OsteoporosisNCT03463850
Analysis of Bone Micro-Architecture as a Clinical Biomarker for Image-Based Fracture Risk Estimation.
A study testing Dual Energy CT (DECT) and DEXA in people with Osteoporosis, run by State University of New York - Upstate Medical University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Osteoporosis is a common disease among elderly people, which leads to an increased bone fracture risk. Bone fractures can greatly reduce quality of life and increase age-related problems including reduced life expectancy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- Dual Energy CT (DECT) and DEXA
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 7 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2016to Nov 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 60 or greater Caucasian female with confirmed osteoporosis via prior DEXA.
- Patients with known vertebral fractures (Genant Grade 2 or higher) and with no fractures (Genant Score <2) from prior DEXA/VFA analysis will be recruited.
- Patients with fractures must have at least one lumbar vertebral body with no fracture(s) (as seen on prior DEXA scan) for analysis.
Who cannot join
- Incidental finding to include pathology unrelated to osteoporosis that would directly affect bone architecture in the L spine (e.g. lytic bone lesions)
- Study DEXA scan reveals all lumbar vertebra have fractures (Genant >= 2)
- Orthopedic hardware in the lumbar spine region
- Unable to have a CT scan (e.g. too heavy for CT scan table, 660 lb. limit)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
About this study
Official title: Multidimensional Analysis of Bone Micro-Architecture as a Clinical Biomarker for Image-Based Quantitative Fracture Risk Estimation.
Osteoporosis is a common disease among elderly people, which leads to an increased bone fracture risk. Bone fractures can greatly reduce quality of life and increase age-related problems including reduced life expectancy. In clinical practice, a bone mineral density (BMD) scan using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is used for diagnosing osteoporosis. However, DEXA does not always accurately predict who will develop fractures and who will not. This is because bone mineral density alone does not capture all of the factors that contribute to bone strength. One factor bone mineral density does not measure is trabecular microarchitecture of bone (structure of bone).
Our goal in this study is to use a specialized CT scan called Dual-Energy CT (DECT) to capture information about the trabecular (spongy) bone in the vertebra of the lower (lumbar) spine. Research has shown that this kind of information helps in predicting bone strength in bone specimens. The investigator will use this information to develop a method to more accurately predict which patients are likely to experience fractures of the lumbar vertebra. These are the most common type of fractures associated with osteoporosis.
Read more
The participant is being asked to participate in this research study because a physician is treating the participant for osteoporosis and the participant has met the initial criteria to participate in the study. Participation in this study involves having a DECT scan, as well as a DEXA scan if the participant has not had one recently (within two months).
Research studies include only those individuals who choose to take part. Please take time to make a decision. Please ask the study doctor or the study staff to explain any words or information that are not understood. The participant may also want to discuss it with family members, friends or other health care providers.
Read the detailed description
Osteoporosis is a common disease among elderly people, the progression of which leads to an increased bone fracture risk, which can adversely affect quality of life and increase age-related morbidity/mortality. The National Osteoporosis Foundation forecast that by 2015, osteoporosis will be responsible for three million fractures resulting in $25.3 billion in healthcare costs. This highlights an urgent demand for methods to accurately predict osteoporotic fracture risk for clinical assessment and management of osteoporosis.
In clinical practice, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the traditional and only method of diagnosing osteoporosis based on BMD measurements. However, DEXA has certain limitations, and a considerable overlap exists in BMD values between individuals who develop fractures and those who do not. This reflects that BMD does not capture all of the factors that contribute to bone strength. One such factor is trabecular microarchitecture of bone, well recognized in the definition of osteoporosis.
Ex vivo studies have demonstrated that trabecular bone microarchitecture constitutes an important component of bone strength, independent of BMD. However, trabecular microarchitecture is not considered in the evaluation of fracture risk in clinical practice. Several imaging techniques have been reviewed as potential candidates for clinical evaluation of trabecular bone microarchitecture. Technological improvements in high resolution X-ray imaging and MRI are providing increasingly accurate data on bone microarchitecture, but can be used only at peripheral sites (femur and forearm) and have not yet been incorporated into standardized clinical imaging protocols due to the lack of central site (lumbar spine) assessment, where osteoporotic fractures are most prevalent.
The current literature suggests a potential to increase the diagnostic accuracy of bone-strength prediction by incorporating advanced mathematical descriptors of bone structure. The project collaborators in Rochester have demonstrated that geometrical features characterizing the femoral trabecular compartment can complement conventional BMD measurements and improve bone strength prediction in ex vivo femur specimens. However, little effort has been made to actually utilize this complementary image information in clinical practice. This study should encourage the further development of these techniques and implementation into clinical practice.
Our goal is to start to bridge the gap between fundamental research on bone strength prediction and clinical management of osteoporosis, reflecting a translational research approach from "bench to bedside". To this end, a novel methodology will be evaluated by both a retrospective analysis and a prospective pilot study. The specific choice of using dual-energy CT (DECT) for the prospective pilot study is motivated by the potential to improve BMD measurement beyond what Quantitative CT (QCT) can, and it also allows for material decomposition into calcium and soft-tissue components, which has applications for other clinically relevant disease entities and will eventually result in the widespread availability of this relatively new technology.
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- Dual Energy CT (DECT), DEXA
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dual Energy CT (DECT)Radiation
Dual Energy CT (DECT)
DEXARadiation
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for measurement of bone mineral density
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Non-fracture | Experimental | subjects without a lumbar fracture will have a Dexa scan and Dual Energy CT (DECT) scan for observation/evaluation Receives: Radiation: Dual Energy CT (DECT); Radiation: DEXA |
| Fracture | Experimental | subjects with one or more lumbar fractures will have a Dexa scan andDual Energy CT (DECT) scan for observation/evaluation Receives: Radiation: Dual Energy CT (DECT); Radiation: DEXA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Development of a predictive software tool that will analyze dual-energy CT scans of the spine, and use the image information to estimate the probability of the patient to suffer an osteoporotic fracture.
Computer algorithms will be developed to differentiate patients with high risk of fracture from patients with low risk of fracture.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Mar 2018
- Study startJun 2016
- Primary completionDec 2021
- Study completionNov 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kent Ogden, State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
- Investigators
- Kent Ogden, PhD, Principal investigator, Upstate Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03463850
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SUNYUMU 713378
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 28 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multidimensional Analysis of Bone Micro-Architecture as a Clinical Biomarker for Image-Based Quantitative Fracture Risk Estimation.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03463850
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SUNYUMU 713378
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- State University of New York - Upstate Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Osteoporosis is a common disease among elderly people, which leads to an increased bone fracture risk. Bone fractures can greatly reduce quality of life and increase age-related problems including reduced life expectancy. In clinical practice, a bone mineral density (BMD) scan using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is used for diagnosing osteoporosis. However, DEXA does not always accurately predict who will develop fractures and who will not. This is because bone mineral density alone does not capture all of the factors that contribute to bone strength. One factor bone mineral density does not measure is trabecular microarchitecture of bone (structure of bone).
Our goal in this study is to use a specialized CT scan called Dual-Energy CT (DECT) to capture information about the trabecular (spongy) bone in the vertebra of the lower (lumbar) spine. Research has shown that this kind of information helps in predicting bone strength in bone specimens. The investigator will use this information to develop a method to more accurately predict which patients are likely to experience fractures of the lumbar vertebra. These are the most common type of fractures associated with osteoporosis.
The participant is being asked to participate in this research study because a physician is treating the participant for osteoporosis and the participant has met the initial criteria to participate in the study. Participation in this study involves having a DECT scan, as well as a DEXA scan if the participant has not had one recently (within two months).
Research studies include only those individuals who choose to take part. Please take time to make a decision. Please ask the study doctor or the study staff to explain any words or information that are not understood. The participant may also want to discuss it with family members, friends or other health care providers.
Detailed description
Osteoporosis is a common disease among elderly people, the progression of which leads to an increased bone fracture risk, which can adversely affect quality of life and increase age-related morbidity/mortality. The National Osteoporosis Foundation forecast that by 2015, osteoporosis will be responsible for three million fractures resulting in $25.3 billion in healthcare costs. This highlights an urgent demand for methods to accurately predict osteoporotic fracture risk for clinical assessment and management of osteoporosis.
In clinical practice, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the traditional and only method of diagnosing osteoporosis based on BMD measurements. However, DEXA has certain limitations, and a considerable overlap exists in BMD values between individuals who develop fractures and those who do not. This reflects that BMD does not capture all of the factors that contribute to bone strength. One such factor is trabecular microarchitecture of bone, well recognized in the definition of osteoporosis.
Ex vivo studies have demonstrated that trabecular bone microarchitecture constitutes an important component of bone strength, independent of BMD. However, trabecular microarchitecture is not considered in the evaluation of fracture risk in clinical practice. Several imaging techniques have been reviewed as potential candidates for clinical evaluation of trabecular bone microarchitecture. Technological improvements in high resolution X-ray imaging and MRI are providing increasingly accurate data on bone microarchitecture, but can be used only at peripheral sites (femur and forearm) and have not yet been incorporated into standardized clinical imaging protocols due to the lack of central site (lumbar spine) assessment, where osteoporotic fractures are most prevalent.
The current literature suggests a potential to increase the diagnostic accuracy of bone-strength prediction by incorporating advanced mathematical descriptors of bone structure. The project collaborators in Rochester have demonstrated that geometrical features characterizing the femoral trabecular compartment can complement conventional BMD measurements and improve bone strength prediction in ex vivo femur specimens. However, little effort has been made to actually utilize this complementary image information in clinical practice. This study should encourage the further development of these techniques and implementation into clinical practice.
Our goal is to start to bridge the gap between fundamental research on bone strength prediction and clinical management of osteoporosis, reflecting a translational research approach from "bench to bedside". To this end, a novel methodology will be evaluated by both a retrospective analysis and a prospective pilot study. The specific choice of using dual-energy CT (DECT) for the prospective pilot study is motivated by the potential to improve BMD measurement beyond what Quantitative CT (QCT) can, and it also allows for material decomposition into calcium and soft-tissue components, which has applications for other clinically relevant disease entities and will eventually result in the widespread availability of this relatively new technology.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Non-fracture | Experimental | Radiation: Dual Energy CT (DECT), Radiation: DEXAsubjects without a lumbar fracture will have a Dexa scan and Dual Energy CT (DECT) scan for observation/evaluation |
| Fracture | Experimental | Radiation: Dual Energy CT (DECT), Radiation: DEXAsubjects with one or more lumbar fractures will have a Dexa scan andDual Energy CT (DECT) scan for observation/evaluation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 60 or greater Caucasian female with confirmed osteoporosis via prior DEXA.
- Patients with known vertebral fractures (Genant Grade 2 or higher) and with no fractures (Genant Score <2) from prior DEXA/VFA analysis will be recruited.
- Patients with fractures must have at least one lumbar vertebral body with no fracture(s) (as seen on prior DEXA scan) for analysis.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Incidental finding to include pathology unrelated to osteoporosis that would directly affect bone architecture in the L spine (e.g. lytic bone lesions)
- Study DEXA scan reveals all lumbar vertebra have fractures (Genant >= 2)
- Orthopedic hardware in the lumbar spine region
- Unable to have a CT scan (e.g. too heavy for CT scan table, 660 lb. limit)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dual Energy CT (DECT)Dual Energy CT (DECT) | Radiation | Fracture, Non-fracture |
| DEXADual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for measurement of bone mineral density | Radiation | Fracture, Non-fracture |
Primary outcome
Development of a predictive software tool that will analyze dual-energy CT scans of the spine, and use the image information to estimate the probability of the patient to suffer an osteoporotic fracture.
Time frame: 2 years
Computer algorithms will be developed to differentiate patients with high risk of fracture from patients with low risk of fracture.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Osteosarcopenia on Falls, Kinesiophobia, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women
Osteosarcopenia, Sarcopenia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
TCM Formula vs. HMB in Pre-Frail Elders: Muscle Strength and Bone Status
Pre-Frailty, Sarcopenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Romosozumab and Denosumab Combination Therapy for Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment and Comparison of Osteoporosis Risk Factors After Stroke
Stroke, Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kent Ogden, PhD principal investigator
Upstate Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dual Energy CT (DECT) and DEXA in people with Osteoporosis, run by State University of New York - Upstate Medical University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Development of a predictive software tool that will analyze dual-energy CT scans of the spine, and use the image information to estimate the probability of the patient to suffer an osteoporotic fracture. (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.