Protection Device for Reducing Perineal Trauma During Vaginal Delivery in First-time Mothers: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Perineal Laceration
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Suzetrigine Following Urogynecologic Surgery: Investigation of Postoperative Pain Management
Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Clinical Outcomes of Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse
Rectal Prolapse, Fecal Incontinence
Active, not recruiting
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
Uterine Prolapse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrea Morciano, M.D. principal investigator
Pia Fondazione Giovanni Panico
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Operative Time (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2018.