Aortic Valve DiseaseIRIS AVRNCT03453567
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Aortic Valve Replacement in Routine Clinical Practice
An observational study of Aortic Valve Disease and Aortic Valve Stenosis, run by Seung-Jung Park at 3 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
This study evaluated effectiveness and safety of aortic valve replacement in real-world clinical practice. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- Valve Replacement
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 900 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 10 May 2018to 15 Dec 2030
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with aortic valve replacement
Who may be able to join
- Age 19 and more
- Patient with aortic valve replacement
Who cannot join
- Combined with mitral stenosis requiring surgery or aorta stenosis
- Acute bacterial endocarditis within 1 month of valve replacement
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
South Korea3 sites
Sejong Hospital
Bucheon-si
Asan Medical Center
Seoul
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Yangsan
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Aortic Valve Replacement in Routine Clinical Practice; A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study
This study evaluated effectiveness and safety of aortic valve replacement in real-world clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
- Being tested
- Valve Replacement
- Keywords
- TAVR, SAVR, TAVI, Conventional AVR, Sutureless AVR
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Valve ReplacementProcedure or surgery
Aortic valve replacement
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TAVR | Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Receives: Procedure: Valve Replacement | |
| Sutureless AVR | Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement Receives: Procedure: Valve Replacement | |
| Conventional AVR | Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement Receives: Procedure: Valve Replacement |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
All-cause death
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (14)
Cardiovascular mortality
- Death due to proximate cardiac cause B. Death caused by noncoronary vascular condition C. All procedure-related/surgery-related death D. All valve-related death E. Sudden or unwitnessed death F. Death of unknown cause
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Measured: 5 years
Myocardial infarction
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Measured: 5 years
All stroke and transient ischemic attack
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Measured: 5 years
Bleeding
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Measured: 5 years
Access site complication
Operation site complication Vascular access site and access-related complication
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Measured: 5 years
Acute kidney injury
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Measured: 5 years
Permanent pacemaker insertion
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Measured: 5 years
TAVR-related complication
- Conversion to open surgery B. Coronary obstruction C. Mitral valve apparatus damage or dysfunction D. Cardiac tamponade E. Endocarditis F. Valve thrombosis G. Valve malpositioning H. TAV-in-TAV deployment
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Measured: 5 years
Prosthetic valve dysfunction
- Prosthetic aortic valve stenosis B. Prosthesis-patient mismatch C. Prosthetic aortic valve regurgitation
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Measured: 5 years
Composite event
- Device success B. Early safety (30 days)
- Death, stroke, life-threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury, coronary stenosis requiring intervention, significant vascular complication, valve dysfunction requiring intervention C. Clinical efficacy (30 days)
- Death, stroke, deteriorating heart failure or valve function requiring hospitalization, NYHA III or IV dyspnea, valve dysfunction
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Measured: 5 years
Structural valve deterioration
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Measured: 5 years
NYHA class
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification
Measured: 30 days and 1 year
The change of valve area
Aortic valve area measured by echocardiography (mm2)
Measured: 30 days and 1 year
New onset atrial fibrillation
Measured: 30 days and 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Mar 2018
- Study start10 May 2018
- Primary completion15 Jun 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Dec 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Aortic Valve DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seung-Jung Park
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Seung-Jung Park, Asan Medical Center
- Investigators
- Suk-Jung Choo, MD, Principal investigator, Asan Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03453567
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AMCCV2018-04
- Acronym
- IRIS AVR
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 2 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Aortic Valve Replacement in Routine Clinical Practice; A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03453567
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRIS AVR / AMCCV2018-04
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
- Keywords
- TAVR, SAVR, TAVI, Conventional AVR, Sutureless AVR
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seung-Jung ParkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea
- Study start
- 10 May 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluated effectiveness and safety of aortic valve replacement in real-world clinical practice.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TAVR | – | Procedure: Valve ReplacementTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
| Sutureless AVR | – | Procedure: Valve ReplacementSutureless Aortic Valve Replacement |
| Conventional AVR | – | Procedure: Valve ReplacementConventional Aortic Valve Replacement |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with aortic valve replacement
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age 19 and more
- Patient with aortic valve replacement
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Combined with mitral stenosis requiring surgery or aorta stenosis
- Acute bacterial endocarditis within 1 month of valve replacement
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Valve ReplacementAortic valve replacement | Procedure or surgery | Conventional AVR, Sutureless AVR, TAVR |
Primary outcome
All-cause death
Time frame: 1 year
14 secondary outcomes
Cardiovascular mortality
Time frame: 5 years
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: 5 years
All stroke and transient ischemic attack
Time frame: 5 years
Bleeding
Time frame: 5 years
Access site complication
Time frame: 5 years
Acute kidney injury
Time frame: 5 years
Permanent pacemaker insertion
Time frame: 5 years
TAVR-related complication
Time frame: 5 years
Prosthetic valve dysfunction
Time frame: 5 years
Composite event
Time frame: 5 years
Structural valve deterioration
Time frame: 5 years
NYHA class
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
The change of valve area
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
New onset atrial fibrillation
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Aortic Valve Disease
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Intravascular Lithotripsy in High Risk Calcified Iliac Anatomy for Transfemoral TAVR
Iliac Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
NHLBI SESAME (SEptal Scoring Along Midline Endocardium) Multi-Center Prospective Study Using Improvised Off-Label Devices
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction
Recruiting
Exercise and Diet Supplements for Older Patients Undergoing TAVI: the IRON-TAVI Trial
Aortic Stenosis Disease, Aortic Stenosis Symptomatic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Suk-Jung Choo, MD principal investigator
Asan Medical Center
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Aortic Valve Disease and Aortic Valve Stenosis, run by Seung-Jung Park at 3 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
All-cause death (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jan 2026.