AzTrials
AzTrials

Retinitis PigmentosaNCT03444961

Computer-Assisted Rehabilitation Environment Training After Argus Retinal Prosthesis

A study testing CAREN system training in people with Retinitis Pigmentosa, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of the current project is to fill the unmet clinical needs around the objective assessment of visual function and develop outcome-oriented visual rehabilitation approach using the computer assisted rehabilitation environment (CAREN) system for Argus recipients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Retinitis Pigmentosa
What is being tested?
CAREN system training
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
4 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
30 Jan 2018to 20 Jun 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Recipient of the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Ability to follow two-step commands
  • Ability to ambulate 300+ feet with or without visual assistance
  • Able to tolerate Argus device turned on for >20 continuous minutes.

Who cannot join

  • Dementia
  • Musculoskeletal contraindication to exercise or walking
  • Cardiopulmonary contraindication exercise (i.e. uncontrolled heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, or pulmonary disease).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comprehensive Visual and Mobility Training Using Computer-Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) After Argus Retinal Prosthesis Surgery

The goal of the current project is to fill the unmet clinical needs around the objective assessment of visual function and develop outcome-oriented visual rehabilitation approach using the computer assisted rehabilitation environment (CAREN) system for Argus recipients.

Being tested
CAREN system training
Keywords
Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System, Rehabilitation
Medical subject headings
Retinitis Pigmentosa

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CAREN system trainingDevice

    CAREN allows Argus users to be trained and enhance their device usage in a safe, controlled, and standardized environment.

Study groups in NCT03444961
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CAREN system trainingExperimentalCAREN training
Receives: Device: CAREN system training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Effects of CAREN Virtual Reality System on Obstacle Course Navigation

    Obstacle course navigation - time (seconds) to complete an obstacle course (walking forward while navigating over a ramp and curb)

    Measured: 6 wks

  2. Time to Complete the Timed Up and Go Test Before and After CAREN Virtual Reality System Training

    Timed Up and Go testing - functional mobility test that requires the individual to stand from a chair, ambulate three meters to a target, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down. Participants were asked to complete two trials was recorded, with a maximum time of 60 seconds per trial.

    Measured: 6 wks

  3. Effects of CAREN Virtual Reality System on Square Localization Visual Function Test

    The square localization test presents a 2.75" square (250 pixels) at a random location on a black background and the patient is instructed to try to touch the square. The test measures the patient's ability to locate an object and results are calculated as a mean error (how far away in pixels from the square the patient touches the screen). A lower mean error (the distance from the square) indicates better patient performance.

    Measured: 6 wks

  4. Effects of CAREN Virtual Reality System on Direction of Motion Visual Function Test.

    The direction of motion test assesses the patient's ability to determine the direction an object is moving. The patient is presented with a white line (1.4'' wide) that moves across the screen in a random series of directions and angles. Patients are instructed to trace their finger on the monitor in the direction they perceived the line moved. Results are calculated as a mean error (how far off, in degrees, was the patient from the direction of the moving line). The higher the mean error/score, the worse the outcome.

    Measured: 6 wks

  5. Effects of CAREN Virtual Reality System on Grating Visual Acuity Visual Function Test

    The grating visual acuity test measures the patient's visual acuity using the principles of acuity charts modified for ultra-low vision subjects. The patients are presented with black and white bars in one of four orientations (horizontal, vertical, diagonal to the left or diagonal to the right). The bars are present on the screen for 5 seconds during which the patient may scan the screen and then provide a verbal response as to which orientation they perceived the bars. The widths of the bars are varied to evaluate different levels of visual acuity. A lower score is associated with better outcomes with 2.9 being the worst possible score.

    Measured: 6 wks

  6. Effects of CAREN Virtual Reality System on Gait Assessment

    Subject's gait assessed by meters traveled while localizing objects on the CAREN system. The higher scores are associated with better outcomes (further distance walked).

    Measured: 6 wks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Feb 2018
  2. Study start30 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion20 Jun 2018
  4. Study completion20 Jun 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
4 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03444961
Sponsor's protocol ID
17-1355
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
26 Oct 2017
Last updated
14 Jul 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Rachitskaya A, Yuan A, Davidson S, Streicher M, DeBenedictis M, Rosenfeldt AB, Alberts J. Computer-Assisted Immersive Visual Rehabilitation in Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Recipients. Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Jun;4(6):613-619. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

    PubMed 31937474

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CAREN system training in people with Retinitis Pigmentosa, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jul 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Effects of CAREN Virtual Reality System on Obstacle Course Navigation (time frame: 6 wks). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03444961, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in