AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With (Acute) ExacerbationNCT03458364

Comparison of HFNC With NIV in Weaning COPD

A study testing High flow nasal cannula and Noninvasive ventilation in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With (Acute) Exacerbation, run by Jie Li at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been shown to improve oxygenation and facilitate weaning in hypoxemia patients. Some clinical studies show the benefits of using HFNC in COPD patients, including reducing dead space and work of breathing. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 90 years
What is being tested?
High flow nasal cannula and Noninvasive ventilation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
42 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2017to 30 Jul 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Intubated patients with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation
  • Meeting extubation criteria (Pulmonary infection control window)
  • Age > 21years and < 90 years

Who cannot join

  • Tracheotomy
  • Combined with severe dysfunction of other organs, including heart, brain, liver, and renal failure;
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Contraindication to NIV: cannot use mask, such as facial injury, burns or deformities; cannot cooperate with NIV such as delirium; copious secretions with weak cough ability; gastric over distention, and vomiting;
  • Contraindication to HFNC: rhinitis, nasal congestion, deformities or blockage.
  • Weak cough ability with copious secretions
  • Refuse to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Binzhou Medical University Hospital

    Yantai, Shandong, 264003

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula With Noninvasive Ventilation in Facilitating Weaning Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease From Invasive Ventilation: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been shown to improve oxygenation and facilitate weaning in hypoxemia patients. Some clinical studies show the benefits of using HFNC in COPD patients, including reducing dead space and work of breathing. However, no clinical study has been to investigate the value of HFNC in weaning COPD patients from invasive ventilation. Thus, we proposed a randomized controlled trial to compare the use of HFNC and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in weaning COPD.

Read the detailed description

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) provides high concentration oxygen in a high flow, which exceeds patient's inspiratory flow demand, to improve oxygenation. In a recent meta-analysis of seven trials with 1771 patients, HFNC was shown to improve oxygenation and avoid intubation in patients with severe hypoxemia. The high velocity of the gas can rinse the dead space of the upper airway and reduce CO2 rebreathing, reduce COPD patients' work of breathing and improve the dynamic compliance of respiratory system.

Thus, we proposed a randomized controlled trial to investigate the value of high flow nasal cannula in weaning AECOPD patients from invasive ventilation, with comparison of noninvasive ventilation.

Being tested
High flow nasal cannula, Noninvasive ventilation
Keywords
Weaning; Noninvasive ventilation; High flow nasal cannula

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High flow nasal cannulaDevice

    Also called High flow high humidity nasal cannula

    High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is a recent technique delivering a high flow of heated and humidified gas. HFNC is simpler to use and apply than noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and appears to be a good alternative treatment for hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF). HFNC is better tolerated than NIV, delivers high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), generates a low level of positive pressure and provides washout of dead space in the upper airways, thereby improving mechanical pulmonary properties and unloading inspiratory muscles during ARF.

  • Noninvasive ventilationDevice

    Also called Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation; Noninvasive mechanical ventilation

    Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the use of airway support administered through a face (nasal) mask instead of an endotracheal tube. Inhaled gases are given with positive end-expiratory pressure often with pressure support or with assist control ventilation at a set tidal volume and rate. Numerous studies have shown this technique to be as effective as, and better tolerated than, intubation and mechanical ventilation in patients with exacerbations of COPD

Study groups in NCT03458364
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High flow nasal cannulaExperimentalHigh flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a type of oxygen device, which provides high concentration oxygen in a high flow, which exceeds patient's inspiratory flow demand, to improve oxygenation.
Receives: Device: High flow nasal cannula
Noninvasive ventilationActive comparatorNon-invasive ventilation (NIV) refers to the provision of ventilatory support through the patient's upper airway using a mask. This technique is distinguished from those which bypass the upper airway with a tracheal tube, laryngeal mask, or tracheostomy and are therefore considered invasive.
Receives: Device: Noninvasive ventilation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. pH

    pH

    Measured: change from the baseline pH within 48 hours

  2. PaCO2

    PaCO2 in mmHg

    Measured: change from the baseline PaCO2 within 48 hours

  3. PaO2/FiO2

    partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood/ fraction of inspired oxygen in mmHg

    Measured: change from the baseline PaO2/FiO2 within 48 hours

  4. HR

    Heart Rate in beats per minute

    Measured: change from the baseline HR within 48 hours

  5. MAP

    mean arterial pressure in mmHg

    Measured: change from the baseline MAP within 48 hours

  6. RR

    respiratory rate in breaths per minute

    Measured: change from the baseline RR within 48 hours

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. duration of respiratory support

    hours of ventilator use

    Measured: 28 days

  2. Length of ICU stay

    Days of stay in ICU

    Measured: 28 days

  3. Mortality

    Measured: 28 days

  4. the patients' comfort score

    comfort score of using high flow nasal cannula or noninvasive ventilator, ranging from 1 to 10. 1 means very comfortable, 10 means very uncomfortable.

    Measured: 48 hours

  5. incidence of nasal trauma

    Measured: 28 days

  6. incidence of barotrauma

    Measured: 28 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2018
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
42 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03458364
Sponsor's protocol ID
HFNC-002
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
2 Mar 2018
Last updated
22 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Zhu Y, Yin H, Zhang R, Wei J. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Dec 13;17(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0525-0.

    PubMed 29237436
  • Mauri T, Turrini C, Eronia N, Grasselli G, Volta CA, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 1;195(9):1207-1215. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201605-0916OC.

    PubMed 27997805
  • Lv Y, Lv Q, Lv Q, Lai T. Pulmonary infection control window as a switching point for sequential ventilation in the treatment of COPD patients: a meta-analysis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Apr 24;12:1255-1267. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S126736. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28490869
  • Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, Hess D, Hill NS, Nava S, Navalesi P Members Of The Steering Committee, Antonelli M, Brozek J, Conti G, Ferrer M, Guntupalli K, Jaber S, Keenan S, Mancebo J, Mehta S, Raoof S Members Of The Task Force. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2017 Aug 31;50(2):1602426. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02426-2016. Print 2017 Aug.

    PubMed 28860265

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing High flow nasal cannula and Noninvasive ventilation in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With (Acute) Exacerbation, run by Jie Li at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

pH (time frame: change from the baseline pH within 48 hours). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03458364, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in