AdhesionNCT03443583
Immediate and Delayed Dentin Sealing Effect on Partial Crowns
A study testing Immediate Dentin Sealing or Delayed Dentin Sealing in people with Adhesion and Tooth, run by University Medical Center Groningen.
Trial summary
Immediate Dentin Sealing as an adjunct to adhesive cementation of all ceramic restorations is proposed and executed in several studies, but there is very limited evidence to support its effectiveness. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- Immediate Dentin Sealing or Delayed Dentin Sealing
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2013to 1 Feb 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients should be over 18 years of age, in reasonable to good general health, as expressed by an ASA-score I or II (de Jong and Abraham-Inpijn, 1994).This ASA-score is already known before participation, due to regular check-ups;
- Patients should have an indication for at least two indirect ceramic restorations on vital teeth.
Who cannot join
- ASA-score III or higher;
- Hypersensitivity of the tooth which has to be restorated. This is measured before inclusion. (Is measured with a cotton pallet and cold spray which are hold to the tooth. If the tooth is painful and is doesn't relief from pain quickly the tooth is hypersensitive)
About this study
Official title: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial on the Survival and Quality of Survival of Lithium Disilicate Posterior Partial Crowns Bonded Using Immediate or Delayed Dentin Sealing a 3- Year Follow up
Immediate Dentin Sealing as an adjunct to adhesive cementation of all ceramic restorations is proposed and executed in several studies, but there is very limited evidence to support its effectiveness. It is presumed that IDS both reduces postoperative sensitivity and increases the bond strength to dentin as compared to DDS.
Read the detailed description
Micromechanical and chemical retention of ceramic fixed prosthesis to tooth structure introduced minimal invasive preparation to dentistry. As a result, biomechanically or aesthetically compromised teeth can be restored at a lower biological price, saving sound tooth tissues. A slow but steady (mind) shift from full metal and metal-ceramic restorations that require conventional cementation and substantial tooth loss (Edelhoff en Sorensen, 2002) to less destructive partial all ceramic restorations that require adhesive cementation is seen in the clinical field.
The clinical success of ceramic restorations relies heavily on the quality of their adhesion to dentin, which remains a clinical challenge to date. Improvements in this field over the years have brought about better cements and more effective methods to condition both substrates and teeth.
Immediate Dentin Sealing (IDS) is a technique that presumably improves adhesion of ceramic fixed prosthesis to tooth structure which results in a better marginal adaptation to dentin and less postoperative sensitivity compared to conventional adhesive cementation, also referred to as Delayed Dentin Sealing (DDS).(Pashley et al, 1992; Paul en Scharer, 1997; Magne et al, 2005; Magne et al, 2007; Breschi et al, 2008; Lee en Park, 2009). The main difference between the IDS and DDS technique lies in the fact that in IDS, a thin layer of bonding resin is applied immediately after tooth preparation and prior to impression taking, whereas in DDS this layer is applied immediately before cementation of the restoration. At first glance this may appear a minor difference, but it is presumed to be of major clinical importance. The effectiveness of IDS is studied as an adjunct to conventional adhesive cementation of ceramic indirect restorations. A split mouth clinical trial comparing ceramic restorations cemented with either IDS or DDS after one year of clinical service is executed. For each patient two all ceramic indirect restorations are made. One is cemented by means of DDS (control group) and the other one is cemented by means of IDS (experimental group). Clinical evaluation is performed shortly after cementation and after 1 and 3 year(s) of clinical function.
- Conditions
- Adhesion, Tooth, Crown, Luting, Immediate Dentin Sealing
- Being tested
- Immediate Dentin Sealing or Delayed Dentin Sealing
- Medical subject headings
- Tissue Adhesions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Immediate Dentin Sealing or Delayed Dentin SealingOther
The main difference between the IDS and DDS technique lies in the fact that in IDS, a thin layer of bonding resin is applied immediately after tooth preparation and prior to impression taking, whereas in DDS this layer is applied immediately before cementation of the restoration.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Survival
Survival of the restorations
Measured: 3 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Quality of the restorations
Criteria according to Hickel and USPHS
Measured: 3 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2018
- Study start1 Nov 2013
- Primary completion1 Feb 2018
- Study completion1 Feb 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AdhesionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- A split mouth clinical trial comparing ceramic restorations cemented with either IDS or DDS after one year of three years of clinical service.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Carline van den Breemer, University Medical Center Groningen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03443583
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL45130
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 18 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial on the Survival and Quality of Survival of Lithium Disilicate Posterior Partial Crowns Bonded Using Immediate or Delayed Dentin Sealing a 3- Year Follow up
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03443583
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NL45130
- Conditions
- Adhesion, Tooth, Crown, Luting, Immediate Dentin Sealing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center GroningenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Immediate Dentin Sealing as an adjunct to adhesive cementation of all ceramic restorations is proposed and executed in several studies, but there is very limited evidence to support its effectiveness. It is presumed that IDS both reduces postoperative sensitivity and increases the bond strength to dentin as compared to DDS.
Detailed description
Micromechanical and chemical retention of ceramic fixed prosthesis to tooth structure introduced minimal invasive preparation to dentistry. As a result, biomechanically or aesthetically compromised teeth can be restored at a lower biological price, saving sound tooth tissues. A slow but steady (mind) shift from full metal and metal-ceramic restorations that require conventional cementation and substantial tooth loss (Edelhoff en Sorensen, 2002) to less destructive partial all ceramic restorations that require adhesive cementation is seen in the clinical field.
The clinical success of ceramic restorations relies heavily on the quality of their adhesion to dentin, which remains a clinical challenge to date. Improvements in this field over the years have brought about better cements and more effective methods to condition both substrates and teeth.
Immediate Dentin Sealing (IDS) is a technique that presumably improves adhesion of ceramic fixed prosthesis to tooth structure which results in a better marginal adaptation to dentin and less postoperative sensitivity compared to conventional adhesive cementation, also referred to as Delayed Dentin Sealing (DDS).(Pashley et al, 1992; Paul en Scharer, 1997; Magne et al, 2005; Magne et al, 2007; Breschi et al, 2008; Lee en Park, 2009). The main difference between the IDS and DDS technique lies in the fact that in IDS, a thin layer of bonding resin is applied immediately after tooth preparation and prior to impression taking, whereas in DDS this layer is applied immediately before cementation of the restoration. At first glance this may appear a minor difference, but it is presumed to be of major clinical importance. The effectiveness of IDS is studied as an adjunct to conventional adhesive cementation of ceramic indirect restorations. A split mouth clinical trial comparing ceramic restorations cemented with either IDS or DDS after one year of clinical service is executed. For each patient two all ceramic indirect restorations are made. One is cemented by means of DDS (control group) and the other one is cemented by means of IDS (experimental group). Clinical evaluation is performed shortly after cementation and after 1 and 3 year(s) of clinical function.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Model description
- A split mouth clinical trial comparing ceramic restorations cemented with either IDS or DDS after one year of three years of clinical service.
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients should be over 18 years of age, in reasonable to good general health, as expressed by an ASA-score I or II (de Jong and Abraham-Inpijn, 1994).This ASA-score is already known before participation, due to regular check-ups;
- Patients should have an indication for at least two indirect ceramic restorations on vital teeth.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- ASA-score III or higher;
- Hypersensitivity of the tooth which has to be restorated. This is measured before inclusion. (Is measured with a cotton pallet and cold spray which are hold to the tooth. If the tooth is painful and is doesn't relief from pain quickly the tooth is hypersensitive)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate Dentin Sealing or Delayed Dentin SealingThe main difference between the IDS and DDS technique lies in the fact that in IDS, a thin layer of bonding resin is applied immediately after tooth preparation and prior to impression taking, whereas in DDS this layer is applied immediately before cementation of the restoration. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Survival
Time frame: 3 year
Survival of the restorations
1 secondary outcome
Quality of the restorations
Time frame: 3 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Adhesion
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Operative Hysteroscopy and Vacuum Aspiration for Terminating First-trimester Pregnancy With Intrauterine Adhesions
Pregnancy Complicated With Intrauterine Adhesion
Recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Repeated Saline Injections to Prevent and Treat Tendon Adhesions After Hand Tendon Repair
Tendon Adhesion, Zone II Flexor Tendon Injury
RecruitingObservational study
3D MRE-Based Evaluation of Vestibular Schwannoma Mechanical Properties and Histological Features
Vestibular Schwannoma
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Immune Function Abnormalities
Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD), X-Linked Severe Combined Immune Deficiency (XSCID)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Bioavailability and Adhesion of Estradiol/Levonorgestrel TDS in Healthy Post-Menopausal Female Participants
Healthy Female Participants, Postmenopause
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Immediate Dentin Sealing or Delayed Dentin Sealing in people with Adhesion and Tooth, run by University Medical Center Groningen.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Survival (time frame: 3 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2018.