Aortic StenosisNCT03432494
Transmural Systems Transcaval Closure Device for Transcaval Access Ports During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
A study testing Transcaval closure device (TCD) in people with Aortic Stenosis, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a non-surgical alternative to standard surgical aortic valve replacement. Not all patients are eligible for TAVR using standard access through the artery in the groin, because the artery is too small or too diseased. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aortic Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- Transcaval closure device (TCD)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Feb 2018to 29 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Consents to participate in this study and all related clinical follow-up procedures
- Adults age greater than or equal to 21 years
- Undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) based on the clinical assessment of the multidisciplinary heart team
- Ineligible for femoral artery access for the selected transcatheter heart valve (THV) according to the THV manufacturer instructions for use. (Note Corevalve Evolut R: greater than or equal to 5mm; Evolut PRO 23, 26, 29 mm valves and Evolut R 34 mm: greater than or equal to 5.5 mm; Edwards Sapien 3, 23-26mm: 5.5 mm; Edwards Sapien 3, 29mm: 6.0mm; Anatomic ineligibility also considers patient-specific pattern of iliofemoral calcium and tortuosity.)
- Eligible for transcaval access based on Core lab analysis of the baseline abdomen/pelvis CT indicating a calcium-free target window on the abdominal aorta; a target greater than or equal to 15mm from the lowest main renal artery or aorto-iliac bifurcation; no important interposed structures; a projected intravascular centerline distance from the lower femoral head to the target at least 5cm less than the intended THV introducer sheath; patient celiac or superior mesenteric artery
- Aorta diameter greater than or equal to 11mm at the target crossing site
- Concordance of the study eligibility committee
Who cannot join
- High risk features on baseline CT including porcelain aorta (confluent calcification); pedunculated aortic atheroma; or leftward aortic angel greater than or equal to 20 degrees with regard to vertical.
- Renal dysfunction limiting follow-up contrast-enhanced CR (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR less than 30mL/min/1.73m^2 if not already on renal replacement therapy)
- Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant prior to completion of all protocol follow-up procedures
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
About this study
Official title: Early Feasibility Evaluation of Transmural Systems Transcaval Closure Device (TCD) for Transcaval Access Ports During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)
Background:
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a non-surgical alternative to standard surgical aortic valve replacement. Not all patients are eligible for TAVR using standard access through the artery in the groin, because the artery is too small or too diseased. In this study, TAVR is performed using a new technique called transcaval access. The catheter is placed in the artery deep in the body by crossing through the wall of a deep vein. The connection between that vein and the aorta is closed with a new metallic device they are testing. This is called a transcaval closure device (TCD).
Read more
Objective:
To test the safety and early feasibility of closure of transcaval aortic access sites using the TCD after TAVR.
Eligibility:
Adults ages 21 and older undergoing TAVR for whom the procedure cannot be performed safely by the standard artery approach
Design:
Participants will be assessed by heart experts including cardiologists and surgeons.
Participants will have TAVR by the transcaval approach. A small catheter will be passed between the largest vein in the body and the nearby largest artery (aorta), inside the abdomen. Through this catheter, the TAVR will be implanted in the usual way.
After, doctors will implant the TCD by catheter to close the hole made in the aorta.
Participants will be X-rayed. A dye will be injected to view the TCD device.
Participants will get standard TAVR care afterwards. They will have physical exams, blood tests, and scans.
Participants will have a follow-up scan within 1 month and after 12 months.
Participants will have follow-up visits and phone calls 6 and 12 months after the procedure.
Read the detailed description
Transcaval access to the abdominal aorta from the neighboring inferior vena cava (IVC) enables transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients not eligible for femoral artery access. Currently the procedure is performed using devices, off-label, designed and marketed to close holes inside the heart and great vessels, manufactured by Abbott St Jude (Amplatzer Duct Occluder and Amplatzer Muscular VSD Occluder). Because these Amplatzer occluders are not designed to close transcaval access sites, they may not completely prevent bleeding.
This is an early feasibility study (EFS) evaluation of a purpose-built closure device for transcaval access. The device, the Transcaval closure device (TCD) will be evaluated for safety and performance to close transcaval access sites in patients ineligible for femoral artery access for TAVR.
- Conditions
- Aortic Stenosis
- Being tested
- Transcaval closure device (TCD)
- Keywords
- Transcatheter, Transcaval, Bioprosthesis, Closure Device, Aortic Stenosis
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcaval closure device (TCD)Device
Transcaval access and closure using the Transmural Transcaval Closure Device (TCD) at the time of medically-necessary transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Transcaval access and closure with the transcaval closure device (TCD) test article. | Experimental | All participants undergo transcaval access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) followed by implantation of the transcaval closure device (TCD). Receives: Device: Transcaval closure device (TCD) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Technical Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)
Number of participants with technical success of delivery of the transcaval closure device (TCD)
All of the following must be present for technical success:
- Alive
- Successful delivery of the TCD, and retrieval of the TCD delivery system
- Deployment and correct positioning of a single intended TCD. Repositioning and recapture of the device, if needed, is not classified as failure.
- No additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the TCD or delivery system
- Adjunctive balloon aortic tamponade is permissible and consistent with technical success
Measured: 1 minute following procedure discharge (Exit from the catheterization laboratory)
Secondary outcomes (18)
Number of Participants With Closure Success of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)
Number of Participants With Technical Closure Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD). This secondary endpoint is a composite of the primary endpoint and hemostasis of the transcaval aortic access site.
All of the following must be present for Closure Success:
- Alive
- Successful delivery of the TCD, and retrieval of the TCD delivery system
- Deployment and correct positioning of a single intended TCD. Repositioning and recapture of the device, if needed, is not classified as failure.
- No additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the TCD or delivery system. Adjunctive balloon aortic tamponade is permissible and consistent with technical success
- Complete occlusion of the aortocaval fistula on the completion aortogram.
Measured: 1 minute following procedure discharge (Exit from the catheterization laboratory)
Number of Participants Who Experienced Device Success of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)
A key performance endpoint is the number of participants who experienced device success of the transcaval closure device (TCD).
All of the following must be present for device success:
- Alive or Death unrelated to transcaval access or TAVR
- Original intended TCD in place
- No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to access or the device after exit from the cath lab
Intended performance of the TCD, including all of:
- Structural Performance: No migration, embolization, detachment, fracture, hemolysis, or endarteritis related to the TCD
- Hemodynamic performance: No abdominal aortic obstruction caused by the TCD implant
- Absence of para-device complications (large retroperitoneal hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, distal thromboembolism, or pulmonary thromboembolism)
Measured: 30 days and 12 Months
Number of Participants That Experienced Procedural Success
Number of participants that experienced safety endpoint of procedural success following transcaval closure device (TCD) at day 30.
All of the following must be present for procedural success:
- Device success
- No device-related Serious Adverse Events, defined as VARC-2 life-threatening bleeding, major vascular or cardiac complications related to the TCD requiring unplanned reintervention or surgery (such as covered stent implantation at the transcaval access site)
Measured: 30 Days
Number of Participants Requiring Covered Stent Implantation as a Normal Provisional Part of the Procedure
Number of participants requiring covered stent implantation as a normal provisional part of the procedure assessed during the procedure.
Measured: During procedure, procedure may last from 2 to 4 hours
Number of Participants With Covered Stent Implantation at the Transcaval Closure Device Implantation Site
Number of participants with covered stent implantation at the transcaval closure device (TCD) implantation site
Measured: During procedure, procedure may last from 2 to 4 hours
Number of Participants Final Acute Aorto-caval Fistula Score
Number of Participants final acute aorto-caval fistula score at procedure completion.
Scoring is defined as: Type 0=occlusion, Type 1=patent fistula, Type 2=cruci-form fistula pattern, Type 3=extravasation.
A score of 0 is associated with complete occlusion at the transcaval closure device (TCD) site while a higher score is associated with incomplete occlusion at the TCD site.
Measured: 30 Days
Number of Participants Who Experienced Modified Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 Vascular Complications
Participants who experienced Minor or Major modified Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) vascular complications.
Major is defined as: Aortic dissection or aortic rupture; Access site-related arterial or venous injury THAT RESULTS IN death, hemodynamic compromise, life-threatening, extensive; or major bleeding, visceral ischemia, neurological impairment; Distal embolization requiring surgery or resulting in amputation or irreversible end-organ damage; severe access site vascular complication Minor is defined as: Access site-related arterial or venous injury THAT DOES NOT RESULT IN death, hemodynamic compromise, life-threatening, extensive; or major bleeding, visceral ischemia, neurological impairment; Distal embolization treated with embolectomy and/or thrombectomy not resulting in amputation or irreversible end-organ damage; Any unplanned endovascular stenting or unplanned surgical intervention not meeting the criteria for a major vascular complication; Vascular repair
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants Who Experienced Modified Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 Bleeding Complications
Number of Participants Who Experienced Major or Life-threatening Modified Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) bleeding complications at 30 days
Major defined as: Corrected drop in the hemoglobin of >=3.0 g/dl AND does not meet criteria of life-threatening or extensive bleeding; Requiring transfusion of >=3 U of whole blood or packed RBCs AND does not meet criteria of life-threatening or extensive bleeding.
Life-threatening defined as: Intracranial requiring surgery or intervention; Intraspinal requiring surgery or intervention; Intraocular requiring surgery or intervention; Pericardial requiring surgery or intervention; Intramuscular with compartment syndrome; Bleeding causing hypovolemic shock or hypotension or requiring significant doses of vasopressors or surgery
Measured: 30 Days
Number of Participants Who Experienced Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Number of Participants Who Experienced Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as VARC-2 Early Safety composite: No mortality, stroke, life-threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 2+, major vascular complication, and valve-related complication.
Measured: Day 30
Number of Participants With Closure Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)
Number of Participants With Closure Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD).
All of the following must be present for Closure Success:
- Alive or Death unrelated to transcaval access or TAVR
- Successful delivery of the TCD, and retrieval of the TCD delivery system
- Deployment and correct positioning of a single intended TCD. Repositioning and recapture of the device, if needed, is not classified as failure.
- No additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the TCD or delivery system. Adjunctive balloon aortic tamponade is permissible and consistent with technical success
- Complete occlusion of the aortocaval fistula on the completion aortogram.
Measured: 30 Days and 12 Months
All-Cause Mortality
All-cause mortality, as categorized by cardiovascular vs non-cardiovascular, peri- vs non-periprocedural, regardless of attribution to Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)
Measured: 30 Days
Number of Participants With Aorto-caval Fistula Patency Assessed by Angiography and Arterial-phase Follow-up Computed Tomography
Number of participants with aorto-caval fistula patency at each timepoint, assessed combining completion angiography and arterial-phase follow-up Computed tomography (CT).
Measured: Day 30, 12 months
Number of Participants Who Experienced Acute Kidney Injury Stage 2 or 3
Number of participants who experienced acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 2 or 3 using the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC).
AKI using the VARC definition:
Stage 2: increase in serum creatinine to 200-300% (2.0-3.0 times increase compared to baseline) or increase of >0.3 mg/dl (>26.4 mmol/L) but <4.0 mg/dl (<354 mmol/L)
Stage 3: increase in serum creatinine to ≥300% (>3 times increase compared to baseline) or serum creatinine of ≥4.0 mg/dl (≥354 mmol/L), with acute increase of ≥0.5 mg/dl (44 mmol/L)
Measured: 30 Days
Number of Participants That Are Free From Infection Related to the Transcaval Closure Device
Number of participants that experience freedom from infection related to the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD) at each time point
Measured: Day 30, 12 Months
Number of Participants That Experience Thrombocytopenia and is Attributable to Residual Aorto-caval Fistula or the Transcaval Closure Device
Number of participants that experience Thrombocytopenia as defined as < 50,000 and is attributable to residual aorto-caval fistula or the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)
Measured: 30 Days
Number of Participants Who Experience Hemolysis and is Attributable to Residual Aorto-caval Fistula or the Transcaval Closure Device
Number of participants who experience hemolysis and is attributable to residual aorto-caval fistula or the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)
Measured: 30 Days
Participant Cumulative Computed Tomography Analysis of Device
Participant cumulative Computed tomography (CT) analysis of device. As defined by: Device position; Device integrity; Aortocaval tract pseudo-aneurysm; Aortic pseudoaneurysm; Retroperitoneal hematoma grade (stranding {=absent and not evidence of overt bleeding;} small; moderate; larger); Intracaval mass or thrombus; Aortic dissection and inferred relatedness to TCD (adjacent to access port) or procedure (remote to access port)
Measured: Day 30
Number of Participants Enrolled Greater Than 65 Years
Outcomes of subjects greater than 65 years (i.e. eligible for Medicare based on age), to determine generalizability to the Medicare population
Measured: Enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Feb 2018
- Study start7 Feb 2018
- Primary completion30 Apr 2018
- Study completion29 Apr 2019
Why it stopped: The trial was kept open (via administrative hold) in anticipation of a device redesign and enrollment suspended, but funding never materialized to support the redesign.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Aortic StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Robert J Lederman, M.D., Principal investigator, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03432494
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 999918045
- Other IDs
- 18-H-N045
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: The authors are willing to share de-identified subject data upon reasonable request
Publications
Rogers T, Greenbaum AB, Babaliaros VC, Stine AM, Khan JM, Schenke WH, Eng MH, Paone G, Leshnower BG, Satler LF, Waksman R, Chen MY, Lederman RJ. Dedicated Closure Device for Transcaval Access Closure: From Concept to First-in-Human Testing. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 11;12(21):2198-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.053. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
PubMed 31629746
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Feasibility Evaluation of Transmural Systems Transcaval Closure Device (TCD) for Transcaval Access Ports During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03432494
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 999918045
- Conditions
- Aortic Stenosis
- Keywords
- Transcatheter, Transcaval, Bioprosthesis, Closure Device, Aortic Stenosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The trial was kept open (via administrative hold) in anticipation of a device redesign and enrollment suspended, but funding never materialized to support the redesign.
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- 7 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 14 Mar 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a non-surgical alternative to standard surgical aortic valve replacement. Not all patients are eligible for TAVR using standard access through the artery in the groin, because the artery is too small or too diseased. In this study, TAVR is performed using a new technique called transcaval access. The catheter is placed in the artery deep in the body by crossing through the wall of a deep vein. The connection between that vein and the aorta is closed with a new metallic device they are testing. This is called a transcaval closure device (TCD).
Objective:
To test the safety and early feasibility of closure of transcaval aortic access sites using the TCD after TAVR.
Eligibility:
Adults ages 21 and older undergoing TAVR for whom the procedure cannot be performed safely by the standard artery approach
Design:
Participants will be assessed by heart experts including cardiologists and surgeons.
Participants will have TAVR by the transcaval approach. A small catheter will be passed between the largest vein in the body and the nearby largest artery (aorta), inside the abdomen. Through this catheter, the TAVR will be implanted in the usual way.
After, doctors will implant the TCD by catheter to close the hole made in the aorta.
Participants will be X-rayed. A dye will be injected to view the TCD device.
Participants will get standard TAVR care afterwards. They will have physical exams, blood tests, and scans.
Participants will have a follow-up scan within 1 month and after 12 months.
Participants will have follow-up visits and phone calls 6 and 12 months after the procedure.
Detailed description
Transcaval access to the abdominal aorta from the neighboring inferior vena cava (IVC) enables transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients not eligible for femoral artery access. Currently the procedure is performed using devices, off-label, designed and marketed to close holes inside the heart and great vessels, manufactured by Abbott St Jude (Amplatzer Duct Occluder and Amplatzer Muscular VSD Occluder). Because these Amplatzer occluders are not designed to close transcaval access sites, they may not completely prevent bleeding.
This is an early feasibility study (EFS) evaluation of a purpose-built closure device for transcaval access. The device, the Transcaval closure device (TCD) will be evaluated for safety and performance to close transcaval access sites in patients ineligible for femoral artery access for TAVR.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Transcaval access and closure with the transcaval closure device (TCD) test article. | Experimental | Device: Transcaval closure device (TCD)All participants undergo transcaval access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) followed by implantation of the transcaval closure device (TCD). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Consents to participate in this study and all related clinical follow-up procedures
- Adults age greater than or equal to 21 years
- Undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) based on the clinical assessment of the multidisciplinary heart team
- Ineligible for femoral artery access for the selected transcatheter heart valve (THV) according to the THV manufacturer instructions for use. (Note Corevalve Evolut R: greater than or equal to 5mm; Evolut PRO 23, 26, 29 mm valves and Evolut R 34 mm: greater than or equal to 5.5 mm; Edwards Sapien 3, 23-26mm: 5.5 mm; Edwards Sapien 3, 29mm: 6.0mm; Anatomic ineligibility also considers patient-specific pattern of iliofemoral calcium and tortuosity.)
- Eligible for transcaval access based on Core lab analysis of the baseline abdomen/pelvis CT indicating a calcium-free target window on the abdominal aorta; a target greater than or equal to 15mm from the lowest main renal artery or aorto-iliac bifurcation; no important interposed structures; a projected intravascular centerline distance from the lower femoral head to the target at least 5cm less than the intended THV introducer sheath; patient celiac or superior mesenteric artery
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- High risk features on baseline CT including porcelain aorta (confluent calcification); pedunculated aortic atheroma; or leftward aortic angel greater than or equal to 20 degrees with regard to vertical.
- Renal dysfunction limiting follow-up contrast-enhanced CR (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR less than 30mL/min/1.73m^2 if not already on renal replacement therapy)
- Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant prior to completion of all protocol follow-up procedures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcaval closure device (TCD)Transcaval access and closure using the Transmural Transcaval Closure Device (TCD) at the time of medically-necessary transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). | Device | Transcaval access and closure with the transcaval closure device (TCD) test article. |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Technical Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)
Time frame: 1 minute following procedure discharge (Exit from the catheterization laboratory)
Number of participants with technical success of delivery of the transcaval closure device (TCD) All of the following must be present for technical success: 1. Alive 2. Successful delivery of the TCD, and retrieval of the TCD delivery system 3. Deployment and correct positioning of a single intended TCD. Repositioning and recapture of the device, if needed, is not classified as failure. 4. No additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the TCD or delivery system 5. Adjunctive balloon aortic tamponade is permissible and consistent with technical success
18 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Closure Success of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)
Time frame: 1 minute following procedure discharge (Exit from the catheterization laboratory)
Number of Participants Who Experienced Device Success of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)
Time frame: 30 days and 12 Months
Number of Participants That Experienced Procedural Success
Time frame: 30 Days
Number of Participants Requiring Covered Stent Implantation as a Normal Provisional Part of the Procedure
Time frame: During procedure, procedure may last from 2 to 4 hours
Number of Participants With Covered Stent Implantation at the Transcaval Closure Device Implantation Site
Time frame: During procedure, procedure may last from 2 to 4 hours
Number of Participants Final Acute Aorto-caval Fistula Score
Time frame: 30 Days
Number of Participants Who Experienced Modified Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 Vascular Complications
Time frame: 30 days
Number of Participants Who Experienced Modified Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 Bleeding Complications
Time frame: 30 Days
Number of Participants Who Experienced Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Time frame: Day 30
Number of Participants With Closure Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD)
Time frame: 30 Days and 12 Months
All-Cause Mortality
Time frame: 30 Days
Number of Participants With Aorto-caval Fistula Patency Assessed by Angiography and Arterial-phase Follow-up Computed Tomography
Time frame: Day 30, 12 months
Number of Participants Who Experienced Acute Kidney Injury Stage 2 or 3
Time frame: 30 Days
Number of Participants That Are Free From Infection Related to the Transcaval Closure Device
Time frame: Day 30, 12 Months
Number of Participants That Experience Thrombocytopenia and is Attributable to Residual Aorto-caval Fistula or the Transcaval Closure Device
Time frame: 30 Days
Number of Participants Who Experience Hemolysis and is Attributable to Residual Aorto-caval Fistula or the Transcaval Closure Device
Time frame: 30 Days
Participant Cumulative Computed Tomography Analysis of Device
Time frame: Day 30
Number of Participants Enrolled Greater Than 65 Years
Time frame: Enrollment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31629746Rogers T, Greenbaum AB, Babaliaros VC, Stine AM, Khan JM, Schenke WH, Eng MH, Paone G, Leshnower BG, Satler LF, Waksman R, Chen MY, Lederman RJ. Dedicated Closure Device for Transcaval Access Closure: From Concept to First-in-Human Testing. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 11;12(21):2198-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.053. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The authors are willing to share de-identified subject data upon reasonable request
Related trials for Aortic Stenosis
Recruiting
SYMmetric Valve fraME Expansion To Reduce hYpoattenuated Leaflet Thickening After Balloon-expandable TAVI: the SYMMETRY Trial
Aortic Valve Stenosis and/or Insufficiency, Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening
RecruitingObservational study
Spanish Prospective Registry of Hydra THV for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis, Valvular Heart Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Korea VHD Echo Study: Surveillance of Aortic, Mitral & Tricuspid Patients - Insights From Real-world Practice
Heart Valve Diseases, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert J Lederman, M.D. principal investigator
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcaval closure device (TCD) in people with Aortic Stenosis, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Mar 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Technical Success of Delivery of the Transcaval Closure Device (TCD) (time frame: 1 minute following procedure discharge (Exit from the catheterization laboratory)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03432494, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2023.