WrinkleNCT03454672
A Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Tixel Device, (Fractional Peri-orbital Wrinkles Treatment ) Compared With Laser
A study testing Tixel and Laser in people with Wrinkle, run by Novoxel Ltd. at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This study is designed to explore the safety and the effectiveness of the Tixel device. This device performs fractional treatment of the skin by applying thermal (heat) energy to the skin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Wrinkle
- What is being tested?
- Tixel and Laser
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 12 Mar 2018to 4 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female 40-70 years old diagnosed with clinically evident fine (mild) to moderate depth periorbital wrinkling
- Willingness and ability to comply with all required study activities and protocol requirements.
- The subject is able to provide written informed consent and perform the study's activities according to HIPAA guidelines and/or Israeli law, depending on each specific study site.
Who cannot join
- The subject may not undergo treatment by the Tixel or comparator device according to the device's contra-indications for use, as defined in the User Manual and in the Instructions for Use and by any other labeling of the device.
- Female subjects who are pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, or have given birth less than 3 months ago or are lactating.
- Subjects with significant exposure to critical amounts of ultraviolet light (Sun tan).
- Subjects who have had the following treatments:
- a prior cosmetic procedure to improve facial rhytides (i.e., rhytidectomy, periorbital or eyelid/eyebrow surgery, brow lift, CO2/Erbium/similar laser/fractional resurfacing, radiofrequency treatment) within 12 months
- prior facial treatments with laser, surgical, chemical or light based facial treatments within the previous 6 months, such as for botulinum toxin injections, retinoid, microdermabrasion or prescription level glycolic acid treatments
Show all 29Show fewer
- Injectable filler in area to be treated within 9 months of investigation.
- permanent facial implant
- Any subject who have visible scars that may affect evaluation of response and/or quality of photography.
- Subjects with any type of active cut, wound, inflammation, lesion (benign, premalignant or malignant) or active bacterial, viral, fungal, or herpetic infection on the skin on the designated treatment sites or in close proximity to it.
- Existing or history of the following (when discussing skin conditions, refers only to the periorbital sites):
- skin malignancy, or any diagnosis of suspected malignancy
- Collagen or vascular or bleeding disease
- Immunosuppression or autoimmune disease
- Erythema with or without blistering
- History of post inflammatory hyperpigmentation.
- Active Acne Vulgaris, Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV-1), or any existing skin condition/disease that in the investigator's opinion would interfere with the evaluation of the safety of the study treatment.
- Any skin pathology which can induce bullous lesions, urticaria, or demonstrate a Koebner phenomenon (psoriasis, lichen planus, etc.).
- Any disease that inhibits pain sensation
- History of keloid formation, or hypertrophic scarring
- Conditions affecting healing rate (i.e. diabetes mellitus I or II, vascular condition, etc.)
- neuromuscular disorders
- Subjects who have used, within 30 days, any medication that can cause dermal hypersensitivity or affect skin characteristics (i.e. topically applied Retinoids, Hydroquinone, Chemical peel of any strength: glycolic acid, lactic acid, salicylic acid)
- Subjects who have used, systemic treatment which may induce dyspigmentation, such as amiodarone, clofazinmine, minocycline or chloroquine.
- Subjects currently taking or have taken an oral retinoid in the past six months (risk of scarring with therapy); Subjects currently taking long-term oral steroid treatment (causing fragility of the skin, risk of hematoma and bullae formation); Subjects taking Isotretinoin (Accutane or Roaccutan) within past 12 months.
- Concurrent therapy that, in the principal investigator's opinion, would interfere with the evaluation of the safety or efficacy of the study treatment.
- Subjects who anticipate the need for surgery or overnight hospitalization during the study.
- Enrollment in any active study involving the use of investigational devices or drugs.
- Any other cause per the principal investigator's discretion.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
United States1 site
New York Laser & Skin Care
New York, New York, 10028
Israel1 site
Dr. Artzi Skin Center Clinic - Linked to Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 6937947
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Double Arm, Controlled Study With Blinded Assessment to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Tixel Fractional System in the Treatment of Periorbital Wrinkles in Comparison With Fractional Laser
This study is designed to explore the safety and the effectiveness of the Tixel device. This device performs fractional treatment of the skin by applying thermal (heat) energy to the skin. The study shall compare the safety and the effectiveness of the Tixel with the safety and the effectiveness of a laser device which is currently cleared for marketing in the US.
- Conditions
- Wrinkle
- Being tested
- Tixel, Laser
- Keywords
- periorbital, wrinkles, double-arm, Tixel, Laser, controlled, randomized, double, arm, fractional, resurfacing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TixelDevice
Also called Fractional
Tixel treatment. Between 3-5 treatment sessions according to investigator's review of subject response.
LaserDevice
Also called Fractional
Tixel treatment. Between 3-5 treatment sessions according to investigator's review of subject response.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tixel | Experimental | Tixel Treatment. Receives: Device: Tixel |
| Laser | Active comparator | Laser Treatment. Receives: Device: Laser |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change by Blinded Assessor Evaluation by Fitzpatrick Classification of Facial Wrinkling (FWCS) Scale
The FWCS shall be assessed and quantified by 3 blinded assessors comparing baseline visit to +42 weeks visit.
Measured: baseline, 42 Weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Mean Change of Subject Experience as Measured by Subject's Subjective Satisfaction Score
Subjective satisfaction is scored on a scale from 1-5, from excellent (5-very satisfied) to poor (1-poor or not satisfied at all). compring results from baseline to 42 weeks.
total minimum total score - 3, total maximum score - 15
Measured: Treatment 1 (Baseline), Treatment 4 (Week 12), Treatment 5 (Week 16), Follow-up Visit 1 (Week 20), Follow-up Visit 3 (Week 42)
Number of Days Reported by Subject Using Subjective Subject Downtime Assessment
This assessment determines the number of days required for the subject to return to normal, daily activities. This will be assessed at each treatment visit : visit 1 - visit 5.
The downtime assessment was evaluated after each Tixel treatment visit. The therapist asked the subject in the next visit regarding the 3 parameters that relate to the total downtime assessment.
The parameters were:
- Return to work (Days)
- Return to social activities (Days)
- Scabs (Days)
The results for subjective Downtime assessments were grouped by two categories:
- More than 2 days vs. less or equal to 2 days for Return to work, Return to social activities, Redness, Edema, and Scabs.
- More than 4 hours vs. less or equal to 4 hours for sensation of heat.
Measured: visit 1 - visit 5
Pain Level as Measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale
Secondary Safety- VAS is scored on a scale from 0-10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worst pain. This will be assessed at each treatment over 8 weeks to 16 weeks (Depending on number of Treatments given).
Measured: treatment 1 - treatment 5
Number on End-User Experience Scale
The scores were converted to the same scale (a minimal score of 10 and a maximal score of 100 ) for both treatments, where a score of 10 is considered the wors outcome, and a score of 100 is considered the better outcome. For ResurFX, the maximal score is 45 therefore, the transformed score= total score *45 /100; for Tixel the maximal score is 50 therefore the transformed score =*50/100.
Measured: After performing 5 treatments with each device. After performing between 20 or 30 treatments with each device. After completing all the required treatments in the investigator's study site with both devices.
Mean Score Performance as Measured by the Fitzpatrick Classification of Facial Wrinkling (FWCS)
The FWCS shall be assessed and quantified by the handling physician at study visits 1-8. The FWCS is classified as I-III, where I indicated mild/fine wrinkles and III indicates moderate wrinkles. (baseline to 42 weeks)
Measured: baseline, 42 Weeks
Mean Improvement Performance as Measured by Improvement Global Assessment
Improvement Global Assessment is scored on a scale from 1-4, with 1 indicating a poor response and 4 indicating an excellent response. This will be assessed at study visits 2-8. (from week 4- week 42)
Measured: visit 2, 3, 4, follow up 1, 2, 3
Mean Score of Performance as Measured by 5-point Wrinkle Assessment Scale (WAS)
The 5-point WAS is scored on a scale from 0-4, with 0 indicating no visible wrinkles and 4 indicating very deep wrinkles. This will be assessed at study visits 1-8. (baseline to 42 weeks)
Measured: 42 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Mar 2018
- Study start12 Mar 2018
- Primary completion4 Sep 2020
- Study completion4 Sep 2020
Why it stopped: Delay in recruitment as per last protocol amendment due to Covid-19
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for WrinkleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The subjects will be randomly allocated to two equally sized groups, one shall be treated by the Tixel, and the other shall be treated by the laser comparator.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novoxel Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Arielle NB Kauvar, M.D, Principal investigator, New York Laser & Skin Care ClinicSharon Naim, B.Sc,, Study director, Novoxel Ltd.Rafi Carasso, M.D, Principal investigator, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03454672
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLN-0460
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized, Double Arm, Controlled Study With Blinded Assessment to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Tixel Fractional System in the Treatment of Periorbital Wrinkles in Comparison With Fractional Laser
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03454672
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CLN-0460
- Conditions
- Wrinkle
- Keywords
- periorbital, wrinkles, double-arm, Tixel, Laser, controlled, randomized, double
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Delay in recruitment as per last protocol amendment due to Covid-19
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novoxel Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 12 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Jun 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to explore the safety and the effectiveness of the Tixel device. This device performs fractional treatment of the skin by applying thermal (heat) energy to the skin. The study shall compare the safety and the effectiveness of the Tixel with the safety and the effectiveness of a laser device which is currently cleared for marketing in the US.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The subjects will be randomly allocated to two equally sized groups, one shall be treated by the Tixel, and the other shall be treated by the laser comparator.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tixel | Experimental | Device: TixelTixel Treatment. |
| Laser | Active comparator | Device: LaserLaser Treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male or female 40-70 years old diagnosed with clinically evident fine (mild) to moderate depth periorbital wrinkling
- Willingness and ability to comply with all required study activities and protocol requirements.
- The subject is able to provide written informed consent and perform the study's activities according to HIPAA guidelines and/or Israeli law, depending on each specific study site.
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- The subject may not undergo treatment by the Tixel or comparator device according to the device's contra-indications for use, as defined in the User Manual and in the Instructions for Use and by any other labeling of the device.
- Female subjects who are pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, or have given birth less than 3 months ago or are lactating.
- Subjects with significant exposure to critical amounts of ultraviolet light (Sun tan).
- Subjects who have had the following treatments:
- Any subject who have visible scars that may affect evaluation of response and/or quality of photography.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TixelAlso: FractionalTixel treatment. Between 3-5 treatment sessions according to investigator's review of subject response. | Device | Tixel |
| LaserAlso: FractionalTixel treatment. Between 3-5 treatment sessions according to investigator's review of subject response. | Device | Laser |
Primary outcome
Mean Change by Blinded Assessor Evaluation by Fitzpatrick Classification of Facial Wrinkling (FWCS) Scale
Time frame: baseline, 42 Weeks
The FWCS shall be assessed and quantified by 3 blinded assessors comparing baseline visit to +42 weeks visit.
7 secondary outcomes
Mean Change of Subject Experience as Measured by Subject's Subjective Satisfaction Score
Time frame: Treatment 1 (Baseline), Treatment 4 (Week 12), Treatment 5 (Week 16), Follow-up Visit 1 (Week 20), Follow-up Visit 3 (Week 42)
Number of Days Reported by Subject Using Subjective Subject Downtime Assessment
Time frame: visit 1 - visit 5
Pain Level as Measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale
Time frame: treatment 1 - treatment 5
Number on End-User Experience Scale
Time frame: After performing 5 treatments with each device. After performing between 20 or 30 treatments with each device. After completing all the required treatments in the investigator's study site with both devices.
Mean Score Performance as Measured by the Fitzpatrick Classification of Facial Wrinkling (FWCS)
Time frame: baseline, 42 Weeks
Mean Improvement Performance as Measured by Improvement Global Assessment
Time frame: visit 2, 3, 4, follow up 1, 2, 3
Mean Score of Performance as Measured by 5-point Wrinkle Assessment Scale (WAS)
Time frame: 42 Weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Aug 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Wrinkle
Active, not recruiting
A Prospective Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Thermage® FLX Radiofrequency Treatment
Wrinkle, Lax Skin
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Can TrenibotulinumtoxinE Reverse OnabotulinumtoxinA Effect in Treating Lateral Canthal Lines?
Wrinkles and Rhytides
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Candela Technology
Hair Reduction, Tattoo Removal
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the Profound Matrix System
Skin Laxity, Wrinkle
Not yet recruiting
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of GP0112 for Cheek Augmentation and Correction of Midface Contour Deficiencies
Cheek Wrinkles, Midface Contour Deficiencies
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arielle NB Kauvar, M.D principal investigator
New York Laser & Skin Care Clinic
Sharon Naim, B.Sc, study director
Novoxel Ltd.
Rafi Carasso, M.D principal investigator
Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tixel and Laser in people with Wrinkle, run by Novoxel Ltd. at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States, Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change by Blinded Assessor Evaluation by Fitzpatrick Classification of Facial Wrinkling (FWCS) Scale (time frame: baseline, 42 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2024.