AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaNCT03429582

Comparison of Cervical CIN II/III Treatment Outcomes With Thermal Ablation Device

A study testing Standard C02 Cryotherapy, Single Tip Thermoablation and Multiple Tip Thermoablation in people with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this academic-industrial partnership will be to compare two thermoablation modalities using devices adapted to low and middle income countries (LMICs) to traditional CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of cervical precancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
What is being tested?
Standard C02 Cryotherapy, Single Tip Thermoablation and Multiple Tip Thermoablation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,154 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
30 Oct 2020to 1 Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Criteria for inclusion

  • Women aged 18 and older
  • Biopsy results of CIN2, CIN2-3, CIN3, or high-grade CIN not otherwise specified
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Willing and able to provide permanent or reliable address

Criteria for exclusion

  • Pregnant or plans to become pregnant during study
  • History of total hysterectomy (verified by medical record or pelvic evaluation)
  • Previous surgery destructive to the cervix within the last 5 years
  • Patient not eligible for cryotherapy or thermoablation (lesion >75% of cervix, lesion extends into canal or there is suspicion for invasive cancer)
  • Cervix shape disfigured or hard to reach

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

China1 site
  • Peking University Shenzhen Hospital

    Shenzhen

Other trials in China

El Salvador1 site
  • Hospital Nacional de la Mujer

    San Salvador

Other trials in El Salvador

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2/3 Treatment Outcomes With a Portable LMIC-adapted Thermal Ablation Device vs. Gas-based Cryotherapy

The purpose of this academic-industrial partnership will be to compare two thermoablation modalities using devices adapted to low and middle income countries (LMICs) to traditional CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of cervical precancer. The investigators will investigate whether the cure rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) with these devices are non-inferior compared to that of conventional cryotherapy. The results of this study will affect other research areas by serving as a springboard to exploring treatment alternatives that are amenable to low-resource settings and thus will reach the most vulnerable populations.

Read the detailed description

The standard treatment for cervical pre-cancer is gas-based cryotherapy, the freezing of tissue to ablate (destroy) lesions. Although cryotherapy is relatively simple to perform, the necessary gas tanks are generally expensive, difficult to obtain and transport, and pose a danger of explosion. An urgent need exists for a point-of-care treatment technology that is accessible, portable, and inexpensive. An alternative ablative procedure in use since the 1970s is thermoablation (also known as cold coagulation or thermocoagulation), which utilizes heat to destroy pre-cancer. Despite its long-standing use, there are no standardized guidelines for thermoablation. There is also little data on patient and provider acceptability, potential side effects, and the impact of different treatment protocols on quality of life. For these reasons, international and national agencies have been hesitant to adopt the technique as an alternative to cryotherapy. The purpose of this research study is to develop a patient-centered thermoablation protocol that is simple, safe, and effective.

Currently, the most common treatment technique for thermoablation involves a multiple-tip protocol, which uses differently shaped probe-tips to cover the affected area. This technique requires a considerable degree of expertise, and may not be the most appropriate strategy for settings where highly trained healthcare providers are scarce. In collaboration with WiSAP Medical Technology (Brunnthal, Germany), the manufacturer of the most widely used thermoablator, the investigators modified the original device to meet the needs of low-resource settings. The LMIC-adapted thermoablator is lightweight, portable, and easy to operate. The investigators will further modify the LMIC-adapted thermoablator to test the non-inferiority of two thermoablation treatment approaches against the standard of care (i.e. gas-based cryotherapy). The experimental approaches include:

  1. Single tip: A 19mm conical tip with a nipple is applied to the cervix for 40-seconds at 100ºC, a single application of which should ablate the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) in the majority of women. In the rare instance that the SCJ is not completely ablated, additional 20 second applications can be applied, or
  2. Multiple tips: A narrow nipple shaped tip at 100ºC is placed in the endocervix for 20 seconds. This is followed by the placement of a 12 mm flat tip at 100ºC on the ectocervix for as many 20-second applications as necessary to ablate the entire SCJ.

These will be tested against traditional CO2 cryotherapy treatment using a MedGyn device in a standard double-freeze procedure (3 minute freeze, 5 minute thaw, 3 minute freeze).

Women will be recruited at colposcopy clinics run by the Ministry of Health and the Mexican Institute of Social Security (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social) in the Mexico City metropolitan region. Eligible women will be those over the age of 18, who are able and willing to provide informed consent and a reliable or permanent address, and with a biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ diagnosis. Women wo are pregnant, plan to become pregnant during the study duration, with a history of total hysterectomy, past surgeries destructive to the cervix within the last 5 years, with a disfigure or hard-to-reach cervix, and those with contraindications for ablative treatment will be excluded from the study.

The investigators will approach 1,602 women with CIN2+ during a four-year enrollment phase (48 months). Assuming an 80% participation rate, approximately 1,282 women will be enrolled; of these, 1,155 (90%) will be eligible for ablation treatment (i.e. no contraindications) and 129 will be ineligible and undergo alternative treatments (i.e. LEEP or invasive cancer treatment). The investigators estimate that approximately 20% will be lost to follow-up at the 12-month visit, resulting in complete data on a total of 924 women (57.7% of 1,602) treated with CO2-based cryotherapy, single-tip thermoablation, or multiple-tip thermoablation. The investigators will monitor the percentages of ineligible women, contraindications, and loss to follow-up in real time and adjust recruitment accordingly to achieve the target sample size.

The clinical endpoint of the study will be residual disease at the 12-month follow-up visit as determined by colposcopy, four-quadrant biopsy, and endocervical curettage (ECC). HPV testing will also be performed at this visit to differentiate between persistent or new infection. Cytology, VIA and care HPV tests will also be performed to evaluate the most effective post treatment screening strategy.

At a pre-treatment visit, consented women will receive a pregnancy test as part of the eligibility criteria for enrollment in the study. Pre-vaginal cultures will be collected to be analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea and chlamydia. The same cultures will be collected at a 6-week follow-up visit. Consented women will be enrolled and undergo a pelvic exam and visual inspection of the cervix following placement of diluted acetic acid on the cervix. Images of the cervix will be taken with a mobile colposcopy device will be taken before and after treatment. Women will be asked to evaluate their pain level after speculum insertion, immediately before treatment, and immediately after treatment. These women will also complete a quality of life assessment. Women deemed ineligible for cryotherapy will undergo LEEP immediately. In the case of suspected cancer, women will be appropriately referred.

Six weeks post-treatment, women who return for a visit for evaluation of treatment side effects; these women will be administered a post-treatment patient satisfaction survey, and complete a questionnaire to assess the presence of pain or cramps, bleeding, stenosis, watery discharge, malodorous discharge and be evaluated for evidence of cervicitis. In addition, vaginal cultures will be collected and analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea, and chlamydia.

One year post-treatment, women will return for a follow-up visit to determine residual disease, which is the primary endpoint. Residual disease will be determined by colposcopy and four-quadrant biopsies. In addition, VIA, cytology, and high-risk HPV DNA testing with careHPV will be performed. Genotyping and next-generation sequencing will be repeated to differentiate between persistent and new infections. The investigators will evaluate sensitivity of VIA, cytology, and HPV testing post-treatment. Women will be asked to again complete the quality of life assessment and treatment acceptability instrument. Women diagnosed with recurrent/untreated CIN2+ on biopsy will be asked to return to undergo LEEP. Women with suspected cancer on biopsy will be referred to the local cancer hospital for standard of care.

Being tested
Standard C02 Cryotherapy, Single Tip Thermoablation, Multiple Tip Thermoablation
Keywords
Human Papilloma Virus, Thermoablation, Thermocoagulation, Cryotherapy, Cervica Pre-cancer, Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs)
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard C02 CryotherapyDevice

    Standard therapy using carbon dioxide for freezing of tissue

  • Single Tip ThermoablationDevice

    Thermoablator outfitted with a 19mm conical tip

  • Multiple Tip ThermoablationDevice

    Thermoablator outfitted with detachable probes

Study groups in NCT03429582
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard C02 CryotherapyActive comparatorStandard therapy using carbon dioxide for freezing of tissue
Receives: Device: Standard C02 Cryotherapy
Single Tip ThermoablationExperimentalThermoablator outfitted with a 19mm conical tip
Receives: Device: Single Tip Thermoablation
Multiple Tip ThermoablationExperimentalThermoablator outfitted with detachable probes
Receives: Device: Multiple Tip Thermoablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Residual CIN2+ diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or with cervical cancer diagnosis Diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or with cervical cancer diagnosis

    To compare CIN2+ cure rates 12-months post-treatment for CO2-based cryotherapy and both single versus multiple tips thermoablation strategies

    Measured: 12-months post treatment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Patient's pain assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES scale

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Patients with Cervical Dysplasia Version 4 (FACIT-CD). Consists of 5-subscales listed below. For all subscales and the scale, 0 is the worst outcome, higher scores are better outcomes. All subscales are summed.

    Subscale ranges are as follows: Physical well-being:0 to 32, Treatment satisfaction:0 to 16, General perceptions:0 to 28, Emotional well-being:0 to 44, Relationship support: 0 to 16 Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale, construct being measured is pain for anyone over the age of 3. Scale range: Minimum = 0, Maximum = 10. For each scale range, what is a better or worse outcome: 0 is a better outcome (no pain), higher scores are worse outcomes, and 10 is the worst outcome (worst pain). There are no subscales.

    Measured: Immediately after speculum insertion, immediately before treatment, and immediately after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Feb 2018
  2. Study start30 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,154 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03429582
Sponsor's protocol ID
17-1385
Other IDs
1R01CA218195-01A1
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
25 Jan 2018
Last updated
3 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Standard C02 Cryotherapy, Single Tip Thermoablation and Multiple Tip Thermoablation in people with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in China, El Salvador. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Residual CIN2+ diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or with cervical cancer diagnosis Diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or with cervical cancer diagnosis (time frame: 12-months post treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in