Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)Phase 3NCT03430843
A Study of Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) Versus Chemotherapy as Second Line Treatment in Participants With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
A Phase 3 study testing Tislelizumab, Paclitaxel and Docetaxel in people with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC), run by BeiGene at 104 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab as second line treatment in participants with advanced unresectable/metastatic ESCC that had progressed during or after first line therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)
- What is being tested?
- Tislelizumab, Paclitaxel and Docetaxel
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 512 participants
- Where
- 104 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Jan 2018to 28 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
- Tumor progression during or after first-line treatment for advanced unresectable / metastatic ESCC
- At least one measurable/evaluable lesion by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 prior to randomization
Who cannot join
- Receipt of 2 or more prior systemic treatments for advanced/metastatic unresectable ESCC
- History of gastrointestinal perforation and /or fistula or aorto-esophageal fistula within 6 months prior to randomization
- Tumor invasion into organs located adjacent to the esophageal disease site (eg, aorta or respiratory tract) at an increased risk of fistula in the study treatment assessed by investigator
- Uncontrollable pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring frequent drainage
- Received prior therapies targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)
- Prior malignancy active within the previous 2 years (exceptions include the tumor under investigation in this trial, and locally recurring cancers that have undergone curative treatment, such as resected basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer or carcinoma in situ of the prostate, cervix or breast)
Show all 13Show fewer
- Active brain or leptomeningeal metastasis.
- Has active autoimmune disease or history of autoimmune diseases at high risk for relapse
- Known history of, or any evidence of interstitial lung disease, non-infectious pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis diagnosed based on imaging or clinical findings, or uncontrolled systemic diseases, including diabetes, hypertension, acute lung diseases, etc
- Known history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
- Has cardiovascular risk factors
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman.
- NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
104 sites in 11 countries.
104 sites in 11 countries
China38 sites
Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University
Baoding, Hebei, 071000
Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730
The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, 130021
Hunan Cancer Hospital
Changsha, Hunan, 410013
The First Peoples Hospital of Changzhou
Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213000
Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial Peoples Hospital
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610071
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001
The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350005
Fujian Cancer Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350014
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat Sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080
The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat Sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655
The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022
Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150000
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Hefei, Anhui, 230601
Huaian Second Peoples Hospital
Huaian, Jiangsu, 223002
Shandong Cancer Hospital
Jinan, Shandong, 250117
Yunnan Cancer Hospital
Kunming, Yunnan, 650100
Linyi Cancer Hospital
Linyi, Shandong, 276001
Jiangxi Province Cancer Hospital
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330029
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital,the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008
Jiangsu Province Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029
Nantong Tumor Hospital Branch South
Nantong, Jiangsu, 226000
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000
Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
Shantou, Guangdong, 515031
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518036
Shanxi Provincial Peoples Hospital
Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030012
Weifang Peoples Hospital
Weifang, Shandong, 261000
Hubei Cancer Hospital
Wuhan, Hubei, 430079
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xian Jiaotong University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
Xiamen, Fujian, 361003
Xiangyang Central Hospital
Xiangyang, Hubei, 441021
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University
Xinxiang, Henan, 453100
The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000
Henan Cancer Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052
Japan17 sites
Akita University Hospital
Akitashi, Akita, 010-8543
National Cancer Center Hospital
Chuoku, Tokyo, 104-0045
Nho Kyushu Cancer Center
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 811-1395
Hiroshima University Hospital
Hiroshima, 734-8551
National Cancer Center Hospital East
Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577
Saitama Cancer Center
Kitaadachigun, Saitama, 362-0806
Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital
Kobe, Hyōgo, 650-0047
Kochi Health Sciences Center
Kochi, 781-8555
Cancer Institute Hospital of Jfcr
Kotoku, Tokyo, 135-8550
Kyoto University Hospital
Kyoto, 6068507
Nho Shikoku Cancer Center
Matsuyama, Ehime, 791-0280
Osaka International Cancer Institute
Osakashi, Osaka, 541-8567
Kindai University Hospital
Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511
Osaka University Hospital
Suitashi, Osaka, 565-0871
Shizuoka Cancer Center
Suntogun, Shizuoka, 411-8777
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital
Takatsukishi, Osaka, 569-8686
St Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 216-8511
France10 sites
Chru de Brest Hospital Morvan
Brest, 29200
Centre Georges Francois Leclerc
Dijon, 21079
Chu Besancon Hopital Jean Minjoz
Doubs, 25030
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, 59000
Hopital Prive Jean Mermoz
Lyon, 69008
Icm Val Daurelle
Montpellier, 34090
Chu Bordeaux Hopital Haut Leveque
Pessac, 33600
Chu de Poitiers Site de La Mileterie
Poitiers, 86000
Ico Site Rene Gauducheau
SaintHerblain, 44805
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, 94805
Spain8 sites
Hospital Del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
Hospital Universitario Vall Dhebron
Barcelona, 08035
Institut Catala Doncologia
Barcelona, 08908
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, 8036
Hospital Universitario Ramon Y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Hospital Universitario de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario Hm Madrid Sanchinarro
Madrid, 28050
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, 50009
South Korea6 sites
Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital
HwasunGun, Jeollanam-do, 58128
Gachon University Gil Medical Center
Incheon, Incheon Gwang'yeogsi, 21565
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, 05505
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, 06351
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, 08308
United Kingdom6 sites
The Christie Hospital
Greater Manchester, M20 4BX
Guys and St Thomas Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust
London, SE1 9RT
Sarah Cannon Research Institute Uk
London, W1G 6AD
St Marys Hospital Imperial College Healthcare Nhs Trust
London, W2 1NY
Mount Vernon Hospital (Mount Vernon Cancer Center)
Northwood, HA6 2RN
Royal Marsden Nhs Foundation Royal Marsden Hospital
Sutton, SM2 5PT
Italy5 sites
Ospedale Di Faenza
Faenza, 48018
Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori Dino Amadori Irst
Meldola, 47014
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga
Orbassano, 10043
Aou Pisana, Stabilimento Di Santa Chiara
Pisa, 56126
Ao Citta Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino Presidio O
Torino, 10126
Taiwan5 sites
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 83301
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 40447
Chi Mei Hospital Liouying
Tainan, 736
National Taiwan University Hospital East Campus
Taipei, 100225
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 11217
Belgium4 sites
Imelda Ziekenhuis Bonheiden
Bonheiden, 2820
Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc
Brussels, 1200
Uz Antwerpen
Edegem, 2650
University Hospitals Leuven
Leuven, 3000
Germany3 sites
Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 13353
Universitares Krebszentrum Leipzig
Leipzig, 04103
Klinikum Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz
Mainz, 55131
United States2 sites
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Toledo Clinic Cancer Center
Toledo, Ohio, 43623
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Global Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) Versus Chemotherapy as Second Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Unresectable/Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab as second line treatment in participants with advanced unresectable/metastatic ESCC that had progressed during or after first line therapy.
- Being tested
- Tislelizumab, Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, Irinotecan
- Keywords
- Unresectable, metastatic, second-line, squamous, esophagus, chemotherapy, paclitaxel, docetaxel, irinotecan
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TislelizumabDrug
Also called BGB-A317
200 mg administered intravenously (IV)
PaclitaxelDrug
135-175 mg /m² administered IV , or 80-100 mg/m^2 administered IV according to local guidelines for standard of care
DocetaxelDrug
75 mg/m^2 administered IV or 70 mg/m^2 IV in Japan
IrinotecanDrug
125 mg/m^2 administered IV
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tislelizumab | Experimental | Tislelizumab on Day 1, given every 21 days Receives: Drug: Tislelizumab |
| Investigator chosen chemotherapy (ICC) | Active comparator | Paclitaxel on Day 1, given every 21 days or on a weekly schedule; OR Docetaxel on Day 1, given every 21 days; OR Irinotecan on Days 1 and 8, given every 21 days Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel; Drug: Docetaxel; Drug: Irinotecan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival (OS) in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set
OS is defined as the length of time from the date of randomization until the date of death due to any cause in all randomized participants
Measured: Approximately 2 years and 10 months from date of first randomization
Secondary outcomes (14)
Overall Survival (OS) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death due to any cause in the PD-L1 positive population, defined as vCPS ≥10%.
Measured: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the ITT Analysis Set
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1;
Measured: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Overall Response Rate (ORR) in the PD-L1 Positive Analysis Sets
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1;
Measured: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) in the ITT Analysis Set
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurs first; reported for the ITT analysis set
Measured: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurs first; reported for the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set
Measured: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Duration of Response (DOR) in the ITT Analysis Set
DOR is defined as the time from the first determination of an objective response until the first documentation of progression as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1, or death, whichever comes first
Measured: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Duration of Response (DOR) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set.
DOR is defined as the time from the first determination of an objective response until the first documentation of progression as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1, or death, whichever comes first
Measured: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C-30) in the ITT Analysis Set
Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 index score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer participants. It includes global health status and quality of life questions related to overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A higher score indicates better health outcomes
Measured: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set
Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Index score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer participants. It includes global health status and quality of life questions related to overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A higher score indicates better health outcomes
Measured: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-Oesophagus Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OES18) Reported in ITT Analysis Set
Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-OES18 index score. The EORTC QLQ-OES18 is a questionnaire that assesses overall symptoms in esophageal cancer participants. It includes questions related to overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A higher score indicates better health outcomes.
Measured: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-OES18) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set.
Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-OES18 index score. The EORTC QLQ-OES18 is a questionnaire that assesses overall symptoms in esophageal cancer participants. It includes questions related to overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A higher score indicates better health outcomes.
Measured: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
HRQoL as Assessed by European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) in the ITT Analysis Set
Mean change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L visual acuity score (VAS). The EQ-5D-5L measures health outcomes using a VAS to record a participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine.' A higher score indicates better health outcomes.
Measured: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
HRQoL as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L in the PD-L1 Positive Analysis Set
Mean change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L visual acuity score (VAS). The EQ-5D-5L measures health outcomes using a VAS to record a participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine.' A higher score indicates better health outcomes.
Measured: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)
Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), which includes laboratory tests, physical exams, electrocardiogram results and vital signs
Measured: From the first dose date to 30 days after the last dose date; up to approximately 4 years and 11 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2018
- Study start26 Jan 2018
- Primary completion1 Dec 2020
- Study completion28 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BeiGeneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 512 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- BeiGene
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03430843
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BGB-A317-302
- Other IDs
- 2017-003699-30, CTR20171026, 2017
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Shen L, Kato K, Kim SB, Ajani JA, Zhao K, He Z, Yu X, Shu Y, Luo Q, Wang J, Chen Z, Niu Z, Zhang L, Yi T, Sun JM, Chen J, Yu G, Lin CY, Hara H, Bi Q, Satoh T, Pazo-Cid R, Arkenau HT, Borg C, Lordick F, Li L, Ding N, Tao A, Shi J, Van Cutsem E; RATIONALE-302 Investigators. Tislelizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (RATIONALE-302): A Randomized Phase III Study. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 10;40(26):3065-3076. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01926. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
PubMed 35442766Ajani JA, Wang K, Nikolaidis GF, Coaquira Castro J, Augusto Novis de Figueiredo M, Sun JM, Soulanis K, Tasoulas A, Zhan L. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab in Second-Line Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Literature Review and Simulated Treatment Comparisons. Adv Ther. 2026 Feb;43(2):567-582. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03410-5. Epub 2025 Dec 3.
PubMed 41335329Moehler M, Yoon HH, Wagner DC, Yang S, Shi J, Zhang Y, Hu H, La Placa C, Peng Y, Du W, McCampbell A, Xu W, Shen Z, Xu H, Huang R, Kato K. Concordance Between the PD-L1 Tumor Area Positivity Score and Combined Positive Score for Gastric or Esophageal Cancers Treated With Tislelizumab. Mod Pathol. 2025 Sep;38(9):100793. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100793. Epub 2025 May 13.
PubMed 40373876Lu Z, Du W, Jiao X, Wang Y, Shi J, Shi Y, Shu Y, Niu Z, Hara H, Wu J, Hsu CH, Van Cutsem E, Brock MV, Zhang Z, Ding N, Zhang Y, Shen Z, Shen L. NOTCH1 Mutation and Survival Analysis of Tislelizumab in Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Biomarker Analysis From the Randomized, Phase III, RATIONALE-302 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun;43(16):1898-1909. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01818. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
PubMed 40179324He Q, Shi X, Yan J, Wu M, Gu C, Yu X. Circulating tumor DNA serial monitoring of relapse and responses to tislelizumab immunotherapy as second-line monotherapy for metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study. Mol Clin Oncol. 2024 Feb 9;20(4):29. doi: 10.3892/mco.2024.2727. eCollection 2024 Apr.
PubMed 38414510Wang LL, Xie YX, Liu Y. Clinical efficacy and adverse reactions analysis of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024 Jan;28(2):659-667. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202401_35062.
PubMed 38305608Hara H, Satoh T, Kojima T, Tsushima T, Sunakawa Y, Okada M, Ding N, Wu H, Li L, Yu T, Barnes G, Kato K. Second-line tislelizumab versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: subgroup analysis from RATIONALE-302. Esophagus. 2024 Apr;21(2):102-110. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-01040-w. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
PubMed 38240916Kim SB, Van Cutsem E, Ajani J, Shen L, Barnes G, Ding N, Tao A, Xia T, Zhan L, Kato K. Tislelizumab in advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: health-related quality of life in Asian patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Jan;40(1):69-75. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2270894. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
PubMed 37846080Van Cutsem E, Kato K, Ajani J, Shen L, Xia T, Ding N, Zhan L, Barnes G, Kim SB. Tislelizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE 302): impact on health-related quality of life. ESMO Open. 2022 Aug;7(4):100517. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100517. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
PubMed 35785595
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Global Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) Versus Chemotherapy as Second Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Unresectable/Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03430843
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BGB-A317-302
- Keywords
- Unresectable, metastatic, second-line, squamous, esophagus, chemotherapy, paclitaxel, docetaxel
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 512 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BeiGeneIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 26 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 29 Dec 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab as second line treatment in participants with advanced unresectable/metastatic ESCC that had progressed during or after first line therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tislelizumab | Experimental | Drug: TislelizumabTislelizumab on Day 1, given every 21 days |
| Investigator chosen chemotherapy (ICC) | Active comparator | Drug: Paclitaxel, Drug: Docetaxel, Drug: IrinotecanPaclitaxel on Day 1, given every 21 days or on a weekly schedule; OR Docetaxel on Day 1, given every 21 days; OR Irinotecan on Days 1 and 8, given every 21 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
- Tumor progression during or after first-line treatment for advanced unresectable / metastatic ESCC
- At least one measurable/evaluable lesion by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 prior to randomization
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Receipt of 2 or more prior systemic treatments for advanced/metastatic unresectable ESCC
- History of gastrointestinal perforation and /or fistula or aorto-esophageal fistula within 6 months prior to randomization
- Tumor invasion into organs located adjacent to the esophageal disease site (eg, aorta or respiratory tract) at an increased risk of fistula in the study treatment assessed by investigator
- Uncontrollable pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring frequent drainage
- Received prior therapies targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TislelizumabAlso: BGB-A317200 mg administered intravenously (IV) | Drug | Tislelizumab |
| Paclitaxel135-175 mg /m² administered IV , or 80-100 mg/m^2 administered IV according to local guidelines for standard of care | Drug | Investigator chosen chemotherapy (ICC) |
| Docetaxel75 mg/m^2 administered IV or 70 mg/m^2 IV in Japan | Drug | Investigator chosen chemotherapy (ICC) |
| Irinotecan125 mg/m^2 administered IV | Drug | Investigator chosen chemotherapy (ICC) |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival (OS) in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set
Time frame: Approximately 2 years and 10 months from date of first randomization
OS is defined as the length of time from the date of randomization until the date of death due to any cause in all randomized participants
14 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set
Time frame: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the ITT Analysis Set
Time frame: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Overall Response Rate (ORR) in the PD-L1 Positive Analysis Sets
Time frame: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) in the ITT Analysis Set
Time frame: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set
Time frame: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Duration of Response (DOR) in the ITT Analysis Set
Time frame: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Duration of Response (DOR) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set.
Time frame: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C-30) in the ITT Analysis Set
Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set
Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-Oesophagus Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OES18) Reported in ITT Analysis Set
Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-OES18) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set.
Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
HRQoL as Assessed by European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) in the ITT Analysis Set
Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
HRQoL as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L in the PD-L1 Positive Analysis Set
Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: From the first dose date to 30 days after the last dose date; up to approximately 4 years and 11 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 35442766Shen L, Kato K, Kim SB, Ajani JA, Zhao K, He Z, Yu X, Shu Y, Luo Q, Wang J, Chen Z, Niu Z, Zhang L, Yi T, Sun JM, Chen J, Yu G, Lin CY, Hara H, Bi Q, Satoh T, Pazo-Cid R, Arkenau HT, Borg C, Lordick F, Li L, Ding N, Tao A, Shi J, Van Cutsem E; RATIONALE-302 Investigators. Tislelizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (RATIONALE-302): A Randomized Phase III Study. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 10;40(26):3065-3076. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01926. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41335329Ajani JA, Wang K, Nikolaidis GF, Coaquira Castro J, Augusto Novis de Figueiredo M, Sun JM, Soulanis K, Tasoulas A, Zhan L. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab in Second-Line Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Literature Review and Simulated Treatment Comparisons. Adv Ther. 2026 Feb;43(2):567-582. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03410-5. Epub 2025 Dec 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40373876Moehler M, Yoon HH, Wagner DC, Yang S, Shi J, Zhang Y, Hu H, La Placa C, Peng Y, Du W, McCampbell A, Xu W, Shen Z, Xu H, Huang R, Kato K. Concordance Between the PD-L1 Tumor Area Positivity Score and Combined Positive Score for Gastric or Esophageal Cancers Treated With Tislelizumab. Mod Pathol. 2025 Sep;38(9):100793. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100793. Epub 2025 May 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40179324Lu Z, Du W, Jiao X, Wang Y, Shi J, Shi Y, Shu Y, Niu Z, Hara H, Wu J, Hsu CH, Van Cutsem E, Brock MV, Zhang Z, Ding N, Zhang Y, Shen Z, Shen L. NOTCH1 Mutation and Survival Analysis of Tislelizumab in Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Biomarker Analysis From the Randomized, Phase III, RATIONALE-302 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun;43(16):1898-1909. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01818. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38414510He Q, Shi X, Yan J, Wu M, Gu C, Yu X. Circulating tumor DNA serial monitoring of relapse and responses to tislelizumab immunotherapy as second-line monotherapy for metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study. Mol Clin Oncol. 2024 Feb 9;20(4):29. doi: 10.3892/mco.2024.2727. eCollection 2024 Apr.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38305608Wang LL, Xie YX, Liu Y. Clinical efficacy and adverse reactions analysis of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024 Jan;28(2):659-667. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202401_35062.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38240916Hara H, Satoh T, Kojima T, Tsushima T, Sunakawa Y, Okada M, Ding N, Wu H, Li L, Yu T, Barnes G, Kato K. Second-line tislelizumab versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: subgroup analysis from RATIONALE-302. Esophagus. 2024 Apr;21(2):102-110. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-01040-w. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37846080Kim SB, Van Cutsem E, Ajani J, Shen L, Barnes G, Ding N, Tao A, Xia T, Zhan L, Kato K. Tislelizumab in advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: health-related quality of life in Asian patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Jan;40(1):69-75. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2270894. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35785595Van Cutsem E, Kato K, Ajani J, Shen L, Xia T, Ding N, Zhan L, Barnes G, Kim SB. Tislelizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE 302): impact on health-related quality of life. ESMO Open. 2022 Aug;7(4):100517. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100517. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Standardized Management of Esophageal Fistula in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC), Esophageal Fistula
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Application of an AI-based Dissection Trajectory Prediction System (ADTPS) in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC), High-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of [225Ac]Ac-AKY-2519 in Patients With B7-H3 Expressing Solid Tumors
NSCLC, NSCLC (Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer)
RecruitingPhase 2
QL1706 Plus Celecoxib in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
CR-002 in Adult Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) - Recurrent/Metastatic (R/M), Gastric/GEJ
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
104 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Tislelizumab, Paclitaxel and Docetaxel in people with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC), run by BeiGene at 104 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 104 sites in China, Japan, France, Spain, South Korea and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Dec 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (OS) in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set (time frame: Approximately 2 years and 10 months from date of first randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03430843, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2024.