Hypoactive DeliriumPhase 4BOMP-AIDNCT03438526
The Basel BOMP-AID Randomized Trial
A Phase 4 study testing Melatonin (Circadin ®) in people with Hypoactive Delirium, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Delirium is a neurobehavioural syndrome that frequently develops in the postoperative and/or ICU setting. The incidence of elderly patients who develop delirium during hospital stay ranges from 11-82%. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypoactive Delirium
- What is being tested?
- Melatonin (Circadin ®)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 190 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 3 Jan 2022to Dec 2027
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:
- Adult patients (aged 55 years or older)
- Current delirium (hypoactive type) detected by a specialised assessment method: ICDSC score >2 and RASS score < 0
Who cannot join
- Participants meeting the following criteria are excluded from the study:
- Delirium prior to ICU admission
- Sleep disorder not caused by hypoactive delirium
- Sedation in the ICU
- Hypersensitivity to the studied substances (i.e., melatonin, placebo content)
- Age <55 years
Show all 12Show fewer
- Terminal state
- Status epilepticus or postictal states following seizures on electroencephalogram (EEG)
- Active psychosis
- Substance abuse in current medical history
- Dementia
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital Basel
Basel, 4031
Alexa Hollinger, MD, 0615565895, alexa.hollinger@usb.ch
Martin Siegemund, MD, 0613286414, martin.siegemund@usb.ch
About this study
Official title: Better Outcome With Melatonin Compared to Placebo Administered to Normalize Sleep-wake Cycle and Treat Hypoactive ICU Delirium The Basel BOMP-AID Randomized Trial
Delirium is a neurobehavioural syndrome that frequently develops in the postoperative and/or ICU setting. The incidence of elderly patients who develop delirium during hospital stay ranges from 11-82%. Delirium was first described more than half a century ago in the cardiac surgery population, where it was already discovered as a state that might be accompanied by serious complications such as prolonged ICU and hospital stay, reduced quality of life and increased mortality. Furthermore, the duration of delirium is associated with worse long-term cognitive function in the general ICU population. This long-term experience with delirium suggests a high socioeconomic liability and has been a focus of many studies. The aforementioned consequences of delirium are observed in all of three subtypes: hypoactive, hyperactive, and mixed. Pharmacological treatment options for hypoactive delirium are lacking. Since patients in hypoactive delirium suffer from disturbed circadian rhythm, the investigators suggest that the administration of melatonin as a promising possibility in these patients to shorten delirium duration and to lower its severity. Previous investigations confirmed loss of melatonin rhythm in patients that had developed delirium thus reasoning the study hypothesis.
In this randomized study, the investigators aim to test the hypothesis that the reinstitution of a normal circadian rhythm by the administration of melatonin compared to placebo after diagnosis of hypoactive delirium, decreases the duration of delirium and reduces the transmission to a form of agitated delirium. The administration might have to be repeated several times to achieve resolution of delirium.
Read the detailed description
Delirium is a neurobehavioural syndrome that frequently develops in the postoperative and/or ICU setting. The incidence of elderly patients who develop delirium during hospital stay ranges from 10-80%. Delirium was first described more than half a century ago in the cardiac surgery population, where it was already discovered as a state that might be accompanied by serious complications such as prolonged ICU and hospital stay, reduced quality of life and increased mortality. Furthermore, the duration of delirium is associated with worse long-term cognitive function in the general ICU population. This long-term experience with delirium suggests a high socioeconomic liability and has been a focus of many studies. Due to the multifactorial origin of delirium, there are several but no incontestable options for prevention and symptomatic treatment. Overall, delirium represents a high burden not only for the patient and his/her family members, but also for the medical care team that aims to prevent postoperative delirium to avoid serious consequences associated with it.
The aforementioned consequences of delirium are observed in all of three subtypes: hypoactive, hyperactive, and mixed. Many studies have been conducted to prevent and treat hyperactive and mixed delirium. Hypoactive delirium, suggested to be the most frequent form of delirium, is a different case: as it corresponds to a patient that is calm and as such doesn't cause any harm or inconvenience to himself or the caring medical team it also leads to two major problems. First, it is already known that hypoactive delirium is hard to detect. Second, because hypoactive delirious patients are calm or even asleep most of the time this delirium subtype doesn't go along with the same urge to become active in order to prevent harm. Also, pharmacological treatment usually addresses hyperactive and mixed delirium in standard operating procedures, whereas treatment of hypoactive delirium remains supportive. Pharmacological treatment options for hypoactive delirium are lacking. Since patients in hypoactive delirium suffer from disturbed circadian rhythm, investigators suggest that the administration of melatonin is a promising possibility in these patients to shorten delirium duration and to lower its severity. Previous investigations confirmed loss of melatonin rhythm in patients that had developed delirium thus reasoning the study hypothesis. Of note, melatonin is to be investigated for ICU delirium prevention in an Australian study, as the potential of chronotherapy to reduce delirium incidence has been suggested in a recently published article. The administration of dexmedetomidine to treat the disturbed circadian rhythm in hyperactive and mixed delirious ICU patients will be investigated in one of the investigators' current studies, but because of its sedative nature it clearly doesn't represent a treatment option for hypoactive delirium.
The aim of the BOMP-AID trial is to assess the superiority of melatonin to placebo for the treatment of hypoactive delirium in the ICU. The study hypothesis is based on the assumption that melatonin compared to placebo (Lactose monohydrate, cellulose powder, magnesium stearate (Ph. Eur.), mocrocristalline cellulose) administered at night restores a normal circadian rhythm, thus decreasing the duration of delirium and reducing the transmission to a form of agitated delirium.
Investigators would like to recruit 190 patients right after the diagnosis of hypoactive delirium. The administration might have to be repeated several times to achieve resolution of delirium.
After the first administration of melatonin or placebo at 8 p.m. investigators shall follow the standard operating procedure for hypoactive delirium for further treatment of delirium during daytime. In case of previously undiagnosed mixed delirium investigators are forced to follow the standard operating procedure for mixed delirium that includes the administration of haloperidol, quetiapine or trazodone. During the consecutive nightly hours the randomized study substance will be administered again if indicated. The latter will allow investigators to clearly detect the suggested shortening of delirium duration in the cohort where melatonin is being used as treating agent. Any use of drugs to treat forms other than hypoactive will be recorded.
The primary outcome measure is delirium duration in shifts of 8 hours each. Due to difficult diagnosis of hypoactive delirium, the investigators will consider those with an ICDSC score > 2 (subsyndromal delirium) and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score < 0 in absence of induced coma as eligible for study inclusion. If patients reveal an ICDSC score > 2 and a RASS score < 0 a member of the study team will assess the patient according to DSM-V delirium criteria REF] for definite study inclusion. The end of the delirium will be defined as the end of the last shift with an ICDSC > 2 and a RASS score < 0 that precedes a minimum of two subsequent shifts with an ICDSC < 3.
Secondary outcomes can be listed as follows:
- Delirium-free days at 28 days after study inclusion
- Death until day 28, day 90, and day 365 from ICU admission
- Number of ventilator days
- Length of ICU stay (hours)
- Length of hospital stay (days)
- Sleep quality, assessed by the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ; total score)
Since melatonin has no known major side effects evidence of its way of function in the human body strongly suggests high benefit for treatment of hypoactive delirium going along with increased comfort and safety also for critically ill patients. No severe adverse events are expected by its use in delirious patients after careful enrolment following investigators exclusion criteria.
Other outcome measures:
The following outcomes are measured by smartwatches. The smartwatches will be attached half an hour before the administration of the drug (07:30 p.m.) and left attached as long as possible, but at least until 6 a.m. of every day of the study period.
The following smartwatch assessments are based on activity (counts/min):
- Sleep duration per night (minutes) defined as the period from lights off to lights on
- Number of sleep interruptions (number of consecutive 5-min bouts of >0 activity)
- The relative amplitude (RA) calculated from the ratio of the most active 10-hour period (M10) to the least active 5-hour period (L5) across the averaged 24-hour profile (assessment depends upon patient cooperation during the day with keeping the smartwatch attached)
- Interdaily stability (IS), which quantifies the invariability day by day, that is, how well the sleep-wake cycle is synchronized to supposedly stable environmental cues. Timing information comes from determining the onset of the 5 hours with least activity (L5 onset) and onset of the 10 hours with most activity (M10 onset).
In addition, wrist/skin temperature (degrees/min) will be registered to assess degree of relaxation (i.e., difference in degrees Celsius per minute between distal skin regions (finger, feet etc) and proximal skin regions (clavicular, sternum etc).
Follow-up:
To assess long-term follow-up of patients who received melatonin and compare it to those who received placebo, we will perform a follow-up at three and twelve months after the prevailing hospital case has been officially closed (discharge date). With this follow-up, we will assess the following information equally at three and twelve months (information either given by the patient or his/her family/contact person):
- Death after hospital discharge
- Hospital readmission
- Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (ADLQ)
- Additional episodes of delirium after study closeout
CRF assessments:
On our electronic case report form, we will document the following information concerning our study participants (sequential order):
- Patient information including socioeconomic status
- Study group
- Study eligibility
- Results of the planned assessment tools
- Cardiovascular parameters
- Lab values
- Drugs administered
- Nursing interventions
- Outcome overview
- Follow-up at three and twelve months
- Conditions
- Hypoactive Delirium
- Being tested
- Melatonin (Circadin ®), Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Melatonin (Circadin ®)Drug
4 mg of oral melatonin at 8 p.m. for the length of the duration of the hypoactive delirium
PlaceboDrug
Also called Oral tablet
Lactose monohydrate, cellulose powder, magnesium stearate (Ph. Eur.), mocrocristalline cellulose
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Melatonin (Circadin ®) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Melatonin (Circadin ®) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duration of hypoactive delirium
Duration of hypoactive delirium in the ICU in 8-hour shifts
Measured: From study inclusion to delirium resolution, assessed daily until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
Secondary outcomes (6)
Delirium-free days at 28 days after study inclusion
Duration of Delirium-free days measured in days
Measured: From study inclusion to ICU discharge, assessed up to 28 days
Death until day 28, day 90, and day 365 from ICU admission
Telephone Survey 28 days, 90 days and 365 days after study inclusion
Measured: Assessed at 28 days, 90 days, and 365 days after study inclusion
Number of ventilator days
Number of days on mechanical ventilation measured in days
Measured: From study inclusion until ICU discharge, assessed daily until the date of withdrawal of mechanical ventilation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
Length of ICU stay
Length of ICU stay measured in hours
Measured: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, assessed daily until the date of ICU discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
Length of hospital stay
Length of hospital stay measured in days
Measured: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed daily until the date of hospital discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days
Sleep quality
Assessed by the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ; total score)
Measured: From study inclusion until study termination, assessed daily until the date of first documented progression (i.e., delirium resolution) or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2018
- Study start3 Jan 2022
- Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hypoactive DeliriumStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alexa Hollinger, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03438526
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EKNZ 2018-00161
- Acronym
- BOMP-AID
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 11 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Study results will be communicated to patients based on expected speed-up in convalescence from delirious state. During the study ongoing and until publication there will be no access to our data.
Publications
Hollinger A, von Felten S, Sutter R, Huber J, Tran F, Reinhold S, Abdelhamid S, Todorov A, Gebhard CE, Cajochen C, Steiner LA, Siegemund M. Study protocol for a prospective randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating a Better Outcome with Melatonin compared to Placebo Administered to normalize sleep-wake cycle and treat hypoactive ICU Delirium: the Basel BOMP-AID study. BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 30;10(4):e034873. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034873.
PubMed 32354780
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Better Outcome With Melatonin Compared to Placebo Administered to Normalize Sleep-wake Cycle and Treat Hypoactive ICU Delirium The Basel BOMP-AID Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03438526
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BOMP-AID / EKNZ 2018-00161
- Conditions
- Hypoactive Delirium
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Delirium is a neurobehavioural syndrome that frequently develops in the postoperative and/or ICU setting. The incidence of elderly patients who develop delirium during hospital stay ranges from 11-82%. Delirium was first described more than half a century ago in the cardiac surgery population, where it was already discovered as a state that might be accompanied by serious complications such as prolonged ICU and hospital stay, reduced quality of life and increased mortality. Furthermore, the duration of delirium is associated with worse long-term cognitive function in the general ICU population. This long-term experience with delirium suggests a high socioeconomic liability and has been a focus of many studies. The aforementioned consequences of delirium are observed in all of three subtypes: hypoactive, hyperactive, and mixed. Pharmacological treatment options for hypoactive delirium are lacking. Since patients in hypoactive delirium suffer from disturbed circadian rhythm, the investigators suggest that the administration of melatonin as a promising possibility in these patients to shorten delirium duration and to lower its severity. Previous investigations confirmed loss of melatonin rhythm in patients that had developed delirium thus reasoning the study hypothesis.
In this randomized study, the investigators aim to test the hypothesis that the reinstitution of a normal circadian rhythm by the administration of melatonin compared to placebo after diagnosis of hypoactive delirium, decreases the duration of delirium and reduces the transmission to a form of agitated delirium. The administration might have to be repeated several times to achieve resolution of delirium.
Detailed description
Delirium is a neurobehavioural syndrome that frequently develops in the postoperative and/or ICU setting. The incidence of elderly patients who develop delirium during hospital stay ranges from 10-80%. Delirium was first described more than half a century ago in the cardiac surgery population, where it was already discovered as a state that might be accompanied by serious complications such as prolonged ICU and hospital stay, reduced quality of life and increased mortality. Furthermore, the duration of delirium is associated with worse long-term cognitive function in the general ICU population. This long-term experience with delirium suggests a high socioeconomic liability and has been a focus of many studies. Due to the multifactorial origin of delirium, there are several but no incontestable options for prevention and symptomatic treatment. Overall, delirium represents a high burden not only for the patient and his/her family members, but also for the medical care team that aims to prevent postoperative delirium to avoid serious consequences associated with it.
The aforementioned consequences of delirium are observed in all of three subtypes: hypoactive, hyperactive, and mixed. Many studies have been conducted to prevent and treat hyperactive and mixed delirium. Hypoactive delirium, suggested to be the most frequent form of delirium, is a different case: as it corresponds to a patient that is calm and as such doesn't cause any harm or inconvenience to himself or the caring medical team it also leads to two major problems. First, it is already known that hypoactive delirium is hard to detect. Second, because hypoactive delirious patients are calm or even asleep most of the time this delirium subtype doesn't go along with the same urge to become active in order to prevent harm. Also, pharmacological treatment usually addresses hyperactive and mixed delirium in standard operating procedures, whereas treatment of hypoactive delirium remains supportive. Pharmacological treatment options for hypoactive delirium are lacking. Since patients in hypoactive delirium suffer from disturbed circadian rhythm, investigators suggest that the administration of melatonin is a promising possibility in these patients to shorten delirium duration and to lower its severity. Previous investigations confirmed loss of melatonin rhythm in patients that had developed delirium thus reasoning the study hypothesis. Of note, melatonin is to be investigated for ICU delirium prevention in an Australian study, as the potential of chronotherapy to reduce delirium incidence has been suggested in a recently published article. The administration of dexmedetomidine to treat the disturbed circadian rhythm in hyperactive and mixed delirious ICU patients will be investigated in one of the investigators' current studies, but because of its sedative nature it clearly doesn't represent a treatment option for hypoactive delirium.
The aim of the BOMP-AID trial is to assess the superiority of melatonin to placebo for the treatment of hypoactive delirium in the ICU. The study hypothesis is based on the assumption that melatonin compared to placebo (Lactose monohydrate, cellulose powder, magnesium stearate (Ph. Eur.), mocrocristalline cellulose) administered at night restores a normal circadian rhythm, thus decreasing the duration of delirium and reducing the transmission to a form of agitated delirium.
Investigators would like to recruit 190 patients right after the diagnosis of hypoactive delirium. The administration might have to be repeated several times to achieve resolution of delirium.
After the first administration of melatonin or placebo at 8 p.m. investigators shall follow the standard operating procedure for hypoactive delirium for further treatment of delirium during daytime. In case of previously undiagnosed mixed delirium investigators are forced to follow the standard operating procedure for mixed delirium that includes the administration of haloperidol, quetiapine or trazodone. During the consecutive nightly hours the randomized study substance will be administered again if indicated. The latter will allow investigators to clearly detect the suggested shortening of delirium duration in the cohort where melatonin is being used as treating agent. Any use of drugs to treat forms other than hypoactive will be recorded.
The primary outcome measure is delirium duration in shifts of 8 hours each. Due to difficult diagnosis of hypoactive delirium, the investigators will consider those with an ICDSC score > 2 (subsyndromal delirium) and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score < 0 in absence of induced coma as eligible for study inclusion. If patients reveal an ICDSC score > 2 and a RASS score < 0 a member of the study team will assess the patient according to DSM-V delirium criteria REF] for definite study inclusion. The end of the delirium will be defined as the end of the last shift with an ICDSC > 2 and a RASS score < 0 that precedes a minimum of two subsequent shifts with an ICDSC < 3.
Secondary outcomes can be listed as follows:
- Delirium-free days at 28 days after study inclusion
- Death until day 28, day 90, and day 365 from ICU admission
- Number of ventilator days
- Length of ICU stay (hours)
- Length of hospital stay (days)
- Sleep quality, assessed by the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ; total score)
Since melatonin has no known major side effects evidence of its way of function in the human body strongly suggests high benefit for treatment of hypoactive delirium going along with increased comfort and safety also for critically ill patients. No severe adverse events are expected by its use in delirious patients after careful enrolment following investigators exclusion criteria.
Other outcome measures:
The following outcomes are measured by smartwatches. The smartwatches will be attached half an hour before the administration of the drug (07:30 p.m.) and left attached as long as possible, but at least until 6 a.m. of every day of the study period.
The following smartwatch assessments are based on activity (counts/min):
- Sleep duration per night (minutes) defined as the period from lights off to lights on
- Number of sleep interruptions (number of consecutive 5-min bouts of >0 activity)
- The relative amplitude (RA) calculated from the ratio of the most active 10-hour period (M10) to the least active 5-hour period (L5) across the averaged 24-hour profile (assessment depends upon patient cooperation during the day with keeping the smartwatch attached)
- Interdaily stability (IS), which quantifies the invariability day by day, that is, how well the sleep-wake cycle is synchronized to supposedly stable environmental cues. Timing information comes from determining the onset of the 5 hours with least activity (L5 onset) and onset of the 10 hours with most activity (M10 onset).
In addition, wrist/skin temperature (degrees/min) will be registered to assess degree of relaxation (i.e., difference in degrees Celsius per minute between distal skin regions (finger, feet etc) and proximal skin regions (clavicular, sternum etc).
Follow-up:
To assess long-term follow-up of patients who received melatonin and compare it to those who received placebo, we will perform a follow-up at three and twelve months after the prevailing hospital case has been officially closed (discharge date). With this follow-up, we will assess the following information equally at three and twelve months (information either given by the patient or his/her family/contact person):
- Death after hospital discharge
- Hospital readmission
- Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (ADLQ)
- Additional episodes of delirium after study closeout
CRF assessments:
On our electronic case report form, we will document the following information concerning our study participants (sequential order):
- Patient information including socioeconomic status
- Study group
- Study eligibility
- Results of the planned assessment tools
- Cardiovascular parameters
- Lab values
- Drugs administered
- Nursing interventions
- Outcome overview
- Follow-up at three and twelve months
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Melatonin (Circadin ®) | Experimental | Drug: Melatonin (Circadin ®) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participants fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:
- Adult patients (aged 55 years or older)
- Current delirium (hypoactive type) detected by a specialised assessment method: ICDSC score >2 and RASS score < 0
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Delirium prior to ICU admission
- Sleep disorder not caused by hypoactive delirium
- Sedation in the ICU
- Hypersensitivity to the studied substances (i.e., melatonin, placebo content)
- Age <55 years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Melatonin (Circadin ®)4 mg of oral melatonin at 8 p.m. for the length of the duration of the hypoactive delirium | Drug | Melatonin (Circadin ®) |
| PlaceboAlso: Oral tabletLactose monohydrate, cellulose powder, magnesium stearate (Ph. Eur.), mocrocristalline cellulose | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Duration of hypoactive delirium
Time frame: From study inclusion to delirium resolution, assessed daily until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
Duration of hypoactive delirium in the ICU in 8-hour shifts
6 secondary outcomes
Delirium-free days at 28 days after study inclusion
Time frame: From study inclusion to ICU discharge, assessed up to 28 days
Death until day 28, day 90, and day 365 from ICU admission
Time frame: Assessed at 28 days, 90 days, and 365 days after study inclusion
Number of ventilator days
Time frame: From study inclusion until ICU discharge, assessed daily until the date of withdrawal of mechanical ventilation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
Length of ICU stay
Time frame: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, assessed daily until the date of ICU discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed daily until the date of hospital discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days
Sleep quality
Time frame: From study inclusion until study termination, assessed daily until the date of first documented progression (i.e., delirium resolution) or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jun 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32354780Hollinger A, von Felten S, Sutter R, Huber J, Tran F, Reinhold S, Abdelhamid S, Todorov A, Gebhard CE, Cajochen C, Steiner LA, Siegemund M. Study protocol for a prospective randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating a Better Outcome with Melatonin compared to Placebo Administered to normalize sleep-wake cycle and treat hypoactive ICU Delirium: the Basel BOMP-AID study. BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 30;10(4):e034873. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034873.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Study results will be communicated to patients based on expected speed-up in convalescence from delirious state. During the study ongoing and until publication there will be no access to our data.
Related trials for Hypoactive Delirium
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Intelligent Intensive Care Unit
Delirium, Confusion
RecruitingObservational study
A Comparison of Healthcare Provider and Caregiver Perception of Discomfort in Advanced Cancer Patients Who Have a Hypoactive Delirium
Hypoactive Delirium
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Alexa Hollinger, MD principal investigator
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Melatonin (Circadin ®) in people with Hypoactive Delirium, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alexa Hollinger, MD (+41786747130, alexa.hollinger@usb.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duration of hypoactive delirium (time frame: From study inclusion to delirium resolution, assessed daily until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03438526, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2026.