EmergenciesDEPAUGNCT03449043
BECOME PATIENTS IN THE EMERGENCIES OF UHC POITIERS
An observational study of Emergencies, run by Poitiers University Hospital.
Trial summary
The number of consultations in the emergency services has continued to increase with 19.7 million passages in 2014, an increase of 4% compared to 2013. Among these admissions, many patients come spontaneously to the emergency department and others are sent by the general practitioner who remains the first resort in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Emergencies
- What is being tested?
- Real care course
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2018to Sep 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patient coming to emergency for all types of pathologies with general practitioner letter
Who may be able to join
- Major patient
- View by a general practitioner whether he is their doctor or a substitute
- Addressed with a mail
- All types of pathologies are taken into account
Who cannot join
- Minor patient
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Maxime EPAILLY contact
About this study
Official title: ANALYSIS OF THE BECOME OF THE PATIENTS ADDRESSED BY THEIR GENERAL PRACTITIONER TO EMERGENCIES OF UHC POITIERS
The number of consultations in the emergency services has continued to increase with 19.7 million passages in 2014, an increase of 4% compared to 2013. Among these admissions, many patients come spontaneously to the emergency department and others are sent by the general practitioner who remains the first resort in the care of the patient.
Faced with this massive influx to emergency services, the investigator will see what is the future of these. Are they more likely to be hospitalized than patients presenting to emergencies on their own?
- Conditions
- Emergencies
- Being tested
- Real care course
- Medical subject headings
- Emergencies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Real care courseOther
Evaluate the rate of adequacy between the request made by the general practitioner and the response to emergencies
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Concordance rate between the general practitioner request and the patient's actual care path.
Medical file
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Feb 2018
- Study startMar 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for EmergenciesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Poitiers University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Poitiers University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03449043
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DEPAUG
- Acronym
- DEPAUG
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ANALYSIS OF THE BECOME OF THE PATIENTS ADDRESSED BY THEIR GENERAL PRACTITIONER TO EMERGENCIES OF UHC POITIERS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03449043
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEPAUG / DEPAUG
- Conditions
- Emergencies
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Poitiers University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The number of consultations in the emergency services has continued to increase with 19.7 million passages in 2014, an increase of 4% compared to 2013. Among these admissions, many patients come spontaneously to the emergency department and others are sent by the general practitioner who remains the first resort in the care of the patient.
Faced with this massive influx to emergency services, the investigator will see what is the future of these. Are they more likely to be hospitalized than patients presenting to emergencies on their own?
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patient coming to emergency for all types of pathologies with general practitioner letter
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Major patient
- View by a general practitioner whether he is their doctor or a substitute
- Addressed with a mail
- All types of pathologies are taken into account
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Minor patient
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Real care courseEvaluate the rate of adequacy between the request made by the general practitioner and the response to emergencies | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Concordance rate between the general practitioner request and the patient's actual care path.
Time frame: 1 day
Medical file
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2018.
Related trials for Emergencies
Not yet recruiting
A Pre-post Study of a Lethal Means Safety Planning Intervention for Youth at Elevated Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department
Suicidal Ideas, Suicidal Ideation
Not yet recruiting
Miniature In-line Respirator
Brain Death, Respiration, Artificial
Recruiting
Development and Preliminary Validation of Intelligent Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Use
Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
RecruitingObservational study
AIDE: Decision Support for Anastomosis or Colostomy in Emergency Surgery for Complicated Acute Diverticulitis
Complicated Diverticulitis, Acute Diverticulitis
Recruiting
Developing a Support Application for Food Pantries (SAFPAS) to Improve Client Access to Healthy Foods & Enhance Emergency Preparedness
Improving Healthy Food Access in Food Insecurity Populations in Normal and Emergency Situations
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maxime EPAILLY contact
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Emergencies, run by Poitiers University Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Maxime EPAILLY (Maxime.epailly12@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Concordance rate between the general practitioner request and the patient's actual care path. (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2018.