Traumatic Brain InjuryNINADiPASNCT03465995
Test and Evaluation of Non-Invasive Neuro-Assessment Devices (NINAD: Neurokinetics, Inc, iPAS
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, run by Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The long term goal for the Traumatic Injury Research Program (TIRP) is testing of novel devices for the identification and longitudinal assessment of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
- What is being tested?
- NKI i-PAS Diagnostic Protocol
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Feb 2018to 30 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: Students of the The Citadel, South Carolina.
Who may be able to join
- Male and female participants
- Between 18 and 55 years old
- In good general health. Good general health is operationalized for the purpose of this study by scores within one standard deviation of the mean in all eight sections of the short form 36.
- A normalized Global Severity Scale of less than or equal to 65 on the Symptom Checklist 90-R and subscale scores less than the cut scores indicating significant pathology.
Who cannot join
- Traumatic brain injury positive as determined by the DVBIC 3 Question Screening Tool.
- Any history of seizures or Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors
- A normalized Global Severity Scale of more than 65 on the Symptom Checklist 90-R or any subscale score indicating significant pathology.
- Scores greater than one standard deviation from the mean on all eight sections of the Short Form 36.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Citadel
Charleston, South Carolina, 29409
Dena P Garner, Ph.D., 843-953-5060, garnerd1@citadel.edu
Christopher J Sole, Ph.D., 843-953-6386, csole@citadel.edu
About this study
The long term goal for the Traumatic Injury Research Program (TIRP) is testing of novel devices for the identification and longitudinal assessment of traumatic brain injury (TBI). DoD (United States Department of Defense) has now tasked TIRP with the test and evaluation of these devices to assess reliability and validity. The objective of this effort is to test the reliability of the NKI, Inc, (NeuroKinetics, Inc) i-PAS device using a test/re-test protocol with healthy controls.
The research design is test/re-test, with three assessments obtained on three separate visits. This will allow the assessment of reliability of both the device and the measure(s) that are computed from the input signals. Participants will be Healthy Controls (HC) as defined in the inclusion exclusion section.
In this initial study, investigators will be administering standardized self-report instruments (Standard Form 36 - SF36, and Symptom Checklist 90r, or SCL-90r), standard three-lead EKG. In addition they will administer the NKI i-PAS specific protocol as delineated by NKI.
Read the detailed description
Traumatic brain injury is not only a significant medical and operational issue for the military but is a significant public health issue in the United States. The CDC reports that 1.4 million Americans sustain traumatic brain injuries each year. Of these 50,000 die, 235,000 are hospitalized and 1.1 million are treated and released from the emergency department. Among children fourteen years old and younger, there are an estimated 2685 TBI deaths per year, 37,000 hospitalizations and 435,000 emergency room visits.
Additionally, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) also notes that TBI is significantly under-reported.
Traumatic brain injury is under detected. Neuropsychological evaluations are often nondisclosing The DoD has invested considerable funds in the development of devices for use in acute and chronic assessment of TBI. Unfortunately none of these devices have been tested systematically to establish reliability of the equipment, reliability of the signals obtained, or reliability of the measures derived from the signals obtained.
The NeuroKinetics i-PAS system is a mobile assessment device with an integrated display for eye tracking with the following properties: a head mounted display, a sampling rate of 100 frames per second, eye tracking in the horizontal, vertical and torsional axes, and pupil area measurement with a spatial resolution less than 0.1 o. The testing protocol includes: optokinetic tracking, smooth pursuit horizontal, smooth pursuit vertical, saccade random horizontal, saccade random vertical, saccade predictive horizontal, antisaccade (horizontal), self-paced saccade, saccade and reaction times, visual reaction time, auditory reaction time, gaze horizontal, light reflex, subjective visual (vertical) and subjective vertical horizontal. Several quantitative measures are computed from the data acquired in each test, and these measures are then employed in a multivariate diagnostic assessment.
It is important to distinguish between a device, a signal and a measure. As used here, the term device refers to a hardware technology used to obtain a signal. In the case of neurodiagnostic devices, the signal is usually a measurement of voltage as a function of time. Examples of signals pertinent to the present discussion include the electrocardiogram (providing an assessment of autonomic nervous system status), the electroencephalogram, evoked potentials, event related potentials, balance records and eye movement trajectories. A clear distinction must be drawn between a signal, typically a voltage record, and a measure which is a number that is computed from the voltage signal. Reliability and validity must be investigated separately for each measure For example, a dozen measures may be calculated from the same EEG voltage signal. The reliability and validity of each measure must be evaluated.
The objectives of this initial study are limited. The investigators address the question: are the measures obtained from the NeuroKinetics iPAS eye tracking system longitudinally stable in a clinically stable healthy participant? These measures are described in a subsequent section.
A single channel ECG will be acquired and measures of heart rate variability will be calculated from this signal. Measures of heart rate variability provide an indirect surrogate measure of complex multifactorial states that can have an impact on psychophysiological variables. Alterations of heart rate variability (HRV) are associated with pain, attention and cognitive function and fatigue, all of which can affect neurophysiological measures. High intra-individual variability in a test-retest study is a warning sign that between recording changes in the state of the participant rather than reliability failures in the eye tracking measure may be playing a role in low reliability.
Following consent, eligibility will be established based on head injury history, the score on the Symptom Checklist 90 (in the Supporting Documents file), the Short Form 36 (in the Supporting Documents file), and the Defense Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC) Three Question Screening Tool.
The standard iPAS eye tracking evaluation as described below will be administered and the ECG will be recorded simultaneously during this process.
A second recording will be obtained within two to six days of the first recording.
A third recording will be obtained at approximately four weeks following the first recording.
This study will establish normal values of neuroassessment measures obtained from healthy controls and will be used to establish the statistical separation between healthy populations and clinical populations presenting neuropsychiatric disorders including TBI-positive patients.
- Being tested
- NKI i-PAS Diagnostic Protocol
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NKI i-PAS Diagnostic ProtocolDevice
The NKI i-PAS:
The NeuroKinetics i-PAS system is a mobile assessment device with an integrated display for eye tracking with the following properties: a head mounted display, a sampling rate of 100 frames per second, eye tracking in the horizontal, vertical and torsional axes, and pupil area measurement with a spatial resolution less than 0.1 o. The testing protocol includes: optokinetic tracking, smooth pursuit horizontal, smooth pursuit vertical, saccade random horizontal, saccade random vertical, saccade predictive horizontal, antisaccade (horizontal), self-paced saccade, saccade and reaction times, visual reaction time, auditory reaction time, gaze horizontal, light reflex, subjective visual (vertical) and subjective vertical horizontal. Several quantitative measures are computed from the data acquired in each test, and these measures are then employed in a multivariate diagnostic assessment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NKI iPAS Diagnostic Protocol | Research participants who qualify for this study will put on EKG leads, and then a non-invasive device called iPAS, which will record heart rate and eye tracking data while participants perform a task on the screen of the device. The testing session will not exceed 30 minutes. Participants will take a total of 3 recordings over a period of roughly 5 weeks. Receives: Device: NKI i-PAS Diagnostic Protocol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Unit performance reliability
Due to the non-interventional nature of this study, no outcome data will be collected or tracked. A database of baseline performance profiles will be developed for a group of healthy research participants. The ultimate outcome of this study is a determination of reliability for the device.
Measured: Total participant time burden for the study is roughly 2 hours over the course of 5 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Mar 2018
- Study start22 Feb 2018
- Primary completion30 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Citadel, The Military College of North Carolina
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03465995
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MEM 91-2714
- Acronym
- NINADiPAS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2020
- First submitted
- 20 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Test and Evaluation of Non-Invasive Neuro-Assessment Devices (NINAD: Neurokinetics, Inc, iPAS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03465995
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NINADiPAS / MEM 91-2714
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Citadel, The Military College of North Carolina
- Study start
- 22 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The long term goal for the Traumatic Injury Research Program (TIRP) is testing of novel devices for the identification and longitudinal assessment of traumatic brain injury (TBI). DoD (United States Department of Defense) has now tasked TIRP with the test and evaluation of these devices to assess reliability and validity. The objective of this effort is to test the reliability of the NKI, Inc, (NeuroKinetics, Inc) i-PAS device using a test/re-test protocol with healthy controls.
The research design is test/re-test, with three assessments obtained on three separate visits. This will allow the assessment of reliability of both the device and the measure(s) that are computed from the input signals. Participants will be Healthy Controls (HC) as defined in the inclusion exclusion section.
In this initial study, investigators will be administering standardized self-report instruments (Standard Form 36 - SF36, and Symptom Checklist 90r, or SCL-90r), standard three-lead EKG. In addition they will administer the NKI i-PAS specific protocol as delineated by NKI.
Detailed description
Traumatic brain injury is not only a significant medical and operational issue for the military but is a significant public health issue in the United States. The CDC reports that 1.4 million Americans sustain traumatic brain injuries each year. Of these 50,000 die, 235,000 are hospitalized and 1.1 million are treated and released from the emergency department. Among children fourteen years old and younger, there are an estimated 2685 TBI deaths per year, 37,000 hospitalizations and 435,000 emergency room visits.
Additionally, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) also notes that TBI is significantly under-reported.
Traumatic brain injury is under detected. Neuropsychological evaluations are often nondisclosing The DoD has invested considerable funds in the development of devices for use in acute and chronic assessment of TBI. Unfortunately none of these devices have been tested systematically to establish reliability of the equipment, reliability of the signals obtained, or reliability of the measures derived from the signals obtained.
The NeuroKinetics i-PAS system is a mobile assessment device with an integrated display for eye tracking with the following properties: a head mounted display, a sampling rate of 100 frames per second, eye tracking in the horizontal, vertical and torsional axes, and pupil area measurement with a spatial resolution less than 0.1 o. The testing protocol includes: optokinetic tracking, smooth pursuit horizontal, smooth pursuit vertical, saccade random horizontal, saccade random vertical, saccade predictive horizontal, antisaccade (horizontal), self-paced saccade, saccade and reaction times, visual reaction time, auditory reaction time, gaze horizontal, light reflex, subjective visual (vertical) and subjective vertical horizontal. Several quantitative measures are computed from the data acquired in each test, and these measures are then employed in a multivariate diagnostic assessment.
It is important to distinguish between a device, a signal and a measure. As used here, the term device refers to a hardware technology used to obtain a signal. In the case of neurodiagnostic devices, the signal is usually a measurement of voltage as a function of time. Examples of signals pertinent to the present discussion include the electrocardiogram (providing an assessment of autonomic nervous system status), the electroencephalogram, evoked potentials, event related potentials, balance records and eye movement trajectories. A clear distinction must be drawn between a signal, typically a voltage record, and a measure which is a number that is computed from the voltage signal. Reliability and validity must be investigated separately for each measure For example, a dozen measures may be calculated from the same EEG voltage signal. The reliability and validity of each measure must be evaluated.
The objectives of this initial study are limited. The investigators address the question: are the measures obtained from the NeuroKinetics iPAS eye tracking system longitudinally stable in a clinically stable healthy participant? These measures are described in a subsequent section.
A single channel ECG will be acquired and measures of heart rate variability will be calculated from this signal. Measures of heart rate variability provide an indirect surrogate measure of complex multifactorial states that can have an impact on psychophysiological variables. Alterations of heart rate variability (HRV) are associated with pain, attention and cognitive function and fatigue, all of which can affect neurophysiological measures. High intra-individual variability in a test-retest study is a warning sign that between recording changes in the state of the participant rather than reliability failures in the eye tracking measure may be playing a role in low reliability.
Following consent, eligibility will be established based on head injury history, the score on the Symptom Checklist 90 (in the Supporting Documents file), the Short Form 36 (in the Supporting Documents file), and the Defense Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC) Three Question Screening Tool.
The standard iPAS eye tracking evaluation as described below will be administered and the ECG will be recorded simultaneously during this process.
A second recording will be obtained within two to six days of the first recording.
A third recording will be obtained at approximately four weeks following the first recording.
This study will establish normal values of neuroassessment measures obtained from healthy controls and will be used to establish the statistical separation between healthy populations and clinical populations presenting neuropsychiatric disorders including TBI-positive patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NKI iPAS Diagnostic Protocol | – | Device: NKI i-PAS Diagnostic ProtocolResearch participants who qualify for this study will put on EKG leads, and then a non-invasive device called iPAS, which will record heart rate and eye tracking data while participants perform a task on the screen of the device. The testing session will not exceed 30 minutes. Participants will take a total of 3 recordings over a period of roughly 5 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Students of the The Citadel, South Carolina.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male and female participants
- Between 18 and 55 years old
- In good general health. Good general health is operationalized for the purpose of this study by scores within one standard deviation of the mean in all eight sections of the short form 36.
- A normalized Global Severity Scale of less than or equal to 65 on the Symptom Checklist 90-R and subscale scores less than the cut scores indicating significant pathology.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Traumatic brain injury positive as determined by the DVBIC 3 Question Screening Tool.
- Any history of seizures or Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors
- A normalized Global Severity Scale of more than 65 on the Symptom Checklist 90-R or any subscale score indicating significant pathology.
- Scores greater than one standard deviation from the mean on all eight sections of the Short Form 36.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NKI i-PAS Diagnostic ProtocolThe NKI i-PAS: The NeuroKinetics i-PAS system is a mobile assessment device with an integrated display for eye tracking with the following properties: a head mounted display, a sampling rate of 100 frames per second, eye tracking in the horizontal, vertical and torsional axes, and pupil area measurement with a spatial resolution less than 0.1 o. The testing protocol includes: optokinetic tracking, smooth pursuit horizontal, smooth pursuit vertical, saccade random horizontal, saccade random vertical, saccade predictive horizontal, antisaccade (horizontal), self-paced saccade, saccade and reaction times, visual reaction time, auditory reaction time, gaze horizontal, light reflex, subjective visual (vertical) and subjective vertical horizontal. Several quantitative measures are computed from the data acquired in each test, and these measures are then employed in a multivariate diagnostic assessment. | Device | NKI iPAS Diagnostic Protocol |
Primary outcome
Unit performance reliability
Time frame: Total participant time burden for the study is roughly 2 hours over the course of 5 weeks.
Due to the non-interventional nature of this study, no outcome data will be collected or tracked. A database of baseline performance profiles will be developed for a group of healthy research participants. The ultimate outcome of this study is a determination of reliability for the device.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2020.
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Nanopulse Laser Therapy
TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Different Intravenous Fluids on Post-operative Chronic Subdural Hematoma Size and Recurrence
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, run by Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dmitry Mirochnitchenko (3018168462, dmitry.mirochnitchenko.ctr@usuhs.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Unit performance reliability (time frame: Total participant time burden for the study is roughly 2 hours over the course of 5 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2020.