AzTrials
AzTrials

Macular DegenerationCOSPNCT03438669

Correlation Between Visual Acuity Measurements, Quality of Life and Morphological Parameters in Wet AMD Patients

An observational study of Macular Degeneration, run by Dr. med. Katja Hatz at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patient-reported vision-related quality of life (QOL) outcomes are increasingly incorporated into clinical trials of new treatments for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In patients with central visual field defects they often do not correlate with distance visual acuity changes as evaluated according to the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Macular Degeneration
How many people
53 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
24 Feb 2017to 27 Oct 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: * Age: ≥ 55 years ( to 100 years) * patients will be required to have a confirmed diagnosis of wet AMD (including early, intermediate and advanced) from an ophthalmologist at the Vista Klinik, Binningen.

Incl.Crit.

  • To be eligible for participation, patients will be required to have a confirmed diagnosis of wet AMD (including early, intermediate and advanced) from an ophthalmologist at the Vista Klinik, Binningen.
  • Best-corrected visual acuity letter score of ≥ 49 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/100 or better) using ETDRS charts at a distance of 4m.
  • Sufficiently clear ocular media, adequate pupillary dilation, and fixation to permit quality fundus imaging
  • Age: ≥ 55 years ( to 100 years)
  • Wet AMD patients with lesions within the central 1mm ETDRS Grid subfield foveal zone. (The patient has to have a lesion within the 1mm central zone in the better eye). Although foveal involvement is required, lesions underneath the Foveola is not necessary. The maximum distance a lesion should be from the central point is 500µm.

Excl. Crit.

  • Significant ocular disease, for example, recurrent infectious or inflammatory ocular disease.
  • Patients who received treatment for CNV within the previous 4 days or who had an acute illness or a history of neurologic disease or cognitive impairment that would interfere with study requirements will not be eligible
  • The research will be conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent will be obtained from all patients before testing. Thus, all patients not signing informed consent will be excluded from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Vista Klinik

    Binningen, Basel-Landschaft, 4102

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Correlation Between Reading Specific New Visual Acuity Measurement Methods, Patient Self-reported Quality of Life Assessments, Macular Morphological Parameters and Standardized Study Protocol ETDRS Visual Acuity in Wet AMD Patients

Patient-reported vision-related quality of life (QOL) outcomes are increasingly incorporated into clinical trials of new treatments for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In patients with central visual field defects they often do not correlate with distance visual acuity changes as evaluated according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Therefore there is the need for better correlated visual acuity (VA) outcome measures for these patients. In a current big trial for treatment of dry AMD (geographic atrophy) reading speed and low luminance visual acuity are used as outcome measures for the first time. However, limited information is available regarding the associations between distance ETDRS visual acuity, reading speed, low luminance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, morphological parameters and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) subscales judged relevant to these measures. Evaluating these correlations could provide the basis for objective study outcome parameters which are better correlated to patient-reported outcomes. Further it increases the understanding of the impact of visual impairment on activities and functioning in patients with eye diseases.

There is an immediate benefit to the study patients, as they might gain information regarding their individual results regarding objective VA measures, contrast sensitivity (and their impact on reading ability). Furthermore, the results of the study could be beneficial for future patients due to, e.g., a better understanding of the disease, especially regarding factors which have an impact on their near vision ability and therefore their quality of life. The study could provide a basis to find and include outcome measures which are correlated better with quality of life than ETDRS distance VA for further AMD trials.

Read the detailed description

3.1 Background and Rationale AGE-RELATED MACULAR Degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness among European descended people older than 65 years.

Today, the average life expectancy in developed nations is over 80 years and climbing. And yet, the quality of life during those additional years is often significantly diminished by the effects of age-related, degenerative diseases, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD) Central-field loss (CFL) is often a consequence of macular degeneration, necessitating the use of peripheral vision for reading That means that AMD affects the central vision, resulting in central scotomas and therefore the patients have problems with near distance activities like reading while the peripheral visual field is kept preserved.

AMD is a gradually progressive disease that evolves through stages into severe central vision loss. The earliest signs of AMD involve the appearance of extracellular deposits (drusen), sub-retinal deposits of oxidized lipids and proteins beneath the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and variable amounts of visible clumps of pigment in the macula. In the intermediate stages of AMD, drusen become larger and pigmentary changes are more severe. In the advanced stages, patients develop either sub-retinal choroidal neovascularization (the exudative or "wet" form of AMD) or the non-neovascular "dry" form of AMD. The dry form of AMD is characterized by sharply demarcated uni- or multi-focal regions of dysfunctional macula, termed geographic atrophy (GA). The GA patches gradually enlarge to involve the RPE and the corresponding neurosensory retina and choriocapillaris layer of the choroid. These progressive and irreversible changes ultimately cause permanent loss of central (macular) vision.

Geographic atrophy (GA) may cause significant compromise of visual function, even when there still is good visual acuity (VA), because of parafoveal scotomas and foveal function abnormalities antedating visible atrophy AMD is a multifactorial disease with largely unknown pathophysiology. It is believed to be caused by cumulative damage over a lifetime leading to progressive deterioration of the RPE, Bruch's membrane and Choriocapillaris-choroid complex (key players in maintaining retinal function), followed by photoreceptor cells damage. However, the locus of primary damage still remains unclear. Identified pathogenic mechanisms to date include a range of genetic and environmental factors related to primary RPE senescence, oxidative stress, alterations in the complement pathway, increased inflammation, changes in the balance of growth factors, and excessive lipofuscin accumulation. Areas of GA are associated with absolute scotomas. Thus, for a period of years, many patients with GA have good VA because of foveal preservation but are limited by the scotomas surrounding the fovea. For example, a patient may have VA of 20/40 or better, but be unable to fit more than a few letters of a word or a full face in the seeing foveal region .Often multiple central scotomas with very small islands of preserved VA, allow the patient to read single optotypes but not the whole word Visual acuity is the most widely used measure of macular function in clinical trials and clinical practice. However, reading ability is an important component of vision function. Reading difficulty diminishes quality of life . Improvement in reading performance is one of the main objectives for elderly low-vision patients ETDRS often does not reflect the reading problems of the patient which are essential in daily life. High contrast distance acuity is not the only relevant measure of visual function in relation to the perceived visual performance of a patient with macular disease (Hazel et al. 2000).

The visual impairment experienced by many patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has been found to affect their ability to perform usual activities, which cause psychological distress, and limit their participation in social events. PROs of visual function provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the impact of, and the effects of treatment for AMD Progression of dry AMD can be slowed in many patients through dietary supplements while visual loss from wet AMD is treated with intravitreal administration of anti-vascular growth factor Therefore there is the need to find a better outcome parameter. The primary purpose of the study will be to evaluate if there is a correlation between self-reported reading difficulties and new near vision testing instrument results and secondarily to establish how strong self-reported reading difficulties are-correlated to functional and morphological parameters. To also evaluate how strong the standard distance visual acuity measurements (ETDRS) are correlated to further functional and morphological parameters.

The study could provide a basis to find and include outcome measures which are correlated better with quality of life than ETDRS distance VA for further AMD trials.

Being tested
no intervention
Keywords
visual acuity, ETDRS, quality of life
Medical subject headings
Macular Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • no interventionOther

    no intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary analysis will be to evaluate if there is a correlation between NEI-VFQ-25 near distance subscale and reading speed

    Pearson correlation between NEI VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire) near visual acuity sub scale score (questions 5,6,7) (maximum score 1, minimum score 6, higher score indicates worse vision related to quality of life)

    Measured: 2 hours

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Correlation between NEI VFQ-25 near visual acuity subscale score and low luminance visual acuity score

    Pearson correlation between NEI VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire) near visual acuity sub scale score (maximum score 1, minimum score 6, higher score indicates worse vision related to quality of life) and low luminance visual acuity and (min 0.3LogMAR, max -0.3LogMAR, higher score indicates indicates worse low luminance acuity)

    Measured: 2 hours

  2. Correlation between NEI VFQ-25 near visual acuity subscale score and contrast sensitivity score

    Pearson correlation between NEI VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire) near visual acuity sub scale score (maximum score 1, minimum score 6, higher score indicates worse vision related to quality of life) and contrast sensitivity score(min 0.00,max 2.25, higher score indicates highest/best contrast sensitivity)

    Measured: 2 hours

  3. Correlation between NEI VFQ-25 near visual acuity subscale score and near visual acuity subscale score

    Pearson correlation between NEI VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire) near visual acuity sub scale score (maximum score 1, minimum score 6, higher score indicates worse vision related to quality of life) and ETDRS 4m distance visual acuity score (min 0.3LogMAR, max -0.3LogMAR, higher score indicates indicates worse ETDRS visual acuity)

    Measured: 2 hours

  4. Correlation between NEI VFQ-25 near visual acuity subscale score and size of hypo-autofluorescent lesions (mm2) at autofluorescence

    Pearson correlation between NEI VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire) near visual acuity sub scale score (maximum score 1, minimum score 6, higher score indicates worse vision related to quality of life)

    Measured: 2 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Feb 2018
  2. Study start24 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion30 May 2017
  4. Study completion27 Oct 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
53 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03438669
Sponsor's protocol ID
COSP /EKNZ2016-02216
Acronym
COSP
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
9 Jun 2017
Last updated
20 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: no IPD, this is a not interventional study

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Macular Degeneration, run by Dr. med. Katja Hatz at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary analysis will be to evaluate if there is a correlation between NEI-VFQ-25 near distance subscale and reading speed (time frame: 2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in