Pain, AcuteNCT03450798
SOFT Block Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Patientsusing Ilizarov External Fixator
A study testing SOFT block group and spinal anesthesia group in people with Pain, Acute, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Peripheral nerve block is an ideal choice for lower limb surgery because of the peripheral site of the surgical procedure and the ability to block pain pathways at multiple levels. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 57 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Acute
- What is being tested?
- SOFT block group and spinal anesthesia group
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 107 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 10 Feb 2018to 10 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 57 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 35 to 57 years old
- ASA I,II
- BMI<30
- fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator -
Who cannot join
- Refusal to participate,
- Inability to communicate with the investigators or hospital staff,
- body mass index>40 kg/m2
- patients undergoing bilateral surgery,
- History of coagulopathies
- creatinine>1.5 mg/dL
Show all 10Show fewer
- American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) III-IV
- Any contraindication to regional anesthesia
- Unstable vital data
- Head or chest trauma will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: SOFT Block Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Fixation of Open Tibial Fractures Using Ilizarov External Fixator
Peripheral nerve block is an ideal choice for lower limb surgery because of the peripheral site of the surgical procedure and the ability to block pain pathways at multiple levels. On the contrary to other anesthetic techniques, as spinal or general anesthesia, properly performed peripheral nerve blocks bypass adverse events as hemodynamic instability and respiratory complications, properly treat post-operative pain leading to early hospital discharge. Additional advantages of peripheral nerve blocks are that they can be used in patients receiving anti-coagulants or lumbosacral disease in addition to avoidance of airway instrumentation.
Recently, there has been a significant interest in regional anesthesia and peripheral nerve blockade. This is facilitated by a significant advance of the research in this field and availability of better equipment facilitating regional anesthesia.The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of SOFT block (sciatic-obturator-femoral nerve block technique) in comparison with spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator.
Read the detailed description
After the approval of medical ethical committee of Ain Shams University, this prospective parallel group double blinded study will be conducted over 60 patients between the age of 35-57 years old, ASA physical status I and II, scheduled for fixation of open tibial fractures using iIlizarov external fixator. at Ain Shams University hospitals in 2018-2019, After written informed consent is obtained.
Refusal to participate, inability to communicate with the investigators or hospital staff, obesity (body mass index>40 kg/m2), patients undergoing bilateral surgery, patients with coagulopathies ,renal insufficiency (creatinine>1.5 mg/dL), American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) III-IV, patients with any contraindication to regional anesthesia , patients with unstable vital data and patients with head or chest trauma will be excluded.
Preanesthetic check will be done at night of surgery. After an intravenous (IV) cannula will be secured , and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg i.v. will be given to all patients before transfer to the operating room where standard monitoring devices as ECG,Non invasive blood pressure and pulse oximetry will be placed. Then, patients will be randomly allocated by sealed envelope technique to receive either spinal anesthesia or SOFT block. In spinal anesthesia group, patients will receive spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (7.5-10mg). This will be administered via a 25-G spinal needle at L4-L5 or L3-L4 with the patient in the sitting position under complete aseptic conditions.
In SOFT group, patients will receive SOFT block where patients will be positioned in supine position,under aseptic conditions, a linear US probe will be placed on the inguinal crease to show the femoral nerve and vessels. Using an in-plane technique, a 12-cm stimulating block needle will be introduced medial to the femoral vein and advanced 1-3 cm below and parallel to the skin. Then, It will be redirected toward the fibres of the femoral nerve, where 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected. To block the obturator nerve, the probe will be shifted medially, superior to the needle, and directed cranially to identify the pectineus muscle . The needle will be then withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissue and redirected using an out-of-plane technique toward the deep surface of the pectineus, where 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%will be injected.[4 ] To locate the sciatic nerve, we will use the curvilinear probe, directed it inferior to the needle, and tilted the probe to get the clearest image of the sciatic nerve.The needle will be inserted then withdrawn subcutaneously and directed by an in-plane technique toward the sciatic nerve deep to the inferior border of the quadratus femoris muscle. Then 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected after needle elicited muscle twitches using 1 mA current.
Sensory level will be evaluated by loss of pinprick sensation (20-gauge hypodermic needle).
Haemodynamic variables will be recorded every 5 min after block performance until the end of surgery. Hypotension will be defined as a decrease in systolic arterial blood pressure by 30% or more from baseline values, and it will be initially treated with 200 ml IV infusion of Ringer's lactate solution; if this proved to be ineffective, an IV bolus of phenylephrine (40-50 mcg) will be given. Bradycardia is defined as heart rate decrease below 45 bpm, and it was treated with 0.5 mg IV atropine.
Sensory block(loss of pinprick sensation at T12 in the Spinal group, or in the femoral, obturator and sciatic nerves distribution in the SOFT group). The quality of the block will be judged according to the need for supplementary IV analgesics and sedation: adequate nerve block = neither sedation nor analgesics required to complete surgery; inadequate nerve block = need for rescue dose of analgesic (100 mg IV bolus of ketamine) or sedation (3mg IV midazolam) will be required to complete surgery; failed nerve block so general anesthesia will be required to complete surgery.
After completion of surgery, patients will be transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Intravenous pethidine (50 mg) will be given as rescue analgesic as needed. Primary endpoint is the time from the end of local anaesthetic injection to complete resolution of sensory block. The secondary endpoints include patient satisfaction, (on a numerical rating scale), the adverse events as back pain, postural -puncture headache , vomiting, adverse events of systemic toxicity from local anesthetic as seizures and cardiovascular collapse, persistent parasthesia observed within 48 hours after the block and failure rate of the block will be recorded.
In case of failure of the block or incidence of seizures resulting from local anesthetic toxicity , we will convert to general anesthesia.
In case of cardiovascular collapse, support the patient with intravenous fluids and vasopressors as required so in these cases patients will be excluded from the study.
- Conditions
- Pain, Acute
- Being tested
- SOFT block group, spinal anesthesia group
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SOFT block groupDevice
needle will be introduced medial to the femoral vein and 3 cm below the skin where 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% injected. the obturator nerve, the probe shifted medially, superior to the needle, and directed cranially to the pectineus muscle . Needle withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissue and redirected using out-of-plane toward the deep surface of pectineus, 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%will be injected. The sciatic nerve, we use the curvilinear probe, inferior to the needle, and tilted the probe to get the clearest image of the sciatic nerve.The needle will be inserted then withdrawn subcutaneously and directed by an in-plane toward the sciatic nerve deep to the inferior border of the quadratus femoris muscle.20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected
spinal anesthesia groupDevice
patients will receive spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (7.5-10mg). This will be administered via a 25-G spinal needle at L4-L5 or L3-L4 with the patient in the sitting position under complete aseptic conditions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SOFT block group | Active comparator | needle will be introduced medial to the femoral vein and 3 cm below the skin where 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% injected. the obturator nerve, the probe shifted medially, superior to the needle, and directed cranially to the pectineus muscle . Needle withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissue and redirected using out-of-plane toward the deep surface of pectineus, 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%will be injected. The sciatic nerve, we use the curvilinear probe, inferior to the needle, and tilted the probe to get the clearest image of the sciatic nerve.The needle will be inserted then withdrawn subcutaneously and directed by an in-plane toward the sciatic nerve deep to the inferior border of the quadratus femoris muscle.20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected Receives: Device: SOFT block group |
| spinal anesthesia group | Sham comparator | patients will receive spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (7.5-10mg). This will be administered via a 25-G spinal needle at L4-L5 or L3-L4 with the patient in the sitting position under complete aseptic conditions. Receives: Device: spinal anesthesia group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
T- test of the recovery time(duration of analgesia)mean±SD
It is the time from the end of local anaesthetic injection to complete resolution of sensory block
Measured: 3-12 hours
Secondary outcomes (2)
Review of medical records for postoperative complications
persistent parasthesia
Measured: 48 hours after the procedure
Failure of the block
general anesthesia will be required to complete surgery.
Measured: 50 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2018
- Study start10 Feb 2018
- Primary completion10 Jan 2019
- Study completion10 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hoda Shokri, Ain Shams University
- Investigators
- Hoda Shokri, MD, Principal investigator, Ain Shams University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03450798
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FWA00001785
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 20 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 24 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: study protocol
Publications
Shokri H, Kasem AA. Sciatic obturator femoral technique versus spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator. A randomised trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jan 4;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0920-6.
PubMed 31901231
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- SOFT Block Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Fixation of Open Tibial Fractures Using Ilizarov External Fixator
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03450798
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FWA00001785
- Conditions
- Pain, Acute
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Peripheral nerve block is an ideal choice for lower limb surgery because of the peripheral site of the surgical procedure and the ability to block pain pathways at multiple levels. On the contrary to other anesthetic techniques, as spinal or general anesthesia, properly performed peripheral nerve blocks bypass adverse events as hemodynamic instability and respiratory complications, properly treat post-operative pain leading to early hospital discharge. Additional advantages of peripheral nerve blocks are that they can be used in patients receiving anti-coagulants or lumbosacral disease in addition to avoidance of airway instrumentation.
Recently, there has been a significant interest in regional anesthesia and peripheral nerve blockade. This is facilitated by a significant advance of the research in this field and availability of better equipment facilitating regional anesthesia.The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of SOFT block (sciatic-obturator-femoral nerve block technique) in comparison with spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator.
Detailed description
After the approval of medical ethical committee of Ain Shams University, this prospective parallel group double blinded study will be conducted over 60 patients between the age of 35-57 years old, ASA physical status I and II, scheduled for fixation of open tibial fractures using iIlizarov external fixator. at Ain Shams University hospitals in 2018-2019, After written informed consent is obtained.
Refusal to participate, inability to communicate with the investigators or hospital staff, obesity (body mass index>40 kg/m2), patients undergoing bilateral surgery, patients with coagulopathies ,renal insufficiency (creatinine>1.5 mg/dL), American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) III-IV, patients with any contraindication to regional anesthesia , patients with unstable vital data and patients with head or chest trauma will be excluded.
Preanesthetic check will be done at night of surgery. After an intravenous (IV) cannula will be secured , and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg i.v. will be given to all patients before transfer to the operating room where standard monitoring devices as ECG,Non invasive blood pressure and pulse oximetry will be placed. Then, patients will be randomly allocated by sealed envelope technique to receive either spinal anesthesia or SOFT block. In spinal anesthesia group, patients will receive spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (7.5-10mg). This will be administered via a 25-G spinal needle at L4-L5 or L3-L4 with the patient in the sitting position under complete aseptic conditions.
In SOFT group, patients will receive SOFT block where patients will be positioned in supine position,under aseptic conditions, a linear US probe will be placed on the inguinal crease to show the femoral nerve and vessels. Using an in-plane technique, a 12-cm stimulating block needle will be introduced medial to the femoral vein and advanced 1-3 cm below and parallel to the skin. Then, It will be redirected toward the fibres of the femoral nerve, where 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected. To block the obturator nerve, the probe will be shifted medially, superior to the needle, and directed cranially to identify the pectineus muscle . The needle will be then withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissue and redirected using an out-of-plane technique toward the deep surface of the pectineus, where 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%will be injected.[4 ] To locate the sciatic nerve, we will use the curvilinear probe, directed it inferior to the needle, and tilted the probe to get the clearest image of the sciatic nerve.The needle will be inserted then withdrawn subcutaneously and directed by an in-plane technique toward the sciatic nerve deep to the inferior border of the quadratus femoris muscle. Then 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected after needle elicited muscle twitches using 1 mA current.
Sensory level will be evaluated by loss of pinprick sensation (20-gauge hypodermic needle).
Haemodynamic variables will be recorded every 5 min after block performance until the end of surgery. Hypotension will be defined as a decrease in systolic arterial blood pressure by 30% or more from baseline values, and it will be initially treated with 200 ml IV infusion of Ringer's lactate solution; if this proved to be ineffective, an IV bolus of phenylephrine (40-50 mcg) will be given. Bradycardia is defined as heart rate decrease below 45 bpm, and it was treated with 0.5 mg IV atropine.
Sensory block(loss of pinprick sensation at T12 in the Spinal group, or in the femoral, obturator and sciatic nerves distribution in the SOFT group). The quality of the block will be judged according to the need for supplementary IV analgesics and sedation: adequate nerve block = neither sedation nor analgesics required to complete surgery; inadequate nerve block = need for rescue dose of analgesic (100 mg IV bolus of ketamine) or sedation (3mg IV midazolam) will be required to complete surgery; failed nerve block so general anesthesia will be required to complete surgery.
After completion of surgery, patients will be transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Intravenous pethidine (50 mg) will be given as rescue analgesic as needed. Primary endpoint is the time from the end of local anaesthetic injection to complete resolution of sensory block. The secondary endpoints include patient satisfaction, (on a numerical rating scale), the adverse events as back pain, postural -puncture headache , vomiting, adverse events of systemic toxicity from local anesthetic as seizures and cardiovascular collapse, persistent parasthesia observed within 48 hours after the block and failure rate of the block will be recorded.
In case of failure of the block or incidence of seizures resulting from local anesthetic toxicity , we will convert to general anesthesia.
In case of cardiovascular collapse, support the patient with intravenous fluids and vasopressors as required so in these cases patients will be excluded from the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SOFT block group | Active comparator | Device: SOFT block groupneedle will be introduced medial to the femoral vein and 3 cm below the skin where 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% injected. the obturator nerve, the probe shifted medially, superior to the needle, and directed cranially to the pectineus muscle . Needle withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissue and redirected using out-of-plane toward the deep surface of pectineus, 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%will be injected. The sciatic nerve, we use the curvilinear probe, inferior to the needle, and tilted the probe to get the clearest image of the sciatic nerve.The needle will be inserted then withdrawn subcutaneously and directed by an in-plane toward the sciatic nerve deep to the inferior border of the quadratus femoris muscle.20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected |
| spinal anesthesia group | Sham comparator | Device: spinal anesthesia grouppatients will receive spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (7.5-10mg). This will be administered via a 25-G spinal needle at L4-L5 or L3-L4 with the patient in the sitting position under complete aseptic conditions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 57 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 35 to 57 years old
- ASA I,II
- BMI<30
- fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator -
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Refusal to participate,
- Inability to communicate with the investigators or hospital staff,
- body mass index>40 kg/m2
- patients undergoing bilateral surgery,
- History of coagulopathies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SOFT block groupneedle will be introduced medial to the femoral vein and 3 cm below the skin where 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% injected. the obturator nerve, the probe shifted medially, superior to the needle, and directed cranially to the pectineus muscle . Needle withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissue and redirected using out-of-plane toward the deep surface of pectineus, 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%will be injected. The sciatic nerve, we use the curvilinear probe, inferior to the needle, and tilted the probe to get the clearest image of the sciatic nerve.The needle will be inserted then withdrawn subcutaneously and directed by an in-plane toward the sciatic nerve deep to the inferior border of the quadratus femoris muscle.20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected | Device | SOFT block group |
| spinal anesthesia grouppatients will receive spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (7.5-10mg). This will be administered via a 25-G spinal needle at L4-L5 or L3-L4 with the patient in the sitting position under complete aseptic conditions. | Device | spinal anesthesia group |
Primary outcome
T- test of the recovery time(duration of analgesia)mean±SD
Time frame: 3-12 hours
It is the time from the end of local anaesthetic injection to complete resolution of sensory block
2 secondary outcomes
Review of medical records for postoperative complications
Time frame: 48 hours after the procedure
Failure of the block
Time frame: 50 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jan 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31901231Shokri H, Kasem AA. Sciatic obturator femoral technique versus spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator. A randomised trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jan 4;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0920-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. study protocol
Related trials for Pain, Acute
Recruiting
Postoperative Delirium and Analgesia in Elderly Patients
Postoperative Delirium, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
Recruiting
Rectus Sheath Catheters Following Midline Laparotomy
Acute Abdomen, Ileus
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Vasopressin and Pain Perception in the Brain
Acute Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Investigating the Analgesic Potential of (2R,6R)-HNK in Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hoda Shokri, MD principal investigator
Ain Shams University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SOFT block group and spinal anesthesia group in people with Pain, Acute, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
T- test of the recovery time(duration of analgesia)mean±SD (time frame: 3-12 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03450798, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2019.