AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic StenosisNCT03432494

Transmural Systems Transcaval Closure Device for Transcaval Access Ports During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

A study testing Transcaval closure device (TCD) in people with Aortic Stenosis, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at 3 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a non-surgical alternative to standard surgical aortic valve replacement. Not all patients are eligible for TAVR using standard access through the artery in the groin, because the artery is too small or too diseased. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aortic Stenosis
What is being tested?
Transcaval closure device (TCD)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
7 Feb 2018to 29 Apr 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Consents to participate in this study and all related clinical follow-up procedures
  • Adults age greater than or equal to 21 years
  • Undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) based on the clinical assessment of the multidisciplinary heart team
  • Ineligible for femoral artery access for the selected transcatheter heart valve (THV) according to the THV manufacturer instructions for use. (Note Corevalve Evolut R: greater than or equal to 5mm; Evolut PRO 23, 26, 29 mm valves and Evolut R 34 mm: greater than or equal to 5.5 mm; Edwards Sapien 3, 23-26mm: 5.5 mm; Edwards Sapien 3, 29mm: 6.0mm; Anatomic ineligibility also considers patient-specific pattern of iliofemoral calcium and tortuosity.)
  • Eligible for transcaval access based on Core lab analysis of the baseline abdomen/pelvis CT indicating a calcium-free target window on the abdominal aorta; a target greater than or equal to 15mm from the lowest main renal artery or aorto-iliac bifurcation; no important interposed structures; a projected intravascular centerline distance from the lower femoral head to the target at least 5cm less than the intended THV introducer sheath; patient celiac or superior mesenteric artery
  • Aorta diameter greater than or equal to 11mm at the target crossing site
  • Concordance of the study eligibility committee

Who cannot join

  • High risk features on baseline CT including porcelain aorta (confluent calcification); pedunculated aortic atheroma; or leftward aortic angel greater than or equal to 20 degrees with regard to vertical.
  • Renal dysfunction limiting follow-up contrast-enhanced CR (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR less than 30mL/min/1.73m^2 if not already on renal replacement therapy)
  • Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant prior to completion of all protocol follow-up procedures

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Henry Ford Hospital

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Early Feasibility Evaluation of Transmural Systems Transcaval Closure Device (TCD) for Transcaval Access Ports During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)

Background:

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a non-surgical alternative to standard surgical aortic valve replacement. Not all patients are eligible for TAVR using standard access through the artery in the groin, because the artery is too small or too diseased. In this study, TAVR is performed using a new technique called transcaval access. The catheter is placed in the artery deep in the body by crossing through the wall of a deep vein. The connection between that vein and the aorta is closed with a new metallic device they are testing. This is called a transcaval closure device (TCD).

Read more

Objective:

To test the safety and early feasibility of closure of transcaval aortic access sites using the TCD after TAVR.

Eligibility:

Adults ages 21 and older undergoing TAVR for whom the procedure cannot be performed safely by the standard artery approach

Design:

Participants will be assessed by heart experts including cardiologists and surgeons.

Participants will have TAVR by the transcaval approach. A small catheter will be passed between the largest vein in the body and the nearby largest artery (aorta), inside the abdomen. Through this catheter, the TAVR will be implanted in the usual way.

After, doctors will implant the TCD by catheter to close the hole made in the aorta.

Participants will be X-rayed. A dye will be injected to view the TCD device.

Participants will get standard TAVR care afterwards. They will have physical exams, blood tests, and scans.

Participants will have a follow-up scan within 1 month and after 12 months.

Participants will have follow-up visits and phone calls 6 and 12 months after the procedure.

Read the detailed description

Transcaval access to the abdominal aorta from the neighboring inferior vena cava (IVC) enables transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients not eligible for femoral artery access. Currently the procedure is performed using devices, off-label, designed and marketed to close holes inside the heart and great vessels, manufactured by Abbott St Jude (Amplatzer Duct Occluder and Amplatzer Muscular VSD Occluder). Because these Amplatzer occluders are not designed to close transcaval access sites, they may not completely prevent bleeding.

This is an early feasibility study (EFS) evaluation of a purpose-built closure device for transcaval access. The device, the Transcaval closure device (TCD) will be evaluated for safety and performance to close transcaval access sites in patients ineligible for femoral artery access for TAVR.

Conditions
Aortic Stenosis
Being tested
Transcaval closure device (TCD)
Keywords
Transcatheter, Transcaval, Bioprosthesis, Closure Device, Aortic Stenosis
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transcaval closure device (TCD)Device

    Transcaval access and closure using the Transmural Transcaval Closure Device (TCD) at the time of medically-necessary transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Study groups in NCT03432494
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Transcaval access and closure with the transcaval closure device (TCD) test article.ExperimentalAll participants undergo transcaval access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) followed by implantation of the transcaval closure device (TCD).
Receives: Device: Transcaval closure device (TCD)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Technical Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)

    Number of participants with technical success of delivery of the transcaval closure device (TCD)

    All of the following must be present for technical success:

    1. Alive
    2. Successful delivery of the TCD, and retrieval of the TCD delivery system
    3. Deployment and correct positioning of a single intended TCD. Repositioning and recapture of the device, if needed, is not classified as failure.
    4. No additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the TCD or delivery system
    5. Adjunctive balloon aortic tamponade is permissible and consistent with technical success

    Measured: 1 minute following procedure discharge (Exit from the catheterization laboratory)

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Number of Participants With Closure Success of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)

    Number of Participants With Technical Closure Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD). This secondary endpoint is a composite of the primary endpoint and hemostasis of the transcaval aortic access site.

    All of the following must be present for Closure Success:

    1. Alive
    2. Successful delivery of the TCD, and retrieval of the TCD delivery system
    3. Deployment and correct positioning of a single intended TCD. Repositioning and recapture of the device, if needed, is not classified as failure.
    4. No additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the TCD or delivery system. Adjunctive balloon aortic tamponade is permissible and consistent with technical success
    5. Complete occlusion of the aortocaval fistula on the completion aortogram.

    Measured: 1 minute following procedure discharge (Exit from the catheterization laboratory)

  2. Number of Participants Who Experienced Device Success of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)

    A key performance endpoint is the number of participants who experienced device success of the transcaval closure device (TCD).

    All of the following must be present for device success:

    1. Alive or Death unrelated to transcaval access or TAVR
    2. Original intended TCD in place
    3. No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to access or the device after exit from the cath lab

    Intended performance of the TCD, including all of:

    1. Structural Performance: No migration, embolization, detachment, fracture, hemolysis, or endarteritis related to the TCD
    2. Hemodynamic performance: No abdominal aortic obstruction caused by the TCD implant
    3. Absence of para-device complications (large retroperitoneal hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, distal thromboembolism, or pulmonary thromboembolism)

    Measured: 30 days and 12 Months

  3. Number of Participants That Experienced Procedural Success

    Number of participants that experienced safety endpoint of procedural success following transcaval closure device (TCD) at day 30.

    All of the following must be present for procedural success:

    1. Device success
    2. No device-related Serious Adverse Events, defined as VARC-2 life-threatening bleeding, major vascular or cardiac complications related to the TCD requiring unplanned reintervention or surgery (such as covered stent implantation at the transcaval access site)

    Measured: 30 Days

  4. Number of Participants Requiring Covered Stent Implantation as a Normal Provisional Part of the Procedure

    Number of participants requiring covered stent implantation as a normal provisional part of the procedure assessed during the procedure.

    Measured: During procedure, procedure may last from 2 to 4 hours

  5. Number of Participants With Covered Stent Implantation at the Transcaval Closure Device Implantation Site

    Number of participants with covered stent implantation at the transcaval closure device (TCD) implantation site

    Measured: During procedure, procedure may last from 2 to 4 hours

  6. Number of Participants Final Acute Aorto-caval Fistula Score

    Number of Participants final acute aorto-caval fistula score at procedure completion.

    Scoring is defined as: Type 0=occlusion, Type 1=patent fistula, Type 2=cruci-form fistula pattern, Type 3=extravasation.

    A score of 0 is associated with complete occlusion at the transcaval closure device (TCD) site while a higher score is associated with incomplete occlusion at the TCD site.

    Measured: 30 Days

  7. Number of Participants Who Experienced Modified Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 Vascular Complications

    Participants who experienced Minor or Major modified Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) vascular complications.

    Major is defined as: Aortic dissection or aortic rupture; Access site-related arterial or venous injury THAT RESULTS IN death, hemodynamic compromise, life-threatening, extensive; or major bleeding, visceral ischemia, neurological impairment; Distal embolization requiring surgery or resulting in amputation or irreversible end-organ damage; severe access site vascular complication Minor is defined as: Access site-related arterial or venous injury THAT DOES NOT RESULT IN death, hemodynamic compromise, life-threatening, extensive; or major bleeding, visceral ischemia, neurological impairment; Distal embolization treated with embolectomy and/or thrombectomy not resulting in amputation or irreversible end-organ damage; Any unplanned endovascular stenting or unplanned surgical intervention not meeting the criteria for a major vascular complication; Vascular repair

    Measured: 30 days

  8. Number of Participants Who Experienced Modified Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 Bleeding Complications

    Number of Participants Who Experienced Major or Life-threatening Modified Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) bleeding complications at 30 days

    Major defined as: Corrected drop in the hemoglobin of >=3.0 g/dl AND does not meet criteria of life-threatening or extensive bleeding; Requiring transfusion of >=3 U of whole blood or packed RBCs AND does not meet criteria of life-threatening or extensive bleeding.

    Life-threatening defined as: Intracranial requiring surgery or intervention; Intraspinal requiring surgery or intervention; Intraocular requiring surgery or intervention; Pericardial requiring surgery or intervention; Intramuscular with compartment syndrome; Bleeding causing hypovolemic shock or hypotension or requiring significant doses of vasopressors or surgery

    Measured: 30 Days

  9. Number of Participants Who Experienced Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

    Number of Participants Who Experienced Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)

    Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as VARC-2 Early Safety composite: No mortality, stroke, life-threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 2+, major vascular complication, and valve-related complication.

    Measured: Day 30

  10. Number of Participants With Closure Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)

    Number of Participants With Closure Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD).

    All of the following must be present for Closure Success:

    1. Alive or Death unrelated to transcaval access or TAVR
    2. Successful delivery of the TCD, and retrieval of the TCD delivery system
    3. Deployment and correct positioning of a single intended TCD. Repositioning and recapture of the device, if needed, is not classified as failure.
    4. No additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the TCD or delivery system. Adjunctive balloon aortic tamponade is permissible and consistent with technical success
    5. Complete occlusion of the aortocaval fistula on the completion aortogram.

    Measured: 30 Days and 12 Months

  11. All-Cause Mortality

    All-cause mortality, as categorized by cardiovascular vs non-cardiovascular, peri- vs non-periprocedural, regardless of attribution to Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)

    Measured: 30 Days

  12. Number of Participants With Aorto-caval Fistula Patency Assessed by Angiography and Arterial-phase Follow-up Computed Tomography

    Number of participants with aorto-caval fistula patency at each timepoint, assessed combining completion angiography and arterial-phase follow-up Computed tomography (CT).

    Measured: Day 30, 12 months

  13. Number of Participants Who Experienced Acute Kidney Injury Stage 2 or 3

    Number of participants who experienced acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 2 or 3 using the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC).

    AKI using the VARC definition:

    Stage 2: increase in serum creatinine to 200-300% (2.0-3.0 times increase compared to baseline) or increase of >0.3 mg/dl (>26.4 mmol/L) but <4.0 mg/dl (<354 mmol/L)

    Stage 3: increase in serum creatinine to ≥300% (>3 times increase compared to baseline) or serum creatinine of ≥4.0 mg/dl (≥354 mmol/L), with acute increase of ≥0.5 mg/dl (44 mmol/L)

    Measured: 30 Days

  14. Number of Participants That Are Free From Infection Related to the Transcaval Closure Device

    Number of participants that experience freedom from infection related to the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD) at each time point

    Measured: Day 30, 12 Months

  15. Number of Participants That Experience Thrombocytopenia and is Attributable to Residual Aorto-caval Fistula or the Transcaval Closure Device

    Number of participants that experience Thrombocytopenia as defined as < 50,000 and is attributable to residual aorto-caval fistula or the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)

    Measured: 30 Days

  16. Number of Participants Who Experience Hemolysis and is Attributable to Residual Aorto-caval Fistula or the Transcaval Closure Device

    Number of participants who experience hemolysis and is attributable to residual aorto-caval fistula or the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)

    Measured: 30 Days

  17. Participant Cumulative Computed Tomography Analysis of Device

    Participant cumulative Computed tomography (CT) analysis of device. As defined by: Device position; Device integrity; Aortocaval tract pseudo-aneurysm; Aortic pseudoaneurysm; Retroperitoneal hematoma grade (stranding {=absent and not evidence of overt bleeding;} small; moderate; larger); Intracaval mass or thrombus; Aortic dissection and inferred relatedness to TCD (adjacent to access port) or procedure (remote to access port)

    Measured: Day 30

  18. Number of Participants Enrolled Greater Than 65 Years

    Outcomes of subjects greater than 65 years (i.e. eligible for Medicare based on age), to determine generalizability to the Medicare population

    Measured: Enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Feb 2018
  2. Study start7 Feb 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2018
  4. Study completion29 Apr 2019

Why it stopped: The trial was kept open (via administrative hold) in anticipation of a device redesign and enrollment suspended, but funding never materialized to support the redesign.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03432494
Sponsor's protocol ID
999918045
Other IDs
18-H-N045
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
13 Feb 2018
Last updated
14 Mar 2023
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: The authors are willing to share de-identified subject data upon reasonable request

Publications

  • Rogers T, Greenbaum AB, Babaliaros VC, Stine AM, Khan JM, Schenke WH, Eng MH, Paone G, Leshnower BG, Satler LF, Waksman R, Chen MY, Lederman RJ. Dedicated Closure Device for Transcaval Access Closure: From Concept to First-in-Human Testing. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 11;12(21):2198-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.053. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

    PubMed 31629746

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Transcaval closure device (TCD) in people with Aortic Stenosis, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Mar 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Technical Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD) (time frame: 1 minute following procedure discharge (Exit from the catheterization laboratory)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03432494, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT03432494 | AzTrials