Multiple SclerosisPIXCISNCT03438357
Evaluation of an Automatic Segmentation Software (Pixyl.Neuro) to Track Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Via Cerebral MRI
An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis and Clinically Isolated Syndrome, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Using an automatic software tool, Pixyl.Neuro, to conduct a retrospective analysis (detection of lesions + segmentation of images + tracking over time) of cerebral MRI images acquired during a prospective study of patients presenting with clinically isolated syndrome, and comparing the results against manual analysis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 56 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Sclerosis, Clinically Isolated Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Analysis of cerebral MRI with automatic segmentation software
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 2 Jan 2019to 6 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 56 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Study population: Subset of patient data collected for the project D-Lay-MS: NCT01817166
Who may be able to join
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is available for 24 months of follow-up
- The patient has had a classic CIS with the past 90 days
- Reference cerebro-medullary MRI scheduled within the 90 days after the beginning of symptoms
- With MRI (cerebro ± medullary) showing demyelination according to spatial spread criteria by Swanton (2006):
Show all 12Show fewer
- At least 1 lesion in at least 2 of the 4 following territories: (1) Peri-ventricular; (2) Juxta-cortical; (3) Sub-tentorial; (4) Medullary
- No other suspected pathology
- Vitamin D level in blood less than 100 nmol / l at the pre-inclusion visit
- Women of childbearing potential must use very effective contraception for the duration of the study. A very effective contraceptive method is defined as a method resulting in a low failure rate (that is to say less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly, such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, IUDs, sexual abstinence, or partner with a vasectomy.
- Randomisation stratification criteria:
- The patient can also also meet the temporal dissemination criteria defined according to McDonald criteria 2010 (Polman et al., 2011), because this condition is currently not sufficient for prescribing a background treatment: Simultaneous presence of at least one asymptomatic lesion taking on contrast and at least one asymptomatic lesion not taking on contrast after injection of gadolinium
Who cannot join
- The patient is participating in another study other than D-Lay-MS: NCT01817166 (this criteria does not apply to the POLAR study (RCB 2011-A01269-32); patients included in this study may simultaneously participate in the POLAR study)
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
Show all 22Show fewer
- Major medical or psychiatric illness that, according to the investigator, would result in the patient running an unnecessary risk or that could affect compliance with the study protocol
- Vitamin D insufficiency linked to currently active digestive or more general diseases (celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal bypass, short bowel syndrome, cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome, hyperthyroidism, rickets, hypoparathyroidism, cancer, granulomatous diseases and lymphomas)
- Moderate or severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance less than 60 ml / min)
- Epilepsy not adequately controlled by treatment
- Any illness requiring chronic treatment with corticosteroids
- Patient with osteoporosis or history of osteopenia
- Pathology requiring calcium intakes greater than 1 gram per day
- Current or past history of hypercalcemia
- Medications that affect the metabolism of vitamin D other than corticosteroids; e.g. anticonvulsants [phenobarbital, primidone, phenytoin] rifampicin, isoniazid, ketoconazole, 5-FU and leucovorin, thiazide diuretics.
- Situations accompanied by increased vulnerability to hypercalcemia, e.g. arrhythmia or known heart disease, treatment with digitalis, and subjects with nephrolithiasis.
- Contraindications to vitamin D3 as mentioned in the documentation for UVEDOSE
- Known hypersensitivity to gadolinium and / or known inability to undergo an MRI (pacemaker, osteosynthesis material, intraocular metal splinter, etc ....).
- The subject is participating in an interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
- The subject refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to give the subject informed information
- The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Using an automatic software tool, Pixyl.Neuro, to conduct a retrospective analysis (detection of lesions + segmentation of images + tracking over time) of cerebral MRI images acquired during a prospective study of patients presenting with clinically isolated syndrome, and comparing the results against manual analysis.
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis, Clinically Isolated Syndrome
- Being tested
- Analysis of cerebral MRI with automatic segmentation software
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Analysis of cerebral MRI with automatic segmentation softwareOther
Pixyl.Neuro software versus manual analysis of lesions
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with multiple sclerosis | Not described Receives: Other: Analysis of cerebral MRI with automatic segmentation software |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lesions detected by Pixyl.Neuro software that were missed by manual analysis of MRI images follow-up images compared to reference image (new T2 lesions, enlarging T2 lesions, new T1 gadolinium lesions)
% cases
Measured: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Inter-reader reproducibility
DICE similarity coefficient between readers
Measured: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
Software versus manual analysis reproducibility for same reader
DICE similarity coefficient between software result and manual result
Measured: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
Classification of discordances
Specific description of missed lesions according to technology at fault
Measured: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2018
- Study start2 Jan 2019
- Primary completion6 Jul 2022
- Study completion6 Jul 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Multiple SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Roche Pharma AG
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eric Thouvenot, Principal investigator, CHU Nimes
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03438357
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IDIL/2017/ET-01
- Acronym
- PIXCIS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of an Automatic Segmentation Software (Pixyl.Neuro) to Track Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Via Cerebral MRI
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03438357
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PIXCIS / IDIL/2017/ET-01
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis, Clinically Isolated Syndrome
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Roche Pharma AG
- Study start
- 2 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Using an automatic software tool, Pixyl.Neuro, to conduct a retrospective analysis (detection of lesions + segmentation of images + tracking over time) of cerebral MRI images acquired during a prospective study of patients presenting with clinically isolated syndrome, and comparing the results against manual analysis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with multiple sclerosis | – | Other: Analysis of cerebral MRI with automatic segmentation software |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 56 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Subset of patient data collected for the project D-Lay-MS: NCT01817166
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is available for 24 months of follow-up
- The patient has had a classic CIS with the past 90 days
- Reference cerebro-medullary MRI scheduled within the 90 days after the beginning of symptoms
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- The patient is participating in another study other than D-Lay-MS: NCT01817166 (this criteria does not apply to the POLAR study (RCB 2011-A01269-32); patients included in this study may simultaneously participate in the POLAR study)
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Analysis of cerebral MRI with automatic segmentation softwarePixyl.Neuro software versus manual analysis of lesions | Other | Patients with multiple sclerosis |
Primary outcome
Lesions detected by Pixyl.Neuro software that were missed by manual analysis of MRI images follow-up images compared to reference image (new T2 lesions, enlarging T2 lesions, new T1 gadolinium lesions)
Time frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
% cases
3 secondary outcomes
Inter-reader reproducibility
Time frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
Software versus manual analysis reproducibility for same reader
Time frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
Classification of discordances
Time frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2023.
Related trials for Multiple Sclerosis
Recruiting
Dry Needling in Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Disease Process of Lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Lung Disease, Pneumothorax
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Safety of Subcutaneous (SC) Ublituximab Administered at Various Injection Sites and Relative Bioavailability Via Autoinjector (AI) Versus Syringe Subcutaneously in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Multiple Sclerosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Stopping TSC Onset and Progression 2B: Sirolimus TSC Epilepsy Prevention Study
Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, Epilepsy
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML)
Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eric Thouvenot principal investigator
CHU Nimes
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis and Clinically Isolated Syndrome, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lesions detected by Pixyl.Neuro software that were missed by manual analysis of MRI images follow-up images compared to reference image (new T2 lesions, enlarging T2 lesions, new T1 gadolinium lesions) (time frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2023.