AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankle SprainsNCT03428620

Effect of Mobilization in Conjunction With Exercise in Participants With a History of Chronic Ankle Instability

A study testing High Velocity Low Amplitude mobilization and Exercise protocol in people with Ankle Sprains, run by Shenandoah University at 2 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Our purpose is to examine the combined effects of thrust mobilization of the ankle joints in conjunction with a six-week rehabilitation program on functional performance in subjects reporting chronic ankle instability (CAI). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Ankle Sprains
What is being tested?
High Velocity Low Amplitude mobilization and Exercise protocol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
14 Feb 2018to Jun 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18-35 years of age
  • A history of at least 1 significant ankle sprain (The initial sprain must have occurred at least 12 months prior to study enrollment, associated with inflammatory symptoms (pain, swelling, etc), created at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity)
  • The most recent injury must have occurred more than 3 months prior to study enrollment.
  • A history of the previously injured ankle joint "giving way" and/or recurrent sprain and/or "feelings of instability."
  • Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) < 24
  • Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)42: ADL scale < 90%, Sport scale < 80%

Who cannot join

  • A history of previous surgeries to the musculoskeletal structures (ie, bones, joint structures, nerves) in either limb of the lower extremity.
  • A history of a fracture in either limb of the lower extremity requiring realignment
  • Acute injury to musculoskeletal structures of other joints of the lower extremity in the previous 3 months, which impacted joint integrity and function (ie, sprains, fractures) resulting in at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Cameron J Bolton, DPT contact

5405426540

cbolton16@su.edu

Sheri Hale, PhD, PT contact

5405457240

shale2@su.edu

United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Methodist University

    Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28311

    Todd Telemeco, DPT, PhD, 910-630-7216, ttelemeco@methodist.edu

    Todd A Telemeco, DPT, PhD

    Recruiting
  • Shenandoah University

    Winchester, Virginia, 22601

    Cameron Bolton, DPT, 540-542-6540, cbolton16@su.edu

    Sheri, PhD, PT, 5405457240, shale2@su.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effect of a Six-week Rehabilitation Program in Conjunction With Thrust Mobilization on Lower Extremity Function in Subjects Reporting Chronic Ankle Instability

Our purpose is to examine the combined effects of thrust mobilization of the ankle joints in conjunction with a six-week rehabilitation program on functional performance in subjects reporting chronic ankle instability (CAI).

Read the detailed description

Joint mobilizations are reported to increase range of motion (ROM), postural control and proprioception, and decrease pain in individuals with CAI. However, there is no research supporting the combined effects of thrust mobilization and exercise on function in this population.

Inclusion and exclusion criterion have been established utilizing the International Ankle Consortium guidelines. Using a convenience sampling, participants will be randomized into the exercise only or mobilization (experimental) and exercise group. Both groups will undergo 12 supervised training sessions across a six-week period. The mobilization (experimental) group will also receive high-velocity-low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust mobilizations at the talocrural, proximal, and distal tibiofibular joints prior to the first three treatment sessions.

An examiner, who is blinded to involved limb and group allocation, will perform a baseline and six-week follow-up examination of joint mobility, range of motion, and functional performance. The participants will complete subjective outcome measures at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks including the Foot and Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM), FAAM-Sport, Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool (AJFAT), and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Participants will also complete baseline and six-week follow up assessments of the figure-of-8 hop test, side hop test, and three directions of the Star Excursion Balance test (SEBT).

The exercise protocol is a modified version of the balance training program described by McKeon et al. Participants will complete this protocol twice a week for six weeks. Treatment sessions will last approximately 30 minutes. Participants will individually progress on particular exercises if zero errors are observed. In addition, all participants will be given a home exercise program (HEP) to complete every day of the week excluding treatment days.

The mobilization (experimental) group will receive HVLA thrust mobilizations at the three joints stated above for the first three sessions prior to completing the exercise protocol. Each mobilization will be performed one time at each joint. The order of joint mobilizations will be randomized prior to administering.

Data analysis will be performed using International Business Machines Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Alpha level will be set p<0.05. Expecting to utilize separate 2 x 2 repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess changes in the FAAM, FAAM-Sport, AJFAT, CAIT, figure-of-8 hop test, side hop test, and three directions of the SEBT.

Conditions
Ankle Sprains
Being tested
High Velocity Low Amplitude mobilization, Exercise protocol
Keywords
Functional Performance, Rehabilitation, Manipulation
Medical subject headings
Ankle Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High Velocity Low Amplitude mobilizationOther

    Also called HVLA, thrust mobilization

    Mobilizations will be performed one time at each joint, prior to completing the exercise protocol during the first three treatment sessions.

  • Exercise protocolOther

    This exercise regimen is a modified version of the balance training program described by McKeon et al.

Study groups in NCT03428620
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MobilizationExperimentalHigh Velocity Low Amplitude mobilization group. The three joints that will be manipulated include proximal tibiofibular, the distal tibiofibular, and talocrural joints and will be mobilized the first three sessions prior to the participants performing the exercise protocol.
Receives: Other: High Velocity Low Amplitude mobilization; Other: Exercise protocol
Exercise ProtocolActive comparatorThis exercise regimen is a modified version of the balance training program described by McKeon et al.
Receives: Other: Exercise protocol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in baseline Figure-of-8 hop test at 6 weeks.

    The participant begins the test on either side of a demarcated 5-meter distance. While standing on the involved ankle, the participant is instructed to "hop on one foot, as fast as you can," twice around the figure 8. Two trials will be performed with the fastest time being recorded.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  2. Change in baseline Side hop test at 6 weeks

    The participant stands on the involved limb on either side of two lines that are 30 cm apart. They are then instructed to "hop on one foot, as fast as you can," laterally and then back to the starting position. This is counted as two repetitions and 10 repetitions are performed. If the participant lands on or between the lines, this repetition does not count and they continue until 10 good repetitions are completed. Participants perform two trials and the fastest time is recorded.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  3. Change in baseline Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) at 6 weeks

    Each participant is asked to maintain single-limb stance, with hands on their hips, while reaching in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  4. Change in baseline Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)- Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Subscale at 6 weeks

    The FAAM- ADL is a 21-item tool that is designed to assess functional limitations related to foot and ankle conditions. Each item is scored on a Likert scale; 0 (unable to do) to 4 (no difficulty) and has total point value of 84 points, reported as a percent value.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  5. Change in baseline Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)- Sport subscale at 6 weeks

    The FAAM- Sport is a 7-item tool that is a sub-scale of the FAAM. Each item is scored on a Likert scale; 0 (unable to do) to 4 (no difficulty) with a total point value of 28 points, reported as a percent value.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  6. Change in baseline Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool (AJFAT) at 6 weeks

    12-item tool that rates the participant's overall perceived level of function. Each item is assigned a point value from 0 (much less than other ankle) to 4 (much more than other ankle) with a possible total value of 48 points.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  7. Change in baseline Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) at 6 weeks.

    9-item questionnaire that helps discriminate and measure the severity of functional ankle instability.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Feb 2018
  2. Study start14 Feb 2018
  3. Primary completionJan 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03428620
Sponsor's protocol ID
511
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
5 Feb 2018
Last updated
17 Apr 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Gribble PA, Delahunt E, Bleakley CM, Caulfield B, Docherty CL, Fong DT, Fourchet F, Hertel J, Hiller CE, Kaminski TW, McKeon PO, Refshauge KM, van der Wees P, Vicenzino W, Wikstrom EA. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. J Athl Train. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):121-7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.1.14. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

    PubMed 24377963
  • McKeon PO, Ingersoll CD, Kerrigan DC, Saliba E, Bennett BC, Hertel J. Balance training improves function and postural control in those with chronic ankle instability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Oct;40(10):1810-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817e0f92.

    PubMed 18799992
  • Hale SA, Hertel J, Olmsted-Kramer LC. The effect of a 4-week comprehensive rehabilitation program on postural control and lower extremity function in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Jun;37(6):303-11. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2322.

    PubMed 17612356
  • Beazell JR, Grindstaff TL, Sauer LD, Magrum EM, Ingersoll CD, Hertel J. Effects of a proximal or distal tibiofibular joint manipulation on ankle range of motion and functional outcomes in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;42(2):125-34. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3729. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

    PubMed 22333567

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing High Velocity Low Amplitude mobilization and Exercise protocol in people with Ankle Sprains, run by Shenandoah University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Cameron J Bolton, DPT (5405426540, cbolton16@su.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in baseline Figure-of-8 hop test at 6 weeks. (time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03428620, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in