AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT03442283

Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Vitamins and Mineral Supplementation for CVD Prevention and Treatment

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases, run by University of Toronto.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The use of vitamin and mineral supplementation has historically been to treat and prevent micronutrient deficiencies. In recent years, however, and with their widespread use, the interest has shifted toward a possible role in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cardiovascular Diseases
What is being tested?
Vitamin mineral supplementation
How many people
1 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2016to Jun 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults free of serious chronic disease infections.

Who may be able to join

  • English studies
  • Supplements taken orally for at least 6 months

Who cannot join

  • Studies in children
  • Studies in women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Studies of adults who have serious chronic disease infections such as HIV
  • Studies with combined interventions and no adequate control group (i.e. interventions other than the supplement must be provided to the control group as well)

About this study

Official title: Supplemental Vitamins and Minerals for CVD Prevention and Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of the Data (Meta-analyses and RCTs) Published Since 2012

The use of vitamin and mineral supplementation has historically been to treat and prevent micronutrient deficiencies. In recent years, however, and with their widespread use, the interest has shifted toward a possible role in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases. The investigators will review and perform meta-analyses of vitamin and mineral supplementation trials in relation to cardiovascular disease. Publications from 2012, both before and including the US Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) 2014 review, will be included in the review.

Read the detailed description

Search strategy:

A literature search of the Cochrane Library, Medline and PubMed will be conducted with the following search terms: "dietary supplements or supplement*" AND "cardiovascular disease or myocardial infarction or stroke or cardiovascular death or mortality or all-cause mortality or death." Specific searches will be conducted for individual supplements and included multivitamins, antioxidants, vitamin A, β-carotene, B1, B2, B3 (niacin), B6, B10 (folic acid), B-complex, C, D and E, calcium, iron, zinc, magnesium and selenium. The search will be limited to meta-analyses and RCTs.

Analysis:

Full article review and data extraction will be conducted by two independent investigators, with all disparities reconciled through consensus. The extracted data will include number of cases and total participants/population for the intervention and control group.

Data will be analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) and publication bias will be conducted using STATA software, version 13.0 (College Station, TX, USA). Heterogeneity will be assessed using the Cochran Q statistic at p<0.1 and quantified by the I² statistic. Publication bias will be investigated by visual inspection of funnel plots and quantitative assessment using Begg's and Egger's tests where p<0.05 is considered evidence of small study effects. If <10 trials are available in a meta-analysis, publication bias analysis will not be assessed due to insufficient power.

Risk of bias The Cochrane risk of bias tool which is based on randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of follow-up and intention-to-treat will be used to assess eligible RCTs.

Grading of the evidence The quality and strength of the evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Using the GRADE tool, evidence will be graded as high, moderate, low, or very low quality evidence using the following criteria: study limitations (as assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool), inconsistency (substantial) unexplained inter-study heterogeneity, I2>50% and p<0.1; indirectness (presence of factors that limit the generalizability of the results); imprecision (the 95% CI for effect estimates crosses a minimally important difference (MID) of 5% [RR 0.95-1.05]) from the line of unity; and publication bias (significant evidence of small-study effects).

Being tested
Vitamin mineral supplementation
Keywords
Supplements, Cardiovascular Diseases, All-cause mortality, Meta-Analysis
Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin mineral supplementationDietary supplement

    supplementation with a vitamin or mineral: vitamin A, β-carotene, B1, B2, B3 (niacin), B6, B10 (folic acid), C, D and E, calcium, iron, zinc, magnesium and selenium. Also, multivitamins, antioxidants, B-complex and the combination of calcium and vitamin D.

Study groups in NCT03442283
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SupplementationNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin mineral supplementation
No SupplementationNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cardiovascular disease (CVD)

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Coronary heart disease (CHD)

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Myocardial infarction (MI)

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Stroke

    Measured: 1 year

  5. CVD mortality

    Measured: 1 year

  6. CHD mortality

    Measured: 1 year

  7. MI mortality

    Measured: 1 year

  8. stroke mortality

    Measured: 1 year

  9. All-cause mortality

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Feb 2018
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completionApr 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03442283
Sponsor's protocol ID
META SUPPLEMENTS 001
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
16 Feb 2018
Last updated
26 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases, run by University of Toronto.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in