AzTrials
AzTrials

PsoriasisPhase 3PROTOSTARNCT03451851

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Administered Guselkumab for the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis in Pediatric Participants

A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab and Etanercept in people with Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 39 sites in 9 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in pediatric participants aged greater than or equal to 6 through less than 18 years with chronic plaque psoriasis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Psoriasis
What is being tested?
Guselkumab and Etanercept
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
120 participants
Where
39 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
11 Jul 2018to 18 Dec 2026
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Have a diagnosis of chronic plaque-type psoriasis for at least 6 months (with or without psoriatic arthritis [PsA]), prior to first administration of study intervention, defined as having at screening and baseline, Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) greater than or equal to (>=) 3, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) >=12, >=10% body surface area (BSA) involvement and at least one of the following: very thick lesions, clinically relevant facial, genital, or hand/ foot involvement, PASI>=20, >20% BSA involvement, or IGA=4
  • Be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment of plaque psoriasis (either naive or history of previous treatment)
  • Have plaque psoriasis considered by the investigator as inadequately controlled with phototherapy and/or topical therapy after an adequate dose and duration of therapy
  • Be considered, in the opinion of the investigator, a suitable candidate for etanercept therapy, according to their country's approved Enbrel product labeling
  • Be otherwise healthy on the basis of physical examination, medical history, and vital signs performed at screening. Any abnormalities, must be consistent with the underlying illness in the study population and this determination must be recorded in the participant's source documents and initialed by the investigator
  • Must have acceptable evidence of immunity to varicella and measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), which includes any one of the following: documentation of age-appropriate vaccination that includes both doses of each vaccine (unless local guidelines specify otherwise) or documentation of past infection by a healthcare provider or in the absence of previous 2 criteria, participants must have positive protective antibody titers to these infection prior to the first administration of study intervention. For participants who have not completed the recommended vaccination schedule for varicella and MMR, and the subsequent vaccination falls within the next 4 years, an accelerated vaccination schedule must be completed prior to study enrollment if available and required or strongly recommended for the location. If varicella or MMR vaccines are utilized, it is necessary for 2 weeks to elapse between the vaccination and receipt of study intervention

Who cannot join

  • Currently has nonplaque forms of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Has current drug-induced psoriasis (example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
  • Has previously received guselkumab or etanercept
  • Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (example, bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic non-remitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers
  • Has a known history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly

Trial locations and contacts

39 sites in 9 countries.

39 sites in 9 countries

United States10 sites
  • Arlington Center for Dermatology

    Arlington, Texas, 76011-3800

  • Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas

    Austin, Texas, 78723

  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Wright State Physicians Health Center

    Dayton, Ohio, 45324

  • Windsor Dermatology

    East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520-2505

  • Dermatologic Surgery Specialists

    Macon, Georgia, 31217

  • Mt. Sinai School of Medicine

    New York, New York, 10003

  • Stanford University

    Palo Alto, California, 94306

  • Arlington Dermatology

    Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008

  • University of California, San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92123

Other trials in United States

Germany7 sites
  • Universitatsklinikum Bonn

    Bonn, 53127

  • Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carcus Dresden

    Dresden, 01307

  • Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt, 60590

  • Universitatsklinikum Schleswig Holstein Kiel

    Kiel, 24105

  • Praxis Dr. med. Beate Schwarz - Germany

    Langenau, 89129

  • Company for Medical Study & Service Selters

    Selters, 56242

  • Hautarztpraxis Dr. Leitz & Kollegen

    Stuttgart, 70178

Other trials in Germany

Italy5 sites
  • Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona

    Ancona, 60026

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi

    Bologna, 40138

  • AOU di Cagliari

    Cagliari, 09124

  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova

    Padova, 35128

  • Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS

    Reggio Emilia, 42123

Other trials in Italy

Hungary4 sites
  • Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft

    Budapest, 1036

  • Debreceni Egyetem

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Borsod Abauj Zemplen Varmegyei Kozponti Korhaz es Egyetemi Oktato Korhaz

    Miskolc, 3526

  • Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem

    Szeged, 6720

Other trials in Hungary

Australia3 sites
  • Eastern Health Research

    Box Hill, 3128

  • Royal North Shore Hospital

    St Leonards, 2065

  • Veracity Clinical Research

    Woolloongabba, 4102

Other trials in Australia

Belgium3 sites
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc

    Brussels, 1200

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

    Ghent, 9000

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman

    Liège, 4000

Other trials in Belgium

Canada3 sites
  • Kirk Barber Reseach Inc.

    Calgary, Alberta, T2G 1B1

  • Dermatology Research Institute Inc

    Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E1

  • Skin Care Centre

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E8

Other trials in Canada

Poland3 sites
  • Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o

    Lodz, 90-265

  • Szpital Dzieciecy im. prof. dr. med. Jana Bogdanowicza w Warszawie

    Warsaw, 03-924

  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny im Jana Mikulicza Radeckiego we Wroclawiu

    Wroclaw, 50 556

Other trials in Poland

Netherlands1 site
  • Radboud University Medical Center

    Nijmegen, 6525 GA

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Administered Guselkumab for the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis in Pediatric Subjects (>=6 To <18 Years of Age)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in pediatric participants aged greater than or equal to 6 through less than 18 years with chronic plaque psoriasis.

Conditions
Psoriasis
Being tested
Guselkumab, Placebo for guselkumab, Etanercept
Medical subject headings
Psoriasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GuselkumabDrug

    Also called CNTO1959

    Participants will receive a weight-based dose of guselkumab subcutaneously.

  • Placebo for guselkumabDrug

    Participants will receive a weight-based dose of placebo for guselkumab subcutaneously.

  • EtanerceptDrug

    Also called Enbrel

    Participants will receive a weight-based dose of etanercept (up to 50 mg) subcutaneously.

Study groups in NCT03451851
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Part 1 Group 1: GuselkumabExperimentalParticipants in Part 1a (age greater than or equal to (>=) 12 - less than (<) 18 years) will receive a weight-based dose of guselkumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, and 12. Participants who are PASI 90 responders at Week 16 will not receive any additional doses of guselkumab until they lose >=50% of their Week 16 PASI response, then they receive 1 dose guselkumab, followed by a dose 4 weeks later, and every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are PASI 90 non-responders at Week 16 will receive a placebo injection at Week 16 and continue to receive guselkumab q8w from Week 20 through Week 52. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab may enter the Long Term Extension (LTE) Phase of the study. Part 1b (age >= 6 - <12 years) will follow the same dosing and commence after Part 1a data review.
Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Placebo for guselkumab
Part 1 Group 2: Placebo for GuselkumabPlacebo comparatorParticipants in Part 1a (age >= 12 - <18 years) will receive placebo for guselkumab administered SC at Weeks 0, 4, and 12. Participants who are PASI 90 responders at Week 16 will not receive any additional doses of study intervention until they lose >=50% of their Week 16 PASI response, at which time they will receive a weight-based guselkumab SC dose, followed by a dose 4 weeks later, and q8w thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are PASI 90 non-responders at Week 16 will receive a weight-based guselkumab dose at Weeks 16 and 20, followed by q8w dosing thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab treatment, may enter the LTE phase of the study. Part 1b (age >= 6 - <12 years) will follow the same dosing and commence after Part 1a data review.
Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Placebo for guselkumab
Part 1 Group 3: EtanerceptActive comparatorParticipants in Part 1a (age >= 12 - <18 years) will receive weight-based etanercept dose up to 50 milligram SC weekly through Week 15. Participants who elect to continue in the study will receive a weight-based guselkumab dose at Weeks 20 and 24, followed by q8w dosing thereafter through Week 48. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab treatment, may enter the LTE phase of the study. Part 1b (age >= 6 - <12 years) will follow the same dosing and commence after Part 1a data review.
Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Etanercept
Part 2: GuselkumabExperimentalParticipants will receive a weight-based dose of open-label guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4 and q8w thereafter through Week 52. Participants who are eligible and willing to continue guselkumab treatment, may enter the LTE of the study and continue to receive guselkumab at Week 52 and q8w thereafter.
Receives: Drug: Guselkumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At Week 16

  2. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 16

    The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 75 response represented participants who achieved at least a 75 % improvement from baseline in the PASI score.

    Measured: At Week 16

Secondary outcomes (33)
  1. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve PASI 90 Response at Week 16

    The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 % to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represented participants who achieved at least a 90 % improvement from baseline in the PASI score.

    Measured: At Week 16

  2. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At Week 16

  3. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16

    The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 100 response represented participants who achieved a 100 % improvement from baseline in the PASI score.

    Measured: At Week 16

  4. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score at Week 16

    CDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on children's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of questions 1-10 and ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children. Change from baseline is defined as post baseline score minus baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  5. Part 1: Percentage of Retreated Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over Time After Retreatment

    PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translates to score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 % to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represented participants who achieved at least a 90 % improvement from baseline in PASI score.

    Measured: At 4 and 8 weeks post retreatment (retreatment period ranged from Week 16 to Week 52)

  6. Part 1: Percentage of Retreated Participants Who Achieved PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Over Time After Retreatment

    The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicated more severe disease. PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100 response represented at least 50, 75, 90 and 100% improvement from baseline respectively, in the PASI score.

    Measured: At 4 and 8 weeks post retreatment (retreatment period ranged from Week 16 to Week 52)

  7. Part 1: Percentage of Retreated Participants Who Achieved IGA Responses (IGA of Cleared [0], Minimal [1], or Mild [2], IGA of Cleared [0] or Minimal [1], and IGA of Cleared [0]) Over Time After Retreatment

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 points scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 points scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At 4 and 8 weeks post retreatment (retreatment period ranged from Week 16 to Week 52)

  8. Part 1: Cumulative Rate of Loss of at Least 50% of Week 16 PASI Improvement Through Week 52 Among Guselkumab PASI 90 Responders at Week 16

    Cumulative rate of loss of at least 50% of PASI improvement was defined as percentage of participants with a loss of >=50% of Week 16 PASI improvement after treatment is withdrawn. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 % to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52

  9. Part 1: Cumulative Maintenance Rate of PASI 90 Response Through Week 52 Among Guselkumab PASI 90 Responders at Week 16

    Cumulative maintenance rate was defined as percentage of participants who maintained their PASI 90 response through Week 52 among guselkumab PASI 90 responders at Week 16. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represented participants who achieved at least a 90% improvement from baseline in PASI score.

    Measured: Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52

  10. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response at Week 16

    The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 % to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no visible skin involvement) to 72 (maximal skin involvement of the whole body). A higher score indicated more severe disease. A PASI 50 response represented at least a 50% improvement from baseline in the PASI score.

    Measured: At Week 16

  11. Part 1: Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Through Week 16

    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  12. Part 2: Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Through Week 52

    The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52

  13. Part 1: Percentage of Participants With PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Through Week 16

    The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicated more severe disease. PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 responses represented at least 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% improvement from baseline respectively, in the PASI score.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  14. Part 2: Percentage of Participants With PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Through Week 52

    The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produced a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicated more severe disease. PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 responses represented at least 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% improvement from baseline respectively, in the PASI score.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52

  15. Part 1: Percentage of Participants With IGA of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1), Mild or Better (<=2) Through Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 points scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 points scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  16. Part 2: Percentage of Participants With IGA of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1), Mild or Better (<=2) Through Week 52

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 points scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 points scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52

  17. Part 2: Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score Through Week 52

    Change from baseline in CDLQI score through Week 52 were reported. CDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on children's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of questions 1-10 and ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52

  18. Part 1: Percentage of Participants With CDLQI Score Equal to 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score Greater Than (>) 1

    CDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on children's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of question 1-10 and ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children.

    Measured: At Week 16

  19. Part 2: Percentage of Participants With CDLQI Score Equal to of 0 or 1 Through Week 52 Among Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score > 1

    CDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on children's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of question 1-10 and ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children.

    Measured: Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52

  20. Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline FDLQI >1

    The FDLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that examined the impact of participant's skin disease on different aspects of their QoL (example: emotional, physical well-being, relationships, social life, leisure activities, burden of care, job/study, housework and expenditure) over the last 1 month, as assessed by a family member/partner. Each item had a four-point response option, where Not at all/Not relevant = 0; A little = 1; Quite a lot = 2; and Very much = 3. The scores of individual items (0-3) were added to give a total scale score that ranged from 0 to 30; a higher score indicated greater impairment of QoL.

    Measured: At Week 16

  21. Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) of 0 or 1 Through Week 52 Among Participants With a Baseline FDLQI >1

    The FDLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that examine the impact of participant's skin disease on different aspects of their QoL (example, emotional, physical well-being, relationships, social life, leisure activities, burden of care, job/study, housework and expenditure) over the last 1 month, as assessed by a family member/partner. Each item had a four-point response option, where Not at all/Not relevant = 0; A little = 1; Quite a lot = 2; and Very much = 3. The scores of individual items (0-3) were added to give a total scale score that ranged from 0 to 30; a higher score indicates greater impairment of QoL.

    Measured: Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52

  22. Part 1: Change From Baseline in FDLQI Score at Week 16

    The FDLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that examined the impact of participant's skin disease on different aspects of their QoL (example, emotional, physical well-being, relationships, social life, leisure activities, burden of care, job/study, housework and expenditure) over the last 1 month, as assessed by a family member/partner. Each item had a four-point response option, where Not at all/Not relevant = 0; A little = 1; Quite a lot = 2; and Very much = 3. The scores of individual items (0-3) are added to give a total scale score that ranged from 0 to 30; a higher score indicates greater impairment of QoL.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  23. Part 2: Change From Baseline in FDLQI Score Through Week 52

    The FDLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that examine the impact of participant's skin disease on different aspects of their QoL (example, emotional, physical well-being, relationships, social life, leisure activities, burden of care, job/study, housework and expenditure) over the last 1 month, as assessed by a family member/partner. Each item had a four-point response option, where Not at all/Not relevant = 0; A little = 1; Quite a lot = 2; and Very much = 3. The scores of individual items (0-3) are added to give a total scale score that ranged from 0 to 30; a higher score indicated greater impairment of QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 28, 36, and 52

  24. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis Skin Involvement at Week 16

    Change from baseline in percent body surface area with psoriasis skin involvement was reported. BSA as physical measure to define disease severity is to determine how much of the BSA is affected by psoriasis. Involved BSA is calculated by using the palm of the participant's hand as equivalent to 1% of the BSA (rule of palm). Psoriasis affected BSA under 5% suggests mild psoriasis, a BSA of 5% to 10% is considered moderate, and an involved BSA of over 10% indicates severe psoriasis.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  25. Parts 2: Change From Baseline in BSA With Psoriasis Skin Involvement Over Time Through Week 52

    Change from baseline in percent body surface area with psoriasis skin involvement was reported. BSA as physical measure to define disease severity is to determine how much of the BSA is affected by psoriasis. Involved BSA is calculated by using the palm of the participant's hand as equivalent to 1% of the BSA (rule of palm). Psoriasis affected BSA under 5% suggests mild psoriasis, a BSA of 5% to 10% is considered moderate, and an involved BSA of over 10% indicates severe psoriasis.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52

  26. LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) Over Time

    Measured: From Week 52 to End of the study (EOS) (December 2026)

  27. LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of (Cleared [0], Cleared [0] or Minimal [1], Mild or Better [<=2] Over Time

    Measured: From Week 52 to EOS (December 2026)

  28. LTE Phase: Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Over Time

    Measured: From Week 52 to EOS (December 2026)

  29. LTE Phase: Change From Baseline in BSA With Psoriasis Skin Involvement Over Time

    Measured: From Week 52 to EOS (Dec 2026)

  30. LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90,and 100) at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment Among Guselkumab Participants Who Were Withdrawn From Guselkumab at Week 16 and Retreated Upon Loss of Response or at Week 52

    Measured: Week 60 and Week 84

  31. LTE Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of (Cleared [0], Cleared [0] or Minimal [1], Mild or Better [<=2] at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment

    Measured: Week 60 and Week 84

  32. LTE Phase: Percent Improvement in PASI Responses (PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100) at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment Among Guselkumab Subjects Who Were Withdrawn From Guselkumab at Week 16 and Subsequently Retreated Upon Loss of Response or at Week 52

    Measured: Week 60 and Week 84

  33. LTE Phase: Change From Baseline in BSA at Weeks 60 and 84 After Retreatment Among Guselkumab Subjects Who Were Withdrawn From Guselkumab at Week 16 and Subsequently Retreated Upon Loss of Response or at Week 52

    Measured: Week 60 and Week 84

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2018
  2. Study start11 Jul 2018
  3. Primary completion19 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion18 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03451851
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR108452
Other IDs
CNTO1959PSO3011, 2023-503378-19-00, 2023
Acronym
PROTOSTAR
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
26 Feb 2018
Last updated
28 Sep 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Crauwels H, Ringold S, Howard S, Van Hartingsveldt B, Smith V, Jett M, Baguet T, Adamson E, Chakravarty SD, Leu JH. Extrapolating Guselkumab Efficacy to Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis from Adult Psoriatic Arthritis and Adult and Pediatric Psoriasis Data. Paediatr Drugs. 2026 Jan;28(1):69-81. doi: 10.1007/s40272-025-00725-2. Epub 2025 Oct 28.

    PubMed 41152645
  • Prajapati VH, Seyger MMB, Wilsmann-Theis D, Szakos E, Kaszuba A, van Hartingsveldt B, Jett M, Jiang G, Li S, Sinha V, Crauwels H, DeKlotz CMC, Paller AS. Guselkumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in paediatric patients: results of the phase III randomized placebo-controlled PROTOSTAR study. Br J Dermatol. 2025 Mar 18;192(4):618-628. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae502.

    PubMed 39708367

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab and Etanercept in people with Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 39 sites in 9 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 39 sites in United States, Germany, Italy, Hungary, Australia and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 (time frame: At Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03451851, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in