AzTrials
AzTrials

Motor ActivityNCT03454061

Effects of a Physical Education Programme in Preschool Children

A study testing physical activity in people with Motor Activity and Child Development, run by University of Palermo.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Unlike other European countries, Italian kindergartens do not include the physical education teacher in the school organic personnel. This is frequently associated with the lack of opportunities to perform physical education by preschool children. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 67 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Motor Activity, Child Development
What is being tested?
physical activity
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
119 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2015to Jun 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 67 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • preschool children

Who cannot join

  • Age < 40 months
  • Age > 67 months

About this study

Official title: The Development of Motor Skills by a Physical Education Programme in Preschool Children: a Preschool-based Controlled Trial

Unlike other European countries, Italian kindergartens do not include the physical education teacher in the school organic personnel. This is frequently associated with the lack of opportunities to perform physical education by preschool children. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of a specific 16-week-long physical education programme (PEP) of 16-week length on the development of locomotor and object control skills in preschool children.

Read the detailed description

We conducted a school-based non-randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a specific 16-week-long physical education program (PEP) on the quotient of gross motor development (QGMD) in preschool children. This study involved 119 children who were clustered in a control group (CG, n= 29, age: 52.1±8.65 months; height: 1.1±0.07 m, body weight: 19.2±5.55 Kg, BMI: 16.9±3.16) and an intervention group (IG, n= 90, age: 57.4±9.42 months; height: 1.1±0.06 m, body weight: 19.3±3.65 Kg, BMI: 16±1.75). Participants were assessed for locomotor ability and object control skills using the Italian version of gross motor development test, before and after the experimental period.

Being tested
physical activity
Keywords
sport, physical activity, education, fundamental motor skills, childhood, exercise, health, training, intervention, gross motor development
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03454061
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalPhysical activity intervention
Receives: Other: physical activity
ControlNo interventionKeep usual activities in kindergarten

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quotient of gross motor development change

    Quotient of gross motor development

    Measured: Change from Baseline at 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. BMI

    Body mass index

    Measured: Change from Baseline at 16 weeks

  2. Weight

    Weight

    Measured: Change from Baseline at 16 weeks

  3. Height

    Height

    Measured: Change from Baseline at 16 weeks

  4. Object control skills change

    Object control

    Measured: Change from Baseline at 16 weeks

  5. Locomotion skills change

    locomotion

    Measured: Change from Baseline at 16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Mar 2018
  2. Study startDec 2015
  3. Primary completion31 May 2016
  4. Study completionJun 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
119 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03454061
Sponsor's protocol ID
TH Project
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
7 Feb 2018
Last updated
5 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Tabacchi G, Battaglia G, Alesi M, Paoli A, Palma A, Bellafiore M. Food literacy predictors and associations with physical and emergent literacy in pre-schoolers: results from the Training-to-Health Project. Public Health Nutr. 2020 Feb;23(2):356-365. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002404. Epub 2019 Sep 2.

    PubMed 31474231

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing physical activity in people with Motor Activity and Child Development, run by University of Palermo.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quotient of gross motor development change (time frame: Change from Baseline at 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03454061, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in