PsoriasisPhase 3PROTOSTARNCT03451851
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Administered Guselkumab for the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis in Pediatric Participants
A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab and Etanercept in people with Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 39 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in pediatric participants aged greater than or equal to 6 through less than 18 years with chronic plaque psoriasis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- Guselkumab and Etanercept
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- 11 Jul 2018to 18 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Have a diagnosis of chronic plaque-type psoriasis for at least 6 months (with or without psoriatic arthritis [PsA]), prior to first administration of study intervention, defined as having at screening and baseline, Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) greater than or equal to (>=) 3, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) >=12, >=10% body surface area (BSA) involvement and at least one of the following: very thick lesions, clinically relevant facial, genital, or hand/ foot involvement, PASI>=20, >20% BSA involvement, or IGA=4
- Be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment of plaque psoriasis (either naive or history of previous treatment)
- Have plaque psoriasis considered by the investigator as inadequately controlled with phototherapy and/or topical therapy after an adequate dose and duration of therapy
- Be considered, in the opinion of the investigator, a suitable candidate for etanercept therapy, according to their country's approved Enbrel product labeling
- Be otherwise healthy on the basis of physical examination, medical history, and vital signs performed at screening. Any abnormalities, must be consistent with the underlying illness in the study population and this determination must be recorded in the participant's source documents and initialed by the investigator
- Must have acceptable evidence of immunity to varicella and measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), which includes any one of the following: documentation of age-appropriate vaccination that includes both doses of each vaccine (unless local guidelines specify otherwise) or documentation of past infection by a healthcare provider or in the absence of previous 2 criteria, participants must have positive protective antibody titers to these infection prior to the first administration of study intervention. For participants who have not completed the recommended vaccination schedule for varicella and MMR, and the subsequent vaccination falls within the next 4 years, an accelerated vaccination schedule must be completed prior to study enrollment if available and required or strongly recommended for the location. If varicella or MMR vaccines are utilized, it is necessary for 2 weeks to elapse between the vaccination and receipt of study intervention
Who cannot join
- Currently has nonplaque forms of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
- Has current drug-induced psoriasis (example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
- Has previously received guselkumab or etanercept
- Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (example, bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic non-remitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers
- Has a known history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 9 countries.
39 sites in 9 countries
United States10 sites
Arlington Center for Dermatology
Arlington, Texas, 76011-3800
Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas
Austin, Texas, 78723
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Wright State Physicians Health Center
Dayton, Ohio, 45324
Windsor Dermatology
East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520-2505
Dermatologic Surgery Specialists
Macon, Georgia, 31217
Mt. Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10003
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94306
Arlington Dermatology
Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92123
Germany7 sites
Universitatsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, 53127
Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carcus Dresden
Dresden, 01307
Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt, 60590
Universitatsklinikum Schleswig Holstein Kiel
Kiel, 24105
Praxis Dr. med. Beate Schwarz - Germany
Langenau, 89129
Company for Medical Study & Service Selters
Selters, 56242
Hautarztpraxis Dr. Leitz & Kollegen
Stuttgart, 70178
Italy5 sites
Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona
Ancona, 60026
Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna, 40138
AOU di Cagliari
Cagliari, 09124
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
Padova, 35128
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS
Reggio Emilia, 42123
Hungary4 sites
Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft
Budapest, 1036
Debreceni Egyetem
Debrecen, 4032
Borsod Abauj Zemplen Varmegyei Kozponti Korhaz es Egyetemi Oktato Korhaz
Miskolc, 3526
Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem
Szeged, 6720
Australia3 sites
Eastern Health Research
Box Hill, 3128
Royal North Shore Hospital
St Leonards, 2065
Veracity Clinical Research
Woolloongabba, 4102
Belgium3 sites
Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc
Brussels, 1200
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, 9000
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman
Liège, 4000
Canada3 sites
Kirk Barber Reseach Inc.
Calgary, Alberta, T2G 1B1
Dermatology Research Institute Inc
Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E1
Skin Care Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E8
Poland3 sites
Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o
Lodz, 90-265
Szpital Dzieciecy im. prof. dr. med. Jana Bogdanowicza w Warszawie
Warsaw, 03-924
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny im Jana Mikulicza Radeckiego we Wroclawiu
Wroclaw, 50 556
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Administered Guselkumab for the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis in Pediatric Subjects (>=6 To <18 Years of Age)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in pediatric participants aged greater than or equal to 6 through less than 18 years with chronic plaque psoriasis.
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Being tested
- Guselkumab, Placebo for guselkumab, Etanercept
- Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GuselkumabDrug
Also called CNTO1959
Participants will receive a weight-based dose of guselkumab subcutaneously.
Placebo for guselkumabDrug
Participants will receive a weight-based dose of placebo for guselkumab subcutaneously.
EtanerceptDrug
Also called Enbrel
Participants will receive a weight-based dose of etanercept (up to 50 mg) subcutaneously.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab | Experimental | Participants in Part 1a (age greater than or equal to (>=) 12 - less than (<) 18 years) will receive a weight-based dose of guselkumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and 12. Participants who are PASI 90 responders at Week 16 will not receive any additional doses of guselkumab until they lose >=50% of their Week 16 PASI response, then they receive 1 dose guselkumab, followed by a dose 4 weeks later, and every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are PASI 90 non-responders at Week 16 will receive a placebo injection at Week 16 and continue to receive guselkumab q8w from Week 20 through Week 52. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab may enter the Long Term Extension (LTE) Phase of the study. Part 1b (age >= 6 - <12 years) will follow the same dosing and commence after Part 1a data review. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Placebo for guselkumab |
| Part 1 Group 2: Placebo for Guselkumab | Placebo comparator | Participants in Part 1a (age >= 12 - <18 years) will receive placebo for guselkumab administered SC at Weeks 0, 4, and 12. Participants who are PASI 90 responders at Week 16 will not receive any additional doses of study intervention until they lose >=50% of their Week 16 PASI response, at which time they will receive a weight-based guselkumab SC dose, followed by a dose 4 weeks later, and q8w thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are PASI 90 non-responders at Week 16 will receive a weight-based guselkumab dose at Weeks 16 and 20, followed by q8w dosing thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab treatment, may enter the LTE phase of the study. Part 1b (age >= 6 - <12 years) will follow the same dosing and commence after Part 1a data review. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Placebo for guselkumab |
| Part 1 Group 3: Etanercept | Active comparator | Participants in Part 1a (age >= 12 - <18 years) will receive weight-based etanercept dose up to 50 milligram SC weekly through Week 15. Participants who elect to continue in the study will receive a weight-based guselkumab dose at Weeks 20 and 24, followed by q8w dosing thereafter through Week 48. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab treatment, may enter the LTE phase of the study. Part 1b (age >= 6 - <12 years) will follow the same dosing and commence after Part 1a data review. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Etanercept |
| Part 2: Guselkumab | Experimental | Participants will receive a weight-based dose of open-label guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4 and q8w thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab treatment, may enter the LTE of the study and continue to receive guselkumab at Week 52 and q8w thereafter. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: At Week 16
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 16
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 75 response represented participants who achieved at least a 75 % improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Measured: At Week 16
Secondary outcomes (33)
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve PASI 90 Response at Week 16
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 % to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represented participants who achieved at least a 90 % improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Measured: At Week 16
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: At Week 16
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 100 response represented participants who achieved a 100 % improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Measured: At Week 16
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score at Week 16
CDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on children's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of questions 1-10 and ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children. Change from baseline is defined as post baseline score minus baseline score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Part 1: Percentage of Retreated Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over Time After Retreatment
PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translates to score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 % to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represented participants who achieved at least a 90 % improvement from baseline in PASI score.
Measured: At 4 and 8 weeks post retreatment (retreatment period ranged from Week 16 to Week 52)
Part 1: Percentage of Retreated Participants Who Achieved PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Over Time After Retreatment
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicated more severe disease. PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100 response represented at least 50, 75, 90 and 100% improvement from baseline respectively, in the PASI score.
Measured: At 4 and 8 weeks post retreatment (retreatment period ranged from Week 16 to Week 52)
Part 1: Percentage of Retreated Participants Who Achieved IGA Responses (IGA of Cleared [0], Minimal [1], or Mild [2], IGA of Cleared [0] or Minimal [1], and IGA of Cleared [0]) Over Time After Retreatment
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 points scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 points scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: At 4 and 8 weeks post retreatment (retreatment period ranged from Week 16 to Week 52)
Part 1: Cumulative Rate of Loss of at Least 50% of Week 16 PASI Improvement Through Week 52 Among Guselkumab PASI 90 Responders at Week 16
Cumulative rate of loss of at least 50% of PASI improvement was defined as percentage of participants with a loss of >=50% of Week 16 PASI improvement after treatment is withdrawn. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 % to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Part 1: Cumulative Maintenance Rate of PASI 90 Response Through Week 52 Among Guselkumab PASI 90 Responders at Week 16
Cumulative maintenance rate was defined as percentage of participants who maintained their PASI 90 response through Week 52 among guselkumab PASI 90 responders at Week 16. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represented participants who achieved at least a 90% improvement from baseline in PASI score.
Measured: Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response at Week 16
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 % to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 50 response represented at least a 50% improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Measured: At Week 16
Part 1: Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Through Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Part 2: Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Through Week 52
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Through Week 16
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicated more severe disease. PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 responses represented at least 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% improvement from baseline respectively, in the PASI score.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Through Week 52
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicated more severe disease. PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 responses represented at least 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% improvement from baseline respectively, in the PASI score.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With IGA of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1), Mild or Better (<=2) Through Week 16
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 points scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 points scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With IGA of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1), Mild or Better (<=2) Through Week 52
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 points scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 points scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
Part 2: Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score Through Week 52
Change from baseline in CDLQI score through Week 52 were reported. CDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on children's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of questions 1-10 and ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With CDLQI Score Equal to 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score Greater Than (>) 1
CDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on children's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of question 1-10 and ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children.
Measured: At Week 16
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With CDLQI Score Equal to of 0 or 1 Through Week 52 Among Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score > 1
CDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on children's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of question 1-10 and ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children.
Measured: Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline FDLQI >1
The FDLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that examined the impact of participant's skin disease on different aspects of their QoL (example: emotional, physical well-being, relationships, social life, leisure activities, burden of care, job/study, housework and expenditure) over the last 1 month, as assessed by a family member/partner. Each item had a four-point response option, where Not at all/Not relevant = 0; A little = 1; Quite a lot = 2; and Very much = 3. The scores of individual items (0-3) were added to give a total scale score that ranged from 0 to 30; a higher score indicated greater impairment of QoL.
Measured: At Week 16
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) of 0 or 1 Through Week 52 Among Participants With a Baseline FDLQI >1
The FDLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that examine the impact of participant's skin disease on different aspects of their QoL (example, emotional, physical well-being, relationships, social life, leisure activities, burden of care, job/study, housework and expenditure) over the last 1 month, as assessed by a family member/partner. Each item had a four-point response option, where Not at all/Not relevant = 0; A little = 1; Quite a lot = 2; and Very much = 3. The scores of individual items (0-3) were added to give a total scale score that ranged from 0 to 30; a higher score indicates greater impairment of QoL.
Measured: Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52
Part 1: Change From Baseline in FDLQI Score at Week 16
The FDLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that examined the impact of participant's skin disease on different aspects of their QoL (example, emotional, physical well-being, relationships, social life, leisure activities, burden of care, job/study, housework and expenditure) over the last 1 month, as assessed by a family member/partner. Each item had a four-point response option, where Not at all/Not relevant = 0; A little = 1; Quite a lot = 2; and Very much = 3. The scores of individual items (0-3) are added to give a total scale score that ranged from 0 to 30; a higher score indicates greater impairment of QoL.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Part 2: Change From Baseline in FDLQI Score Through Week 52
The FDLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that examine the impact of participant's skin disease on different aspects of their QoL (example, emotional, physical well-being, relationships, social life, leisure activities, burden of care, job/study, housework and expenditure) over the last 1 month, as assessed by a family member/partner. Each item had a four-point response option, where Not at all/Not relevant = 0; A little = 1; Quite a lot = 2; and Very much = 3. The scores of individual items (0-3) are added to give a total scale score that ranged from 0 to 30; a higher score indicated greater impairment of QoL.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis Skin Involvement at Week 16
Change from baseline in percent body surface area with psoriasis skin involvement was reported. BSA as physical measure to define disease severity is to determine how much of the BSA is affected by psoriasis. Involved BSA is calculated by using the palm of the participant's hand as equivalent to 1% of the BSA (rule of palm). Psoriasis affected BSA under 5% suggests mild psoriasis, a BSA of 5% to 10% is considered moderate, and an involved BSA of over 10% indicates severe psoriasis.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Parts 2: Change From Baseline in BSA With Psoriasis Skin Involvement Over Time Through Week 52
Change from baseline in percent body surface area with psoriasis skin involvement was reported. BSA as physical measure to define disease severity is to determine how much of the BSA is affected by psoriasis. Involved BSA is calculated by using the palm of the participant's hand as equivalent to 1% of the BSA (rule of palm). Psoriasis affected BSA under 5% suggests mild psoriasis, a BSA of 5% to 10% is considered moderate, and an involved BSA of over 10% indicates severe psoriasis.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Over Time
Measured: From Week 52 to End of the study (EOS) (December 2026)
LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of (Cleared [0], Cleared [0] or Minimal [1], Mild or Better [<=2] Over Time
Measured: From Week 52 to EOS (December 2026)
LTE Phase: Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Over Time
Measured: From Week 52 to EOS (December 2026)
LTE Phase: Change From Baseline in BSA With Psoriasis Skin Involvement Over Time
Measured: From Week 52 to EOS (Dec 2026)
LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90,and 100) at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment Among Guselkumab Participants Who Were Withdrawn From Guselkumab at Week 16 and Retreated Upon Loss of Response or at Week 52
Measured: Week 60 and Week 84
LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of (Cleared [0], Cleared [0] or Minimal [1], Mild or Better [<=2] at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment
Measured: Week 60 and Week 84
LTE Phase: Percent Improvement in PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment Among Guselkumab Subjects Who Were Withdrawn From Guselkumab at Week 16 and Subsequently Retreated Upon Loss of Response or at Week 52
Measured: Week 60 and Week 84
LTE Phase: Change From Baseline in BSA at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment Among Guselkumab Subjects Who Were Withdrawn From Guselkumab at Week 16 and Subsequently Retreated Upon Loss of Response or at Week 52
Measured: Week 60 and Week 84
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Mar 2018
- Study start11 Jul 2018
- Primary completion19 Jul 2023
- Study completion18 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03451851
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR108452
- Other IDs
- CNTO1959PSO3011, 2023-503378-19-00, 2023
- Acronym
- PROTOSTAR
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Crauwels H, Ringold S, Howard S, Van Hartingsveldt B, Smith V, Jett M, Baguet T, Adamson E, Chakravarty SD, Leu JH. Extrapolating Guselkumab Efficacy to Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis from Adult Psoriatic Arthritis and Adult and Pediatric Psoriasis Data. Paediatr Drugs. 2026 Jan;28(1):69-81. doi: 10.1007/s40272-025-00725-2. Epub 2025 Oct 28.
PubMed 41152645Prajapati VH, Seyger MMB, Wilsmann-Theis D, Szakos E, Kaszuba A, van Hartingsveldt B, Jett M, Jiang G, Li S, Sinha V, Crauwels H, DeKlotz CMC, Paller AS. Guselkumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in paediatric patients: results of the phase III randomized placebo-controlled PROTOSTAR study. Br J Dermatol. 2025 Mar 18;192(4):618-628. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae502.
PubMed 39708367
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Administered Guselkumab for the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis in Pediatric Subjects (>=6 To <18 Years of Age)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03451851
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROTOSTAR / CR108452
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 11 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 28 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in pediatric participants aged greater than or equal to 6 through less than 18 years with chronic plaque psoriasis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab | Experimental | Drug: Guselkumab, Drug: Placebo for guselkumabParticipants in Part 1a (age greater than or equal to (>=) 12 - less than (<) 18 years) will receive a weight-based dose of guselkumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and 12. Participants who are PASI 90 responders at Week 16 will not receive any additional doses of guselkumab until they lose >=50% of their Week 16 PASI response, then they receive 1 dose guselkumab, followed by a dose 4 weeks later, and every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are PASI 90 non-responders at Week 16 will receive a placebo injection at Week 16 and continue to receive guselkumab q8w from Week 20 through Week 52. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab may enter the Long Term Extension (LTE) Phase of the study. Part 1b (age >= 6 - <12 years) will follow the same dosing and commence after Part 1a data review. |
| Part 1 Group 2: Placebo for Guselkumab | Placebo comparator | Drug: Guselkumab, Drug: Placebo for guselkumabParticipants in Part 1a (age >= 12 - <18 years) will receive placebo for guselkumab administered SC at Weeks 0, 4, and 12. Participants who are PASI 90 responders at Week 16 will not receive any additional doses of study intervention until they lose >=50% of their Week 16 PASI response, at which time they will receive a weight-based guselkumab SC dose, followed by a dose 4 weeks later, and q8w thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are PASI 90 non-responders at Week 16 will receive a weight-based guselkumab dose at Weeks 16 and 20, followed by q8w dosing thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab treatment, may enter the LTE phase of the study. Part 1b (age >= 6 - <12 years) will follow the same dosing and commence after Part 1a data review. |
| Part 1 Group 3: Etanercept | Active comparator | Drug: Guselkumab, Drug: EtanerceptParticipants in Part 1a (age >= 12 - <18 years) will receive weight-based etanercept dose up to 50 milligram SC weekly through Week 15. Participants who elect to continue in the study will receive a weight-based guselkumab dose at Weeks 20 and 24, followed by q8w dosing thereafter through Week 48. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab treatment, may enter the LTE phase of the study. Part 1b (age >= 6 - <12 years) will follow the same dosing and commence after Part 1a data review. |
| Part 2: Guselkumab | Experimental | Drug: GuselkumabParticipants will receive a weight-based dose of open-label guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4 and q8w thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab treatment, may enter the LTE of the study and continue to receive guselkumab at Week 52 and q8w thereafter. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Have a diagnosis of chronic plaque-type psoriasis for at least 6 months (with or without psoriatic arthritis [PsA]), prior to first administration of study intervention, defined as having at screening and baseline, Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) greater than or equal to (>=) 3, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) >=12, >=10% body surface area (BSA) involvement and at least one of the following: very thick lesions, clinically relevant facial, genital, or hand/ foot involvement, PASI>=20, >20% BSA involvement, or IGA=4
- Be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment of plaque psoriasis (either naive or history of previous treatment)
- Have plaque psoriasis considered by the investigator as inadequately controlled with phototherapy and/or topical therapy after an adequate dose and duration of therapy
- Be considered, in the opinion of the investigator, a suitable candidate for etanercept therapy, according to their country's approved Enbrel product labeling
- Be otherwise healthy on the basis of physical examination, medical history, and vital signs performed at screening. Any abnormalities, must be consistent with the underlying illness in the study population and this determination must be recorded in the participant's source documents and initialed by the investigator
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Currently has nonplaque forms of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
- Has current drug-induced psoriasis (example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
- Has previously received guselkumab or etanercept
- Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (example, bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic non-remitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers
- Has a known history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GuselkumabAlso: CNTO1959Participants will receive a weight-based dose of guselkumab subcutaneously. | Drug | Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab, Part 1 Group 2: Placebo for Guselkumab, Part 1 Group 3: Etanercept, Part 2: Guselkumab |
| Placebo for guselkumabParticipants will receive a weight-based dose of placebo for guselkumab subcutaneously. | Drug | Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab, Part 1 Group 2: Placebo for Guselkumab |
| EtanerceptAlso: EnbrelParticipants will receive a weight-based dose of etanercept (up to 50 mg) subcutaneously. | Drug | Part 1 Group 3: Etanercept |
Primary outcome
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
Time frame: At Week 16
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 16
Time frame: At Week 16
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 75 response represented participants who achieved at least a 75 % improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
33 secondary outcomes
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve PASI 90 Response at Week 16
Time frame: At Week 16
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16
Time frame: At Week 16
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16
Time frame: At Week 16
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Part 1: Percentage of Retreated Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over Time After Retreatment
Time frame: At 4 and 8 weeks post retreatment (retreatment period ranged from Week 16 to Week 52)
Part 1: Percentage of Retreated Participants Who Achieved PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Over Time After Retreatment
Time frame: At 4 and 8 weeks post retreatment (retreatment period ranged from Week 16 to Week 52)
Part 1: Percentage of Retreated Participants Who Achieved IGA Responses (IGA of Cleared [0], Minimal [1], or Mild [2], IGA of Cleared [0] or Minimal [1], and IGA of Cleared [0]) Over Time After Retreatment
Time frame: At 4 and 8 weeks post retreatment (retreatment period ranged from Week 16 to Week 52)
Part 1: Cumulative Rate of Loss of at Least 50% of Week 16 PASI Improvement Through Week 52 Among Guselkumab PASI 90 Responders at Week 16
Time frame: Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Part 1: Cumulative Maintenance Rate of PASI 90 Response Through Week 52 Among Guselkumab PASI 90 Responders at Week 16
Time frame: Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response at Week 16
Time frame: At Week 16
Part 1: Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Through Week 16
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Part 2: Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Through Week 52
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Through Week 16
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Through Week 52
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With IGA of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1), Mild or Better (<=2) Through Week 16
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With IGA of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1), Mild or Better (<=2) Through Week 52
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
Part 2: Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score Through Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With CDLQI Score Equal to 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score Greater Than (>) 1
Time frame: At Week 16
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With CDLQI Score Equal to of 0 or 1 Through Week 52 Among Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score > 1
Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline FDLQI >1
Time frame: At Week 16
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) of 0 or 1 Through Week 52 Among Participants With a Baseline FDLQI >1
Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52
Part 1: Change From Baseline in FDLQI Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Part 2: Change From Baseline in FDLQI Score Through Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis Skin Involvement at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Parts 2: Change From Baseline in BSA With Psoriasis Skin Involvement Over Time Through Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Over Time
Time frame: From Week 52 to End of the study (EOS) (December 2026)
LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of (Cleared [0], Cleared [0] or Minimal [1], Mild or Better [<=2] Over Time
Time frame: From Week 52 to EOS (December 2026)
LTE Phase: Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Over Time
Time frame: From Week 52 to EOS (December 2026)
LTE Phase: Change From Baseline in BSA With Psoriasis Skin Involvement Over Time
Time frame: From Week 52 to EOS (Dec 2026)
LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90,and 100) at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment Among Guselkumab Participants Who Were Withdrawn From Guselkumab at Week 16 and Retreated Upon Loss of Response or at Week 52
Time frame: Week 60 and Week 84
LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of (Cleared [0], Cleared [0] or Minimal [1], Mild or Better [<=2] at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment
Time frame: Week 60 and Week 84
LTE Phase: Percent Improvement in PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment Among Guselkumab Subjects Who Were Withdrawn From Guselkumab at Week 16 and Subsequently Retreated Upon Loss of Response or at Week 52
Time frame: Week 60 and Week 84
LTE Phase: Change From Baseline in BSA at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment Among Guselkumab Subjects Who Were Withdrawn From Guselkumab at Week 16 and Subsequently Retreated Upon Loss of Response or at Week 52
Time frame: Week 60 and Week 84
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41152645Crauwels H, Ringold S, Howard S, Van Hartingsveldt B, Smith V, Jett M, Baguet T, Adamson E, Chakravarty SD, Leu JH. Extrapolating Guselkumab Efficacy to Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis from Adult Psoriatic Arthritis and Adult and Pediatric Psoriasis Data. Paediatr Drugs. 2026 Jan;28(1):69-81. doi: 10.1007/s40272-025-00725-2. Epub 2025 Oct 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39708367Prajapati VH, Seyger MMB, Wilsmann-Theis D, Szakos E, Kaszuba A, van Hartingsveldt B, Jett M, Jiang G, Li S, Sinha V, Crauwels H, DeKlotz CMC, Paller AS. Guselkumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in paediatric patients: results of the phase III randomized placebo-controlled PROTOSTAR study. Br J Dermatol. 2025 Mar 18;192(4):618-628. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae502.
Related trials for Psoriasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Pharmacokinetics of LPX-TI641 in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
RecruitingObservational study
Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases or Psoriasis
Osteoporosis, Inflammatory Rheumatism
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HL40626S Tablets in Healthy Adults
Skin Disease, Immune System Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Metabolic Profiling of Immune Responses in Immune-mediated Diseases
Primary Immunodeficiency, Psoriasis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Efficacy and Flexibility of Tildrakizumab Treatment in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis and High Disease Burden
Psoriasis, Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
39 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab and Etanercept in people with Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 39 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in United States, Germany, Italy, Hungary, Australia and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 (time frame: At Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03451851, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2026.