Breast CancerNCT03440398
Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Vs Conventional Open Technique
A study testing Robotic NSM and Open NSM in people with Breast Cancer, run by European Institute of Oncology at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
This trial is designed to compare robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction with conventional open technique. It is a prospective randomized trial evaluating patients satisfaction Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Robotic NSM and Open NSM
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 82 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 31 Mar 2017to 1 Feb 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Invasive breast cancer, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Breast Related Cancer Antigens mutation carriers.
- Any age
- Candidates to nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
- Negative preoperative assessment of nipple-areola complex
- Absence of skin involvement
- Low probability to have positivity of nipple-areola complex tissue intra-operative frozen section
Show all 11Show fewer
- Breast volume ≤ Bra IV; from cup A to D
- No hard smoking (hard smoking defined as >20 cigarettes/day)
- Low and intermediate risk for anesthesia (ASA Scale)
- Written informed consent must be signed and dated by the patient and the investigator prior to inclusion
- Patients must be accessible for follow-up
Who cannot join
- Previous thoracic radiation therapy for any reason
- Inflammatory Breast Cancer
- Skin involvement
- Pre-operative diagnosis (radiological or cytological) of nipple-areola complex disease
- Pregnancy
- Patients with psychiatric, addictive, or any disorder, which compromises ability to give informed consent for participation in this study
Show all 9Show fewer
- Uncompensated Diabetes Mellitus
- Hard smokers (hard smoking defined as >20 cigarettes/day)
- High risk for anesthesia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy And Immediate Robotic Breast Reconstruction Vs Conventional Open Technique: A Prospective Randomized Trial Evaluating Patients Satisfaction
This trial is designed to compare robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction with conventional open technique. It is a prospective randomized trial evaluating patients satisfaction
Read the detailed description
High proportion of patients with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer in Europe and US undergo to mastectomy. The absolute numbers of mastectomy rates in US is still today around 38% and represent one of the most performed operation for cancer reasons. Despite the lack of a natural cavity needed for endoscopic viewing, applications of robotic surgery have recently emerged for superficial organs such as in the fields of thyroidectomy, oropharyngeal surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, it has never been applied in breast cancer except for a feasibility and safety study conducted at European Institute of Oncology.
The technique was firstly published by Toesca et al. considering the first 3 cases. The same research as continued on breast cancer evaluating feasibility, reproducibility and safety studying 26 consecutive procedures of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction (article under peer to peer review at European Journal of Surgical Oncology, EJSO). In these initial cases of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction authors found two main advantages such as the robotic optical vision and the minimal invasiveness. The two main limitations noticed in this initial experience were the duration of operating time and the additional costs related to the operation. The limitations of the applicability of robotic surgery to the breast, such as operating time and costs, might be offset by the advantages they observed such as better vision and minimally invasive approach with an anatomically more respectful mastectomy.
This project is a superiority trial comparing robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast robotic reconstruction with conventional open technique.
The primary end-point is to evaluate patient satisfaction. Second end-point is to compare post-operative outcome considering complications, post-operative pain, reduction of the average length of stay of patients, long term oncological outcome of the two different surgical techniques.
Patients will be randomized into two treatment arms:
- Open nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant (Open NSM) B. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction with implant (Robotic NSM) Both arms will undergo to the same pre-surgical staging, intra-operative axillary surgical staging, post-operative multidisciplinary evaluation and adjuvant treatments according to international and internal protocols.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Robotic NSM, Open NSM
- Keywords
- Robotic Mastectomy, Nipple Sparing Mastectomy, Conservative mastectomy, Breast reconstruction
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Robotic NSMProcedure or surgery
Surgical technique conducted using robot to perform nipple sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction
Open NSMProcedure or surgery
Open nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Open NSM | Active comparator | Conventional Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Receives: Procedure: Open NSM |
| Robotic NSM | Experimental | Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Receives: Procedure: Robotic NSM |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient satisfaction
The BREAST-Q survey is used to detect differences in patient satisfaction among the groups
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (7)
Average length of stay of patients
Reduction of the average length of stay of patients of the two different surgical techniques.
Measured: 1 month
Post operative complications
Compare post operative complications (pain, skin or nipple-areola injury or necrosis or infection, hematoma, seroma)
Measured: 1 month
Cumulative incidence of local recurrence
Cumulative incidence of local recurrence
Measured: 5 years
Cumulative incidence of axillary recurrences
Cumulative incidence of axillary recurrences
Measured: 5 years
Cumulative incidence of distant recurrences
Cumulative incidence of distant recurrences
Measured: 5 years
Disease free survival
Disease free survival
Measured: 5 years
Overall survival
Overall survival
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Feb 2018
- Study start31 Mar 2017
- Primary completion1 Feb 2026
- Study completion1 Feb 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- European Institute of Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Paolo Veronesi, MD, Principal investigator, European Institute of Oncology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03440398
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R 530/16- IEO 562
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, Bonanni B, Curigliano G, Rietjens M, Viale G, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast. 2017 Feb;31:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
PubMed 27810700Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Nevola Teixeira LF. Reply to the letter to the editor "Robotic-assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A feasibility study on cadaveric models" by Sarfati B. et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Apr;70(4):558-560. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 23. No abstract available.
PubMed 28153430Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V, Manconi A, Intra M, Gentilini O, Sances D, Negri D, Veronesi G, Rietjens M, Zurrida S, Luini A, Veronesi U, Veronesi P. Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Implant: First Report of Surgical Technique. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):e28-e30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001397. No abstract available.
PubMed 28692558Toesca A, Sangalli C, Maisonneuve P, Massari G, Girardi A, Baker JL, Lissidini G, Invento A, Farante G, Corso G, Rietjens M, Peradze N, Gottardi A, Magnoni F, Bottiglieri L, Lazzeroni M, Montagna E, Labo P, Orecchia R, Galimberti V, Intra M, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. A Randomized Trial of Robotic Mastectomy Versus Open Surgery in Women With Breast Cancer or BrCA Mutation. Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):11-19. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004969. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
PubMed 34597010
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy And Immediate Robotic Breast Reconstruction Vs Conventional Open Technique: A Prospective Randomized Trial Evaluating Patients Satisfaction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03440398
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R 530/16- IEO 562
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Robotic Mastectomy, Nipple Sparing Mastectomy, Conservative mastectomy, Breast reconstruction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- European Institute of OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial is designed to compare robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction with conventional open technique. It is a prospective randomized trial evaluating patients satisfaction
Detailed description
High proportion of patients with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer in Europe and US undergo to mastectomy. The absolute numbers of mastectomy rates in US is still today around 38% and represent one of the most performed operation for cancer reasons. Despite the lack of a natural cavity needed for endoscopic viewing, applications of robotic surgery have recently emerged for superficial organs such as in the fields of thyroidectomy, oropharyngeal surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, it has never been applied in breast cancer except for a feasibility and safety study conducted at European Institute of Oncology.
The technique was firstly published by Toesca et al. considering the first 3 cases. The same research as continued on breast cancer evaluating feasibility, reproducibility and safety studying 26 consecutive procedures of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction (article under peer to peer review at European Journal of Surgical Oncology, EJSO). In these initial cases of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction authors found two main advantages such as the robotic optical vision and the minimal invasiveness. The two main limitations noticed in this initial experience were the duration of operating time and the additional costs related to the operation. The limitations of the applicability of robotic surgery to the breast, such as operating time and costs, might be offset by the advantages they observed such as better vision and minimally invasive approach with an anatomically more respectful mastectomy.
This project is a superiority trial comparing robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast robotic reconstruction with conventional open technique.
The primary end-point is to evaluate patient satisfaction. Second end-point is to compare post-operative outcome considering complications, post-operative pain, reduction of the average length of stay of patients, long term oncological outcome of the two different surgical techniques.
Patients will be randomized into two treatment arms:
- Open nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant (Open NSM) B. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction with implant (Robotic NSM) Both arms will undergo to the same pre-surgical staging, intra-operative axillary surgical staging, post-operative multidisciplinary evaluation and adjuvant treatments according to international and internal protocols.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Open NSM | Active comparator | Procedure: Open NSMConventional Nipple Sparing Mastectomy |
| Robotic NSM | Experimental | Procedure: Robotic NSMRobotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Invasive breast cancer, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Breast Related Cancer Antigens mutation carriers.
- Any age
- Candidates to nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
- Negative preoperative assessment of nipple-areola complex
- Absence of skin involvement
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Previous thoracic radiation therapy for any reason
- Inflammatory Breast Cancer
- Skin involvement
- Pre-operative diagnosis (radiological or cytological) of nipple-areola complex disease
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Robotic NSMSurgical technique conducted using robot to perform nipple sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction | Procedure or surgery | Robotic NSM |
| Open NSMOpen nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant | Procedure or surgery | Open NSM |
Primary outcome
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 1 year
The BREAST-Q survey is used to detect differences in patient satisfaction among the groups
7 secondary outcomes
Average length of stay of patients
Time frame: 1 month
Post operative complications
Time frame: 1 month
Cumulative incidence of local recurrence
Time frame: 5 years
Cumulative incidence of axillary recurrences
Time frame: 5 years
Cumulative incidence of distant recurrences
Time frame: 5 years
Disease free survival
Time frame: 5 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 27810700Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, Bonanni B, Curigliano G, Rietjens M, Viale G, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast. 2017 Feb;31:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 28153430Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Nevola Teixeira LF. Reply to the letter to the editor "Robotic-assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A feasibility study on cadaveric models" by Sarfati B. et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Apr;70(4):558-560. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 23. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 28692558Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V, Manconi A, Intra M, Gentilini O, Sances D, Negri D, Veronesi G, Rietjens M, Zurrida S, Luini A, Veronesi U, Veronesi P. Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Implant: First Report of Surgical Technique. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):e28-e30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001397. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34597010Toesca A, Sangalli C, Maisonneuve P, Massari G, Girardi A, Baker JL, Lissidini G, Invento A, Farante G, Corso G, Rietjens M, Peradze N, Gottardi A, Magnoni F, Bottiglieri L, Lazzeroni M, Montagna E, Labo P, Orecchia R, Galimberti V, Intra M, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. A Randomized Trial of Robotic Mastectomy Versus Open Surgery in Women With Breast Cancer or BrCA Mutation. Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):11-19. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004969. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
- Interview to Dr ToescaLink provided by the sponsor.
- Article on "La Repubblica"Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy in Cancer Patients With Adjustment Disorder
Adjustment Disorder, Adjustment Disorder With Anxious Mood
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Using Ultrasound Robots for Breast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer, Ultrasound
RecruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of Lasofoxifene Combined With Abemaciclib Compared With Fulvestrant Combined With Abemaciclib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer With an ESR1 Mutation
Metastatic Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Interest of Broadband Spectroscopy Analysis by Infrared Laser on Liquid Biopsies in Breast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer Female, BRCA1 Mutation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paolo Veronesi, MD principal investigator
European Institute of Oncology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Robotic NSM and Open NSM in people with Breast Cancer, run by European Institute of Oncology at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient satisfaction (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03440398, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2026.