AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic Valve StenosisPEA-ValveNCT03458806

Phono- and Electrocardiogram Assisted Detection of Valvular Disease

An observational study of Aortic Valve Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The diagnosis of valvular heart disease (VHD), or its absence, invariably requires cardiac imaging. A familiar and inexpensive tool to assist in the diagnosis or exclusion of significant VHD could both expedite access to life-saving therapies and reduce the need for costly testing. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
AS Algorithm 1, AS Algorithm 2 and MR Algorithm 1
How many people
156 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
22 Feb 2018to 11 Nov 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults with either moderate-to-severe to severe AS or moderate-to-severe to severe MR (cases) and adults with structurally normal hearts with minimal VHD (controls). In practice, the accessible population will be adults meeting the entry criteria undergoing clinical echocardiograms at the UCSF echocardiography laboratory amenable to participation.

Who may be able to join

  • Able to provide consent
  • Undergoing a complete echocardiogram

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to participate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94143

Other trials in United States

About this study

The diagnosis of valvular heart disease (VHD), or its absence, invariably requires cardiac imaging. A familiar and inexpensive tool to assist in the diagnosis or exclusion of significant VHD could both expedite access to life-saving therapies and reduce the need for costly testing. The FDA-approved Eko Duo device consists of a digital stethoscope and a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), which wirelessly pairs with the Eko Mobile application to allow for simultaneous recording and visualization of phono- and electrocardiograms. These features uniquely situate this device to accumulate large sets of auscultatory data on patients both with and without VHD.

In this study, the investigators seek to develop an automated system to identify VHD by phono- and electrocardiogram. Specifically, the investigators will attempt to develop machine learning algorithms to learn the phonocardiograms of patients with clinically important aortic stenosis (AS) or mitral regurgitation (MR), and then task the algorithms to identify subjects with clinically important VHD, as identified by a gold standard, from naïve phonocardiograms. The investigators anticipate that the study has the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis of VHD by providing a more accurate substitute to traditional auscultation.

Read the detailed description

Phono- and Electrocardiogram Assisted Detection of Valvular Disease (PEA-Valve Study)

Specific aim(s) Aim 1: Can a machine learning algorithm derived from simultaneous phono- and electrocardiogram recordings reliably diagnose clinically important aortic stenosis?

Aim 2: Can a machine learning algorithm derived from simultaneous phono- and electrocardiogram recordings reliably diagnose clinically important mitral regurgitation?

Significance Valvular heart disease (VHD) is a common global health problem, with population-based studies showing a prevalence of 10% for aortic stenosis (AS) and 20% for mitral regurgitation (MR). New surgical and interventional advances allow for the treatment of patients at an older age or whose risk of intervention would previously have been untenable. Given that the incidence of both MR and AS increases with increasing age, there is a growing need to identify these conditions so as to offer disease-altering therapies.

In current clinical practice, the diagnosis of VHD relies heavily on echocardiography. This, in turn, requires both a referral from a provider with a clinical suspicion for VHD, typically from an abnormality on auscultation, as well as access to the echocardiogram itself. MR and AS both result in reliably reproducible auscultatory findings: holosystolic and systolic crescendo-decrescendo murmurs, respectively. Yet despite this, auscultation as a diagnostic tool is notoriously poor: its accuracy to detect MR and AS ranges only from 5-40%. These factors all lead to concerns for underdiagnosis of these increasingly treatable conditions.

Here, the investigators will address the needs for both greater access to and improved diagnostic accuracy of testing for VHD. The investigators will utilize a combination of phonocardiogram (PCG) and single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings, synced in real-time to a secure cloud-based server, using the Eko Duo electronic stethoscope. With these data, the investigators will develop and validate a machine learning algorithm to diagnose clinically important AS or MR. As the Eko Duo is essentially similar to a traditional stethoscope, an iconic tool widely accepted by patients and providers alike, its use to drive an automated detection algorithm is both feasible and attractive as a substitute for traditional auscultation. Furthermore, by shifting the burden of test interpretation away from the clinician and onto the algorithm, the investigators hypothesize that this will improve overall diagnostic accuracy.

Methods Overview of design: Cross-sectional study of all subjects undergoing clinical echocardiograms at the UCSF adult echocardiography laboratory

Study subjects Overview: The investigators will enroll adult subjects undergoing clinical echocardiograms at the UCSF Parnassus campus. These subjects will be grouped into derivation and validation cohorts sequentially, stratified by case status, so as to reach the expected sample size. Such grouping will occur after subject enrollment and data collection.

Target Population: Adults with either moderate-to-severe to severe AS or moderate-to-severe to severe MR (cases) and adults with structurally normal hearts with minimal VHD (controls). In a more-stringent, parallel analysis, a target population of controls will be defined as having any degree of AS or MR less than moderate-to-severe.

Accessible Population: Adults meeting the entry criteria undergoing clinical echocardiograms at the UCSF echocardiography laboratory amenable to participation.

Sampling Scheme: The investigators will approach subjects presenting to the adult echocardiography laboratory at UCSF Parnassus consecutively. Additionally, the investigators will pre-screen subjects for a high likelihood of having AS or MR (based on indication for study and prior diagnoses in the APEX medical record) and selectively target their enrollment during situations where the enrollment capacity of the study coordinator is saturated.

Recruitment Strategy: Introduction of study at time of registering for echocardiogram with a brochure or flyer, followed by in-person approaching of potential subjects while awaiting the clinical echocardiogram.

Retention Strategy: None. The investigators will retain a master file of the medical record numbers to identify contact information in the future if deemed necessary.

Measurements Overview: The study will focus on two measurements: 1) the gold standard assessment of VHD by echocardiogram, as reported by the UCSF echocardiography laboratory. 2) 30 second simultaneous PCG and single-lead ECG recordings by the Eko Duo device at each of the four standard cardiac auscultatory positions, with optional additional recordings with the Eko Core device. The study takes advantage of the fact that all clinical echocardiogram reports include these valvular assessments.

Gold Standard: The echocardiogram is accepted as the gold standard for diagnosis of VHD severity by the cardiology community. To minimize the burden on the investigators, as well as reduce costs, the investigators will take advantage of that all clinical echocardiogram reports include assessments of VHD, which will serve as the gold standard. These reports follow American Society for Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines, which allow grading of VHD as follows: none, mild, moderate, or severe. The UCSF echocardiography laboratory includes additional categories of trace, mild-to-moderate, moderate-to-severe, and critical, allowing for interpretations where individual parameters within the study conflict. The primary measurement will be the final conclusion of severity of VHD for MR or AS, as reported by a board-certified cardiologist. The investigators will define "clinically important" VHD as that graded moderate-to-severe or worse, as this would encompass all levels of disease which could require direct intervention. In addition, the investigators will extract the entire echocardiography report, as well as the images of the echocardiogram files, so as to save the data for future use as new research questions arise.

Device Measurements: Recordings of the simultaneous PCG and single-lead ECG will be performed for each subject in a standardized manner. Each subject will undergo 30 second recordings using the Eko Duo device at the four standard auscultation positions. Observers will be trained on the systematic method of obtaining measurements. Time and patient permitting, the investigators will also obtain the same recordings using the Eko Core device, which uses the same software but does not include ECG recording. As the device will allow visualization of the PCG during recording, the observer will get real-time feedback on positioning of the device to maximize the quality of the recording at each position. The investigators will plan for periodic review of recordings to ensure adequate data quality. The investigators anticipate that this flexibility and real-time feedback will improve the generalizability of the use of the device to a real-world (i.e. non-study) clinical situation.

Confounders and Bias: The derivation and validation of the algorithms will occur remotely, after the clinical echocardiogram has been performed, and therefore with no effect on the outcome of the gold standard. The test may be influenced by the presence of other conditions causing systolic murmurs (including VHD other than AS or MR, or congenital heart disease). The investigators will include these measures from the echocardiogram report to compare test performance in those with and without these other conditions.

Statistical issues Null Hypothesis: A machine learning algorithm cannot predict the presence of clinically important AS or MR.

Sample Size Justification:

  • Sensitivity of Algorithm: 90%
  • Specificity of Algorithm: 90%
  • Target Likelihood Ratio (+) of Algorithm [LR(R)]: 9 (derived from Sn / [1 - Sp])
  • Minimum Likelihood Ratio (+) of Algorithm [LR(R)]: 5
  • Confidence Level = 0.95 (alpha = 0.05)
  • Confidence Interval [LR(R)]: 5.120-15.820
  • Sample Size = 110 per group; 330 per cohort (control, AS case, MR case); 660 overall (training and validation cohorts)
  • Summary: Assuming the sensitivity and specificity of the machine learning algorithm for detection of clinically important AS or MR are both 0.9, a total sample size of 660 is not expected to go below the threshold likelihood ratio of 5.0 in the 95% confidence interval in either the derivation or validation cohorts.
  • Justification of Critical Assumptions: The investigators assume that the algorithm can produce a sensitivity and specificity of 90% in detecting aortic stenosis or mitral regurgitation compared to hearts with no valvular disease, based upon prior published reports using neural networks, using sample sizes of under 100 cases. Furthermore, the investigators estimate a minimum likelihood ratio of 5 would be necessary for the test to be clinically useful. While this estimate works well for the validation set, the number needed for the derivation set is less clear; the estimates above are a conservative number. The investigators anticipate training the algorithm after enrollment of every 20 cases using a bootstrapping approach; this will provide interim test characteristics and help determine the true number needed for the derivation set. As this is, in part, a pilot study, identification of the true sensitivity and specificity of the test is in itself a valuable result.

Analysis approach: The investigators will generate ROC curves (plotting Sn vs. 1-Sp) for algorithm scores for the validation set. Ultimately the investigators will generate 4 curves: two each for MR and AS, using algorithms generated by the primary (defining controls as having no greater than mild VHD) and secondary (defining controls as not having moderate-to-severe or greater VHD) approaches. Additionally, the investigators anticipate performing exploratory, descriptive analyses of the algorithm itself, by identifying clinical correlates to the characteristics most heavily weighted in detecting AS or MR.

Miscellaneous Ethical considerations: No major concerns. Data will be securely stored on HIPAA compliant platforms. The study qualifies as minimal risk by UCSF CHR criteria.

Pretest plans: Prior to study recruitment, study staff will collect data on themselves and providers to test the data collection system. During initial subject recruitment, study staff will review the process after each day to discuss roadblocks or concerns.

Data Management Plan: Data from the study will come from two sources. Reports of echocardiograms, extracted from the electronic medical record (APEX), will be reviewed by study staff to generate the main database of disease characteristics. A master file linking subject identifiers with identifiable information, as well as extracted and de-identified echocardiogram reports and de-identified raw echocardiogram images will be stored on a secure research server used by the Division of Cardiology. Recorded PCG and ECG data (the actual study measurements) will be synced in real-time to a secure, HIPAA-compliant, cloud-based server managed by Eko Devices. At pre-specified times of algorithm training, the machine learning team (coordinated by Eko Devices) will be provided keys to the assignment of subject identifier to VHD category.

Quality control measures: Periodic review of the recorded data will be performed by the study PI to ensure appropriate data quality.

Timetable:

Contract/Logistics Subject Enrollment Algorithm Development Analysis Publication Overall Timetable: 9 Months

Being tested
AS Algorithm 1, AS Algorithm 2, MR Algorithm 1, MR Algorithm 2
Keywords
Auscultation, Phonocardiogram, Machine Learning, Heart Sounds
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Heart Murmurs, Heart Valve Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AS Algorithm 1Diagnostic test

    Machine learning algorithm, generated from ECG and PCG recordings, distinguishing moderate-to-severe or greater aortic stenosis from controls having structurally normal hearts with no greater than mild valvular heart disease at any location.

  • AS Algorithm 2Diagnostic test

    Machine learning algorithm, generated from ECG and PCG recordings, distinguishing moderate-to-severe or greater aortic stenosis from controls having any findings other than moderate-to-severe or greater aortic stenosis.

  • MR Algorithm 1Diagnostic test

    Machine learning algorithm, generated from ECG and PCG recordings, distinguishing moderate-to-severe or greater mitral regurgitation from controls having structurally normal hearts with no greater than mild valvular heart disease at any location.

  • MR Algorithm 2Diagnostic test

    Machine learning algorithm, generated from ECG and PCG recordings, distinguishing moderate-to-severe or greater mitral regurgitation from controls having any findings other than moderate-to-severe or greater mitral regurgitation.

Study groups in NCT03458806
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlSubjects with echocardiographically confirmed valvular disease of less than moderate-to-severe grading with regards to aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR). Note that within this cohort will be a sub cohort consisting of subjects with structurally normal hearts, with no greater than mild valvular disease of any valve, no prior valvular intervention, and no evidence of congenital heart disease.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: AS Algorithm 2; Diagnostic Test: MR Algorithm 2
AS CaseSubjects with echocardiographically confirmed aortic stenosis (AS) of moderate-to-severe or greater grading.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: AS Algorithm 1; Diagnostic Test: AS Algorithm 2
MR CaseSubjects with echocardiographically confirmed mitral regurgitation (MR) of moderate-to-severe or greater grading.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: MR Algorithm 1; Diagnostic Test: MR Algorithm 2
Control SubgroupSubjects with structurally normal hearts, with no greater than mild valvular disease of any valve, no prior valvular intervention, and no evidence of congenital heart disease.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: AS Algorithm 1; Diagnostic Test: MR Algorithm 1

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Differentiation of clinically significant aortic stenosis from structurally normal hearts

    Identification by the trained machine learning algorithm of clinically important aortic stenosis (defined as moderate-to-severe or greater) from control subjects with structurally normal hearts and no greater than mild valvular heart disease, with comparison to the gold standard echocardiogram interpretation. As our algorithm will provide a continuous "score" to determine the likelihood of disease, the data will primarily come in the form of a receiver operating characteristic curve, for which we will calculate accuracy, specificity, and likelihood ratios at sensitivity cutoffs of 0.9, 0.95, and 0.99.

    Measured: Close of study (after final enrollment of the aortic stenosis validation set), within 1 year.

  2. Differentiation of clinically significant mitral stenosis from structurally normal hearts

    Identification by the trained machine learning algorithm of clinically important mitral regurgitation (defined as moderate-to-severe or greater) from control subjects with structurally normal hearts and no greater than mild valvular heart disease, with comparison to the gold standard echocardiogram interpretation. As our algorithm will provide a continuous "score" to determine the likelihood of disease, the data will primarily come in the form of a receiver operating characteristic curve, for which we will calculate accuracy, specificity, and likelihood ratios at sensitivity cutoffs of 0.9, 0.95, and 0.99..

    Measured: Close of study (after final enrollment of the mitral regurgitation validation set), within 1 year.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Differentiation of clinically significant aortic stenosis from the absence of clinically significant aortic stenosis

    Identification by the trained machine learning algorithm of clinically important aortic stenosis (defined as moderate-to-severe or greater) from controls with less than moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis, with comparison to the gold standard echocardiogram interpretation. As our algorithm will provide a continuous "score" to determine the likelihood of disease, the data will primarily come in the form of a receiver operating characteristic curve, for which we will calculate accuracy, specificity, and likelihood ratios at sensitivity cutoffs of 0.9, 0.95, and 0.99.

    Measured: Close of study (after final enrollment of the aortic stenosis validation set), within 1 year.

  2. Differentiation of clinically significant mitral regurgitation from the absence of clinically significant mitral regurgitation

    Identification by the trained machine learning algorithm of clinically important mitral regurgitation (defined as moderate-to-severe or greater) from controls with less than moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation, with comparison to the gold standard echocardiogram interpretation. As our algorithm will provide a continuous "score" to determine the likelihood of disease, the data will primarily come in the form of a receiver operating characteristic curve, for which we will calculate accuracy, specificity, and likelihood ratios at sensitivity cutoffs of 0.9, 0.95, and 0.99.

    Measured: Close of study (after final enrollment of the mitral regurgitation validation set), within 1 year.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2018
  2. Study start22 Feb 2018
  3. Primary completion11 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion11 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
156 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03458806
Sponsor's protocol ID
17-21881
Acronym
PEA-Valve
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
19 Feb 2018
Last updated
2 Jul 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: We will create several de-identified databases of information and will be open to requests to share data as requested on a case-by-case basis.

Publications

  • Jones EC, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Liu JE, Fishman D, Lee ET, Welty TK, Fabsitz RR, Howard BV. Prevalence and correlates of mitral regurgitation in a population-based sample (the Strong Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 2001 Feb 1;87(3):298-304. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01362-x.

    PubMed 11165964
  • Eveborn GW, Schirmer H, Heggelund G, Lunde P, Rasmussen K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. the Tromso study. Heart. 2013 Mar;99(6):396-400. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302265. Epub 2012 Sep 2.

    PubMed 22942293
  • Faxon DP, Williams DO. Interventional Cardiology: Current Status and Future Directions in Coronary Disease and Valvular Heart Disease. Circulation. 2016 Jun 21;133(25):2697-711. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023551. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27324364
  • Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA, O'Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM 3rd, Thomas JD; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 10;63(22):e57-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536. Epub 2014 Mar 3. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24603191
  • Mangione S, Nieman LZ. Cardiac auscultatory skills of internal medicine and family practice trainees. A comparison of diagnostic proficiency. JAMA. 1997 Sep 3;278(9):717-22.

    PubMed 9286830
  • Mangione S. Cardiac auscultatory skills of physicians-in-training: a comparison of three English-speaking countries. Am J Med. 2001 Feb 15;110(3):210-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00673-2.

    PubMed 11182108
  • Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, Grayburn PA, Hahn RT, Han Y, Hung J, Lang RM, Little SH, Shah DJ, Shernan S, Thavendiranathan P, Thomas JD, Weissman NJ. Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Apr;30(4):303-371. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Mar 14. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28314623
  • Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S, Lancellotti P, LeFevre M, Miller F Jr, Otto CM. Recommendations on the Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Focused Update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Apr;30(4):372-392. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.02.009.

    PubMed 28385280
  • Pretorius E, Cronje ML, Strydom O. Development of a pediatric cardiac computer aided auscultation decision support system. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:6078-82. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627633.

    PubMed 21097128
  • Chorba JS, Shapiro AM, Le L, Maidens J, Prince J, Pham S, Kanzawa MM, Barbosa DN, Currie C, Brooks C, White BE, Huskin A, Paek J, Geocaris J, Elnathan D, Ronquillo R, Kim R, Alam ZH, Mahadevan VS, Fuller SG, Stalker GW, Bravo SA, Jean D, Lee JJ, Gjergjindreaj M, Mihos CG, Forman ST, Venkatraman S, McCarthy PM, Thomas JD. Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Cardiac Murmur Detection via a Digital Stethoscope Platform. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 4;10(9):e019905. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019905. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

    PubMed 33899504

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Aortic Valve Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Differentiation of clinically significant aortic stenosis from structurally normal hearts (time frame: Close of study (after final enrollment of the aortic stenosis validation set), within 1 year.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03458806, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
PEA-Valve Clinical Trial NCT03458806 | AzTrials