AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerMonoFIT+NCT03462992

Peripheral Blood Monocytes as Predictive Marker for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: A Comparative Study of a Stool Based Versus Blood Based Screening Test

An observational study of Colorectal Cancer, run by DNAlytics at 1 site in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this prospective study, the main goal is to evaluate the strength of Monomark -a monocyte-based transcriptomic test combined to a mathematical model- in patients with a positive FIT test. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 56 to 74 years
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
MonoMark
How many people
250 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
11 Dec 2012to 2 May 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 56 to 74 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Currently, a Flemish screening project is ongoing in male and female patients between 56 and 74 years old. If patients have a positive stool test, they are advised to contact their general practitioner for planning of a colonoscopy. The goal is to avoid 400 deaths of colon cancer per year. In 2013, 248.970 patients were invited of which 49% send a stool sample to the lab. Of all the examined tests, 10.1% tested positive. However, only 5 to 10% of patients testing positive with the stool test are diagnosed with cancer. Therefore, our goal is to discriminate with the monomark those patients with a high likelihood of having colon cancer. Patients of this study are patients who took part to this screening campaign and showed positive for the stool test.

Who may be able to join

  • Having participated to the Flemish (Northern Belgium) Colorectal Screening Campaign and, as a result, having a positive stool test (FIT) outcome.

Who cannot join

  • None other than non-fulfillment of the inclusion criterion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • University Hospitals Leuven

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

In this prospective study, the main goal is to evaluate the strength of Monomark -a monocyte-based transcriptomic test combined to a mathematical model- in patients with a positive FIT test. Therefore, in parallel to the routine FIT screening, blood samples will be harvested and the monocyte genetic profile will be determined. This fundamental study, will disclose the diagnostic power of a biomarker panel ("MonoMark") head to head with the well-established FIT diagnostic test, a core prerequisite for the routine use of this test as an alternative and more reliable CRC screening tool.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death (approximately 9% of cancer deaths). In Belgium, a country with a population of 11,2 million people, every year 8600 patients get diagnosed with CRC. The cumulative risk is 5,1% for males and 3,5 % for females. Five-year survival of these patients is around 60%. Most colorectal cancers arise from polyps that progress from dysplasia to cancer. This adenoma - carcinoma sequence approximately takes several years. The slow transition from polyps to cancer allows opportunities to prevent CRC by removing polyps and early cancer. Although colonoscopic screening for CRC is currently the most reliable screening tool, the invasive nature and the incurred cost have hampered the wide application of this procedure. On the other hand, the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and the most recently used fecal immunohistochemical test (FIT) are non-invasive screening tests that can be used prior to colonoscopy. However, they both lack the sensitivity or specificity required for an effective screening. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify specific non-invasive biomarkers for CRC early diagnosis.

Peripheral blood is an easily accessible tissue and therefore suitable for screening of disease biomarkers. Among the cells circulating in peripheral blood, monocytes are an interesting target as they represent a source of macrophages and dendritic cells, contributing to tumor growth, metastasis and angiogenesis as well as anti-tumor immune response.

Investigators from the Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB) have over the years built an international network and team (UZ Leuven (Belgium), Jules Bordet Institute (Belgium), San Filippo Neri Hospital (Italy), University Hospital of Heidelberg (Germany)). With the initial aim to characterize different monocyte/macrophage phenotypes, the outstanding collaboration led to the development of an innovative test for the diagnosis of CRC that combines transcriptomic data with an efficient predictive model, the so-called "Monomark" test. In the Monomark study, VIB defined a genetic signature, which is induced specifically in circulating monocytes at early disease onset by soluble signals derived from transformed colon epithelium (in comparison to benign colon epithelium or other cancer histotypes). This gene signature was validated in a case-control study including 360 samples from the four European oncological centers with outstanding diagnostic accuracy, showing a sensitivity of about 90% and a specificity of about 95% (even when stratifying patients in stage I, II, III and IV) compared to other tests previously described or currently in use in the clinic (6,7). Moreover, preliminary data suggest the test can also detect relapse - an application that is being further developed.

Within this study investigators propose to further develop the Monomark test for the screening application, in order to maximize the interest from potential licensees. Investigators will need to show that the assay is superior to existing assays in casu the FOBT/FIT assays. Therefore, we will compare the sensitivity and specificity of this test head to head to the FIT stool test currently used in clinical screening for CRC. These findings will showcase Monomark's potential as a novel, non-invasive, cheap and safe assay for early detection of CRC, thus increasing the cure rate of CRC patients and reducing costs for the public health. The outstanding network built around the Monomark diagnostic platform will strongly support and speed up its validation and commercialization with specialized methodologies and analyses.

In this prospective study, the main goal is to evaluate the strength of the Monomark test in patients with a positive FIT test. Therefore, in parallel to the routine FIT screening, blood samples will be harvested and the monocyte genetic profile will be determined. This fundamental study, will disclose the diagnostic power of this biomarker panel head to head with the well-established FIT diagnostic test, a core prerequisite for the commercialization of the Monomark test as an alternative and more reliable CRC screening tool.

Currently, a Flemish screening project is ongoing in male and female patients between 56 and 74 years old. If patients have a positive stool test, they are advised to contact their general practitioner for planning of a colonoscopy. The goal is to avoid 400 deaths of colon cancer per year. In 2013, 248.970 patients were invited of which 49% send a stool sample to the lab. Of all the examined tests, 10.1% tested positive. However, only 5 to 10% of patients testing positive with the stool test are diagnosed with cancer. Therefore, the goal of this study is to discriminate with the monomark those patients with a high likelihood of having colon cancer.

At University Hospital Gasthuisberg (Leuven, Belgium) there are weekly about 5 patients with a positive stool test that are referred for a screening colonoscopy. It has been computed that 167 patients would be needed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Monomark test in patients with a positive stool test. To make sure that investigators can draw sound conclusions from this study, it is proposed to include 200 patients in total. In those patients it is planned to perform the blood based Monomark test. Therefore, during the first 12 months approximately 200 patients will be recruited whereas in the next 6 months all the molecular, bioinformatics and statistical analysis required will be performed to draw a robust and clear comparison.

The ultimate goal of this study is to provide solid data that the Monomark can be used as diagnostic tool and outperforms the current stool based diagnostic tests available on the market in order to screen more patients for early colon cancer and improve cure rate.

Being tested
MonoMark
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MonoMarkDiagnostic test

    MonoMark (also known under the registered trademark ColonoKit), is a monocyte-based test using a transcriptomic signature and a mathematical predictive model aimed at discriminating between healthy individuals and CRC patients.

Study groups in NCT03462992
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FIT-positive individualsPatients being positive to an FIT test performed in the context of the Flemish (Northern Belgium) colorectal cancer screening campaign. These patients are male and female between 56 and 74 years old.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: MonoMark

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. AUC of the MonoMark test

    Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of the MonoMark test, comparing its predictions to the colonoscopy-confirmed status.

    Measured: Within 1 year after recruitment completion.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Mar 2018
  2. Study start11 Dec 2012
  3. Primary completion21 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion2 May 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
250 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03462992
Sponsor's protocol ID
MonoFIT+
Acronym
MonoFIT+
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
5 Mar 2018
Last updated
13 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colorectal Cancer, run by DNAlytics at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

AUC of the MonoMark test (time frame: Within 1 year after recruitment completion.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in