AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Respiratory Failure With HypoxiaPhase 4REDOXNCT03441204

REgistry-based Treatment Duration and Mortality in Long-term OXygen Therapy (REDOX)

A Phase 4 study testing LTOT 24 h/day and LTOT 15h/day in people with Chronic Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia, run by Skane University Hospital at 2 sites in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Multicenter, phase IV, non-superiority, registry-based, randomized controlled trial. Patients starting long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) are randomized between LTOT prescribed 24 h/day or 15 h/day using the Swedish Register for Respiratory Failure (Swedevox). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia
What is being tested?
LTOT 24 h/day and LTOT 15h/day
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
241 participants
Where
2 sitesSweden
Study dates
16 May 2018to 4 Apr 2023
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Severe resting hypoxemia (PaO2 < 7.4 kPa or oxygen saturation < 88% breathing air), or PaO2 < 8.0 kPa on air and either signs of heart failure or polycythemia (EVF > 0.54).

Who cannot join

  • Smoking or contact with open fire
  • Other inability to safely comply with LTOT
  • Already on LTOT for more than 28 days
  • Inability to comply with any of the study interventions as judged by the responsible oxygen staff
  • Opt out from being registered in Swedevox
  • Inability to give informed written consent to participate in the study as judged by the oxygen responsible staff
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Lack of Swedish identification number
  • Previous participation in the study.
  • Patient populations that will be evaluated:
  • Primary analysis: In all randomized patients according to the intention-to-treat and per protocol principles.
  • Secondary analyses: In patients with 1) PaO2 (air) < 7.4 kPa; 2) PaO2 (air) 7.4 to 8.0 kPa; 3) COPD verified by spirometry (COPD as primary diagnosis and FEV1/FVC < 0.7 after bronchodilation); 4) and in patients with a primary diagnosis other than COPD.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Sweden2 sites
  • Blekinge hospital

    Karlskrona, Blekinge County, SE-37185

  • Örebro University Hospital

    Örebro, SE-70185

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: REgistry-based Randomized Controlled Trial of Treatment Duration and Mortality in Long-term OXygen Therapy (REDOX) A Multicenter, Phase IV, Registry-Based, Randomized Controlled Trial (R-RCT)

Multicenter, phase IV, non-superiority, registry-based, randomized controlled trial. Patients starting long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) are randomized between LTOT prescribed 24 h/day or 15 h/day using the Swedish Register for Respiratory Failure (Swedevox). Clinical follow-up and concurrent treatments are according to routine clinical practice. The main endpoints of mortality, hospitalizations, and incident disease are assessed using Swedish registry data, with expected complete follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes are assessed using a posted questionnaire at 3 and 12 months. The study is managed by the Uppsala Clinical Research Centre (UCR).

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

LTOT given 15 h/day or more improves the survival time in patients with chronic daytime hypoxemia due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on two randomized trials; the 'Continuous or Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy' Trial (NOTT) published in 1980 [1] and the Medical Research Council (MRC) trial published in 1981.[2] International guidelines recommend that LTOT is prescribed continuously (24 h/day), which is based on an observational, unadjusted comparison of the treatment arms of the MRC and NOTT studies only. [3] However, LTOT 24 h/day may place an unnecessary burden on patients in terms of increased dependence, isolation, side effects and restricted activity.[3, 4] Data from the National Swedish Registry for Respiratory Failure (Swedevox) indicate no survival benefit from LTOT 24 vs 15 h/day (Figure 1). No randomized trial has evaluated the additional benefit of longer daily duration of LTOT above 15 h/day.[4] Studies on the effect of LTOT are also lacking for diseases other than COPD, such as pulmonary fibrosis, yet LTOT is given in these conditions according to the same criteria as in COPD in clinical practice.[4]

IMPORTANCE:

This will be the first R-RCT in respiratory medicine and the largest trial of LTOT to date. If LTOT 24 h/day is found to be superior to 15 h/day, this will confirm the importance of oxygen therapy in chronic respiratory failure and the importance of implementing services to optimize the daily duration of LTOT. If LTOT 24 h/day is non-superior to 15 h/day, this supports that patients safely can be free of supplemental oxygen for up to nine hours per day. This trial will also be the first to evaluate effects of LTOT on symptoms and HRQOL, effects in patients with moderate hypoxemia and in diseases other than COPD. This study will have direct impact on research and clinical management.

AIM:

Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) 24 h/day is recommended to prolong survival time in severe hypoxemia but may be burdensome and evidence of its additional benefit compared with LTOT 15 h/day is lacking. The purpose is to determine whether LTOT prescribed continuously 24 h/day fails to reduce the rate of all-cause hospitalization or death at 1 year compared with LTOT 15 h/day. The aim is improved evidence-based treatment in chronic hypoxemia.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary: To determine whether oxygen prescribed 24 h/day compared with 15 h/day in patients starting LTOT fails to improve rate of all-cause mortality or death at 1 year. Secondary objectives: evaluate between-group differences in overall and cause-specific mortality (respiratory and cardiovascular deaths); overall and cause-specific hospitalization rate; incident cardiovascular disease; breathlessness; fatigue; self-reported physical activity; health-related quality of life; cognition; measured oxygen adherence; and patient preference to continue treatment.

ANALYSIS:

Primary analysis: In all randomized patients according to the intention-to-treat and per protocol principles. Secondary analyses: In patients with severe resting hypoxemia (PaO2 < 7.4 kPa breathing air); moderate resting hypoxemia (PaO2 7.4 to 8.0 kPa breathing air); COPD verified by spirometry (FEV1/FVC < 0.7 after bronchodilation); and in patients with other conditions than COPD.

STUDY DESIGN:

Multicenter, single-blinded (analyst), effectiveness, phase IV, register-based, randomized controlled trial (R-RCT). Patients starting LTOT are randomized between oxygen prescribed 24 h/day or 15 h/day using the Swedevox registry. Clinical follow-up and concurrent treatments are according to routine clinical practice. The main endpoints of mortality, hospitalizations, and incident disease are assessed using Swedish registry data, with expected complete follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes are assessed using a postal questionnaire at 3 months. The study is managed by the Uppsala Clinical Research Centre (UCR)

Investigational products, dosage and mode of administration: Patients are randomized between two daily durations of oxygen used in current clinical practice: LTOT 24 h/day (intervention) or 15 h/day (control). The LTOT is provided according to standard clinical practice using oxygen concentrator, cylinders or liquid oxygen and administered mainly through nasal prongs. The oxygen dose (l/min) is titrated aiming at a PaO2 on oxygen > 8 kPa in accordance with current routine practice and management guidelines.

Duration of treatment: Throughout LTOT. Primary endpoint is at 1 year after randomization.

STATISTICAL METHODS:

Statistical methods: The primary analysis is according to the intention to treat (ITT) principle and the per protocol (PP) principle. Secondary analyses are according to the PP principle. The primary endpoint of the composite event of death or 1st hospitalization is analyzed with Cox´s proportional hazards model. Hospitalizations are analyzed using Fine Gray regression accounting for death as competing event. Other secondary endpoints are analyzed using two-sided Student's t-tests for continuous variables (including HRQOL, breathlessness, cognition, fatigue, activity, and health care usage) and chi-2 test for categorical variables (causes of death, cognition, treatment preference). Correlational analyses, including of factors predictive of the primary and secondary outcomes will be conducted using linear regression (continuous outcomes), logistic regression (categorical outcomes), and Cox and Fine-Gray regression models (time to event outcomes).

Being tested
LTOT 24 h/day, LTOT 15h/day
Keywords
COPD, Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), Registry, Registry-based randomized controlled trial (R-RCT), Treatment duration, Mortality
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LTOT 24 h/dayDrug

    Also called Long-term oxygen therapy prescribed continuously (24 h/day)

    LTOT prescribed for 24 h/day.

  • LTOT 15h/dayDrug

    Also called Long-term oxygen therapy prescribed for 15 h/day

    : LTOT prescribed for 15 h/day. The patient is instructed to use LTOT during sleep and not to use LTOT for about 9 hours during daytime, totalling 15 h/day.

Study groups in NCT03441204
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LTOT 24 h/day (intervention)Active comparatorLong-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) prescribed 24 h/day. The LTOT is provided according to standard clinical practice using oxygen concentrator, cylinders or liquid oxygen and administered mainly through nasal prongs. The oxygen dose (l/min) is titrated aiming at a PaO2 on oxygen > 8 kPa in accordance with current routine practice and management guidelines.
Receives: Drug: LTOT 24 h/day
LTOT 15 h/day (control)Active comparatorLong-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) prescribed 15 h/day. The LTOT is provided according to standard clinical practice using oxygen concentrator, cylinders or liquid oxygen and administered mainly through nasal prongs. The oxygen dose (l/min) is titrated aiming at a PaO2 on oxygen > 8 kPa in accordance with current routine practice and management guidelines.
Receives: Drug: LTOT 15h/day

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. All-cause hospitalization or mortality rate

    To determine whether oxygen prescribed 24 h/day compared with 15 h/day in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and severe hypoxemia improves the rate of all-cause hospitalization or mortality at 1 year.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. All-cause mortality rate

    Between-group difference in deaths from all causes

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  2. Mortality rate from respiratory disease

    Between-group difference in deaths from respiratory disease

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  3. Mortality rate from cardiovascular disease

    Between-group difference in deaths from cardiovascular disease

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  4. Hospitalization rate from all causes

    Between-group difference in hospitalization rate from all causes

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  5. Hospitalization rate with a primary diagnosis of respiratory disease

    Between-group difference in hospitalization rate with a primary diagnosis of respiratory disease

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  6. Hospitalization rate with a primary diagnosis of cardiovascular disease

    Between-group difference in hospitalization rate with a primary diagnosis of cardiovascular disease

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  7. Rate of an incident diagnosis of cardiovascular disease

    Between-group difference in rate of an incident diagnosis of cardiovascular disease

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  8. Self-reported questionnaire data on oxygen use

    Between-group difference in data from postal questionnaire on self-reported oxygen utilization (group percentages)

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  9. Self-reported questionnaire data on physical activity

    Between-group difference in data from postal questionnaire on self-reported physical activity (group percentages)

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  10. Self-reported questionnaire data on LTOT continuation

    Between-group difference in data from postal questionnaire on preference of continuing the LTOT (group percentages)

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  11. Self-reported questionnaire data on breathlessness (MDP scale)

    Between-group difference in data from postal questionnaire on breathlessness; Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) scale. One item (A1) assesses the unpleasantness of dyspnoea on a 0-10 visual numerical scale anchored by "neutral" (0) and "unbearable" (10). Five items assess the sensory dimension of dyspnoea, both in terms of quality and intensity (on a scale of 0-10). Five items assess the affective dimension of dyspnoea, also in terms of quality and intensity (on a scale of 0-10).

    Two domain scores are calculated: an "immediate perception domain" score (S) as the sum of A1 intensity and the intensities of the five sensory descriptors; and an "emotional response domain" score (A2) as the sum of the five emotional descriptors. The median (IQR) ratings will be compared betwwen the groups.

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  12. Self-reported questionnaire data on breathlessness (mMRC scale)

    Between-group difference in data from postal questionnaire on breathlessness; modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. measure the degree of disability that breathlessness poses on day-to-day activities on a scale from 0 to 4: 0, no breathlessness and 5 worse breathlessness. Percentages and mean scores are reported.

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  13. Self-reported questionnaire data on fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue)

    Between-group difference in data from postal questionnaire on fatigue; Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue scale is a 13 item questionnaire measured on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much). All items are summed to create a single fatigue total score with a range from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate better functioning or less fatigue.

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  14. Self-reported questionnaire data on cognition (BAS)

    Between-group difference in data from postal questionnaire on cognition self-report; Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE-SR) consists of 16-items (score range, 1.0-5.0; where 1=much better and 5=much worse). Total score is used.

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  15. Self-reported questionnaire data on HRQOL (CAT)

    Between-group difference in data from postal questionnaire on HRQOL; COPD Assessment test (CAT) consists of 8 items; 0-5 scale with higher scores indicating worse outcome and total scores ranging between 0 and 40. Mean scores are reported.

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  16. Self-reported questionnaire data on HRQOL (EQ-5D-5L)

    Between-group difference in data from postal questionnaire on HRQOL; EuroQol five-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) describing health on the dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Scores are graded into 'no problems', 'slight problems', 'moderate problems', 'severe problems' and 'extreme problems/unable to. Mean scores are reported.

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  17. Self-reported questionnaire data on treatment response (GIC)

    Between-group difference in data from postal questionnaire; Global impression of change (GIC) is a 7-point descriptive scale: ranging from 1 to 7 with 1 being very much improved and 7 very much worse. Mean scores are reported.

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  18. Health care utilization

    Between-group difference in number of hospitalizations; number of outpatient visits and Emergency Department visits and Other medication use and cost through national registries (National Inpatient Register; National Outpatient Care Register; National Patient Register; Prescribed Drug Register)

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Feb 2018
  2. Study start16 May 2018
  3. Primary completion4 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion4 Apr 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
241 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03441204
Sponsor's protocol ID
REDOX 2016
Acronym
REDOX
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
1 Feb 2018
Last updated
8 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Continuous or nocturnal oxygen therapy in hypoxemic chronic obstructive lung disease: a clinical trial. Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial Group. Ann Intern Med. 1980 Sep;93(3):391-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-93-3-391.

    PubMed 6776858
  • Long term domiciliary oxygen therapy in chronic hypoxic cor pulmonale complicating chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Report of the Medical Research Council Working Party. Lancet. 1981 Mar 28;1(8222):681-6.

    PubMed 6110912
  • Anthonisen NR. Prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from multicenter clinical trials. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Sep;140(3 Pt 2):S95-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/140.3_Pt_2.S95. No abstract available.

    PubMed 2675713
  • Hardinge M, Annandale J, Bourne S, Cooper B, Evans A, Freeman D, Green A, Hippolyte S, Knowles V, MacNee W, McDonnell L, Pye K, Suntharalingam J, Vora V, Wilkinson T; British Thoracic Society Home Oxygen Guideline Development Group; British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. British Thoracic Society guidelines for home oxygen use in adults. Thorax. 2015 Jun;70 Suppl 1:i1-43. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-206865.

    PubMed 25870317
  • Ekstrom M, Andersson A, Papadopoulos S, Kipper T, Pedersen B, Kricka O, Sobrino P, Runold M, Palm A, Blomberg A, Hamed R, Lindberg E, Sundberg B, Hadziosmanovic N, Bjorklund F, Janson C, McDonald CF, Currow DC, Sundh J; REDOX Collaborative Research Group. Long-Term Oxygen Therapy for 24 or 15 Hours per Day in Severe Hypoxemia. N Engl J Med. 2024 Sep 19;391(11):977-988. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2402638. Epub 2024 Sep 10.

    PubMed 39254466
  • Sundh J, Bornefalk-Hermansson A, Ahmadi Z, Blomberg A, Janson C, Currow DC, McDonald CF, McCaffrey N, Ekstrom M. REgistry-based randomized controlled trial of treatment and Duration and mortality in long-term OXygen therapy (REDOX) study protocol. BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Feb 26;19(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0809-7.

    PubMed 30808321

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing LTOT 24 h/day and LTOT 15h/day in people with Chronic Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia, run by Skane University Hospital at 2 sites in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

All-cause hospitalization or mortality rate (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03441204, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in