AzTrials
AzTrials

Dementia With Lewy BodiesPhase 2NCT03467152

Study To Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of E2027 (Hereinafter Referred to as Irsenontrine) in Participants With Dementia With Lewy Bodies

A Phase 2 study testing Irsenontrine in people with Dementia With Lewy Bodies, run by Eisai Inc. at 74 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will be conducted to compare Irsenontrine to placebo on the cognitive endpoint of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the global clinical endpoint of Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Change Plus (CIBIC-Plus) Caregiver Input in participants with dementia with Lewy bodies after 12 weeks of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Dementia With Lewy Bodies
What is being tested?
Irsenontrine
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
326 participants
Where
74 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
4 May 2018to 15 Apr 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female, age 50 to 85 years, inclusive at time of consent.
  • Meet criteria for probable dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) (as defined by the 4th report of the DLB Consortium).
  • Mini-Mental State Examination greater than or equal to (≥)14 and less than or equal to (≤) 26 at Screening Visit.
  • Has experienced visual hallucinations during the past 4 weeks before Screening Visit.
  • If receiving acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI), must have been on a stable dose for at least 12 weeks before Screening Visit, with no plans for dose adjustment during the study. Treatment-naive participants can be entered into the study but there should be no plans to initiate treatment with AChEIs from Screening to the end of the study.
  • If receiving memantine, must have been on a stable dose for at least 12 weeks before Screening Visit, with no plans for dose adjustment during the study. Treatment naive participants can be entered into the study but there should be no plans to initiate treatment with memantine from Screening to the end of the study.
  • Must have an identified caregiver or informant who is willing and able to provide follow-up information on the participant throughout the course of the study.
  • Provide written informed consent. If a participant lacks capacity to consent in the investigator's opinion, the participant's assent should be obtained, as required in accordance with local laws, regulations and customs, plus the written informed consent of a legal representative should be obtained (capacity to consent and definition of legal representative should be determined in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations). In countries where local laws, regulations, and customs do not permit participants who lack capacity to consent to participate in this study, they will not be enrolled.

Who cannot join

  • Any neurological condition that may be contributing to cognitive impairment above and beyond those caused by the participant's DLB, including any comorbidities detected by clinical assessment or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • History of transient ischemic attacks or stroke within 12 months of Screening.
  • Modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale greater than (>) 4.
  • Parkinsonian (extrapyramidal) features with Hoehn and Yahr stage 4 intravenous or higher.
  • Any major psychiatric diagnosis, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and current major depressive disorder as per Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition.
  • Geriatric Depression Scale score > 8.

Trial locations and contacts

74 sites in 7 countries.

74 sites in 7 countries

United States25 sites
  • Neurological Associates of Albany, PC

    Albany, New York, 12208

  • Advanced Research Center Inc

    Anaheim, California, 92805

  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106

  • University of Virginia Adult Neurology

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903

  • Kerwin Research Center, LLC

    Dallas, Texas, 75231-4350

  • Parkinsons and Movement Disorders Institute

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Indiana University, Dept of Neurology

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • New Orleans Center for Clinical Research

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920

  • Cleveland Clinic, Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health at Lakewood Hospital

    Lakewood, Ohio, 44107

  • University of Kentucky, Dept of Neurology Sanders Brown Center on Aging

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40504

  • Miami Jewish Health-Clinical Research

    Miami, Florida, 33137

  • Elias Research Associates (Allied Biomedical Research Institute)

    Miami, Florida, 33155

  • Pharmax Research of South Florida; Elias Research Associates

    Miami, Florida, 33175

  • Columbia University

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Compass Research-Bioclinica

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Neurology Associates of Ormond Beach

    Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174

  • Advanced Research Consultants, Inc.

    Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33410

  • Anchor Neuroscience

    Pensacola, Florida, 32502

  • Summit Research Network (Oregon) Inc.

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Paradigm Clinical Research Centers, Inc

    San Diego, California, 92117

  • Syrentis Clinical Research

    Santa Ana, California, 92705

  • New England Institute for Clinical Research

    Stamford, Connecticut, 06905

  • Banner Sun Health Research Institute

    Sun City, Arizona, 85351

  • Compass Research-Bioclinica

    The Villages, Florida, 32162

  • PMG Research of Winston-Salem, LLC

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

Other trials in United States

Japan23 sites
  • Eisai Trial Site #10

    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0034

  • Eisai Trial Site #20

    Chiba, Chiba, 263-0043

  • Eisai Trial Site #8

    Fujioka-shi, Gunma, 375-0017

  • Eisai Trial Site #17

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-0180

  • Eisai Trial Site #2

    Himeji-shi, Hyōgo, 670-0981

  • Eisai Trial Site #25

    Hiroshima, 732-0066

  • Eisai Trial Site #6

    Kanzaki-gun, Saga-ken, 842-0192

  • Eisai Trial Site #11

    Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556

  • Eisai Trial Site #3

    Kurashiki-shi, Okayama-ken, 710-0813

  • Eisai Trial Site #12

    Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511

  • Eisai Trial Site #22

    Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, 181-0013

  • Eisai Trial Site #14

    Miyoshi-shi, Hiroshima, 728-0013

  • Eisai Trial Site #9

    Nagaoka-shi, Niigata, 940-2302

  • Eisai Trial Site #1

    Naniwa-ku, Osaka, 556-0017

  • Eisai Trial Site #5

    Nishisonogigun, Nagasaki, 851-2103

  • Eisai Trial Site #21

    Osaka, 550-0012

  • Eisai Trial Site #4

    Otake-shi, Hiroshima, 739-0651

  • Eisai Trial Site #16

    Sakai-ku, Sakai-shi, Osaka, 590-0018

  • Eisai Trial Site #18

    Setagaya-Ku, Tokyo, 158-0098

  • Eisai Trial Site #24

    Suita-shi, Osaka, 565-0871

  • Eisai Trial Site #13

    Suita-shi, Osaka, 565-0874

  • Eisai Trial Site #19

    Yanai-shi, Yamaguchi, 742-1352

  • Eisai Trial Site #23

    Yokohama, Kanagawa, 225-0013

Other trials in Japan

United Kingdom9 sites
  • Dementia Research Unit

    Crowborough, East Sussex, TN6 1HB

  • Clinical Research Centre (CRC)

    Dundee, Scotland, DD1 9SY

  • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital

    Glasgow, Scotland, G51 4TF

  • West London Mental Health Trust

    Isleworth, TW7 6FY

  • Kings College

    London, SE5 8AF

  • Cognition Health

    London, W1G 9JF

  • Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust

    Manchester, M25 3BL

  • Newcastle General Hospital

    Newcastle, NE45PL

  • Memory Assessment and Research Centre, Moorgreen Hospital

    Southampton, Hampshire, S030 3JB

Other trials in United Kingdom

France6 sites
  • Centre Memoire du CHRU de Lille

    Lille, 59037

  • Centre de Recherche Clinique - Viellissement-Cerveau-Fragilite (CRC-VCF), Hopital des Charpennes

    Lyon, Villeurbanne, 69100

  • Hopital Neurologique de Lyon

    Lyon, 69677

  • University Hospital de la Timone

    Marseille, 13385

  • Centre d'Investigation Clinique (CIC) Hopitaux universitaires Strasbourg HOPITAL DE HAUTEPIERRE - BATIMENT AX5

    Strasbourg, 67000

  • CHRU Nancy- CMRR de lorraine Hôpital de Brabois-Service de Gériatrie

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, 54500

Other trials in France

Spain6 sites
  • Institut Internacional de Neurociències Aplicades

    Barcelona, 08006

  • Fundacio ACE

    Barcelona, 08228

  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona, 08235

  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon

    Madrid, 28007

  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda

    Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222

  • Hospital Mutua de Terrassa

    Terrassa, Barcelona, 08221

Other trials in Spain

Germany3 sites
  • Eisai Trial Site #3

    Berlin, 12203

  • Eisai Trial Site #1

    Kassel, 34128

  • Eisai Trial Site #2

    Westerstede, 26655

Other trials in Germany

Italy2 sites
  • Universita Chieti, CeSI Met

    Chieti, 66100

  • Clinica Neurologica Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova

    Padova, 35128

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Randomized, Study To Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of E2027 in Subjects With Dementia With Lewy Bodies

This study will be conducted to compare Irsenontrine to placebo on the cognitive endpoint of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the global clinical endpoint of Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Change Plus (CIBIC-Plus) Caregiver Input in participants with dementia with Lewy bodies after 12 weeks of treatment.

Being tested
Irsenontrine, Placebo
Keywords
Irsenontrine, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Mini-Mental State Examination, Cognitive Fluctuation Inventory
Medical subject headings
Lewy Body Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IrsenontrineDrug

    Also called E2027

    Oral hypromellose capsules.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Oral hypromellose capsules.

Study groups in NCT03467152
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IrsenontrineExperimentalParticipants will be randomized to receive a 50 milligram (mg) once daily oral dose of Irsenontrine for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Irsenontrine
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will be randomized to receive a 50 mg once daily oral dose of Irsenontrine-matched placebo for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Total Score at Week 12 of Treatment

    The MoCA scale is used for detecting cognitive impairment. The scores range between 0 to 30 points; a score of 26 or above was considered normal. Higher values represent a better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Number of Participants Based on Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus) Scale at Week 12 of Treatment

    Number of participants are reported categorized in grades based on the CIBIC-Plus scale. The CIBIC-Plus scale is designed to measure various domains that describe participant function: general, mental/cognitive state, behavior, and activities of daily living. It is a semi-structured global rating derived from a comprehensive interview with the participant and caregiver or informant by an independent rater who has no access to the source data or other psychometric test scores conducted post-randomization as part of the protocol. The CIBIC-Plus was a 7-point scale and scores were: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderate improvement), 3 (minimal improvement), 4 (no change), 5 (minimal worsening), 6 (moderate worsening), and 7 (marked worsening). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Clinician's Global Impression of Change - In Dementia With Lewy Bodies (CGIC-DLB) Scale at Week 12 of Treatment

    Number of participants are reported categorized in grades based on the CGIC-DLB scale. The CGIC-DLB scale provided an overall clinician-determined summary measure of change from the participant's clinical status that takes into account all available information from the efficacy endpoints (which include cognitive function, non-cognitive symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function) and safety data. The (CGIC-DLB) was a 7-point scale and scores were: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderate improvement), 3 (minimal improvement), 4 (no change), 5 (minimal worsening), 6 (moderate worsening), and 7 (marked worsening). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in the Cognitive Fluctuation Inventory (CFI) Score at Week 12 of Treatment

    The CFI scale assessed cognitive fluctuation. It evaluates fluctuation in various domains including attention, ability to perform daily functions, orientation, verbal communication and behavior. The score was based on frequency and severity with a score range of 0 to 12. The scale also assessed the degree of caregiver or informant distress engendered by the symptoms. Higher scores indicating greater impairment.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score Week 12 of Treatment

    The MMSE is a 30-point scale that measured orientation to time and place, registration, immediate and delayed recall, attention, language, and drawing. The total score ranges from 0 (most impaired) to 30 (no impairment). The lower score means severe cognitive deficit and higher score indicates better function.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-12) Total Score at Week 12 of Treatment

    The NPI-12 scale assessed the frequency and severity of 12 neuropsychiatric symptoms commonly described in dementia participants: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, motor disturbance, nighttime behaviors, and appetite/eating changes. The scale also assessed the degree of caregiver or informant distress engendered by each of the symptoms. The sum of the composite scores for the 12 domains yielded the NPI-12 total score. NPI-12 total score ranged from 0 (minimum severity) to 144 (maximum severity); higher score indicates greater neuropsychiatric disturbance.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  5. Change From Baseline in NPI-4 Subscore at Week 12

    The NPI scale assesses the frequency and severity of 12 neuropsychiatric symptoms commonly described in dementia participants: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, motor disturbance, nighttime behaviors, and appetite/eating changes. NPI-4 is the subscore covering the domains of delusions, hallucinations, apathy and depression. NPI-4 total subscore ranged from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating a greater neuropsychiatric disturbance.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  6. Change From Baseline in NPI-10 Subscore at Week 12

    The NPI-10 assessed range of behaviors seen in dementia for both frequency and severity. It is a 10 item questionnaire with the following domains: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/liability and aberrant motor behavior. The total score was a sum of the 10 domains, where the score of each domain was calculated as frequency (scale: 1=occasionally to 4=very frequently)*Severity (scale: 1=Mild to 3=Severe). Each domain has a maximum score of 12 and all domains were equally weighted for total score, the range for total score is 0 to 120. Higher scores indicating a greater neuropsychiatric disturbance.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  7. Change From Baseline in NPI-D (Caregiver Distress) Total Score at Week 12

    The NPI-D scale assesses the frequency and severity of 12 neuropsychiatric symptoms commonly described in dementia participants: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, motor disturbance, nighttime behaviors, and appetite/eating changes. The scale assesses the degree of caregiver distress engendered by each of the symptoms. The caregiver distress (NPI-D) is rated by caregiver based on his or her own stress on a five point scale from 0 to 5, where: 0(no distress), 1(minimal), 2(mild), 3(moderate), 4(moderately severe), 5(very severe or extreme). NPI-D total score is calculated by summing the scores of the 12 sub-scale distress scores. The NPI-D total scores ranges from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating greater distress.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  8. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Severe TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Study Discontinuation

    A TEAE was defined as an AE that emerged or worsened in severity relative to baseline during treatment or within 28 days after the last dose of study drug. Severe TEAE was defined as inability to work or to perform normal daily activity. A Serious TEAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; is life threatening (that is, the participant was at immediate risk of death from the adverse event as it occurred; this does not include an event that, had it occurred in a more severe form or was allowed to continue, might have caused death) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria. An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an investigational product.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug up to Week 16

  9. Number of Participants With Orthostatic Hypotension

    Orthostatic hypotension was defined as drop in standing systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to (>=) 20 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg) compared to supine, or drop in standing diastolic blood pressure >=10 mmHg compared to supine.

    Measured: Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 9 and Week 12

  10. Number of Participants With Orthostatic Tachycardia

    Orthostatic tachycardia by numerical criteria was defined by the following numerical criteria: Standing heart rate (HR) increased by >30 beats/min compared to supine and absolute standing HR was >100 beats/min.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug up to Week 16

  11. Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values

    A laboratory value was determined to be a markedly abnormal value if the postbaseline common toxicity criteria grade increased from baseline and the post-baseline grade was greater than or equal to 2.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug up to Week 16

  12. Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

    Measured: From first dose of study drug up to Week 16

  13. Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior as Measured Using Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

    The C-SSRS (mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) categories); is an interview-based instrument to systematically assess suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. C-SSRS assess whether participant experience any of the following: completed suicide; suicide attempt (response of "yes" on "actual attempt"); preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior ("yes" on "preparatory acts or behavior", "aborted attempt" or "interrupted attempt"), suicidal ideation ("yes" on "wish to be dead", "non-specific active suicidal thoughts", "active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent, any self-injurious behavior with no suicidal intent ("yes" on "has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior"). Here, number of participants with positive response ("yes") to suicidal behavior or/and Ideation, any non-suicidal self-injurious behavior was reported.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug up to Week 16

  14. Change From Baseline in Total Score of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III: Motor Examination (UPDRS-III)

    The UPDRS scale evaluates extrapyramidal features in motor function in Parkinson's disease. It contains 33 items in 18 categories: (1) speech, (2) facial expression, (3) rigidity, (4) finger tapping, (5) hand movements, (6) supinational and pronation movements of hands, (7) toe tapping, (8) leg agility, (9) arising from chair, (10) gait, (11) freezing of gait, (12) postural stability, (13) posture, (14) body bradykinesia, (15) postural tremor of hands, (16) kinetic tremor of hands, (17) rest tremor amplitude and (18) constancy of rest tremor. Each item is scored 0 to 4, giving a total score range 0 to 132. Higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Mar 2018
  2. Study start4 May 2018
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2020
  4. Study completion15 Apr 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
326 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03467152
Sponsor's protocol ID
E2027-G000-201
Other IDs
2017-003728-64, 2017
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
9 Mar 2018
Last updated
1 Aug 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Oosthoek M, In 't Veld SGJG, Vermunt L, Ye Y, van Ingen M, Koel-Simmelink M, Vijverberg EGB, Saxena S, Hersch S, Irizarry M, Sachdev P, Teunissen CE. Effects of the novel phosphodiesterase 9 inhibitor irsenontrine on CSF proteomics profile in Abeta+ and Abeta- dementia with Lewy bodies patients. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2026 Apr 24;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13195-026-02065-w.

    PubMed 42026627

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Irsenontrine in people with Dementia With Lewy Bodies, run by Eisai Inc. at 74 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 74 sites in United States, Japan, United Kingdom, France, Spain and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Aug 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Total Score at Week 12 of Treatment (time frame: Baseline and Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03467152, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in