Ventral HerniaNCT03429374
Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width
A study testing Liquiband Fix8 and Absorbable tack in people with Ventral Hernia, run by Duomed at 11 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
In laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, an abundance of methods has been developed to fix the mesh to the abdominal wall, including sutures (non-absorbable or absorbable), staples (non-absorbable or absorbable), clips, tacks (non-absorbable or absorbable) and (fibrin and synthetic) glues. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventral Hernia
- What is being tested?
- Liquiband Fix8 and Absorbable tack
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 19 Nov 2018to 20 May 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient with ventral hernia (primary or incisional) with a defect size between 2 and 5 cm and eligible for laparoscopic repair.
- Patients with ASA grade I to III.
- Patient is at least 18 years old.
- Patient must sign and date the informed consent form prior to treatment.
Who cannot join
- Patient with a recurrence of a previously treated ventral hernia repaired with mesh. Recurrences are only allowed to be included after former primary (suture) repair or retromuscular/onlay mesh repair.
- Patient is treated by open surgery.
- Patient has more than one defect. Treatment of Swiss-cheese defects (multiple small defects) is allowed if all defects can be treated with one mesh. Total width cannot exceed 5 cm.
- Patient with a complex hernia, likely not eligible for laparoscopic repair. Complexity is determined by the investigator (adhesions, small bowel resection, etc).
- Patient with a life expectancy of less than 2 years.
- Patient is suspected of being unable to comply with the study protocol.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Patient with ASA IV or V.
- Patient is pregnant.
- Patient needs acute surgery.
- Patient is scheduled for surgery within 6 weeks after the index-procedure.
- Patient has fibromyalgia.
- Patient with depression as shown in patient medical record.
- Patient is enrolled in another study.
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
Belgium11 sites
Hospital Network Antwerp (ZNA) Jan Palfijn
Antwerp
General Hospital Sint Jan Brugge
Bruges
University Hospital Brussels
Brussels
CHU Charleroi
Charleroi
General Hospital Sint Vincentius Deinze
Deinze
ZOL Genk
Genk
University Hospital Leuven
Leuven
CHR Namur
Namur
General Hospital Nikolaas
Sint-Niklaas
Regional Hospital HH Tienen
Tienen
General Hospital Delta Torhout
Torhout
About this study
Official title: Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
In laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, an abundance of methods has been developed to fix the mesh to the abdominal wall, including sutures (non-absorbable or absorbable), staples (non-absorbable or absorbable), clips, tacks (non-absorbable or absorbable) and (fibrin and synthetic) glues. Which fixation technique is superior, is still under evaluation. There is clearly a need for larger trials to obtain confident results on the safety and performance of glue mesh fixation and tack mesh fixation in LVHR. The hypothesis of this prospective, randomized controlled study is that post-operative pain at 4 to 6 weeks after mesh fixation with glue (LiquiBand® Fix 8™) will not differ compared to treatment with absorbable tacks during LVHR. A total of 510 patients will be recruited for this trial. This study will assess: pain, hernia recurrence, safety, procedural characteristics, technical success, analgesic intake, period to return to normal activity and quality of life.
- Conditions
- Ventral Hernia
- Being tested
- Liquiband Fix8, Absorbable tack
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Ventral
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Liquiband Fix8Device
LiquiBand® Fix 8™ (Advanced Medical Solutions - Plymouth, UK) is a hernia mesh fixation device providing strong and secure mesh fixation without causing any tissue damage or mechanical trauma. This device is designed to offer precise and controlled delivery of tissue glue (n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate), resulting in a strong mesh fixation.
Absorbable tackDevice
Absorbable tack
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Liquiband Fix8 glue mesh fixation | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Liquiband Fix8 |
| Mesh fixation with absorbable tacks | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Absorbable tack |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain in both groups at 4-6 weeks after LVHR using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain. The patient is asked to select the number on the scale that corresponds to the worst level of pain he/she experiences. Pain is classified into mild (1 - 30 mm), moderate (31 - 60 mm) and severe (61 - 100 mm). Absence of pain is defined as VAS = 0.
Measured: At 4 - 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (19)
Period of hospitalization
Record the number of days in hospital until discharge
Measured: up to 5 days
Operating time
Measured: Intra-operatively
Intra-operative adverse events
Intra-operative adverse events include bleeding and enterotomy
Measured: Intra-operatively
Post-operative adverse events
Post-operative adverse events include seroma (i.e. accumulation of wound fluid), ileus (i.e. bowel obstruction), infection, bowel injury, major bleeding requiring blood transfusion or re-intervention, complications due to anesthesia and minor bleeding at a trocar insertion site
Measured: up to 24 months follow-up
Usability of the glue during the index-procedure
Usability scoring: 1 = bad -> 3 = moderate -> 5 = excellent
Measured: Intra-operatively
Technical success of glue fixation
During the index-procedure, the investigator will register whether fixation of the mesh with glue achieved technical success or not. Technical success is defined as successful hernia repair as intended.
Measured: Intra-operatively
Technical success of tack fixation
During the index-procedure, the investigator will register whether fixation of the mesh with tacks achieved technical success or not. Technical success is defined as successful hernia repair as intended.
Measured: Intra-operatively
Pain at baseline using the VAS scale
The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Measured: At baseline
Pain at discharge using the VAS scale
The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Measured: Up to 5 days
Pain at 12 months follow-up using the VAS scale
The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Measured: At 12 months follow-up
Pain at 24 months follow-up using the VAS scale
The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Measured: At 24 months follow-up
Postoperative analgesic intake
Period of intake
Measured: Up to 24 months follow-up
Postoperative analgesic intake
Type of intake
Measured: Up to 24 months follow-up
Period to return to normal activity
Number of days after the index-procedure at which the patient resumes normal activities.
Measured: At 4 - 6 weeks follow-up
Quality of life at baseline.
The Carolinas Comfort Scale questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific, quality of life questionnaire developed for patients undergoing hernia repair with mesh. It is a 23-item questionnaire that measures severity of pain, sensation, and movement limitations from the mesh in eight categories. The CCS score is derived by adding the scores from each of the 23 items. The best possible score is 0 and the worst possible score is 115.
Measured: At baseline
Quality of life at 4-6 weeks.
CCS questionnaire
Measured: At 4 - 6 weeks follow-up
Quality of life at 12 months follow-up.
CCS questionnaire
Measured: At 12 months follow-up
Quality of life at 24 months follow-up.
CCS questionnaire
Measured: At 24 months follow-up
Recurrences during follow-up
A clinical examination is conducted to evaluate recurrence. If there is any suspicion of recurrence, an ultrasound or MRI is performed according to hospital practice to distinguish true recurrences from bulging.
Measured: up to 24 months follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2018
- Study start19 Nov 2018
- Primary completion20 May 2021
- Study completion20 May 2021
Why it stopped: Limited patient enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ventral HerniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients are randomly allocated to group 1 or group 2: * Group 1: Mesh fixation with tacks. * Group 2: Mesh fixation with glue.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duomed
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03429374
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BLITS-01
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 24 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03429374
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BLITS-01
- Conditions
- Ventral Hernia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Limited patient enrollment
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- DuomedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 19 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, an abundance of methods has been developed to fix the mesh to the abdominal wall, including sutures (non-absorbable or absorbable), staples (non-absorbable or absorbable), clips, tacks (non-absorbable or absorbable) and (fibrin and synthetic) glues. Which fixation technique is superior, is still under evaluation. There is clearly a need for larger trials to obtain confident results on the safety and performance of glue mesh fixation and tack mesh fixation in LVHR. The hypothesis of this prospective, randomized controlled study is that post-operative pain at 4 to 6 weeks after mesh fixation with glue (LiquiBand® Fix 8™) will not differ compared to treatment with absorbable tacks during LVHR. A total of 510 patients will be recruited for this trial. This study will assess: pain, hernia recurrence, safety, procedural characteristics, technical success, analgesic intake, period to return to normal activity and quality of life.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients are randomly allocated to group 1 or group 2: * Group 1: Mesh fixation with tacks. * Group 2: Mesh fixation with glue.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Liquiband Fix8 glue mesh fixation | Active comparator | Device: Liquiband Fix8 |
| Mesh fixation with absorbable tacks | Active comparator | Device: Absorbable tack |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient with ventral hernia (primary or incisional) with a defect size between 2 and 5 cm and eligible for laparoscopic repair.
- Patients with ASA grade I to III.
- Patient is at least 18 years old.
- Patient must sign and date the informed consent form prior to treatment.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Patient with a recurrence of a previously treated ventral hernia repaired with mesh. Recurrences are only allowed to be included after former primary (suture) repair or retromuscular/onlay mesh repair.
- Patient is treated by open surgery.
- Patient has more than one defect. Treatment of Swiss-cheese defects (multiple small defects) is allowed if all defects can be treated with one mesh. Total width cannot exceed 5 cm.
- Patient with a complex hernia, likely not eligible for laparoscopic repair. Complexity is determined by the investigator (adhesions, small bowel resection, etc).
- Patient with a life expectancy of less than 2 years.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Liquiband Fix8LiquiBand® Fix 8™ (Advanced Medical Solutions - Plymouth, UK) is a hernia mesh fixation device providing strong and secure mesh fixation without causing any tissue damage or mechanical trauma. This device is designed to offer precise and controlled delivery of tissue glue (n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate), resulting in a strong mesh fixation. | Device | Liquiband Fix8 glue mesh fixation |
| Absorbable tackAbsorbable tack | Device | Mesh fixation with absorbable tacks |
Primary outcome
Pain in both groups at 4-6 weeks after LVHR using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: At 4 - 6 weeks
The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain. The patient is asked to select the number on the scale that corresponds to the worst level of pain he/she experiences. Pain is classified into mild (1 - 30 mm), moderate (31 - 60 mm) and severe (61 - 100 mm). Absence of pain is defined as VAS = 0.
19 secondary outcomes
Period of hospitalization
Time frame: up to 5 days
Operating time
Time frame: Intra-operatively
Intra-operative adverse events
Time frame: Intra-operatively
Post-operative adverse events
Time frame: up to 24 months follow-up
Usability of the glue during the index-procedure
Time frame: Intra-operatively
Technical success of glue fixation
Time frame: Intra-operatively
Technical success of tack fixation
Time frame: Intra-operatively
Pain at baseline using the VAS scale
Time frame: At baseline
Pain at discharge using the VAS scale
Time frame: Up to 5 days
Pain at 12 months follow-up using the VAS scale
Time frame: At 12 months follow-up
Pain at 24 months follow-up using the VAS scale
Time frame: At 24 months follow-up
Postoperative analgesic intake
Time frame: Up to 24 months follow-up
Postoperative analgesic intake
Time frame: Up to 24 months follow-up
Period to return to normal activity
Time frame: At 4 - 6 weeks follow-up
Quality of life at baseline.
Time frame: At baseline
Quality of life at 4-6 weeks.
Time frame: At 4 - 6 weeks follow-up
Quality of life at 12 months follow-up.
Time frame: At 12 months follow-up
Quality of life at 24 months follow-up.
Time frame: At 24 months follow-up
Recurrences during follow-up
Time frame: up to 24 months follow-up
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Limited patient enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 May 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ventral Hernia
Recruiting
GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial Product Study
Hernia, Ventral, Hernia, Hiatal
RecruitingPhase 4
Preoperative BOTOX® Injection for Large Ventral Hernia Repair
Hernia Abdominal Wall, Botox Injection
Recruiting
Duramesh Versus Minimally Invasive IPOM for High-Risk Umbilical Hernia Repairs
Umbilical Hernia, Ventral Hernia
Not yet recruiting
SUTURE TYPE AND RECURRENCE RISK AFTER INCISIONAL HERNIA REPAIR
Ventral Incisional Hernia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
ORION Study: Mesh Position and Risk During Subsequent Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgery
Ventral Hernia Repair
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Liquiband Fix8 and Absorbable tack in people with Ventral Hernia, run by Duomed at 11 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Limited patient enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain in both groups at 4-6 weeks after LVHR using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: At 4 - 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2021.